dc.contributor | Ana Valéria Carneiro Dias | |
dc.contributor | http://lattes.cnpq.br/6308958998969674 | |
dc.contributor | Maria Cecília Pereira | |
dc.contributor | Nery Cunha Vital | |
dc.creator | Bruno Coelho Resende de Castro | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-03-01T14:38:23Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-03T23:50:12Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-03-01T14:38:23Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-10-03T23:50:12Z | |
dc.date.created | 2021-03-01T14:38:23Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-02-27 | |
dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/1843/35081 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3828784 | |
dc.description.abstract | Organizational structures are important elements within innovation process and
influence people's action who shape and are shaped by those structures. Some
organizations aiming at innovation can face a dilemma when it comes to balancing
different approaches in their organizational structures: while there may be a need for
social constraint through well-defined control and limits to action, this could hinder
innovation, therefore raising the issue of employing a different structure which enables
social action.
Public Institutes of Research are framed within this approach – there are mandatory
bureaucracy aspects on its structures and at the same time, their purpose is to
innovate. Within that context, elements such as innovation strategy, support from the
strategic apex, organizational flexibility, autonomy for people and teams, shared
learning, leadership for innovation and innovative environment are aspects that must
exist together with the bureaucratic structure of the State.
This work aim at understanding the innovation process within a Public Institute of
Research in order to propose a structure that is able to balance both social constraint
and social action approaches.
In order to do this, a case study has been conducted at the Brazilian public institute
Fundação Ezequiel Dias (FUNED), focusing in the Research and Development
Department. Interviews with researchers and managers at FUNED were conducted to
understand the innovation process and how it happens, as well as to understand its
issues and peculiarities. The main findings point that the innovation process is not only
complex but also happens in a diverse range of ways within the department. The case
was analyzed according to the literature as to propose a new organizational structure
based on the institute's context and considering its particularities. The proposed
changes are based in aspects as emergent strategy, teamwork with autonomy,
community of practices, networking and flexibility at the organization. | |
dc.publisher | Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais | |
dc.publisher | Brasil | |
dc.publisher | ICB - INSTITUTO DE CIÊNCIAS BIOLOGICAS | |
dc.publisher | Programa de Pós-Graduação em Inovação Tecnológica e Propriedade Intelectual | |
dc.publisher | UFMG | |
dc.rights | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pt/ | |
dc.rights | Acesso Aberto | |
dc.subject | Estrutura organizacional para inovação | |
dc.subject | Processo de inovação na pesquisa pública | |
dc.subject | Pesquisa Pública | |
dc.subject | Inovação no setor público | |
dc.subject | Organização para inovação | |
dc.subject | Ação Social | |
dc.subject | Restrição Social | |
dc.title | A FUNED como uma organização pública para a inovação: uma proposta de estrutura organizacional para a área de pesquisa e desenvolvimento | |
dc.type | Dissertação | |