Artículo de revista
Constitutional Justice of Russia within the judicial landscape of contemporary Europe
Fecha
2017-12-13Registro en:
10.18601/01229893.n40.02
2346-2051
0122-9893
Autor
Abramova, Marianna
Institución
Resumen
The Russian Federation became a member of the Council of Europe in 1996. This step determined the development of Russia’s judicial system for the coming several decades and made it possible for Russia’s national system of law to integrate into judicial landscape of Europe, thereby enabling Russia to uphold democratic values. The emergence of new legislation affected all branches of Russia’s system of law. But the experience of the two decades has demonstrated that such modernization can be effective only by way of dialogue rather than by simple copying and implementing international rules. An important role in this process was played by the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation (RF) that was founded in 1991. The paper reviews the role it played in the 1993 Constitutional crisis, examines the Court’s structure and powers, and also analyzes the juridical nature of its decisions. The Author analyzes the collisions between decisions handed down by the European Court of Human Rights and the Constitution of Russia from the point of view of the stand taken by the Constitutional Court of the RF. In the¿ end, the Author arrives at the conclusion that there is a need for a dialogue among European and national systems of justice with the help of filtration mechanisms and multilevel constitutionalism. The Russian Federation became a member of the Council of Europe in 1996. This step determined the development of Russia’s judicial system for the coming several decades and made it possible for Russia’s national system of law to integrate into judicial landscape of Europe, thereby enabling Russia to uphold democratic values. The emergence of new legislation affected all branches of Russia’s system of law. But the experience of the two decades has demonstrated that such modernization can be effective only by way of dialogue rather than by simple copying and implementing international rules. An important role in this process was played by the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation (RF) that was founded in 1991. The paper reviews the role it played in the 1993 Constitutional crisis, examines the Court’s structure and powers, and also analyzes the juridical nature of its decisions. The Author analyzes the collisions between decisions handed down by the European Court of Human Rights and the Constitution of Russia from the point of view of the stand taken by the Constitutional Court of the RF. In the¿ end, the Author arrives at the conclusion that there is a need for a dialogue among European and national systems of justice with the help of filtration mechanisms and multilevel constitutionalism
Materias
Ítems relacionados
Mostrando ítems relacionados por Título, autor o materia.
-
[pt] A DIGNIDADE DA PESSOA HUMANA COMO PRINCÍPIO CATALISADOR DA UNIDADE DA CONSTITUIÇÃO
FILOMENO ESPIRITO SANTO GOMES VARELA -
[pt] A DIGNIDADE DA PESSOA HUMANA COMO PRINCÍPIO CATALISADOR DA UNIDADE DA CONSTITUIÇÃO
FILOMENO ESPIRITO SANTO GOMES VARELA -
Constitutional Dismemberment in Latin America
Albert, Richard; Zaiden Benvindo, Juliano; Jiménez Ramírez, Milton César; Villalonga, Cristian (Departamento de Derecho Constitucional, 2022-04-28)Some constitutional changes are constitutional amendments in name alone. These unusual constitutional changes dismantle the basic structure of the constitution while at the same time building a new foundation rooted in ...