dc.creatorBustos, O.
dc.creatorEgan, A
dc.date2012-08-16T21:33:23Z
dc.date2012-08-16T21:33:23Z
dc.date2011
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-07T14:58:01Z
dc.date.available2017-03-07T14:58:01Z
dc.identifierNORTHERN JOURNAL OF APPLIED FORESTRY Volume: 28 Issue: 4 Pages: 194-198 Published: DEC 2011
dc.identifier0742-6348
dc.identifierhttp://dspace.utalca.cl/handle/1950/8700
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/375650
dc.description1. Univ Talca, Dept Forest Prod, Talca 3460000, Chile 2. Paul Smiths Coll, New Mexico Forest & Watershed Restorat Inst, Div Forestry Nat Resources & Recreat, Paul Smiths, NY 12970 USA
dc.descriptionA study of soil compaction associated with four harvesting systems-a forwarder working with a mechanized harvester and a rubber-tired cable skidder, a farm tractor, and a bulldozer, each of them coupled with a chainsaw felling-was conducted in a group selection harvest of a mixed hardwood stand in Maine. The bulldozer system was associated with the highest percentage differences in soil bulk density measured in machine tracks (16.9%), trail centerlines (15.7%), and harvested group selection units (13.1%) versus adjacent untrafficked areas, whereas the forwarder system was associated with the lowest percentage differences in soil bulk density measured in machine tracks (3.5%), trail centerlines (1.2%), and harvested group selection units (6.3%) versus adjacent untrafficked areas. Results will help to inform loggers and foresters on equipment selection, harvest planning, and the conservation of forest soils and soil productivity.
dc.languageen
dc.subjectlogging
dc.subjectsoil bulk density
dc.subjectgroup selection harvest
dc.titleA Comparison of Soil Compaction Associated with Four Ground-Based Harvesting Systems
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución