masterThesis
Learning strategies to foster vocabulary in EFL
Fecha
2018-11-07Registro en:
Arias, J, D, Y & Vieira, N. (2014). The state of the art of the English language teaching in public schools
from Pereira. (Master's thesis, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira, Pereira, Colombia).
Baumeister, R, & Leary, M. (1997). Writing narrative literature reviews. Review of General Psychology,
311-320.
Bem, D. (1995). Writing a review article for Psychological Bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, 172-177.
Bentler, P. (1992). On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the Bulletin. Psychological
Bulletin, 400-404.
Brusnighan, S, & Folk, J. (2012). Combining Contextual and Morphemic Cues Is Beneficial during
Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition: Semantic Transparency in Novel Compound Word Processing.
Reading Research Quarterly, 172-190.
Carpenter, S, & Olson, K. (2012). Are pictures good for learning new vocabulary in a foreign language?
Only if you think they are not. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,
38(1), 92-101
Cronin, C. (2011). Doing your literature review: traditional and systematic techniques. Evaluation &
Research in Education, 219-221
Dwaik, R. (2015). English Digital Dictionaries as Valuable Blended Learning Tools for Palestinian College
Students. English Language Teaching;, 1-10.
Elbourne, D. (2002). Systematic Research Synthesis to Inform Policy, Practice and Democratic Debate.
Social Policy and Society, 225-236.
Fisher, U. (1994). Learning words from context and dictionaries: An experimental comparison. Applied
Psycholinguistics .551-574.
Ghamrawi, N. (2014). Multiple Intelligences and ESL Teaching and Learning. An Investigation in KG II
Classrooms in One Private School in Beirut, Lebanon. Journal of Advanced Academics. 25-46
Goll, P. (2004). Mnemonic strategies: Creating schemata for learning enhancement. . Education, 306-
312.
Guo, C. (2010). The Application of the Semantic Field Theory in College English Vocabulary Instruction.
Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics. 61.
Harris, M, Schumaker, J, & Deshler, D. (2012). The Effects of Strategic Morphological Analysis Instruction
on the Vocabulary Performance of Secondary Students with and without Disabilities. Learning Disability
Quarterly, 17-33.
Hockley, W. (2008). The picture superiority effect in associative recognition. Memory & Cognition, 1351–
1359
Hunt, A, & Beglar, D. (2005). A framework for developing EFL reading vocabulary. Reading in a Foreign
Language, 17
Khan, K. (2003). Five steps to conducting a systematic review. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine,
118–121
Lambert, N, & McCombs, B. (2000). Introduction: Learner-centered schools and classrooms as a
direction for school reform. How students learn, 1-15.
Laufer, B. (2000). Avoidance of idioms in a second language: The effect of L1‐L2 degree of similarity.
Studia Linguistica, 186-196.
Marulanda, D. (2018). Free Voluntary Reading: Promoting Vocabulary Learning and Self-Directedness.
Canadian Center of Science and Education, 51-64.
Michael, K, & Donald, D. (2013). Effects of Multimedia Vocabulary Instruction on Adolescents with
Learning Disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1-17.
Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies what every teacher should know. Heinle & Heinle,
Boston. Trove, 342
Pérez, L, & Alvira, R. (2017). The Acquisition of Vocabulary through Three Memory Strategies. Colombian
Applied Linguistics Journal, 103-116.
Peters, E. (2009). Learning L2 German vocabulary through reading: The effect of three enhancement
techniques compared. Language Learning, 59, 113–51.
Richard, J. (2012). The benefits and challenges of using systematic reviews in international development
research. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 445-455.
Richards, J. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Robinson, P. (2001). Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University
Press
Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies: Theoretical assumptions, research history and typology. Learner
strategies in language learning, 15-30.
Rupley, W. H. (1999). Vocabulary instruction in a balanced reading program. The Reading Teacher, 336-
346
Sasaki, Y. (2013). Picture-Based e-Learning of English Phrasal Verbs: A Comparative Study of the Use of
Pictures and L1 Glosses. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing, 222-233
Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stahl, S. (2005). Four problems with teaching word meanings (and what to do to make vocabulary an
integral part of instruction). Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice, pp. 95–
114.
Wenden, A. (1987). Learner Strategies in Language Learning. New York: Prentice Hall.
Wilkins, D. (1972). Linguistics in Language Teaching. En D. A. Wilkins, Linguistics in Language Teaching.
Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Yildirim, K. (2011). Is Vocabulary a Strong Variable Predicting Reading Comprehension and Does the
Prediction Degree of Vocabulary Vary according to Text Types. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice,
1541-1547.
270428
TE09977
Autor
Monguí, Rocío
Institución
Resumen
Learning strategies to foster vocabulary in EFL, is a systematic literature review that focuses on updated research papers from 2012 to 2016, with the objective of identifying and analyzing learning strategies that are used to foster vocabulary in basic EFL students. In order to achieve the aim of this research, a systematic literature review was followed. This type of research is a method of gathering, analyzing and presenting the implications of different strategies for enhancing vocabulary. The investigation focuses on the latest literature on vocabulary learning and learning strategies that examine differentiated ways for learning and applicable tools, more specifically the literature on vocabulary learning strategies. Rubin’s taxonomy was used to organize the findings and draw conclusions. It can be determined, based on the main findings, that the mixture of regular and particular strategies, the teacher’s awareness of the target vocabulary plus student’s motivation make in all an appreciable difference in vocabulary learning.