dc.creatorKerr, Jonathan R
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-06T16:21:28Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-22T15:06:32Z
dc.date.available2020-08-06T16:21:28Z
dc.date.available2022-09-22T15:06:32Z
dc.date.created2020-08-06T16:21:28Z
dc.identifierISSN: 2044-6055
dc.identifierhttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/26371
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g6993
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3445096
dc.description.abstractA serious flaw in Michaëlsson and colleagues’ study is that it did not distinguish between raw and pasteurised milk.1 These two entities are completely different in structure, content, nutritional benefits, and disease associations, and referring to both as “milk” underestimates this difference.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Group
dc.relationBMJ (Online), ISSN:2044-6055, Vol.349, No (2014); pp.-349
dc.relationhttps://www.bmj.com/content/349/bmj.g6993
dc.relationBMJ British Medical Journal
dc.relationVol. 349
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rightsRestringido (Acceso a grupos específicos)
dc.sourceBMJ British Medical Journal
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.sourcereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
dc.titleMilk and mortality: Raw versus pasteurised milk
dc.typeannotation


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución