dc.creatorOlasolo Alonso, Hector
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-19T14:42:32Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-22T14:54:11Z
dc.date.available2020-08-19T14:42:32Z
dc.date.available2022-09-22T14:54:11Z
dc.date.created2020-08-19T14:42:32Z
dc.identifierISSN: 0924-4883
dc.identifierhttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/27519
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004166554.i-774.108
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3443199
dc.description.abstractThe distinction between perpetration of a crime, which gives rise to principal liability, and participation in a crime committed by a third person, which gives rise to accessorial liability, responds to the distinction between those who are directly liable for the violation of a penal norm (perpetrators or principals to the crime) and those others who are derivatively liable (accessories to the crime or secondary parties).Although this distinction is embraced by most national criminal law systems there are a few national systems (in particular Denmark and Italy) usually referred
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherBrill Academic
dc.relationLegal Aspects of International Organization, ISSN: 0924-4883, Vol.48 (2009); pp. 339-359
dc.relationhttps://brill.com/view/book/edcoll/9789004180758/Bej.9789004166554.i-774_021.xml
dc.relation359
dc.relation339
dc.relationLegal Aspects of International Organization
dc.relationVol. 48
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rightsRestringido (Acceso a grupos específicos)
dc.sourceLegal Aspects of International Organization
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.sourcereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
dc.titleDevelopments In the distinction between principal and accessorial liability In light of the first case law of the international criminal court
dc.typearticle


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución