Gobernanza y salud en Bogotá, una mirada desde el análisis del contenido.

Abstract

The governance implies the relationships between actors of plurality with its decision making about something collective problem, about health, it is necessary establish as governance is approached from an instrument of public policies how is the Plan Territorial de Salud. Objective. To determine the coherence between the conception and the implementation of comparative governance approach in two PTS of the city of Bogotá. Methodology. Qualitative study that used content analysis based on emerging categories in two PTS for the years 2012 to 2020, comparing them with management reports from the Comités Operativos Distritales de Infancia y Adolescencia CODIA Results. The PTS 2012-2016 contemplated a governance with an analytical approach, while in the PTS 2016-2020 it proposed a vision of normative governance. According to the established categories: the nodal points dialogue consistently between the units of analysis to obtain a governance exercise. Under the category of community participation and actors, there are opposing elements from the approach postulated in a PTS and the configuration for execution. Discussion. The normative approach embraces a hierarchical vision, constituting a decision-making from the State, unlike the analytical approach that enables the participation and decision of a multiplicity of actors. The comparison between the PTS and CODIA reports indicate coherence in some categories, however, the actors and community participation categories allow us to identify that an approach designed by the institutionalist does not dialogue with the sense of resolution of a collective problem.