Correlación ecocardiográfica entre la Integral Velocidad Tiempo del tracto de salida del ventrículo izquierdo y la Fracción de Eyección en un hospital de cuarto nivel en Bogotá

dc.contributorVelandia Carrillo, Carlos Alberto
dc.creatorAvila Cortés, Yeisson Danilo
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-08T20:51:29Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-22T14:35:55Z
dc.date.available2022-04-08T20:51:29Z
dc.date.available2022-09-22T14:35:55Z
dc.date.created2022-04-08T20:51:29Z
dc.identifierhttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/34005
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_34005
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3440369
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The evaluation of the left ventricular function can be assessed by quantifying the ventricular volumes and represents an important value in the diagnosis, management, follow-up, and prognosis of the patients in a variety of clinical settings. However, in some patients could have technical limitations in order to evaluate these volumes, so additional methods may be required in order to help estimate them. Objective: To evaluate the correlation between the left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral (LVOT VTI) and the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of patients admitted to an echocardiography study. Methods: Study of diagnostic tests to evaluate the retrospective correlation between LVOT VTI and LVEF. Results: The correlation between the LVOT VTI and LVEF showed in this Study a strong correlation, estimated by a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.671 (95% CI 0.604-0.729) and statistical significance p < 0.0001. Conclusion and discussion: LVOT IVT presents a good correlation with LVEF determined by the Simpson method, which is proposed as a useful tool for the approximation in the echocardiography services to estimate an approximate of the LVEF in cases where there may be limitations for its estimation.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosario
dc.publisherEspecialización en Ecocardiografía
dc.publisherEscuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/co/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAbierto (Texto Completo)
dc.rightsEL AUTOR, manifiesta que la obra objeto de la presente autorización es original y la realizó sin violar o usurpar derechos de autor de terceros, por lo tanto la obra es de exclusiva autoría y tiene la titularidad sobre la misma. PARGRAFO: En caso de presentarse cualquier reclamación o acción por parte de un tercero en cuanto a los derechos de autor sobre la obra en cuestión, EL AUTOR, asumirá toda la responsabilidad, y saldrá en defensa de los derechos aquí autorizados; para todos los efectos la universidad actúa como un tercero de buena fe. EL AUTOR, autoriza a LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO, para que en los términos establecidos en la Ley 23 de 1982, Ley 44 de 1993, Decisión andina 351 de 1993, Decreto 460 de 1995 y demás normas generales sobre la materia, utilice y use la obra objeto de la presente autorización. -------------------------------------- POLITICA DE TRATAMIENTO DE DATOS PERSONALES. Declaro que autorizo previa y de forma informada el tratamiento de mis datos personales por parte de LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO para fines académicos y en aplicación de convenios con terceros o servicios conexos con actividades propias de la academia, con estricto cumplimiento de los principios de ley. Para el correcto ejercicio de mi derecho de habeas data cuento con la cuenta de correo habeasdata@urosario.edu.co, donde previa identificación podré solicitar la consulta, corrección y supresión de mis datos.
dc.rightsAtribución 2.5 Colombia
dc.sourceRoth GA, Forouzanfar MH, Moran AE, Barber R, Nguyen G, Feigin VL, et al. Demographic and epidemiologic drivers of global cardiovascular mortality. New England Journal of Medicine. 2015;372(14):1333–41.
dc.sourceYusuf S, Rangarajan S, Teo K, Islam S, Li W, Liu L, et al. Cardiovascular risk and events in 17 low-, middle-, and high-income countries. New England Journal of Medicine. 2014;371(9):818–27.
dc.sourcePonikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, Bueno H, Cleland JGF, Coats AJS, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. European Heart Journal. 2016;37(27):2129–2200m.
dc.sourceColonna P, Cadeddu C, Chen L, Iliceto S. Clinical applications of contrast echocardiography. American Heart Journal. 2001;141(2 SUPPL.).
dc.sourceCannan C, Friedrich MG. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: current status and future directions. Expert review of cardiovascular therapy. 2010 Aug;8(8):1175–89.
dc.sourceKlaeboe LG, Edvardsen T. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular systolic function. Journal of Echocardiography. 2019;17(1):10–6.
dc.sourceLang RM, Badano LP, Victor MA, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: An update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2015;28(1):1-39.e14.
dc.sourcePonikowski P, Voors A. 2016 Esc guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European society of cardiology (ESC): Developed with the special contribution. Vol. 141, Eur Heart J. Silicea-Poligraf; 2016. p. 7–81.
dc.sourceDorosz JL, Lezotte DC, Weitzenkamp DA, Allen LA, Salcedo EE. Performance of 3-dimensional echocardiography in measuring left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2012;59(20):1799–808.
dc.sourceThavendiranathan P, Grant AD, Negishi T, Plana JC, Popović ZB, Marwick TH. Reproducibility of echocardiographic techniques for sequential assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes: application to patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2013 Jan;61(1):77–84.
dc.sourceMulticenter Postinfarction Research Group. Risk Stratification and Survival after Myocardial Infarction. New England Journal of Medicine. 1983 Aug;309(6):331–6.
dc.sourceCurtis JP, Sokol SI, Wang Y, Rathore SS, Ko DT, Jadbabaie F, et al. The association of left ventricular ejection fraction, mortality, and cause of death in stable outpatients with heart failure. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2003 Aug;42(4):736–42.
dc.sourceEmond M, Mock MB, Davis KB, Fisher LD, Holmes DR, Chaitman BR, et al. Long-term survival of medically treated patients in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) Registry. Circulation. 1994 Dec;90(6):2645–57.
dc.sourceBellenger NG, Burgess MI, Ray SG, Lahiri A, Coats AJS, Cleland JGF, et al. Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart failure by echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Are they interchangeable? European Heart Journal. 2000;21(16):1387–96.
dc.sourceJenkins C, Moir S, Chan J, Rakhit D, Haluska B, Marwick TH. Left ventricular volume measurement with echocardiography: a comparison of left ventricular opacification, three-dimensional echocardiography, or both with magnetic resonance imaging. European heart journal [Internet]. 2009 Jan [cited 2022 Jan 25];30(1):98–106. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18997179/
dc.sourceTan C, Rubenson D, Srivastava A, Mohan R, Smith MR, Billick K, et al. Left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral outperforms ejection fraction and Doppler-derived cardiac output for predicting outcomes in a select advanced heart failure cohort. Cardiovascular Ultrasound 2017 15:1 [Internet]. 2017 Jul 3 [cited 2022 Jan 26];15(1):1–8. Available from: https://cardiovascularultrasound.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12947-017-0109-4
dc.sourceHaites NE, McLennan FM, Mowat DHR, Rawles JM. Assessment of cardiac output by the Doppler ultrasound technique alone. British Heart Journal. 1985;53(2):123–9.
dc.sourceRistow B, Na B, Ali S, Whooley MA, Schiller NB. Left ventricular outflow tract and pulmonary artery stroke distances independently predict heart failure hospitalization and mortality: The heart and soul study. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2011;24(5):565–72.
dc.sourceDíaz A, Zócalo Y, Cabrera-Fischer E, Bia D. Reference intervals and percentile curve for left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), velocity time integral (VTI), and LVOT-VTI-derived hemodynamic parameters in healthy children and adolescents: Analysis of echocardiographic methods association and agreem. Echocardiography. 2018;35(12):2014–34.
dc.sourceZusman O, Pressman GS, Banai S, Finkelstein A, Topilsky Y. Intervention Versus Observation in Symptomatic Patients With Normal Flow Low Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2018;11(9):1225–32.
dc.sourceQuiñones MA, Otto CM, Stoddard M, Waggoner A, Zoghbi WA. Doppler Quantification Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the American Society of Echocardiography. Recommendations for quantification of Doppler echocardiography: A report from the Doppler quantification task force of the nomenclature and standards committee of the American Society of Echocardiography. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2002 Feb;15(2):167–84
dc.sourceIsaaz K, Ethevenot G, Admant P, Brembilla B, Pernot C. A new Doppler method of assessing left ventricular ejection force in chronic congestive heart failure. The American Journal of Cardiology. 1989;64(1):81–7.
dc.sourceJoffe SW, Ferrara J, Chalian A, Tighe DA, Aurigemma GP, Goldberg RJ, et al. Are ejection fraction measurements by echocardiography and left ventriculography equivalent?, 2015;158(3):496–502.
dc.sourceTournoux F, Petersen B, Thibault H, Zou L, Chao W, Picard MH, et al. NIH Public Access. 2012;24(4):465–70.
dc.sourceLewis JF, Kuo LC, Nelson JG, Limacher MC, Quinones MA. Pulsed Doppler echocardiographic determination of stroke volume and cardiac output: Clinical validation of two new methods using the apical window. Circulation. 1984;70(3 I):425–31.
dc.sourceClavel MA, Malouf J, Messika-Zeitoun D, Araoz PA, Michelena HI, Enriquez-Sarano M. Aortic valve area calculation in aortic stenosis by CT and doppler echocardiography. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2015;8(3):248–57.
dc.sourceA R, C G. Epidemiología Clínica: Investigación clínica aplicada. 2015.
dc.sourceCohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Second Edition. 1988.
dc.sourceR Development Core Team (2012). R: A language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN: 3-900051-07-0, URL: https://www.r-project.org/.
dc.sourceKwiecien R, Kopp-Schneider A, Blettner M. Concordance analysis: part 16 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications. Deutsches Arzteblatt international [Internet]. 2011 Jul 29 [cited 2022 Jan 25];108(30):515–21. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21904584/
dc.sourceMitchell C, Rahko PS, Blauwet LA, Canaday B, Finstuen JA, Foster MC, et al. Guidelines for Performing a Comprehensive Transthoracic Echocardiographic Examination in Adults: Recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography [Internet]. 2019 Jan 1 [cited 2022 Jan 26];32(1):1–64. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30282592/
dc.sourceCikes M, Solomon SD. Beyond ejection fraction: an integrative approach for assessment of cardiac structure and function in heart failure. European heart journal [Internet]. 2016 Jun 1 [cited 2022 Jan 25];37(21):1642–50. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26417058/
dc.sourceGlikson M, Nielsen JC, Kronborg MB, Michowitz Y, Auricchio A, Barbash IM, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. European heart journal [Internet]. 2021 Sep 14 [cited 2022 Jan 25];42(35):3427–520. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34455430/
dc.sourcePotter E, Marwick TH. Assessment of Left Ventricular Function by Echocardiography: The Case for Routinely Adding Global Longitudinal Strain to Ejection Fraction. JACC Cardiovascular imaging [Internet]. 2018 Feb 1 [cited 2022 Jan 25];11(2 Pt 1):260–74. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29413646/
dc.sourceChung N, Nishimura RA, Holmes DR, Tajik AJ. Measurement of Left Ventricular dp/dt by Simultaneous Doppler Echocardiography and Cardiac Catheterization. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography [Internet]. 1992 Mar 1 [cited 2022 Jan 26];5(2):147–52. Available from: http://www.onlinejase.com/article/S0894731714805440/fulltext
dc.sourceHarjai KJ, Scott L, Vivekananthan K, Nunez E, Edupuganti R. The Tei index: A new prognostic index for patients with symptomatic heart failure. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography [Internet]. 2002 Sep 1 [cited 2022 Jan 26];15(9):864–8. Available from: http://www.onlinejase.com/article/S0894731702000573/fulltext
dc.sourcePatel HN, Miyoshi T, Addetia K, Henry MP, Citro R, Daimon M, et al. Normal Values of Cardiac Output and Stroke Volume According to Measurement Technique, Age, Sex, and Ethnicity: Results of the World Alliance of Societies of Echocardiography Study. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography [Internet]. 2021 Oct 1 [cited 2022 Jan 25];34(10):1077-1085.e1. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34044105
dc.sourceBlanco P. Rationale for using the velocity-time integral and the minute distance for assessing the stroke volume and cardiac output in point-of-care settings. The ultrasound journal [Internet]. 2020 Dec 1 [cited 2022 Jan 26];12(1). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32318842/
dc.sourceHu K, Liu D, Niemann M, Herrmann S, Gaudron PD, Ertl G, et al. Methods for assessment of left ventricular systolic function in technically difficult patients with poor imaging quality. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography [Internet]. 2013 Feb [cited 2022 Jan 25];26(2):105–13. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23257213/
dc.sourceMele D, Andrade A, Bettencourt P, Moura B, Pestelli G, Ferrari R. From left ventricular ejection fraction to cardiac hemodynamics: role of echocardiography in evaluating patients with heart failure. Heart failure reviews [Internet]. 2020 Mar 1 [cited 2022 Jan 25];25(2):217–30. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31327115/
dc.sourcePontet J, Yic C, Díaz-Gómez JL, Rodriguez P, Sviridenko I, Méndez D, et al. Impact of an ultrasound-driven diagnostic protocol at early intensive-care stay: a randomized-controlled trial. The ultrasound journal [Internet]. 2019 Dec 1 [cited 2022 Jan 25];11(1). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31595353/
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.sourcereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
dc.subjectIntegral velocidad tiempo del tracto de salida del ventrículo izquierdo
dc.subjectFracción de eyección del ventrículo izquierdo
dc.subjectCorrelación
dc.titleCorrelación ecocardiográfica entre la Integral Velocidad Tiempo del tracto de salida del ventrículo izquierdo y la Fracción de Eyección en un hospital de cuarto nivel en Bogotá
dc.typebachelorThesis


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución