dc.contributorMorales González, Mauricio
dc.contributorMontoya Murillo, Diana Paola
dc.contributorRojas Liévano, Jorge
dc.creatorDelgadillo Arias, David
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-22T14:09:58Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-22T14:33:57Z
dc.date.available2020-09-22T14:09:58Z
dc.date.available2022-09-22T14:33:57Z
dc.date.created2020-09-22T14:09:58Z
dc.identifierhttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/30176
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_30176
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3440050
dc.description.abstractBackground: Degenerative arthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MPJ) is hallux rigidus; which may be associated with pain, deformities, functional limitation and neuropathic pain. Operative treatment is indicated when patients do not improve after non-operative treatment. Currently, the first MPJ fusion is considered the standard of care for patients who require operative treatment. However, there are a variety of fixation options and the evidence on the effectiveness is limited. Aim: To describe the effectiveness, in terms of pain improvement, and short-term complications of the first MTP joint fusion fixed with a combined method which includes a dorsal locking plate and an interfragmentary compression screw for treatment of symptomatic hallux rigidus. Methodology: We retrospectively identified 20 cases of MTP joint fusion fixed with the described method performed in a tertiary hospital between 2012 and 2017. The demographic characteristics, the radiologic grade of arthrosis and treatments received before surgery were collected to characterize this group of patients. The primary outcome was the patient-reported improvement of pain at the MTP joint, measured with a numerical verbal scale from 0 to 10 at a minimum 1-year follow-up. T Student was applied, all statistical analysis was made with Stata software®. Secondary outcomes included the rate of radiological union evaluated in postoperative radiographs, and the rate of complications and reintervention. Results: The study included 11 women (12 cases) and 7 men (8 cases) with an average age of 58 years (Range 21-75 years). Radiologically, the degree of preoperative osteoarthritis was classified as grade II in 2 cases (10%), grade III in 12 cases (60%) and grade IV in 6 cases (30%). Before surgery, 35% of the cases had failed to non-surgical management, while 65% of the cases had not had any treatment. All cases reported pain with movement before surgery, while only 7 cases (35%) reported pain at rest. After an average follow-up of 58 months (range 26-75 months), there was a statistically significant decrease in pain from 6.7 ± 2.3 points preoperatively to 0.3 ± 0.2 points postoperatively (p <0.001). During the same follow-up time, no patient required reintervention, and there were no reported complications. Only one case (5%) reported discomfort in other areas of the foot due to bunionette development at the little toe. Of seven cases who reported performing sports before surgery, six (86%) returned to sports without pain after surgery. In 15 of the 20 cases, radiological follow-up was completed at an average time of 14 months (range 05-58 months). In all of these cases, radiological signs of arthrodesis union with no signs of complications were identified. Conclusion: In patients requiring first MPJ fusion for the management of symptomatic hallux rigidus, fixation with an anatomical dorsal plate and an interfragmentary compression screw is a method that results in a significant improvement in pain with a high rate of union and a low rate of complications. However, further prospective studies comparing this fixation technique with other techniques of fixation of the first MPJ fusion are required.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosario
dc.publisherEspecialización en Ortopedia y Traumatología FSFB
dc.publisherFacultad de Medicina
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAbierto (Texto Completo)
dc.rightsEL AUTOR, manifiesta que la obra objeto de la presente autorización es original y la realizó sin violar o usurpar derechos de autor de terceros, por lo tanto la obra es de exclusiva autoría y tiene la titularidad sobre la misma. PARGRAFO: En caso de presentarse cualquier reclamación o acción por parte de un tercero en cuanto a los derechos de autor sobre la obra en cuestión, EL AUTOR, asumirá toda la responsabilidad, y saldrá en defensa de los derechos aquí autorizados; para todos los efectos la universidad actúa como un tercero de buena fe. EL AUTOR, autoriza a LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO, para que en los términos establecidos en la Ley 23 de 1982, Ley 44 de 1993, Decisión andina 351 de 1993, Decreto 460 de 1995 y demás normas generales sobre la materia, utilice y use la obra objeto de la presente autorización. -------------------------------------- POLITICA DE TRATAMIENTO DE DATOS PERSONALES. Declaro que autorizo previa y de forma informada el tratamiento de mis datos personales por parte de LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO para fines académicos y en aplicación de convenios con terceros o servicios conexos con actividades propias de la academia, con estricto cumplimiento de los principios de ley. Para el correcto ejercicio de mi derecho de habeas data cuento con la cuenta de correo habeasdata@urosario.edu.co, donde previa identificación podré solicitar la consulta, corrección y supresión de mis datos.
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.sourceA finite-element analysis study of the metatarsophalangeal joint of the hallux rigidus. Flavin R, Halpin T, O’Sullivan R et al. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]2008;90-B:1334-40.
dc.sourceAsunción J, Martín X. Hallux rigidus: etiología, diagnóstico, clasificación y tratamiento. Rev Ortop Traumatol. 2010;54:321---8.
dc.sourceSurgical Management of Hallux Rigidus. Deland JTh, Williams BR. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2012;20:347-358
dc.sourcePons M, Alvarez F, Solana J, Viladot R,Varela L: Sodium hyaluronate in thetreatment of hallux rigidus: A single-blind, randomized study. Foot Ankle Int2007;28(1):38-42.
dc.sourceCurrent Concepts Review: Hallux Rigidus. Yee G, Lau J,Foot Ankle Int 2008 29: 637.DOI: 10.3113/FAI.2008.0637.
dc.sourceA Retrospective Comparisonof First MetatarsophalangealJoint Arthrodesis Using aLocked Plate and CompressionScrew Technique. Hyer Ch, Scott RT, Swiatek M. Foot & Ankle Specialist 2012;5(5):289-292.
dc.sourceBerlet GC, Hyer CF, Glover JP. A retrospective review of immediate weightbearing after first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Spec. 2008;1:24-28.
dc.sourceA Retrospective Comparison of Four Plate Constructs for First MetatarsophalangealJoint Fusion: Static Plate, Static Plate with Lag Screw, Locked Plate, and Locked Platewith Lag Screw. Hyer Ch, Scott RT, Swiatek M.JFAS 2012;Volume 51, Issue 3, Pages 285–287.
dc.sourceLocked Versus Nonlocked Plate Fixation for First MetatarsophalangealArthrodesis: A Biomechanical Investigation. Hunt K, Barr CR, Lindsey DP, Chou LB. Foot & Ankle International/Vol. 33, No. 11/November 2012:984-990.
dc.sourceCoughlin, MJ: Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint.Orthop Rev. 19:177 –186, 1990.
dc.sourceHamilton, GA; Ford, LA; Patel, S: First metatarsophalangealjoint arthrodesis and revision arthrodesis. Clin Podiatr Med Surg.26:459 – 473, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpm.2009.03.010.
dc.sourceMann, RA; Oates, JC: Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangealjoint. Foot Ankle. 1:159 – 166, 1980.
dc.sourceWomack, JW; Ishikawa, SN: First metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis.Foot Ankle Clin.14:43 – 50, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcl.2008.11.008
dc.sourceBuranosky, DJ; Taylor, DT; Sage, RA; et al.: First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis: quantitative mechanical testing of six-holedorsal plate versus crossed screw fixation in cadaveric specimens. JFoot Ankle Surg. 40:208 – 213, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S10672516(01)80020-X
dc.sourceCurtis, MJ; Myerson, M; Jinnah, RH; Cox, QG; Alexander, I:Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint: a biomechanical studyof internal fixation techniques. Foot Ankle. 14:395 – 399, 1993.
dc.sourcePoliti, J; John, H; Njus, G; Bennett, GL; Kay, DB: First metatarsal-phalangeal joint arthrodesis: a biomechanical assessment of stability.Foot Ankle Int. 24:332 – 337, 2003.
dc.sourceClinical Presentation and Management of Hallux Rigidus. Kamran S. Hamid, MD, MPHa, Selene G. Parekh, MD, MBAb,* Foot Ankle Clin N Am 20 (2015) 391–399.
dc.sourceDickerson, JB; Green, R; Green, DR: Long-Term followup of theGreen-Watermann osteotomy for hallux limitus. J. Am. Podiatr. Med.Assoc. 92(10):543 – 554, 2002.
dc.sourceEasley, ME; Davis, WH; Anderson, RB: Intermediate to long-termfollowup of medial-approach dorsal cheilectomy for hallux rigidus. FootAnkle Int. 20(3):147 –152, 1999.
dc.sourceHorton, GA; Park, YW; Myerson, MS: Role of metatarsus primuselevatus in the pathogenesis of hallux rigidus. Foot Ankle Int.20(12):777 – 780, 1999.
dc.sourceCoughlin MJ, Shurnas PS. Hallux rigidus: demographics, etiology, and radiographic assessment. Foot Ankle Int 2003;24:731-43.
dc.sourceMann RA, Coughlin MJ, DuVries HL. Hallux rigidus: a review of the literature and a method of treatment. Clin Orthop 1979;142:57-63.
dc.sourceMoberg E. A simple operation for hallux rights. Clin Orthop 1979;142:55-6.
dc.sourceFirstMetatarsophalangealArthrodesis forHallux Rigidus. Fuhrmann RA. Foot Ankle Clin N Am 16 (2011) 1–12doi:10.1016/j.fcl.2010.12.003
dc.sourceGrady JF, Axe TM, Zager EJ, Sheldon LA. A retrospective analysisof 772 patients with hallux limitus. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc.2002;92:102---8.
dc.sourceA Short-Term Retrospectiveof First MetatarsophalangealJoint Arthrodesis Usinga Plate With PocketLockFixation. Gross ChE, Bei Ch, Parekh SG. Foot & Ankle Specialist 2015:XX,X:1-6.
dc.sourceEvidence-Based Analysis of the Efficacy for Operative Treatment of Hallux Rigidus. McNeil DS, Baumhauer JF, Glazebrook MA. Foot Ankle Int 2013 34: 15. DOI:10.1177/1071100712460220.
dc.sourceClutton HH. The treatment of hallux valgus. St Thomas Rep 1894;22:1–12.
dc.sourceCoughlin MJ, Shurnas PS. Hallux rigidus: grading and long-term results of operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85(11):2072–88.
dc.sourceShereff MJ, Baumhauer JF. Hallux rigidus and osteoarthrosis of the first metatar sophalangeal joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998;80(6):898–908.
dc.sourceLombardi CM, Silhanek AD, Connolly FG, et al. First metatarsophalangealarthrodesis for treatment of hallux rigidus: a retrospective study. J Foot AnkleSurg 2001;40(3):137–43.
dc.sourceA Comparison of Nonlocking SemitubularPlates and Precontoured Locking Plates forFirst Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis. Mayer SA, Zelenski NA, DeOrio JK, Easley ME, Nunley JA. Foot & Ankle International 2014, Vol. 35(5) 438–444.
dc.sourceBuranosky DJ, Taylor DT, Sage RA, et al. First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis: quantitative mechanical testing ofsix hole dorsal plate versus crossed screw fixation in cadaveric specimens. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2001;40:208-213.
dc.sourceHunt KJ, Barr CR, Lindsey DP, Chou LB. Locked versus non-locked plate fixation for first metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis: abiomechanical investigation. Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33:984-990.
dc.sourceHyer CF, Glover LP, Berlet GC, Lee TH. Cost comparison of crossed screws versus dorsal plate construct for firstmetatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis. J Foot Ankle Surg.2008;47:13-18.
dc.sourceNeufeld SK, Parks BG, Naseef GS, Melamed EA, SchonLC. Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint: a biomechanical study comparing memory compression staples,cannulated screws and a dorsal plate. Foot Ankle Int.2002;23:97-101.
dc.sourcePoliti J, Hayes J, Njus G, Bennett GL, Kay DB. First metatarsal-phalangeal joint arthrodesis: a biomechanical assessmentof stability. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24:332-337.
dc.sourceLocked Versus Nonlocked Plate Fixation For Hallux MTP Arthrodesis. Hunt KJ, Ellington JK, Anderson RB, Cohen BE, Davis WH. Jones CP. Foot & Ankle International/Vol. 32, No. 7/July 2011.
dc.sourceEnd-Stage Hallux RigidusCheilectomy, Implant, or Arthrodesis?. Peace RA, Hamilton GA. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 29 (2012) 341–353doi:10.1016/j.cpm.2012.04.002.
dc.sourceSolan MC, Calder JD, Bendall SP. Manipulation and injection for hallux rigidus. Is it worthwhile? J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001; 83: 706-708 [PMID: 11476310 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.83B5.11425].
dc.sourceLam A, Chan JJ, Surace MF, Vulcano E. Hallux rigidus: How do I approach it? World J Orthop 2017 May 18; 8(5): 364-371.
dc.sourceBrodsky JW, Baum BS, Pollo FE, Mehta H. Prospective gait analysis in patients with first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis for hallux rigidus. Foot Ankle Int 2007; 28: 162-165 [PMID: 17296132 DOI: 10.3113/FAI.2007.0162]
dc.sourceChraim et al. Long-term outcome of first metatarsophalangeal joint fusion in the treatment of severe hallux rigidus. 2016. 40(11). International Orthopaedics (SICOT) DOI 10.1007/s00264-016-3277-1.
dc.sourceGoucher et al. Hallux Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis Using Dome-Shaped Reamers and Dorsal Plate Fixation: A Prospective Study. Foot & Ankle International. 2006. 27(11).
dc.sourceDoty et al. Hallux Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis With a Hybrid Locking Plate and a Plantar Neutralization Screw: A Prospective Study. Foot & Ankle International 34(11) 1535–1540.
dc.sourceJones et al. Comparison of Hallux Rigidus Surgical Treatment Outcomes Between Active Duty and Non–Active Duty Populations. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association. 2018. 108(4).
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.sourcereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
dc.subjectHallux rigidus
dc.subjectArtrosis
dc.subjectArtrodesis
dc.subjectArticulación metatarsofalángica del dedo gordo del pie
dc.titleArtrodesis Metatarsofalángica del Hallux con placa anatómica y tornillo interfragmentario como tratamiento del Hallux Rigidus. Serie de casos
dc.typemasterThesis


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución