'Problem-solving' and Critical Theory Distinction: A Reflection from the International Relations

Abstract

This paper attempts to determine what points of view of certain ir authors have been associated with the category 'critical', and for what reasons. Second, it seeks to show that there are not just nuanced, but substantial differences between different 'critical' approaches, and within them. Finally, it concludes exploring plausible reasons for this classification of theories, currently useful in IR, arguing that there is a sense in which this comprehensive concept is of utility, but that it may also cause confusion and spurious generalizations.