Desenlaces funcionales y radiológicos de reemplazos de cadera por vía anterior en pacientes del centro de cuidado clínico de ortogeriatría desde el 2014 al 2019

dc.contributorBarragán González, Ana María
dc.contributorPesantez, Rodrigo
dc.creatorVillán Gaona, Jorge Luciano
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-14T21:28:17Z
dc.date.available2022-07-14T21:28:17Z
dc.date.created2022-07-14T21:28:17Z
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_34523
dc.identifierhttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/34523
dc.description.abstractBackground: Intracapsular hip fractures are a fragility injury that affects the elderly. Total hip replacement (THR) is currently recommended, which can be performed by different surgical approaches. The anterior approach in Colombia has been little described. Objective: To characterize the functional and radiographic outcomes of the THR secondary to trauma performed in patients older than 65 years of the Orthogeriatric Program of the Fundación Santa Fe University Hospital (FSFB) during January 2014 - January 2019. Methodology: Case series where the cases are surgical events performed in patients diagnosed with hip fracture and THR by anterior approach, excluding patients with pathological fractures. Descriptive statistics were produced to summarize the variables. The protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the Fundación Santafé de Bogotá. Results: 46 events are described. The follow-up was 108 days (Q1:62;Q3:880), the average age was 80 years (SD 9). The mean duration of surgery was 125 minutes (SD 24). There was no mortality associated with the surgical procedure. Functional outcome (PARKER) improves three months postoperatively and improves twelve months later. Radiological outcomes, 80% of the radiographs had technical problems. There are no differences in the length of the operated tip compared to the contralateral one. The general offset, at 12 months the median is 93 (Q1:86; Q3:103) in the operated hip and 96 (Q1:88; Q3:105) in the contralateral hip. Conclusions: No clinical differences are suggested in postoperative functionality tests when compared with prefracture values. Regarding the radiological outcomes, it can be concluded that symmetry was maintained with respect to the contralateral hip.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosario
dc.publisherEscuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud
dc.publisherEspecialización en Ortopedia y Traumatología FSFB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAbierto (Texto Completo)
dc.rightsEL AUTOR, manifiesta que la obra objeto de la presente autorización es original y la realizó sin violar o usurpar derechos de autor de terceros, por lo tanto la obra es de exclusiva autoría y tiene la titularidad sobre la misma. PARGRAFO: En caso de presentarse cualquier reclamación o acción por parte de un tercero en cuanto a los derechos de autor sobre la obra en cuestión, EL AUTOR, asumirá toda la responsabilidad, y saldrá en defensa de los derechos aquí autorizados; para todos los efectos la universidad actúa como un tercero de buena fe. EL AUTOR, autoriza a LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO, para que en los términos establecidos en la Ley 23 de 1982, Ley 44 de 1993, Decisión andina 351 de 1993, Decreto 460 de 1995 y demás normas generales sobre la materia, utilice y use la obra objeto de la presente autorización. -------------------------------------- POLITICA DE TRATAMIENTO DE DATOS PERSONALES. Declaro que autorizo previa y de forma informada el tratamiento de mis datos personales por parte de LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO para fines académicos y en aplicación de convenios con terceros o servicios conexos con actividades propias de la academia, con estricto cumplimiento de los principios de ley. Para el correcto ejercicio de mi derecho de habeas data cuento con la cuenta de correo habeasdata@urosario.edu.co, donde previa identificación podré solicitar la consulta, corrección y supresión de mis datos.
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.sourceOuanes J-P, García T, Sieber F. Special Anesthetic Consideration for the Fragility Fracture Patient. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine. 2014;30(2):243–59.
dc.sourceJohnell O, Kanis JA. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporosis International. 2006;17:1726–33.
dc.sourceNikitovic M, Wodchis WP, Krahn MD, Cadarette SM. Direct health-care costs attributed to hip fractures among seniors: A matched cohort study. Osteoporosis International. 2013;24(2):659–69.
dc.sourceBeratarrechea A, Diehl M, Saimovici J, Pace N, Trossero A, Plantalech L. Mortalidad a largo plazo y factores predictores en pacientes con fractura de cadera. Actualizaciones en Osteologia. 2011;7(1):9–18.
dc.sourceSimunovic N, Devereaux PJ, Sprague S, Guyatt GH, Schemitsch E, Debeer J, et al. Effect of early surgery after hip fracture on mortality and complications: systematic review and meta-analysis. Canadian Medical Association. 2010;182(15):1609–16.
dc.sourceRobertson GA, Wood AM. Hip hemi-arthroplasty for neck of femur fracture: What is the current evidence? World journal of orthopedics. 2018;9(11):235–44.
dc.sourcePalm H, Krasheninnikoff M, Holck K, Lemser T, Foss NB, Jacobsen S, et al. A new algorithm for hip fracture surgery. Acta Orthopaedica. 2012;83(1):26–30.
dc.sourceRobertson GA, Wood AM. Hip hemi-arthroplasty for neck of femur fracture: What is the current evidence? World journal of orthopedics. 2018;9(11):235–44.
dc.sourceBeltrán A. Características de las fracturas de fémur proximal. Repertorio de medicina y cirugia. 2017;6(4):213–8.
dc.sourceMelton LJ, Clinic M, Infirmary R. Hip Fractures in the Elderly : A World-Wide Projection. Osteoporosis International. 1992;285–9.
dc.sourceChen YT, Peng LN, Liu CL, Chen LK. Orthogeriatrics in Taiwan: Overview and experiences. Journal of Clinical Gerontology and Geriatrics. 2011;2(3):66–70.
dc.sourceChen YT, Peng LN, Liu CL, Chen LK. Orthogeriatrics in Taiwan: Overview and experiences. Journal of Clinical Gerontology and Geriatrics. 2011;2(3):66–70.
dc.sourceFriedman SM, Mendelson DA, Kates SL, McCann RM. Geriatric co-management of proximal femur fractures: Total quality management and protocol-driven care result in better outcomes for a frail patient population. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2008;56(7):1349–56.
dc.source14. Friedman SM, Mendelson DA, Kates SL, McCann RM. Geriatric co-management of proximal femur fractures: Total quality management and protocol-driven care result in better outcomes for a frail patient population. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2008;56(7):1349–56.
dc.source15. Connolly KP, Kamath AF. Direct anterior total hip arthroplasty: Comparative outcomes and contemporary results. World Journal of Orthopedics. 2016;7(2):94.
dc.source16. Laude F. Total hip arthroplasty through an anterior Hueter minimally invasive approach. Interactive Surgery. 2006;1(1–4):5–11.
dc.source17. Hernández-vaquero D. Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología Influence of preoperative variables on total hip arthroplasty results. Revista española de cirugía ortopédica y traumatología (English edition). 2011;55(2):91–7.
dc.source18. Flecher X, Ollivier M, Argenson JN. Lower limb length and offset in total hip arthroplasty. Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and Research. 2016;102(1):S9–20.
dc.source19. Vanrusselt J, Vansevenant M, Vanderschueren G, Vanhoenacker F. Postoperative radiograph of the hip arthroplasty: what the radiologist should know. Insights into Imaging. 2015;6(6):591–600.
dc.source20. Restrepo-betancur LF. Análisis comparativo de la esperanza de vida en Sudamérica, 1980 – 2010. 2014;177–87.
dc.source21. Ilchmann T. Approaches for primary total hip replacement. HIP International. 2014;24(July):S2–6.
dc.source22. Hailer NP, Weiss RJ, Stark A, Kärrholm J. The risk of revision due to dislocation after total hip arthroplasty depends on surgical approach, femoral head size, sex, and primary diagnosis. Acta Orthopaedica. 2012;83(5):442–8.
dc.source23. Martin CT, Pugely AJ, Gao Y, Clark CR. A comparison of hospital length of stay and short-term morbidity between the anterior and the posterior approaches to total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2013;28(5):849–54.
dc.source24. Veltman ES, Wolkenfelt J, Poolman RW. PICO : Anterior approach versus posterolateral approach in primary total hip arthroplasty. 2017;(June).
dc.source25. Higgins BT, Barlow DR, Heagerty NE, Lin TJ. Anterior vs. Posterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty, a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2015;30(3):419–34.
dc.source28. Of A, Management C. Cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty. 2014;80:336–47.
dc.source29. Hambright D, Hellman M, Barrack R. Intra-operative digital imaging: Assuring the alignment of components when undertaking total hip arthroplasty. Bone and Joint Journal. 2018;100B(1):36–43.
dc.source30. Parvizi. Sharkey. Surgical Treatment of Limb-Length Discrepancy Following Total Hip Arthroplasty. 2004;(January 2016).
dc.source31. Mulcahy H, Chew FS. Current concepts of hip arthroplasty for radiologists: Part 2, revisions and complications. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2012;199(3):570–80.
dc.source32. Scheerlinck T. Cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthopaedica Belgica. 2014;80(3):336–47.
dc.source33. Poster S, Balanika A, Theocharakis S, Vrizidou S, Drosos C, Baltas C. Radiographic interpretation of hip replacement hardware . A pictorial essay . 2014;1–23.
dc.source34. Chan J, Khoriati AA, Chiang CH, Hadithy N Al. Understanding, Interpreting and Reporting a Total Hip Arthroplasty Radiograph. Orthopedic & Muscular System. 2017;06(03).
dc.source35. Clement ND, S. Patrick-Patel R, MacDonald D, Breusch SJ. Total hip replacement: increasing femoral offset improves functional outcome. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 2016;136(9):1317–23.
dc.source36. Blum A, Meyer JB, Raymond A, Louis M, Bakour O, Kechidi R, et al. Developments in imaging methods used in hip arthroplasty: a diagnostic algorithm. Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging. 2016;97(7–8):725–33.
dc.source37. Awan O, Chen L, Resnik CS. Imaging evaluation of complications of hip arthroplasty: Review of current concepts and imaging findings. Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal. 2013;64(4):306–13.
dc.source38. Marsland D, Mears SC. A Review of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Associated With Total Hip Arthroplasty. Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation. 2012;3(3):107–20.
dc.source39. Parker MJ, Palmer CR. A new mobility score for predicting mortality after hip fracture. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B. 1993;75(5):797–8.
dc.source40. Kristensen MT, Foss NB, Ekdahl C, Kehlet H. Prefracture functional level evaluated by the New Mobility Score predicts in-hospital outcome after hip fracture surgery. Acta Orthopaedica. 2010;81(3):296–302.
dc.source41. Hernández I, Martínez M, Belén A, López S, Reolid R, Gema M, et al. Análisis de la comorbilidad y calidad de vida de pacientes mayores polimedicados. Revista Clínica de Medicina de Familia. 2016;9(2):91–9.
dc.source42. Rosas-Carrasco O, González-Flores E, Brito-Carrera AM, Vázquez-Valdez OE, Peschard-Sáenz E, Gutiérrez-Robledo LM, et al. Evaluación de la comorbilidad en el adulto mayor. Revista médica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. 2011;49(2):153–62.
dc.source43. Hailer NP, Weiss RJ, Stark A, Kärrholm J. The risk of revision due to dislocation after total hip arthroplasty depends on surgical approach, femoral head size, sex, and primary diagnosis. Acta Orthopaedica. 2012 Oct;83(5):442–8.
dc.source44. Kristensen MT, Foss NB, Ekdahl C, Kehlet H. Prefracture functional level evaluated by the New Mobility Score predicts in-hospital outcome after hip fracture surgery. Acta Orthopaedica. 2010 Jun 3;81(3):296–302.
dc.source45. Evanovich J, King L. Predictors for blood loss and transfusion frequency to guide blood saving programs in primary knee‐ and hip‐arthroplasty.
dc.source46. Parker MJ, Palmer CR. A NEW MOBILITY SCORE FOR PREDICTING MORTALITY AFTER HIP FRACTURE. Vol. 755. 1993.
dc.source47. Beratarrechea A, Diehl M, Saimovici J, Pace N, Tros A, Plantalech L. ARTÍCULOS ORIGINALES / Originals MORTALIDAD A LARGO PLAZO Y FACTORES PREDICTORES EN PACIENTES CON FRACTURA DE CADERA. Vol. 7, Actual. Osteol. 2011.
dc.source48. Huerfano E, Bautista M, Huerfano M, Nossa JM. Use of Surgical Approach Is Not Associated With Instability After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis Comparing Direct Anterior and Posterolateral Approaches. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2021 Nov 15;29(22):e1126–40.
dc.source49. Martin CT, Pugely AJ, Gao Y, Clark CR. A comparison of hospital length of stay and short-term morbidity between the anterior and the posterior approaches to total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2013 May;28(5):849–54.
dc.source50. Finch DJ, Martin BI, Patricia Franklin MD, Magder LS, Pellegrini VD. Patient-reported Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Comparison Based on Surgical Approaches Patient-reported Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: A 1 Multicenter Comparison Based on Surgical Approaches 2. The Journal of Arthroplasty.
dc.source51. Bosker BH, Verheyen CCPM, Horstmann WG, Tulp NJA. Poor accuracy of freehand cup positioning during total hip arthroplasty. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 2007 Jul;127(5):375–9.
dc.source52. Hambright D, Hellman M, Barrack R, Knight J. Intra-operative digital imaging ASSURING THE ALIGNMENT OF COMPONENTS WHEN UNDERTAKING TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY.
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.sourcereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
dc.subjectReemplazo total de cadera
dc.subjectOrtogeriatria
dc.subjectDesenlaces
dc.subjectFracturas de cadera intracapsulares
dc.subjectFracturas de cadera en adulto mayor
dc.titleDesenlaces funcionales y radiológicos de reemplazos de cadera por vía anterior en pacientes del centro de cuidado clínico de ortogeriatría desde el 2014 al 2019
dc.typemasterThesis


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución