dc.contributorGrupo de investigaciones. Facultad de Economía. Universidad del Rosario
dc.creatorAugsburg, Britta
dc.creatorBaquero, Juan Pablo
dc.creatorGautam, Sanghmitra
dc.creatorRodríguez Lesmes, Paul Andres
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-28T13:45:57Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-22T13:58:21Z
dc.date.available2021-09-28T13:45:57Z
dc.date.available2022-09-22T13:58:21Z
dc.date.created2021-09-28T13:45:57Z
dc.date.issued2021-09-27
dc.identifierhttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/32571
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_32571
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3434566
dc.description.abstractThis paper analyses the marriage decisions of men and women, focusing on the added attractiveness of sanitation within the living arrangement, in rural India. We exploit district and time variation from the Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC) which increased sanitation by 6.6 percent among households with marriage eligible children and generated an exogenous increase in the composition of households with sanitation. Using data from the Indian Human Development household survey (IHDS) and district level census, we show that exposure to TSC increased the probability of marriage for men and women, from poorer households, by 3.8 pp and 6.5 pp respectively. The reduced form estimates incorporate both general equilibrium effects and heterogeneous program effects – two important components of equilibrium marital behavior. To decompose the overall policy impact on marriage market equilibrium we formulate a simple matching model where men and women match on observed and unobserved characteristics. Through model simulations, we show that cohorts within TSC exposed markets experienced a shift in marital gains both across matches but also within a given match. Specifically, the resultant sorting patterns display a marked gender asymmetry with an increase in marital surplus among matches where men are wealthier than their spouse, and a decrease in surplus where the wife is wealthier. Moreover, the increased access to sanitation for TSC exposed women implied a decline in their expected control over resources within the marriage.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosario
dc.publisherFacultad de Economía
dc.relationDocumentos de trabajo economía, (2021); 35 pp.
dc.relationhttps://www.dropbox.com/s/zn0u9hwb9i375el/ABGR_Sept2021_draft.pdf?dl=0
dc.relationhttps://ideas.repec.org/p/col/000092/019624.html
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAbierto (Texto Completo)
dc.sourceAbramitzky, R., Delavande, A., and Vasconcelos, L. (2011). Marrying up: the role of sex ratio in assortative matching. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 3(3):124–57.
dc.sourceAbramovsky, L., Augsburg, B., Luuhrmann, M., Oteiza, F., and Rud, J. P. (2019). Community matters: heterogenous impacts of a sanitation intervention.
dc.sourceAdams-Prassl, A. and Andrew, A. (2019). Preferences and beliefs in the marriage market for young brides
dc.sourceAndré, P. and Dupraz, Y. (2019). Education and polygamy: Evidence from Cameroon. Technical report, Warwick Economics Research Papers No 1219
dc.sourceAndres, L. A., Deb, S., Joseph, G., Larenas, M. I., and Grabinsky Zabludovsky, J. (2020). A multiple-arm, cluster-randomized impact evaluation of the Clean India (Swachh Bharat) Mission program in rural Punjab, India. Working Paper 9249, World Bank"
dc.sourceAngrist, J. (2002). How do sex ratios affect marriage and labor markets? Evidence from America’s second generation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(3):997–1038
dc.sourceArnold, B. F., Khush, R. S., Ramaswamy, P., London, A. G., Rajkumar, P., Ramaprabha, P., Durairaj, N., Hubbard, A. E., Balakrishnan, K., and Colford, J. M. (2010). Causal inference methods to study nonrandomized, preexisting development interventions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(52):22605–22610
dc.sourceAugsburg, B. and Sainati, T. (2020). Editorial: WASH economics and financing: towards a better understanding of costs and benefits. Journal of WASH for Development, 10:615—-617
dc.sourceBanerjee, A., Duflo, E., Ghatak, M., and Lafortune, J. (2013). Marry for what? Caste and mate selection in modern India. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 5(2):33–72
dc.sourceBarnard, S., Routray, P., Majorin, F., Peletz, R., Boisson, S., Sinha, A., and Clasen, T. (2013). Impact of Indian Total Sanitation Campaign on latrine coverage and use: A cross-sectional study in Orissa three years following programme implementation. PLOS One, 8
dc.sourceBasu, A. (1999). Fertility decline and increasing gender imbalance in India, including a possible South Indian turnaround. Development and Change, 30:237–263
dc.sourceBeauchamp, A., Calvi, R., and Fulford, S. (2017). Terms of engagement: Marriage and migration in India. In Structural Models in Development: Migration, Marriage and the Family. Econometric Society
dc.sourceBecker, G. S. and Becker, G. S. (2009). A Treatise on the Family. Harvard university press.
dc.sourceBorker, G., Eeckout, J., Luke, N., Minz, S., Munshi, K., and Swaminathan, S. (2018). Wealth, marriage, and sex selection. PAA 2018 Annual Meeting
dc.sourceBorker, G., Eeckout, J., Luke, N., Minz, S., Munshi, K., and Swaminathan, S. (2019). Wealth, marriage, and sex selection. Working paper.
dc.sourceBotticini, M. and Siow, A. (2003). Why dowries? American Economic Review, 93(4):1385–1398.
dc.sourceBriceno, B., Coville, A., Gertler, P., and Martinez, S. (2017). Are there synergies from combining hygiene and sanitation promotion campaigns: Evidence from a large-scale cluster-randomized trial in rural Tanzania. PLoS One, 12(11):e0186228
dc.sourceCavill, S., Mott, J., Tyndale-Biscoe, P., Bond, M., Edström, J., Huggett, C., and Wamera, E. (2018). Men and boys in sanitation and hygiene: A desk-based review. CLTS Knowledge Hub and Learning Paper, Institute of Development Studies.
dc.sourceCBGA, U. (2011). Total sanitation campaign (TSC). budgeting for change series, 2011. Centre for Budget and Governance Accountability; Social Policy, Planning, Monitoring and evaluation (SPPME), UNICEF
dc.sourceCharles, K. K. and Luoh, M. C. (2010). Male incarceration, the marriage market, and female outcomes. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(3):614–627
dc.sourceChiappori, P.-A., Dias, M. C., and Meghir, C. (2018). The marriage market, labor supply, and education choice. Journal of Political Economy, 126(S1):S26–S72
dc.sourceChiappori, P.-A., Iyigun, M., and Weiss, Y. (2009). Investment in schooling and the marriage market. American Economic Review, 99(5):1689–1713
dc.sourceChiappori, P.-A., Oreffice, S., and Quintana-Domeque, C. (2012). Fatter attraction: anthropometric and socioeconomic matching on the marriage market. Journal of Political Economy, 120(4):659–695.
dc.sourceChiappori, P.-A., Salanié, B., and Weiss, Y. (2017). Partner choice, investment in children, and the marital college premium. American Economic Review, 107(8):2109–67
dc.sourceChoo, E. and Siow, A. (2006). Who marries whom and why. Journal of political Economy, 114(1):175–201
dc.sourceClasen, T., Boisson, S., Routray, P., Torondel, B., Bell, M., Cumming, O., Ensink, J., Freeman, M., Jenkins, M., Odagiri, M., et al. (2014). Effectiveness of a rural sanitation programme on diarrhoea, soiltransmitted helminth infection, and child malnutrition in Odisha, India: A cluster-randomised trial. The Lancet Global Health, 2(11):e645–e653
dc.sourceCox, O. C. (1940). Sex ratio and marital status among negroes. American Sociological Review, 6(5):937–947
dc.sourceCrocker, J. (2016). Teachers and sanitation promotion: An assessment of community-led total sanitation in Ethiopia. Environmental Science and Technology, 50(12)
dc.sourceCrocker, J., Abodoo, E., Asamani, D., Domapielle, W., Gyapong, B., and Bartram, J. (2016). Impact evaluation of training Natural Leaders during a Community-Led Total sanitation intervention: A clusterrandomized field trial in Ghana. Environ. Sci. Technol., 50(16):8867–8875
dc.sourceDas Gupta, M., Zhenghua, J., Bohua, L., Zhenming, X., Chung, W., and Hwa-Ok, B. (2003). Why is son preference so persistent in East and South Asia? A cross-country study of China, India and the Republic of Korea. The Journal of Development Studies, 40:153–187
dc.sourceDesai, S. and Andrist, L. (2010). Erratum: Fatter attraction: Anthropometric and socioeconomic matching on the marriage market. Demography, 47:667–687
dc.sourceEasterlin, R. A. (1961). The American baby boom in historical perspective. American Economic Review, 51(5):869–911
dc.sourceFernández, R. and Wong, J. C. (2017). Free to leave? A welfare analysis of divorce regimes. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 9(3):72–115
dc.sourceGarn, J. V., Sclar, G. D., Freeman, M. C., Penakalapati, G., Alexander, K. T., Brooks, P., Rehfuess, E. A., Boisson, S., Medlicott, K. O., and Clasen, T. F. (2017). The impact of sanitation interventions on latrine coverage and latrine use: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International journal of hygiene and environmental health, 220(2):329–340
dc.sourceGautam, S. (2017). Household Demand in the Presence of Externalities: Model and Applications. PhD thesis, University College London, United Kingdom
dc.sourceGautam, S. (2020). Quantifying welfare effects in the presence of externalities: An ex-ante evaluation of sanitation interventions. Working Paper, Washington University in St. Louis
dc.sourceGreenwood, J., Guner, N., Kocharkov, G., and Santos, C. (2016). Technology and the changing family: A unified model of marriage, divorce, educational attainment, and married female labor-force participation. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 8(1):1–41
dc.sourceGrossbard, S. (1993). On the economics of marriage-a theory of marriage, labor and divorce. MPRA Paper, 1832
dc.sourceGuiteras, R., Levinsohn, J., and Mobarak, A. M. (2015). Sanitation subsidies. encouraging sanitation investment in the developing world: A cluster-randomized trial. Science, 348(6237):903–906
dc.sourceGupta, B. (2014). Where have all the brides gone? Son preference and marriage in India over the twentieth century. The Economic History Review, 67(1):1–24
dc.sourceHammer, J. S. and Spears, D. (2016). Village sanitation and children’s human capital: evidence from a randomized experiment by the Maharashtra government. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 6580
dc.sourceHener, T. and Wilson, T. (2018). Marital age gaps and educational homogamy-evidence from a compulsory schooling reform in the UK. Technical report, ifo Working Paper
dc.sourceHitsch, G. J., Hortaçsu, A., and Ariely, D. (2010). Matching and sorting in online dating. American Economic Review, 100(1):130–63
dc.sourceIyigun, M. and Walsh, R. P. (2007). Endogenous gender power, household labor supply and the demographic transition. Journal of Development Economics, 82(1):138–155
dc.sourceJaggi, T. (2001). The economics of dowry: Causes and effects of an Indian tradition. University Avenue Undergraduate Journal of Economics, 5(1):2
dc.sourceKone, Z. L., Liu, M. Y., Mattoo, A., Ozden, C., and Sharma, S. (2018). Internal borders and migration in India. Journal of Economic Geography, 18(4):729–759
dc.sourceLundberg, S. and Pollak, R. A. (1996). Bargaining and distribution in marriage. Journal of economic perspectives, 10(4):139–158
dc.sourceMoorjani, P., Thangaraj, K., Patterson, N., Lipson, M., Loh, P.-R., Govindaraj, P., Berger, B., Reich, D., and Singh, L. (2013). Genetic evidence for recent population mixture in India. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 93(3):422–438
dc.sourceMurthi, M., Guio, A.-C., and Dréze, J. (1995). Mortality, fertility, and gender bias in India: A district level analysis. Population and Development Review, pages 745–782
dc.sourceOrgill-Meyer, J. and Pattanayak, S. K. (2020). Improved sanitation increases long-term cognitive test scores. World Development, 132(104975)
dc.sourcePatil, S. R., Arnold, B. F., Salvatore, A. L., Briceno, B., Ganguly, S., Colford Jr, J. M., and Gertler, P. J. (2014). The effect of India’s Total Sanitation Campaign on defecation behaviors and child health in rural Madhya Pradesh: A cluster randomized controlled trial. PLoS Med, 11(8):e1001709
dc.sourcePattanayak, S. K., Yang, J.-C., Dickinson, K. L., Poulos, C., Patil, S. R., Mallick, R. K., Blitstein, J. L., and Praharaj, P. (2009). Shame or subsidy revisited: social mobilization for sanitation in orissa, india. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 87:580–587
dc.sourcePencavel, J. (1998). Assortative mating by schooling and the work behavior of wives and husbands. The American Economic Review, 88(2):326–329
dc.sourcePickering, A. J., Djebbari, H., Lopez, C., Coulibaly, M., and Alzua, M. L. (2015). Effect of a CommunityLed Sanitation intervention on child diarrhoea and child growth in rural Mali: A cluster-randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Global Health, 3(11):e701–e711
dc.sourceRadtke, I. (2018). WASH guidelines for field practitioners. Part 2: Sanitation. Malteser Inernational
dc.sourceRao, V. (1993). The rising price of husbands: A hedonic analysis of dowry increases in rural India. Journal of political Economy, 101(4):666–677
dc.sourceRasul, I. (2006). Marriage markets and divorce laws. Journal of Law, Economics, and organization, 22(1):30–69.
dc.sourceReynoso, A. (2018). The impact of divorce laws on the equilibrium in the marriage market. University of Michigan, Job Market Paper.
dc.sourceSpears, D. and Lamba, S. (2016). Effects of early-life exposure to sanitation on childhood cognitive skills: Evidence from India’s Total Sanitation Campaign. Journal of Human Resources, 51(2):298–327
dc.sourceStopnitzky, Y. (2017). No toilet no bride? Intrahousehold bargaining in male-skewed marriage markets in India. Journal of Development Economics, 127:269–282
dc.sourceWater and Sanitation Program (WSP) (2011). A decade of the Total Sanitation Campaign: Rapid assessment of processes and outcomes. Volume 1: Main Report
dc.sourceZha, D. (2019). Schooling expansion and the female marriage age: Evidence from Indonesia. Columbia University, Job Market Paper
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.sourcereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
dc.subjectEmparejamiento empírico
dc.subjectMercados matrimoniales
dc.subjectSaneamiento
dc.subjectClasificación
dc.titleSanitation and Marriage Markets in India: Evidence from the Total Sanitation Campaign
dc.typeworkingPaper


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución