Enfoque de capacidades e inequidad espacial: un estudio de accesibilidad y pobreza multidimensional en la ciudad de Bogotá

dc.contributorVergel-Tovar, Erik
dc.creatorMartínez Ramírez, Paulo Federico
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-21T22:15:28Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-22T13:52:17Z
dc.date.available2022-01-21T22:15:28Z
dc.date.available2022-09-22T13:52:17Z
dc.date.created2022-01-21T22:15:28Z
dc.identifierhttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/33439
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3433487
dc.description.abstractThis work addresses issues of equity and mobility by studying the spatial relationships between accessibility and multidimensional poverty in Bogotá. The methodology operationalizes the Capability Approach, originally proposed by Amartya Sen (1985). On the one hand, it calculates the accessibility-as-capability concept to understand the ability of Bogota citizens to access certain destinations. This approach is developed by counting employment, education and health opportunities with different time thresholds, in various modes of transport and including other elements of the Capability Approach as conversion factors of personal and environmental characteristics as controls. On the other hand, the data analysis includes the Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) to explain certain relevant capacities for the population. Global and Local Spatial Autocorrelation Indices were used to establish spatial and non-spatial relationships between capabilities captured by the MPI and accessibility at the block level. The regression results show significantly negative associations between multidimensional poverty and accessibility-as- capability. When spatializing the coefficients, blocks in Usme and Ciudad Bolívar urban districts, especially the sectors of Mirador, Bella Flor, Alpes Sur and Mochuelo present high deprivations in the ability to access employment opportunities, health and education as in those captured by the MPI. On the other hand, the planning zones of Teusaquillo, Galerías and Chapinero show low deprivation in both capacity measurements. The few block that exhibit just one of the two deprivations presented above provide arguments to support the theories of social exclusion and deprivation of capabilities, both caused by low accessibilities, explained by Lucas (2012) and Vecchio and Martens (2021) respectively. Based on these findings, this research recommends to the local government to focus actions on the areas with the greatest deprivation in each dimension, paying greater attention to the measures of counting opportunities in the Mobility Master Plan and strengthening the transport network through the construction of cables to Diana Turbay and Arabia, in Usme and Ciudad Bolívar.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosario
dc.publisherEconomía
dc.publisherFacultad de economía
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
dc.rightsRestringido (Temporalmente bloqueado)
dc.rightsEL AUTOR, manifiesta que la obra objeto de la presente autorización es original y la realizó sin violar o usurpar derechos de autor de terceros, por lo tanto la obra es de exclusiva autoría y tiene la titularidad sobre la misma. PARGRAFO: En caso de presentarse cualquier reclamación o acción por parte de un tercero en cuanto a los derechos de autor sobre la obra en cuestión, EL AUTOR, asumirá toda la responsabilidad, y saldrá en defensa de los derechos aquí autorizados; para todos los efectos la universidad actúa como un tercero de buena fe. EL AUTOR, autoriza a LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO, para que en los términos establecidos en la Ley 23 de 1982, Ley 44 de 1993, Decisión andina 351 de 1993, Decreto 460 de 1995 y demás normas generales sobre la materia, utilice y use la obra objeto de la presente autorización. -------------------------------------- POLITICA DE TRATAMIENTO DE DATOS PERSONALES. Declaro que autorizo previa y de forma informada el tratamiento de mis datos personales por parte de LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO para fines académicos y en aplicación de convenios con terceros o servicios conexos con actividades propias de la academia, con estricto cumplimiento de los principios de ley. Para el correcto ejercicio de mi derecho de habeas data cuento con la cuenta de correo habeasdata@urosario.edu.co, donde previa identificación podré solicitar la consulta, corrección y supresión de mis datos.
dc.sourceAkbar, P., & Duranton, G. (2017). Akbar & Duranton (2017).pdf. Working paper.
dc.sourceAlkire, S. (2007). Choosing Dimensions: The Capability Approach and Multidimensional Poverty. En N. Kakwani & J. Silber (Eds.), The Many Dimensions of Poverty (pp. 89-119). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230592407_6
dc.sourceAlkire, S., & Foster, J. (2011). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 12.
dc.sourceµlvarez-Rivadulla, M. J., & Aliaga-Linares, L. (2010). Aliaga Alvarez Residential Segregation in Bogota across time and space. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. https://www.academia.edu/1404294/Aliaga_Alvarez_Residential_Segregation_in_Bogota_across_time_and_space
dc.sourceAngulo, R. C., D¡az, Y., & Pardo, R. (2011). Öndice de Pobreza Multidimensional para Colombia (IPM-Colombia) 1997-2010 (p. 57). Departamento Nacional de Planeaci¢n.
dc.sourceAnselin, L. (2003). Spatial Econometrics. En B. H. Baltagi (Ed.), A Companion to Theoretical Econometrics (pp. 310-330). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996249.ch15
dc.sourceAnselin, L. (2020). Local Spatial Autocorrelation. Geoda Center. https://geodacenter.github.io/workbook/6c_local_multi/lab6c.html#fn1
dc.sourceApaolaza, R., & Blanco, J. (2015). Sobre capacidades, experiencias y posibilidades de uso y apropiaci¢n de la ciudad: Breve estado del arte del concepto de capital espacial. XI Jornadas de Sociolog¡a. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, 17.
dc.sourceApaolaza, R., Blanco, J., Lerena, N., L¢pez-Morales, E., Lukas, M., & Rivera, M. (2016). Transporte, desigualdad social y capital espacial: An lisis comparativo entre Buenos Aires y Santiago de Chile. Öconos - Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 56, 19
dc.sourceArellana, J., Oviedo, D., Guzman, L., & Alvarez, V. (2020). Urban transport planning and access inequalities: A tale of two Colombian cities. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 100554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2020.100554
dc.sourceBocarejo, J. P., & Urrego, L. F. (2020). The impacts of formalization and integration of public transport in social equity: The case of Bogota. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 100560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2020.100560
dc.sourceBantis, T., & Haworth, J. (2020). Assessing transport related social exclusion using a capabilities approach to accessibility framework: A dynamic Bayesian network approach. Journal of Transport Geography, 84, 102673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102673
dc.sourceBocarejo S., J. P., & Oviedo H., D. R. (2012). Transport accessibility and social inequities: A tool for identification of mobility needs and evaluation of transport investments. Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 142-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.12.004
dc.sourceBogot  C¢mo Vamos. (2021). Capitulo de Movilidad, Informe de Calidad de Vida 2020, Programa Bogota Como Vamos (XXIII; pp. 233-293). Bogot  C¢mo Vamos. https://bogotacomovamos.org/vigesimo-tercer-informe-de-calidad-de-vida-en-bogota-2020/
dc.sourceBorja, J. (2016). Contra la injusticia espacial, por los derechos ciudadanos, la igualdad y la sostenibilidad. | Jordi Borja. https://www.jordiborja.cat/contra-la-injusticia-espacial-por-los-derechos-ciudadanos-la-igualdad-y-la-sostenibilidad/
dc.sourceBrussel, M., Zuidgeest, M., Pfeffer, K., & van Maarseveen, M. (2019). Access or Accessibility? A Critique of the Urban Transport SDG Indicator. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 8(2), 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8020067
dc.sourceCairns, S., Greig, J., Wachs, M., University of California, B., & Institute of Transportation Studies. (2003). Environmental justice & transportation: A citizen's handbook. Instititute of Transportation Studies, University of California Berkeley.
dc.sourceCao, M., & Hickman, R. (2019). Urban transport and social inequities in neighbourhoods near underground stations in Greater London. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TECHNOLOGY, 42, 419-441.
dc.sourceCelem¡n, J. P. (2009). Autocorrelaci¢n espacial e indicadores locales de asociaci¢n espacial. Importancia, estructura y aplicaci¢n. Revista Universitaria de Geograf¡a, 18, 11-31.
dc.sourceCheng, G., Zeng, X., Duan, L., Lu, X., Sun, H., Jiang, T., & Li, Y. (2016). Spatial difference analysis for accessibility to high level hospitals based on travel time in Shenzhen, China. Habitat International, 53, 485-494
dc.sourceDaude, C., Fajardo, G., Brassiolo, P., Estrada, R., Goytia, C., Sanguinetti, P., µlvarez, F., & Vargas, J. (2017). RED 2017. Crecimiento urbano y acceso a oportunidades: Un desaf¡o para Am‚rica Latina. CAF. https://scioteca.caf.com/handle/123456789/1090
dc.sourceDeka, D. (2017). Social and Environmental Justice Issues in Urban Transportation. En G. Giuliano & S. Hanson (Eds.), The geography of urban transportation (Fourth edition, pp. 332-355). Guilford Press.
dc.sourceGannon, C. A., & Liu, Z. (1997). Poverty and Transport. TWU, 30, 69.
dc.sourceGeurs, K. T., & van Wee, B. (2004). Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: Review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography, 12(2), 127-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005
dc.sourceGoodchild, M. F. (2008). Spatial autocorrelation. En K. K. Kemp (Ed.), Encyclopedia of geographic information science. SAGE Publications.
dc.sourceGuo, J. Y., & Bhat, C. R. (2007). Operationalizing the concept of neighborhood: Application to residential location choice analysis. Journal of Transport Geography, 15(1), 31-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2005.11.001
dc.sourceGuzman, L., & Bocarejo, J. P. (2017). Urban form and spatial urban equity in Bogota, Colombia. Transportation Research Procedia, 25, 4491-4506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.345
dc.sourceGuzman, L., Oviedo, D., & Cardona, R. (2018). Accessibility Changes: Analysis of the Integrated Public Transport System of Bogot . Sustainability, 10(11), 3958. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113958
dc.sourceGuzman, L., Oviedo, D., & Rivera, C. (2017). Assessing equity in transport accessibility to work and study: The Bogot  region. Journal of Transport Geography, 58, 236-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.12.016
dc.sourceHansen, W. G. (1959). How Accessibility Shapes Land Use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 25(2), 73-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944365908978307
dc.sourceHanson, S. (2017). The Context of Urban Travel. En G. Giuliano & S. Hanson (Eds.), The geography of urban transportation (Fourth edition, pp. 3-29). Guilford Press.
dc.sourceHern ndez, D. (2012). Activos y estructuras de oportunidades de movilidad: Una propuesta anal¡tica para el estudio de la accesibilidad por transporte p£blico, el bienestar y la equidad. EURE (Santiago), 38(115), 117-135. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0250-71612012000300006
dc.sourceHick, R. (2012). The Capability Approach: Insights for a New Poverty Focus. Journal of Social Policy, 41(2), 291-308. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279411000845
dc.sourceHickman, R., Cao, M., Mella Lira, B., Fillone, A., & Bienvenido Biona, J. (2017). Understanding Capabilities, Functionings and Travel in High and Low Income Neighbourhoods in Manila. Social Inclusion, 5(4), 161-174. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v5i4.1083
dc.sourceLora, E. (1987). T‚cnicas de medici¢n econ¢mica: Metodolog¡a y aplicaciones en Colombia (1a ed). FEDESARROLLO?: Siglo Veintiuno Editores de Colombia.
dc.sourceLucas, K. (2012). Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now? Transport Policy, 20, 105-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.01.013
dc.sourceLynch, K. (1992). The image of the city (21st ed). Mit press.
dc.sourceMaciel, V., Kuwahara, M., Fronzaglia, M., Scarano, P., & Muramatsu, R. (2015, septiembre 11). Accessibility and well-being: Measuring urban (im)mobility as deprivation.
dc.sourceMarina, M. J., & Mitchell, A. (2018). Same City, Worlds Apart: Multidimensional poverty and residential segregation in Buenos Aires. Asociaci¢n Argentina de Econom¡a Pol¡tica, 29.
dc.sourceMartens, K. (2017). Transport justice: Designing fair transportation systems. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
dc.sourceMartens, K., & Golub, A. (2012). A justice-theoretic exploration of accessibility measures. En Accessibility Analysis and Transport Planning. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781781000106/9781781000106.00020.xml
dc.sourceMiller, E. (2020). Measuring Accessibility: Methods and Issues. International Transport Forum Discussion Papers, 2020/25.
dc.sourceMOOVIT. (2021, febrero). Facts and usage statistics about public transport in Bogota, Colombia. https://moovitapp.com/insights
dc.sourceOviedo, D., & Guzman, L. (2020). Revisiting Accessibility in a Context of Sustainable Transport: Capabilities and Inequalities in Bogot . Sustainability, 12, 22.
dc.sourcePereira, R. H. M. (2019). Future accessibility impacts of transport policy scenarios: Equity and sensitivity to travel time thresholds for Bus Rapid Transit expansion in Rio de Janeiro. Journal of Transport Geography, 74, 321-332.
dc.sourcePreston, J., & Raj‚, F. (2007). Accessibility, mobility and transport-related social exclusion. Journal of Transport Geography, 15(3), 151-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.05.002
dc.sourceRobeyns, I. (2005a). The Capability Approach: A theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 93-117. https://doi.org/10.1080/146498805200034266
dc.sourceSen, A. (1985). Commodities and capabilities. North-Holland?; Sole distributors for the U.S.A. and Canada, Elsevier Science Pub. Co.
dc.sourceSen, A. (2000). Development as freedom (Anchor Books). Anchor Books.
dc.sourceSen, A., Bravo, A. M., & Schwartz, P. (2010). Nuevo examen de la desigualdad. Alianza Editorial.
dc.sourceTsivanidis, N. (2019). Evaluating the Impact of Urban Transit Infrastructure: Evidence from Bogot 's TransMilenio. Working Paper, 114.
dc.sourceUN Habitat (Ed.). (2013). Planning and design for sustainable urban mobility: Global report on human settlements 2013. Routledge.
dc.sourceUNDP. (2021). Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/es/
dc.sourceVasconcellos, E. (2001). Urban transport, environment, and equity: The case for developing countries. Earthscan.
dc.sourceVecchio, G., & Martens, K. (2021). Accessibility and the Capabilities Approach: A review of the literature and proposal for conceptual advancements. Transport Reviews, 1-1-22. Academic Search Complete. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2021.1931551
dc.sourceVecchio, G., Tiznado-Aitken, I., & Hurtubia, R. (2020). Transport and equity in Latin America: A critical review of socially oriented accessibility assessments. Transport Reviews, 40(3), 354-381. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2020.1711828
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.sourcereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
dc.subjectEnfoque de capacidades
dc.subjectAccesibilidad
dc.subjectMovilidad
dc.subjectPobreza multidimensional
dc.subjectEconomía urbana
dc.subjectEconometría espacial
dc.titleEnfoque de capacidades e inequidad espacial: un estudio de accesibilidad y pobreza multidimensional en la ciudad de Bogotá
dc.typebachelorThesis


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución