dc.contributor | Martínez Del Valle, Anacaona | |
dc.creator | Polania Reyes, Diana Patricia | |
dc.creator | Perez Herandez, Maria Alejandra | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-28T17:08:55Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-06-28T17:08:55Z | |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-28T17:08:55Z | |
dc.identifier | https://doi.org/10.48713/10336_31687 | |
dc.identifier | https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/31687 | |
dc.description.abstract | The digital examination or vaginal touch has been through the years the study carried out during labor to estimate the relationships between the fetus and the birth canal, however, unfavorable outcomes have been documented due to the subjectivity of the measurement, main limitation of it. Currently, in some countries the measurement of different variables through intrapartum obstetric ultrasound has been implemented to define the route of delivery to which to proceed, however the usefulness and precision of the image is not clear in order to reduce possible complications derived from prolonged labor. Objective To review the available scientific literature on the use of obstetric ultrasound during labor as an accurate predictor of the route of delivery. Methods We carried out a systematic review of the literature which included descriptive observational studies found in PUBMED, EBSCO, EMBASE, SCOPUS as multidisciplinary databases; GOOGLE SCHOLAR and OPEN GRAY as an open search engine for gray literature. Pregnant women, between 18 and 45 years old, with a term pregnancy greater than 37 weeks' gestation, who had vertex cephalic presentation and patients in the first or second phase of labor were included. Only studies in Spanish and English were applied. The QUADAS-2 tool was applied to assess the risk of bias. Result The search strategy yielded 951 records of which 138 were excluded in duplicates. Of the total articles, 790 were excluded, leaving 23 full-text articles to assess their eligibility. Of these, 12 articles were excluded for different reasons, which is why a total of 11 articles were obtained for the qualitative synthesis and 5 articles for the quantitative synthesis. Discussion Obstetric ultrasound during the first and second phases of labor is recommended as a more objective tool for taking different measurements and angles of the birth canal, showing the diagnostic precision of the test. Although great heterogeneity was found between the studies, it is suggested to implement this type of diagnostic aids in the short term to specify the route of delivery to which to proceed. | |
dc.language | spa | |
dc.publisher | Universidad del Rosario | |
dc.publisher | Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud | |
dc.publisher | Especialización en Epidemiología | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.rights | Abierto (Texto Completo) | |
dc.rights | EL AUTOR, manifiesta que la obra objeto de la presente autorización es original y la realizó sin violar o usurpar derechos de autor de terceros, por lo tanto la obra es de exclusiva autoría y tiene la titularidad sobre la misma.
PARGRAFO: En caso de presentarse cualquier reclamación o acción por parte de un tercero en cuanto a los derechos de autor sobre la obra en cuestión, EL AUTOR, asumirá toda la responsabilidad, y saldrá en defensa de los derechos aquí autorizados; para todos los efectos la universidad actúa como un tercero de buena fe.
EL AUTOR, autoriza a LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO, para que en los términos establecidos en la Ley 23 de 1982, Ley 44 de 1993, Decisión andina 351 de 1993, Decreto 460 de 1995 y demás normas generales sobre la materia, utilice y use la obra objeto de la presente autorización.
--------------------------------------
POLITICA DE TRATAMIENTO DE DATOS PERSONALES. Declaro que autorizo previa y de forma informada el tratamiento de mis datos personales por parte de LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO para fines académicos y en aplicación de convenios con terceros o servicios conexos con actividades propias de la academia, con estricto cumplimiento de los principios de ley. Para el correcto ejercicio de mi derecho de habeas data cuento con la cuenta de correo habeasdata@urosario.edu.co, donde previa identificación podré solicitar la consulta, corrección y supresión de mis datos. | |
dc.source | Dębska M, Kretowicz P, Dębski R. Intrapartum sonography – eccentricity or necessity? J Ultrason. 2015;61:125–36. | |
dc.source | Chou MR, Kreiser D, Taslimi MM, Druzin ML, El-Sayed YY. Vaginal versus ultrasound examination of fetal occiput position during the second stage of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(2):521–4. | |
dc.source | Akmal S, Tsoi E, Nicolaides KH. Intrapartum sonography to determine fetal occipital position: Interobserver agreement. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;24(4):421–4. | |
dc.source | Wiafe YA, Whitehead B, Venables H, Nakua EK. The effectiveness of intrapartum ultrasonography in assessing cervical dilatation, head station and position: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound. 2016;24(4):222– 32. | |
dc.source | Tao H, Wang R, Liu W, Zhao Y, Zou L. The value of intrapartum ultrasound in the prediction of persistent occiput posterior position: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol [Internet]. 2019;238:25–32. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.04.041 | |
dc.source | Dückelmann AM, Kalache KD. Sonographic assessment of the positioning and level of head descent before operative vaginal delivery . Gynakologe [Internet]. 2014;47(11):871–8. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0- 84920945325&doi=10.1007%2Fs00129-014-3468- z&partnerID=40&md5=da3d762c49b4bbd725d51267db8c4601 | |
dc.source | Eggebø TM, Wilhelm-Benartzi C, Hassan WA, Usman S, Salvesen KA, Lees CC. A model to predict vaginal delivery in nulliparous women based on maternal characteristics and intrapartum ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2015;213(3):362.e1-362.e6. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0- 84946901745&doi=10.1016%2Fj.ajog.2015.05.044&partnerID=40&md5=efe 5d0b6033f88e0cc11602b8f38fede | |
dc.source | Erlik U, Wolman I. Intrapartum sonographic assessment of labor. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2013;63(5):297–300. | |
dc.source | Cunningham GF, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC. Williams Obstetricia. In: 23rd ed. 2010. | |
dc.source | Sherer DM, Miodovnik M, Bradley KS, Langer O. Intrapartum fetal head position I: Comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the active stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;19(3):258–63. | |
dc.source | Dupuis O, Silveira R, Zentner A, Dittmar A, Gaucherand P, Cucherat M, et al. Birth simulator: Reliability of transvaginal assessment of fetal head station as defined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists classification. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(3):868–74. | |
dc.source | Ghi T, Eggebø T, Lees C, Kalache K, Rozenberg P, Youssef A, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: intrapartum ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2018;52(1):128–39. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0- 85049523956&doi=10.1002%2Fuog.19072&partnerID=40&md5=0a4d3591c ea5c9ac4a2da50efe87f375 | |
dc.source | Molina FS, Nicolaides KH. Ultrasound in labor and delivery. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2010;27(2):61–7. | |
dc.source | Fahmmy MM, Elhalaby AEF, Hamza HA, Elnasr IS, Elshaikn NMT. Role of intrapartum transperineal ultrasound in predicting mode of delivery in primigravida women. Menoufia Med J. 2020;33:474–9. | |
dc.source | Minajagi PS, Srinivas SB, Hebbar S. Predicting the Mode of Delivery by Angle of Progression (AOP) before the Onset of Labor by Transperineal Ultrasound in Nulliparous Women. Curr Women s Heal Rev. 2019 Nov 15;16(1):39–45. | |
dc.source | Carvalho Neto RH, Viana Junior AB, Moron AF, Júnior EA, Carvalho FHC, Feitosa HN. Pubic Arch Angle Measurement by Transperineal Ultrasonography: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study. Rev Bras Ginecol e Obstet. 2020 Apr 1;42(4):181–7 | |
dc.source | Youssef A, Ghi T, Martelli F, Montaguti E, Salsi G, Bellussi F, et al. Subpubic Arch Angle and Mode of Delivery in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2016;40(2):150–5. | |
dc.source | Eggebø TM, Wilhelm-Benartzi C, Hassan WA, Usman S, Salvesen KA, Lees CC. A model to predict vaginal delivery in nulliparous women based on maternal characteristics and intrapartum ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep 1;213(3):362.e1-362.e6. | |
dc.source | Kamel R, Negm S, Montaguti E, Dodaro MG, Brunelli E, Di Donna G, et al. Reliability of transperineal ultrasound for the assessment of the angle of progression in labor using parasagittal approach versus midsagittal approach. J Matern Neonatal Med. 2019; | |
dc.source | Malvasi A, Raimondo P, Beck R, Tinelli A, Kuczkowski KM. Intrapartum ultrasound monitoring of malposition and malrotation during labor neuraxial analgesia: maternal outcomes. J Matern Neonatal Med [Internet]. 2019;1–7. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0- 85071767929&doi=10.1080%2F14767058.2019.1579193&partnerID=40&md 5=8c2d8c4cf0e16bef5ea710b07a59132f | |
dc.source | Maged AM, Soliman EM, Abdellatif AA, Nabil M, Said OI, Mohesen MN, et al. Measurement of the fetal occiput-spine angle during the first stage of labor as predictor of the progress and outcome of labor. J Matern neonatal Med Off J Eur Assoc Perinat Med Fed Asia Ocean Perinat Soc Int Soc Perinat Obstet. 2019 Jul;32(14):2332–7. | |
dc.source | Kanjanasignh T, Luangdansakul W. Head perineal distance and angle of progression to predict caesarean delivery due to labor dystocia in term pregnancy with active phase of labor. J Med Assoc Thail. 2018;101(9):1157– 62. | |
dc.source | Masturzo B, Piazzese A, Paracchini S, Quezada MS, Todros T, Farina A. Time remaining in labor and probability of vaginal delivery as a function of the angle of progression in a low risk population with a normal first stage of labor. In- house observational study and comparison with the data in the literature. Minerva Ginecol. 2018 Feb;70(1):35–43. | |
dc.source | Gillor M, Vaisbuch E, Zaks S, Barak O, Hagay Z, Levy R. Transperineal sonographic assessment of angle of progression as a predictor of successful vaginal delivery following induction of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Feb 1;49(2):240–5. | |
dc.source | Ghi T, Bellussi F, Azzarone C, Krsmanovic J, Franchi L, Youssef A, et al. The “occiput-spine angle”: A new sonographic index of fetal head deflexion during the first stage of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2016;215(1):84.e1- 84.e7. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0- 84962297816&doi=10.1016%2Fj.ajog.2016.02.020&partnerID=40&md5=4a1 7be4d5bb7885f5eefb3119cc8fabd | |
dc.source | Ciaciura-Jarno M, Cnota W, Wójtowicz D, Niesłuchowska-Hoxha A, Ruci A, Kierach R, et al. Evaluation of selected ultrasonography parameters in the second stage of labor in prediction mode of delivery. Ginekol Pol. 2016;87(6):448–53. | |
dc.source | Hadad S, Oberman M, Ben-Arie A, Sacagiu M, Vaisbuch E, Levy R. Intrapartum ultrasound at the initiation of the active second stage of labor predicts spontaneous vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 Jan 1;3(1):100249. | |
dc.source | 25. Malik R, Singh S. Measurement of Angle of Descent (AOD) by Transperineal Ultrasound in Labour to Predict Successful Vaginal Delivery. J Obstet Gynecol India [Internet]. 2020;70(2):126–32. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0- 85077251564&doi=10.1007%2Fs13224-019-01300- 9&partnerID=40&md5=141b47e82353b568305f7b3a5dbc640d | |
dc.source | Solaiman SA, Atwa KA, Gad AA, al-Shatouri M. Transperineal ultrasound of fetal head progression in prolonged labor: women’s acceptance and ability to predict the mode of delivery. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2020;51(1). | |
dc.source | instname:Universidad del Rosario | |
dc.source | reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR | |
dc.subject | Ecografía obstétrica como herramienta predictiva en las complicaciones del parto | |
dc.subject | Análisis de la efectividad de la ecografía obstétrica intraparto para definir la vía de parto | |
dc.subject | Uso de imágenes diagnosticas para prevenir complicaciones durante el parto | |
dc.subject | Ultrasonido transperineal en el diagnostico de la mejor vía de parto | |
dc.title | Ecografía durante la primera y segunda fase del trabajo de parto como predictor preciso de la vía del parto: una revisión sistemática de la literatura | |
dc.type | bachelorThesis | |