Manual de Medidas Cautelares en el Arbitraje Comercial Internacional con Sede en Colombia

dc.contributorAljure Salame, Antonio
dc.creatorSalazar de Greiff, Valentina
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-26T13:15:42Z
dc.date.available2020-10-26T13:15:42Z
dc.date.created2020-10-26T13:15:42Z
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_30450
dc.identifierhttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/30450
dc.description.abstractThis work is a handbook for understanding precautionary measures and their analysis in the Colombian system in relation to international commercial arbitration. Its importance lies in the fact that currently in Colombia there is not much investigation and investigation regarding precautionary measures in international commercial arbitration based in Colombia, which is why it is intended that the reader has a greater understanding of how they are developed in Law 1563 of 2012 and how they should be developed, taking into account that in other jurisdictions this concept has been widely expressed and analyzed.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosario
dc.publisherFacultad de Jurisprudencia
dc.publisherJurisprudencia
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAbierto (Texto Completo)
dc.rightsEL AUTOR, manifiesta que la obra objeto de la presente autorización es original y la realizó sin violar o usurpar derechos de autor de terceros, por lo tanto la obra es de exclusiva autoría y tiene la titularidad sobre la misma. PARGRAFO: En caso de presentarse cualquier reclamación o acción por parte de un tercero en cuanto a los derechos de autor sobre la obra en cuestión, EL AUTOR, asumirá toda la responsabilidad, y saldrá en defensa de los derechos aquí autorizados; para todos los efectos la universidad actúa como un tercero de buena fe. EL AUTOR, autoriza a LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO, para que en los términos establecidos en la Ley 23 de 1982, Ley 44 de 1993, Decisión andina 351 de 1993, Decreto 460 de 1995 y demás normas generales sobre la materia, utilice y use la obra objeto de la presente autorización. -------------------------------------- POLITICA DE TRATAMIENTO DE DATOS PERSONALES. Declaro que autorizo previa y de forma informada el tratamiento de mis datos personales por parte de LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO para fines académicos y en aplicación de convenios con terceros o servicios conexos con actividades propias de la academia, con estricto cumplimiento de los principios de ley. Para el correcto ejercicio de mi derecho de habeas data cuento con la cuenta de correo habeasdata@urosario.edu.co, donde previa identificación podré solicitar la consulta, corrección y supresión de mis datos.
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.sourceAmerican Arbitration Association. “Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures,” 2013. www.adr.org.
dc.sourceBerger, Klaus Peter. “Part III, 21st Scenario: Interim Measures of Protection.” In Private Dispute Resolution in International Business: Negotiation, Mediation, Arbitration, 3rd editio., 439–58. Kluwer Law International, 2015.
dc.sourceBinder, Peter. “Article 1: Scope of Application of Application.” In International Commercial Arbitration and Mediation in UNCITRAL Model Law Jurisdictions, edited by Peter Binder, 30–48. Kluwer Law International, 2019. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845276564-1184.
dc.source“Article 17C ( 2006 Version): Specific Regime for Preliminary Orders.” In International Commercial Arbitration and Mediation in UNCITRAL Model Law Jurisdictions, 4th editio., 301–4. Kluwer Law International, 2019.
dc.source“Article 2 : Interpretation.” Kluwer Law International, no. 4 (2018): 569–72. Born, Gary B. “Chapter 11: Provisional Measures in International Arbitration.” In International Arbitration: Law and Practice, Second Edi., 209–26. Kluwer Law International, 2015.
dc.sourceInternational Commercial Arbitration. Second Edi. Kluwer Law International;, 2014. Broches, Aron. Commentary on the UNCITRAL Model Law (1990). Lise Bosma. Vol. 11. ICCA & Kluwer Law International, 2019.
dc.sourceCalvo Caravaca, Alfonso-Luis. “Medidas Cautelares y Arbitraje Privado Internacional.” Foro de Derecho Mercantil, no. 6 (2005): 1–20. http://legal.legis.com.co/document/Index?obra=rmercantil&document=rmercantil_7680752a7fb9404ce0430a010151404c.
dc.sourceCárdenas Mejía, Juan Pablo. “Módulo Arbitraje Nacional e Internacional.” Bogotá: Confederación de Cámaras de Comercio, 2019.
dc.sourceEbb, Lawrence F. “Flight of Assets from the Jurisdiction ‘In the Twinkling of a Telex’: Pre- and Post-Award Conservatory Relief in International Commercial Arbitrations.” Journal of International Arbitration 7, no. 1 (1990): 9–36.
dc.source“Explanatory Note By The UNCITRAL Secretariat On The Model Law On International Commercial Arbitration.” United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, n.d. http://www.sice.oas.org/Dispute/Comarb/Uncitral/Icomarbe3.Asp.
dc.sourceGaillard., Emmanuel, and Diego P. Fernández. Cuestiones Claves Del Arbitraje Internacional. Primera Ed. Bogotá: Universidad del Rosario, 2013.
dc.sourceGaillard, Emmanuel. “Chapter 10: Reflections on the Use of Anti-Suit Injunctions in International Arbitration.” In Pervasive Problems in International Arbitration, edited by Loukas A. Mistelis and Julian David Mathew Lew, 201–13. Kluwer Law International, 2006.
dc.sourceGary B. Born. “Chapter 17: Provisional Relief in International Arbitration.” In International Commercial Arbitration, Second Edi., 2424–2563. Kluwer Law International, 2014.
dc.sourceGaviria Gil, Juan Antonio. “Comentarios Sobre Las Nuevas Normas Colombianas En Materia de Arbitraje Internacional.” Revista de Derecho Privado 0, no. 24 (2013): 259–81.
dc.sourceGinkel, Eric. van. “The UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Conciliation.” Journal of International Arbitration 21, no. 1 (2004): 1–65.
dc.sourceGraham, Luis Enrique. “Interim Measures: Ongoing Regulation and Practices (A View from the UNCITRAL Arbitration Regime).” In 50 Years of the New York Convention: ICCA International Arbitration Conference (Van Den Berg (Ed.); Jan 2009), Albert Jan., 539–69. Kluwer Law International, 2009.
dc.sourceHoltzmann, Howard M., and Joseph Neuhaus. “A Guide to the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration: Legislative History and Commentary.” Kluwer Law International, 2015, 1159–1237.
dc.sourceHoltzmann, Howard M., and Joseph E. Neuhaus. “UNCITRAL Model Law, Chapter IV.A (Articles 17 – 17J) – as Amended. Interim Measures and Preliminary Orders.” In A Guide to the 2006 Amendments to the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration: Legislative History and Commentary, 159–586. Kluwer Law International, 2015.
dc.sourceHoltzmann, Howard M., Joseph E. Neuhaus, Edda Kristjansdottir, and Thomas Walsh. A Guide To The 2006 Amendments To The UNCITRAL Model Law On International Commercial Arbitration: Legislative History and Commentary. Kluwer Law International, 2015.
dc.sourceInternational Chamber of Commerce. “ICC Rules of Arbitration,” 2017.
dc.source“Pre-Arbitral Referee Rules,” 1990.
dc.sourceMathew Lew, Julian David. “Control of Jurisdiction by Injunctions Issued by National Courts.” In International Arbitration 2006: Back to Basics, Albert Jan., 185–220, 2007.
dc.sourceMathew Lew, Julian David, and Loukas A. Mistelis. “Interim and Conservatory Measures.” In Comparative International Commercial Arbitration, 585–625. Kluwer Law International, 2003.
dc.sourceMcNerney, Mary, and Carlos Esplugues. “International Commercial Arbitration: The UNCITRAL Model Law.” Boston College International and Comparative Law Review 9, no. 1 (1986): 47–71.
dc.sourceMoses, Margaret. “Public Policy: National, International and Transnational.” Kluwer Arbitration Blog 3 (2018): 1–11.
dc.sourceOviedo Albán, Jorge. “El Carácter Internacional y La Interpretación Uniforme de La Convención de Naciones Unidas Sobre Compraventa Internacional de Mercadería.” Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas, Boletín Mexicano de Derecho Comparado 133 (2012): 253–82.
dc.sourcePaulsson, Jan, and Georgios Petrochilos. “UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, Section III, Article 26 Interim Measures.” In UNCITRAL Arbitration, 215–33. Kluwer Law International, 2017.
dc.sourcePerales Viscasillas, Pilar. “Novedades Legislativas En El Arbitraje Comercial Internacional : Ley Modelo de La Uncitral y Convenio de Nueva York.” Revista de Arbitraje Comercial y de Inversiones 1, no. 2 (2008): 363–401.
dc.source“Reforma Sobre Medidas Cautelares En La ‘Ley Modelo De Arbitraje’ De La CNUDMI.” Revista Foro Derecho Mercantil 2, no. 3 (2007): 1–14.
dc.sourcePérez Solano, Jimmy Antonio. “El Concepto y La Naturaleza Del Arbitraje Comercial En El Ordenamiento Jurídico Colombiano.” Justicia 22, no. 32 (2017): 259–82. https://doi.org/10.17081/just.22.32.2917.
dc.sourcePolanco Donado, Nathalia Ahydee. “Análisis Del Sistema Arbitral Dualista Acogido En Colombia: ¿Es Posible Una Legislación Monista En Nuestro País?” Universidad Externado de Colombia 53, no. 9 (2019): 107. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
dc.sourcePombo, Fernando. Arbitration and Anti Suit Injunctions in the Case Law of the European Court of Justice. Edited by Miguel Angel Fernandez-Ballester and David Arias Lozano. Liber Amic. La Ley, 2010.
dc.source“Provisional Measures in International Arbitrational Law.” Law Explorer, 2012.
dc.sourcePulido Riveros, Juan C. “Secuelas de La Armonización En El Derecho Privado.” Nueva Época, no. 49 (2018): 37–82. https://doi.org/10.18041/0124-0013/nueva_epoca.49.2017.3632.
dc.sourceRaeschke-Kessler, Hilmar. OLG Nürnberg, 12 U 2881/04 (2004).
dc.sourceRenée Bucy, Dana. “How To Best Protect Party Rights: The Future Of Interim Relief In International Commercial Arbitration Under The Amended Uncitral Model Law.” American University International Law Review, 2010.
dc.sourceReyes-Sinisterra, Cindy Charlotte. “Las Medidas Cautelares Anticipatorias e Innominadas En El Proceso Arbitral En Colombia.” Vniversitas, no. 132 (2016): 390–421. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.vj132.mcai.
dc.sourceRivas Ramirez, Daniel. “El Vicio Surrealista Del Monismo y El Dualismo Ante La Metamorfosis Del Derecho Internacional Público.” Research Gate, n.d.
dc.sourceRodríguez Mejía, Marcela. “Ejecución de La Decisión Cautelar.” In Medidas Cautelares En El Proceso Arbitral, 345–433. Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia, 2013. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.uec.279.
dc.source“Una Aproximación Al Régimen Del Arbitraje Nacional Del Nuevo Estatuto Del Arbitraje En Colombia, Ley 1563 de 2012.” Revista de Derecho Privado. Bogotá, 2012.
dc.sourceSabogal Campoverde, Hector Camilo. “El Arbitraje Internacional En Colombia: Ventajas y Desventajas Con La Vigencia de La Ley 1563 de 2012.” Universidad Libre de Colombia, 2017, 1–19.
dc.sourceSánchez Lorenzo, Sixto. “El Principio de Mínima Intervención Judicial En El Arbitraje Comercial Internacional.” Arbitraje. Revista de Arbitraje Comercial y de Inversiones IX, no. 1 (2016): 13–44.
dc.sourceSimson, Caroline. “Revived $100M Award Boosts NY’s Pro-Arbitration Reputation.” Law 360. October 5, 2018. https://www.law360.com/articles/1089914/revived-100m-award-boosts-ny-s-pro-arbitration-reputation.
dc.sourceUNCITRAL. “A Guide to UNCITRAL: Basic Facts about the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law,” 2013, 1–66.
dc.source“Explanatory Note by the UNCITRAL Secretariat on the 1985 Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration as Amended in 20061” 4, no. 87 (2007): 14. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
dc.sourceVeeder, V V. The Need for Cross-Border Enforcement of Interim Measures Ordered by a State Court In Support of the International Arbitral Process. New Horizons in International Commercial Arbitration and Beyond. Albert Jan. Vol. 12. Kluwer Law International, 2005.
dc.sourceYesilirmak, Ali. “Chapter 5 ‐ Arbitral Provisional Measures.” In Provisional Measures in International Commercial Arbitration, 12:159–236. International Arbitration Law Library, 2005. http://www.kluwerarbitration.com/book-toc.aspx?book=TOC_Yesilirmak_2005_V01.
dc.sourceJuan Felipe Roldán Pardo, “El Estado Del Arte Del Concepto de Orden Público Internacional En El Ámbito Del Derecho Internacional Privado y El Arbitraje Internacional,” Revista de Derecho Privado No. 44, 2010, 1–30.
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.sourcereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
dc.subjectLey 1563 de 2012
dc.subjectMedidas cautelares
dc.subjectArbitraje Comercial Internacional
dc.subjectLey Modelo
dc.subjectUNCITRAL
dc.subjectÁrbitro
dc.subjectAutoridad Judicial
dc.subjectSede
dc.titleManual de Medidas Cautelares en el Arbitraje Comercial Internacional con Sede en Colombia
dc.typebachelorThesis


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución