dc.creatorPaz M.C.
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-26T00:08:45Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-22T13:45:49Z
dc.date.available2020-05-26T00:08:45Z
dc.date.available2022-09-22T13:45:49Z
dc.date.created2020-05-26T00:08:45Z
dc.identifier163813
dc.identifierhttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24110
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3432217
dc.description.abstractThis paper reviews the three approaches adopted by the Colombian Constitutional Court to justify the protection of the right to health, and questions whether other rights that are not constitutionally defined, i.e. the right to a precise diagnosis, the right to access medical records, and the right to informed consent, also belong to the right to health or if they are distinctly different rights with a defined constitutional character.
dc.languagespa
dc.relationGaceta Medica de Mexico, ISSN:163813, Vol.148, No.4 (2012); pp. 406-410
dc.relationhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84867784872&partnerID=40&md5=c47ba07b8179795b175a318615854995
dc.relation410
dc.relationNo. 4
dc.relation406
dc.relationGaceta Medica de Mexico
dc.relationVol. 148
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAbierto (Texto Completo)
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.sourcereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
dc.titleUnnamed fundamental rights as part of the guarantees of the right to health. the colombian case
dc.typearticle


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución