Metodología para la evaluación de herramientas de software para la e-Participación

dc.contributorSánchez Torres, Jenny Marcela
dc.contributorGriego (Grupo Investigación en Gestión y Organizaciones)
dc.creatorMuñoz Bernal, César Alejandro
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-04T19:57:31Z
dc.date.available2022-02-04T19:57:31Z
dc.date.created2022-02-04T19:57:31Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/80879
dc.identifierUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifierRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/
dc.description.abstractEsta tesis de maestría presenta la investigación realizada para la obtención de la Metodología para la Evaluación de Software para la e-Participación – MESeP, diseñada para ser aplicable a cualquier herramienta de software para la e-Participación, siempre y cuando se tenga acceso a la información. Este trabajo surge como respuesta a varias inquietudes, tales como: la falta de rigurosidad en la definición de las etapas de evaluación para las herramientas software para e-participación, la carencia de una identificación precisa de las funcionalidades de los sistemas de información para la participación ciudadana y, la ausencia de metodologías de evaluación de herramientas de software para la participación electrónica, lo que llevó a dos preguntas orientadoras que a su vez se tradujeron en dos revisiones sistemáticas de literatura -RSL. En la primera RSL se identificaron características y factores asociados a las herramientas de software para la e-Participación, y en la segunda, a la identificación de variables e indicadores. A partir de lo anterior, se realizó la asociación de los factores con las variables identificadas y luego de las variables con los indicadores. Se realizó la primera versión de la metodología la cual fue sometida a un juicio de expertos. Luego del juicio de expertos se realizó un proceso de refinamiento, lo que dio como resultado la versión final de la MESeP que cuenta con cuatro fases y ocho actividades, de igual forma se presentan los nueve factores, 23 variables y 64 indicadores identificados. (Texto tomado de la fuente).
dc.description.abstractThis master thesis presents the research conducted to obtain the Methodology for the Evaluation of e-Participation Software - MESeP, designed to apply to any e-Participation software tool if access to information is available. This research emerges as a response to some lacks identified. On the one hand, there is a lack of rigorousness in the definition of evaluation stages for e-participation software tools. Another is a lack of precise identification of information systems functionalities for citizen participation. On the other hand, there are no methodologies for evaluating e-participation software tools, leading to two guiding questions translated into two systematic literature reviews SLR. The first SLR identified characteristics and factors associated with e-Participation software tools. The second one identified variables and indicators. Then, the factors were associated with the determined variables and the indicators. An expert judgment analyzed the first version of the methodology. After the expert judgment, a refinement process was carried out, resulting in the final version of the MESeP, which has four phases and eight activities and the nine factors, 23 variables, and 64 indicators identified.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.publisherBogotá - Ingeniería - Maestría en Ingeniería - Ingeniería de Sistemas y Computación
dc.publisherDepartamento de Ingeniería de Sistemas e Industrial
dc.publisherFacultad de Ingeniería
dc.publisherBogotá, Colombia
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
dc.relation(AECID)., F. E.-P. y de la A. E. para la C. I. y el D. (2014). Ciudadanía Política Voz Y Participación Ciudadana En América Latina (Issue Ciudadanía política: Voz y participación ciudadana en América).
dc.relationAbu-Shanab, E. A. (2017). E-government familiarity influence on Jordanians’ perceptions. Telematics and Informatics, 34(1), 103–113.
dc.relationAham-Anyanwu, N., & Honglei, L. (2017). E-PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT: FORMULATING A CITIZENCONTENT ENGAGEMENT MODEL. Proceedings of the 25th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2017, 753–770.
dc.relationAichholzer, G., & Strauß, S. (2016). Electronic participation in Europe. In Electronic Democracy in Europe: Prospects and Challenges of E-Publics, E-Participation and E-Voting.
dc.relationAl-Sai, Z. A., & Abualigah, L. M. (2017). Big data and E-government: A review. ICIT 2017 - 8th International Conference on Information Technology, Proceedings, 580–587.
dc.relationAl Athmay, A. A. A. R. A. (2015). Demographic factors as determinants of e-governance adoption: A field study in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 9(2), 159–180.
dc.relationAl Nagi, E., & Hamdan, M. (2009). Computerization and e-Government implementation in Jordan: Challenges, obstacles and successes. Government Information Quarterly, 26(4), 577–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2009.04.003
dc.relationAlarcón Aldana, A., González Sanabria, J., & Rodríguez Torres, S. (2011). Guía para pymes desarrolladoras de software, basada en la norma ISO/IEC 15504. Revista Virtual Universidad Católica Del Norte, 1(34), 285-313–313.
dc.relationAlharbi, A. (2016). An Investigation of the Impact Factors to Increase Citizens’ Engagement in E-participation on E-government in Saudi Arabia.
dc.relationAlharbi, A., & Kang, K. (2014a). E-participation service in Saudi Arabian e-Government websites: The influencing factors from citizens’ perspective. Proceedings of the European Conference on E-Government, ECEG, 2014-Janua, 265–272.
dc.relationAlharbi, A., & Kang, K. (2014b). E-participation service in Saudi Arabian e-Government websites: The influencing factors from citizens’ perspective. Proceedings of the European Conference on E-Government, ECEG, 2014-Janua, 265–272.
dc.relationAlharbi, A., & Kang, K. (2015). Key aspects of citizen engagement in E-participation on E-government websites. Proceedings of the 26th International Business Information Management Association Conference - Innovation Management and Sustainable Economic Competitive Advantage: From Regional Development to Global Growth, IBIMA 2015, 1684–1692.
dc.relationAlharbi, A., Kang, K., & Hawryszkiewycz, I. (2015). The influence of trust and subjective norms on citizens’ intentions to engage in E-participation on E-government websites. ACIS 2015 Proceedings - 26th Australasian Conference on Information Systems.
dc.relationAlharbi, A., Kang, K., & Sohaib, O. (2016). Citizens engagement in e-participation on egovernemnt websites through SWAT model: A case of Saudi Arabia. PACIS 2016 Proceedings, May, 2019. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85011116104&partnerID=40&md5=a883334371af1c7e84da7d609d282ee5
dc.relationAli, H., Macaulay, L., & Zhao, L. (2009). A collaboration pattern language for e-participation: A strategy for reuse. Proceedings of the European Conference on E-Government, ECEG, 29–38.
dc.relationAlmuwil, A., Weerakkody, V., & El-Haddadeh, R. (2011). A conceptual study of the factors influencing e-inclusion. Proceedings of the European, Mediterranean and Middle Eastern Conference on Information Systems - Informing Responsible Management: Sustainability in Emerging Economies, EMCIS 2011, 2011(2008), 198–209.
dc.relationAlshehri, M., Drew, S., Alhussain, T., & Alghamdi, R. (2012). The effects of website quality on adoption of E-Government service: An empirical study applying UTAUT model using SEM. ACIS 2012 : Proceedings of the 23rd Australasian Conference on Information Systems, November.
dc.relationAmaya-Rodríguez, J. E., Gonzalez-Sanabria, J. S., & Castro-Romero, A. (2017). Urna de cristal como canal digital de participación ciudadana en Colombia -Glass urn as digital channel for citizen participation in Colombia. Revista Científica, 4(27), 407. https://doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.RC.2016.27.a10
dc.relationAPEP. (2015). La privacidad en el desarrollo de software: obligación y oportunidad. | LOPD y Seguridad.
dc.relationAraújo, R. P. A., Penteado, C. L. C., & dos Santos, M. B. P. (2015). Digital democracy and experiences in e-participation: Internet activism and public policy | Democracia digital e experiências de e-participação: Webativismo e políticas públicas. Historia, Ciencias, Saude - Manguinhos, 22, 1597–1619. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-59702015000500004
dc.relationAs-Saber, S. N., Srivastava, A., & Hossain, K. (2006). Information Technology Law and E-government : A Developing Country Perspective. 1(1), 84–101.
dc.relationÅström, J., Karlsson, M., Linde, J., & Pirannejad, A. (2012). Understanding the rise of e-participation in non-democracies: Domestic and international factors. Government Information Quarterly, 29(2), 142–150.
dc.relationBagui, L., & Bytheway, A. (2012). Listening to the ground: Key indicators of e-participation in government for Africa. In Handbook of Research on E-Government in Emerging Economies: Adoption, E-Participation, and Legal Frameworks.
dc.relationBanjac, M. (2017). Slovenian e-government: A citizencentred perspective. Journal of Comparative Politics, 10(2), 37–54.
dc.relationBannister, F. (2005). E-government and administrative power: the one-stop-shop meets the turf war. Electronic Government, 2(2), 160–176. https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2005.007092
dc.relationBarcellini, F., Détienne, F., & Burkhardt, J.-M. (2009). Participation in online interaction spaces: Design-use mediation in an Open Source Software community. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39(3), 533–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2008.10.013
dc.relationBataineh, L., & Abu-Shanab, E. (2016). How perceptions of E-participation levels influence the intention to use E-government websites. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 10(2), 315–334. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-12-2015-0058
dc.relationBehl, A., Sheorey, P., Nayak, S., & Kumar, V. V. A. (2017). Role of information and communications technology (ICT) in participatory democracy: A forerunner to an egalitarian society. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Part F1280, 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1145/3047273.3047375
dc.relationBenyoucef, M., & Verrons, M.-H. (2008). Configurable e-negotiation systems for large scale and transparent decision making. Group Decision and Negotiation, 17(3), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-007-9073-y
dc.relationBertot, J. C., McDermott, P., & Smith, T. (2012). Measurement of Open Government: Metrics and Process. 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2491–2499. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2012.658
dc.relationBID. (2016). ¿Por qué el gobierno abierto es importante para las ciudades?
dc.relationBojovic, D., Bonzanigo, L., & Giupponi, C. (2012). Drivers of change in southern European agriculture: Online participatory approaches for the analysis of planned and autonomous adaptation strategies. IEMSs 2012 - Managing Resources of a Limited Planet: Proceedings of the 6th Biennial Meeting of the International Environmental Modelling and Software Society, 684–691.
dc.relationBojovic, D., Bonzanigo, L., Giupponi, C., & Maziotis, A. (2015). Online participation in climate change adaptation: A case study of agricultural adaptation measures in Northern Italy. Journal of Environmental Management, 157, 8–19.
dc.relationBojovic, D., Giupponi, C., Klug, H., Morper-Busch, L., Cojocaru, G., & Schörghofer, R. (2018). An online platform supporting the analysis of water adaptation measures in the Alps. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 61(2), 214–229.
dc.relationBolgov, R., & Karachay, V. (2016). E-participation projects development in the e-governance institutional structure of the eUrasian Economic Union’s countries: Comparative overview. In Communications in Computer and Information Science (Vol. 674). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49700-6_20
dc.relationBonsón, E., Royo, S., & Ratkai, M. (2015). Citizens’ engagement on local governments’ facebook sites. an empirical analysis: The impact of different media and content types in western europe. Government Information Quarterly, 32(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.11.001
dc.relationBouchard, G., Clinchant, S., & Convertino, G. (2014). E-participation with stakeholders’ feedback platforms. In Handbook of Research on Advanced ICT Integration for Governance and Policy Modeling. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6236-0.ch010
dc.relationBoudjelida, A., & Mellouli, S. (2018). A practical framework for electronic citizens participation using a multidimensional analysis approach. 14(3), 287–311.
dc.relationBoudjelida, A., & Mellouli, S. (2016). A multidimensional analysis approach for electronic citizens participation. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 08-10-June, 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1145/2912160.2912195
dc.relationBoudjelida, A., Mellouli, S., & Lee, J. (2016). Electronic citizens participation: Systematic review. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 01-03-Marc, 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1145/2910019.2910097
dc.relationBraccini, A. M., Federici, T., & Sæbø, Ø. (2017). Tensions in online communities: The case of a mass size eparticipation initiative. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 10429 LNCS, 149–160.
dc.relationBraccini, A. M., Za, S., & Sæbø, Ø. (2018). A collaborative discourse or only a collection of voices? An exploratory study of the use of social media in the e-participation domain. 26th European Conference on Information Systems: Beyond Digitization - Facets of Socio-Technical Change, ECIS 2018.
dc.relationBurkhardt, D., Nazemi, K., & Ginters, E. (2015). Best-Practice Piloting Based on an Integrated Social Media Analysis and Visualization for E-Participation Simulation in Cities. Procedia Computer Science, 75, 66–74.
dc.relationBurkhardt, D., Nazemi, K., Klamm, C., Kohlhammer, J., & Kuijper, A. (2014). Comparison of E-Participation roadmap in industrial and developing countries based on Germany and Kenya. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 2014-Janua, 399–402. https://doi.org/10.1145/2691195.2691209
dc.relationCai, G., Sun, F., & Kropczynski, J. (2017). Crystallizing local political knowledge for informed public participation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 10429 LNCS, 53–64.
dc.relationCalderón, C., & Lorenzo, S. (2010). Open Government. http://libros.metabiblioteca.org:8080/bitstream/001/163/8/978-84-937218-5-5.pdf
dc.relationCallejas-Cuervo, M., Alarcón-Aldana, A. C., & Álvarez-Carreño, A. M. (2017). Modelos de calidad del software, un estado del arte. ENTRAMADO, 13(1), 236–250. https://doi.org/10.18041/entramado.2017v13n1.25125
dc.relationCallinan, C., Scott, M., Whelan, E., & Ojo, A. (2017). A co-creation based model for engaging citizen open data use. 30th Bled EConference: Digital Transformation - From Connecting Things to Transforming Our Lives, BLED 2017, 47–56. https://doi.org/10.18690/978-961-286-043-1.5
dc.relationCaric, A., Vukovic, M., & Jevtic, D. (2015). E-Consultation: Automatic system for online consultations. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Telecommunications, ConTEL 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/ConTEL.2015.7231215
dc.relationCastells, M., Martinez Gimeno, C., & Alborés, J. (2000). LA SOCIEDAD RED (S. A. Alianza Editorial (Ed.); Segunda Ed). United States byBlackwell Publishers Inc. http://www.felsemiotica.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/LA_SOCIEDAD_RED-Castells-copia.pdf
dc.relationCecez-Kecmanovic, D., Kennan, M. A., & Hull, D. (2010). Youth online participation in government decision making. Proc. of the IADIS Int. Conf. e-Commerce 2010, Proc. of the IADIS Int. Conf. e-Democracy, Equity and Social Justice 2010, Part of the MCCSIS 2010, 11–20.
dc.relationCEPAL. (2012). Plan de Gobierno abierto: Una hoja de ruta para los gobiernos de la región.
dc.relationChaieb, C., Achour, H., & Ferchichi, A. (2018). E-government and social media in tunisia: An empirical analysis. In Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing (Vol. 325). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97749-2_14
dc.relationCharalabidis, Y, & Loukis, E. (2011). Transforming government agencies’ approach to eparticipation through efficient exploitation of social media. 19th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2011.
dc.relationCharalabidis, Y, & Loukis, E. (2012). Participative public policy making through multiple social media platforms utilization. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 8(3), 78–97.
dc.relationCharalabidis, Y, & Loukis, E. (2015). Transforming government agencies’ approach to eParticipation through multiple social media exploitation. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, 5, 251–268.
dc.relationCharalabidis, Y, Loukis, E. N., Androutsopoulou, A., Karkaletsis, V., & Triantafillou, A. (2014). Passive crowdsourcing in government using social media. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 8(2), 283–308. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-09-2013-0035
dc.relationCharalabidis, Yannis, & Koussouris, S. (2012). Empowering Open and Collaborative Governance: Technologies and Methods for Online Citizen Engagement in Public Policy Making.
dc.relationChu, P.-Y., Tseng, H.-L., Lee, C.-P., Huang, W.-L., Huang, T.-Y., & Hung, Y.-T. (2017). A Longitudinal research of public value and electronic governance development in Taiwan. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Part F1280, 459–464. https://doi.org/10.1145/3047273.3047387
dc.relationChun, S. A., & Cho, J. S. (2012). E-participation and transparent policy decision making. Information Polity, 17(2), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-2012-0273
dc.relationCMMI Product Team. (2006). CMMI for Development , Version 1 . 2. Framework, August, 573.
dc.relationComisión Europea. (1998). La Información del Sector público: un recurso Clave para Europa. Libro verde sobre la información del sector público. COM (1998). http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/psi/docs/pdfs/green_paper/gp_es.pdf
dc.relationCommission of the European Communities. (2002). eEurope 2005 : Una sociedad de la información para todos. 2002, 21–22.
dc.relationCommission of the European Communities. (2003). The Role of eGovernment for Europe’s Future.
dc.relationCouncill, B., & Heineman, G. T. (2007). Definition of a Software Component and Its Elements. Open Distributed Systems, 5–19.
dc.relationCreswell, J. W. (2001). Educational Research - Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (Pearson (Ed.); 4th edition).
dc.relationDalcher, D. (2014). Software project management in a changing world. In Software Project Management in a Changing World (Vol. 9783642550). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55035-5_7
dc.relationDe Blasio, E., & Selva, D. (2016). Why Choose Open Government? Motivations for the Adoption of Open Government Policies in Four European Countries. Policy and Internet, 8(3), 225–247. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.118
dc.relationDe Cindio, F., De Marco, A., & Grew, P. (2007). Deliberative community networks for local governance. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 7(2), 108–121. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTPM.2007.014532
dc.relatione Jong, M. D. T., Neulen, S., & Jansma, S. R. (2019). Citizens’ intentions to participate in governmental co-creation initiatives: Comparing three co-creation configurations. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), 490–500
dc.relationDeloitte, Research, D., Touche, D. &, & Consulting, D. (2000). At the Dawn of E-Government: The Citizen as Customer. Deloitte Consulting.
dc.relationDIamantopoulou, V., Androutsopoulou, A., Gritzalis, S., & Charalabidis, Y. (2018). An assessment of privacy preservation in crowdsourcing approaches: Towards GDPR compliance. Proceedings - International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science, 2018-May, 1–9.
dc.relationDíaz Nafría, J. M., Alfonso Cendón, J., & Panizo Alonso, L. (2015). Building up eParticipatory decision-making from the local to the global scale. Study case at the European Higher Education Area. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 26–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.004
dc.relationDiaz Narvaez, Vi., & Calzadilla Nuñez, A. (2015). Artículos científicos, tipos de investigación y productividad científica en las Ciencias de la Salud. https://doi.org/10.12804/revsalud14.01.2016.10
dc.relationDini, A. A. (2017). The dark side of social media in eparticipation: A socio-legal perspective. AMCIS 2017 - America’s Conference on Information Systems: A Tradition of Innovation, 2017-Augus.
dc.relationDini, A. A., & Sæbø, O. (2016). The current state of social media research for eParticipation in developing countries: A literature review. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2016-March, 2698–2707.
dc.relationDini, A. A., Wahid, F., & Sæbo, Ø. (2016). Affordances and constraints of social media use in eparticipation: Perspectives from Indonesian politicians. Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, PACIS 2016 - Proceedings.
dc.relationEdelmann, N., Krimmer, R., & Parycek, P. (2017). How online lurking contributes value to E-participation: A conceptual approach to evaluating the role of lurkers in e-participation. 2017 4th International Conference on EDemocracy and EGovernment, ICEDEG 2017, 86–93.
dc.relationEdelmann, N., Parycek, P., & Schossbölck, J. (2011). The unibrennt movement: A successful case of mobilising lurkers in a public sphere. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 4(1–2), 43–68.
dc.relationElseiver. (2018). Elseiver.
dc.relationErgazakis, K., Askounis, D., Kokkinakos, P., & Tsitsanis, A. (2012). An Integrated Methodology for the Evaluation of ePetitions. In Yannis Charalabidis & S. Koussouris (Eds.), Empowering Open and Collaborative Governance: Technologies and Methods for Online Citizen Engagement in Public Policy Making (pp. 39–59). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27219-6_3
dc.relationEscobar-Pérez, J., & Cuervo-Martínez, Á. (2008). Validez de Contenido y Juicio de Expertos: Una Aproximacón a su Utilización. Avances En Medición. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861(78)90049-6
dc.relationFalco, E. (2016). The use of open source softwares in the process of planning participation | L’uso di software open source nel processo di pianificazione partecipata. Territorio, 78, 159–165.
dc.relationFath-allah, A., Cheikhi, L., Al-qutaish, R. E., & Idri, A. (2014). E-Government Maturity Models: A Comparative Study. March. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijsea.2014.5306
dc.relationFederici, T., Braccini, A. M., & Sæbø, Ø. (2015). “Gentlemen, all aboard!” ICT and party politics: Reflections from a Mass-eParticipation experience. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 287–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.04.009
dc.relationFedotova, O., Teixeira, L., & Alvelos, H. (2012). E-participation in Portugal: evaluation of government electronic platforms. Procedia Technology, 5, 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2012.09.017
dc.relationFuchs, C., Bernhaupt, R., Hartwig, C., Kramer, M. A., & Maier-Rabler, U. (2006). Broadening eParticipation: Rethinking ICTs and Participation. Association of Internet Researchers(AoIR), 2, 38.
dc.relationFugini, M., Maggiolini, P., & Valles, R. S. (2013). e-Government typologies, stakeholder relationships and information systems support: The case of services to employment. Proceedings of the European Conference on E-Government, ECEG, 187–195.
dc.relationGalbraith, B., Cleland, B., Martin, S., Wallace, J., Mulvenna, M., & McAdam, R. (2013). Engaging user communities with eParticipation technology: Findings from a European project. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 25(3), 281–294.
dc.relationGarcía, E. C. (2013). Fostering e-participation in Colombia. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 170–173. https://doi.org/10.1145/2591888.2591916
dc.relationGibson, R., & Cantijoch, M. (2013). Conceptualizing and measuring participation in the age of the internet: Is online political engagement really different to offline? Journal of Politics, 75(3), 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381613000431
dc.relationGil-García, J. R., Criado, J. I., & Carlos Téllez, J. (2017). Tecnologías de Información y Comunicación en la Administración Pública: Conceptos, Enfoques, Aplicaciones y Resultados. www.infotec.mx
dc.relationGobierno Vasco. (2017). Irekia Eusko Jaurlaritza - Gobierno Vasco. https://www.irekia.euskadi.eus
dc.relationGoldkuhl, G., & Röstlinger, A. (2015). Inter-organisational e-government: From four levels of interoperability to seven dimensions of co-governance. The 12th Scandinavian Workshop on E-Government, 1–15. http://www.vits.org/publikationer/dokument/802.pdf
dc.relationGonzález-Zabala, M. P.; Galvis Lista, E. A.;Sánchez Torres, J. M. (2015). Identificación de factores que afectan el desarrollo de la inclusión digital * Identifying Factors that Affect the Development of Digital Inclusion Identification des facteurs qui affectent le développement de l ’ inclusion numérique. 175–191.
dc.relationonzález-Zabala; Galvis Lista;Sánchez Torres, J. (2015). Identificación de factores que afectan el desarrollo de la inclusión digital. 175–191.
dc.relationGrimmelikhuijsen, S. G., & Feeney, M. K. (2017). Developing and Testing an Integrative Framework for Open Government Adoption in Local Governments. Public Administration Review, 77(4), 579–590. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12689
dc.relationGuillamón, M.-D., Ríos, A.-M., Gesuele, B., & Metallo, C. (2016). Factors influencing social media use in local governments: The case of Italy and Spain. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), 460–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.06.005
dc.relationHa, H., & Jose, J. (2017). Public participation and environmental governance in Singapore. International Journal of Environment, Workplace and Employment, 4(3), 186–204.
dc.relationHansson, K., & Ekenberg, L. (2014). Deliberation and representation in participatory tools for the public sector. ECIS 2014 Proceedings - 22nd European Conference on Information Systems.
dc.relationHansson, K., Ludwig, T., & Aitamurto, T. (2019). Capitalizing Relationships: Modes of Participation in Crowdsourcing. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: CSCW: An International Journal, 28(5), 977–1000.
dc.relationHansson, K., Muller, M., Aitamurto, T., Light, A., Mazarakis, A., Gupta, N., & Ludwig, T. (2016). Toward a typology of participation in crowdwork. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW, 26-Februar, 515–521.
dc.relationHarahap, N., & Budi, I. (2016). The use of twitter for government agencies in Indonesia. Proceedings of the International Conferences on ICT, Society, and Human Beings 2016, Web Based Communities and Social Media 2016, Big Data Analytics, Data Mining and Computational Intelligence 2016 and Theory and Practice in Modern Computing 2016 - Part O, 73–80.
dc.relationHeumader, P., Edler, C., Miesenberger, K., & Wolkerstorfer, S. (2018). Requirements engineering for people with cognitive disabilities – Exploring new ways for peer-researchers and developers to cooperate. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 10896 LNCS, 439–445.
dc.relationHung, S. Y., Chang, C. M., & Yu, T. J. (2006). Determinants of user acceptance of the e-Government services: The case of online tax filing and payment system. Government Information Quarterly, 23(1), 97–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2005.11.005
dc.relationIBM. (2019). What is software development? | IBM.
dc.relationIslam, M. (2008). Towards a sustainable e-Participation implementation model. European Journal of EPractice, 5(10).
dc.relationISO/IEC. (2018). ISO - ISO/IEC 9126-1:2001 - Software engineering — Product quality — Part 1: Quality model.
dc.relationISO. (2019). ISO - International Organization for Standardization
dc.relationJamal, M. Al, & Shanab, E. A. (2016). The influence of open government on e-government website: the case of Jordan. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 8(2), 159. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2016.078131
dc.relationJanssen, M., Wimmer, M. A., & Deljoo, A. (2015). Policy practice and digital science: Integrating complex systems, social simulation and public administration in policy research. In Policy Practice and Digital Science: Integrating Complex Systems, Social Simulation and Public Administration in Policy Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12784-2
dc.relationJohann, T., & Maalej, W. (2015). Democratic mass participation of users in Requirements Engineering? 256–261. https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2015.7320433
dc.relationJohannessen, M. R., & Følstad, A. (2014). Political social media sites as public sphere: A case study of the norwegian labour party. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 34(1), 1067–1096.
dc.relationJohannessen, M. R., & Munkvold, B. E. (2012). Defining the social media IT artefact for eparticipation: An ensemble view. ECIS 2012 - Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Information Systems.
dc.relationJung, K. (2018). Mapping community diversity and e-participation in emergency management: Evidence from WebEOC in the city of San Francisco. International Journal of Emergency Management, 14(3), 275–290.
dc.relationJung, K., Park, S. J., Wu, W.-N., & Park, H. W. (2014). A webometric approach to policy analysis and management using exponential random graph models. Quality and Quantity, 49(2), 581–598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0010-2
dc.relationKapoor, K. K., Omar, A., & Sivarajah, U. (2017). Enabling multichannel participation through ICT adaptation. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 13(2), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.2017040104
dc.relationKarkin, N. (2014). Barriers for Sustainable e-Participation Process: The Case of Turkey. Public Administration and Information Technology, 3, 227–243.
dc.relationKassen, M. (2018). Open data and its intermediaries: a cross-country perspective on participatory movement among independent developers. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 16(3), 327–342.
dc.relationKhasawneh, R.T., Abu Shamaa, R. A., & Rabayah, W. A. (2014). E-participation: A way for creating public value. In Human Rights and the Impact of ICT in the Public Sphere: Participation, Democracy, and Political Autonomy. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6248-3.ch002
dc.relationKhasawneh, Rawan T, & Abu-Shanab, E. A. (2013). E-Government and Social Media Sites: The Role and Impact. World Journal of Computer Application and Technology, 1(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.13189/wjcat.2013.010103
dc.relationKitchenham, B., Pearl Brereton, O., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., & Linkman, S. (2009). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering – A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 51(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009
dc.relationKoussouris, S., Charalabidis, Y., & Askounis, D. (2011). A review of the European Union eParticipation action pilot projects. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 5(1), 8–19.
dc.relationKrishnan, S., Teo, T. S. H., & Lim, J. (2013). E-participation and E-government maturity: A global perspective. In IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology (Vol. 402). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38862-0_26
dc.relationKrishnan, S., Teo, T. S. H., & Lim, V. K. G. (2012). Contextual factors, e-participation, and E-Government development: Testing a multiple-mediation model. Proceedings - Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, PACIS 2012.
dc.relationLaosuwan, T., & Ritjareonwattu, S. (2012). An innovative approach to the development of spatial data infrastructures and Web 2.0 technologies. International Journal of Geoinformatics, 8(2), 53–61.
dc.relationLee, J., & Kim, S. (2014). Active citizen e-participation in local governance: Do individual social capital and e-participation management matter? Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2044–2053.
dc.relationLeitner, M., & Bonitz, A. (2016). Authentication in the context of e-participation: Current practice, challenges and recommendations. Proceedings - 2016 11th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security, ARES 2016, 480–485.
dc.relationLi, S., Hietajärvi, L., Palonen, T., Salmela-Aro, K., & Hakkarainen, K. (2017). Adolescents’ Social Networks: Exploring Different Patterns of Socio-Digital Participation. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(3), 255–274.
dc.relationLin, Y. (2018). A comparison of selected Western and Chinese smart governance: The application of ICT in governmental management, participation and collaboration. Telecommunications Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2018.07.003
dc.relationLoukis, E, Charalabidis, Y., & Diamantopoulou, V. (2012). Different digital moderated and nonmoderated mechanisms for public participation. Proceedings of the European, Mediterranean and Middle Eastern Conference on Information Systems, EMCIS 2012, 63–73.
dc.relationLoukis, Euripidis. (2014). Evaluating eparticipation projects and lessons learnt. In Empowering Open and Collaborative Governance: Technologies and Methods for Online Citizen Engagement in Public Policy Making (Vol. 9783642272, pp. 95–115). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27219-6_6
dc.relationLourenço, R. P. (2015). An analysis of open government portals: A perspective of transparency for accountability. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 323–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.05.006
dc.relationLuciano, E. M., Wiedenhöft, G. C., & Dos Santos, F. P. (2018). Promoting social participation through Digital Governance: Identifying barriers in the Brazilian public administration. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209281.3209376
dc.relationLuján-Mora, S., Navarrete, R., & Peñafiel, M. (2014). Egovernment and web accessibility in South America. 2014 1st International Conference on EDemocracy and EGovernment, ICEDEG 2014, 77–82.
dc.relationMaciel, C., Roque, L., & Garcia, A. C. B. (2018). Maturity in decision-making: A method to measure e-participation systems in virtual communities. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 14(4), 395–416.
dc.relationMacintosh, A. (2004). Characterizing e-participation in policy-making. Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 37(C), 1843–1852. https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2004.1265300
dc.relationMacintosh, A. (2006). Evaluating How Eparticipation Changes. Communication, 06(Macintosh 2004), 1–16.
dc.relationMacintosh, A., Coleman, S., & Schneeberger, A. (2009). eParticipation: The research gaps. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 5694 LNCS, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03781-8_1
dc.relationMacintosh, A., Gordon, T. F., & Renton, A. (2009). Providing argument support for E-participation. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 6(1), 43–59.
dc.relationMacintosh, A., & Whyte, A. (2008). Towards an evaluation framework for eParticipation. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 2(1), 16–30.
dc.relationMahou-Lago, X. M., & Varela-Álvarez, E. J. (2016). Innovation and Opportunities for Citizen Participation in Spanish Smart Cities. Public Administration and Information Technology, 11, 367–392.
dc.relationManolopoulos, C., Nakou, P., Panagiotaki, A., Sofotassios, D., Stamatiou, Y., & Spirakis, P. (2008). A step-wise refinement approach for enhancing e-Voting acceptance. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 351, 275–280.
dc.relationManolopoulos, C., Sofotassios, D., Spirakis, P., & Stamatiou, Y. C. (2013). A framework for protecting voters’ privacy in electronic voting procedures. Journal of Cases on Information Technology, 15(2), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.4018/jcit.2013040101
dc.relationMawela, T., & Ochara, N. M. (2013). Sustainability of E-participation through mobile technologies. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1145/2513456.2513475
dc.relationMedaglia, R. (2012). EParticipation research: Moving characterization forward (2006-2011). In Government Information Quarterly (Vol. 29, Issue 3, pp. 346–360). https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84862533883&doi=10.1016%2Fj.giq.2012.02.010&partnerID=40&md5=ddd876b3bee04bb1f3cbca875074ea0c
dc.relationMedaglia, Ronny, & Andersen, K. N. (2009). The Use of Facebook in National Election Campaigns: Politics as Usual? Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5694, X, 187 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03781-8
dc.relationMehdi, M., Stasiewicz, A., Porwol, L., Lee, D., & Ojo, A. (2014). Synthesizing a criterion for SOA reference architecture to sustain eParticipation. In Communications in Computer and Information Science (Vol. 441). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11710-2_4
dc.relationMendeley. (2019). Mendeley.
dc.relationMenger, F., Morris, J., & Salis, C. (2016). Aphasia in an Internet age: wider perspectives on digital inclusion. Aphasiology, 30(2–3), 112–132.
dc.relationMerhi, M. I., & Koong, K. S. (2013). E-government effectiveness: Assessment of contributing governments’ ICT usage factors. International Journal of Business and Systems Research, 7(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBSR.2013.050615
dc.relationMetz, I., Blöchlinger, A., & Varveris, A. (2010). A prototype system for electronic data interchange among registrar’s offices of different states. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, 26 LNICST, 270–278.
dc.relationMinisterio de Secretaría General de la Presidencia - Chile. (2019). Guía Digital Chile.
dc.relationMINTIC. (2016). Guía para la Implementación de Seguridad de la Información en.
dc.relationMobini, P., & Hansson, H. (2015). E-participation in higher education: The importance of non-technical factors as identified in the EU-project MyUniversity. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 2015-Febru(February). https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2014.7043998
dc.relationMolina Montes, W. A. (2016). Medición de la inclusión digital a través de los servicios de gobierno electrónico en la población rural de Colombia. Caso: municipio de Valledupar.
dc.relationMora Agudo, leonor; Delgado, María; Rivero, J. (2017). A Proposal of Assessment for Local Government E-Participation. Reforma y Democracia, 2017-Febru(67), 69–94.
dc.relationMoreno Giraldo, C., & Ruiz Zambrano, D. (2016). Modelo de aplicación de la NTC-iSO/IEC 90003 al desarrollo de software de los sistemas de información geográfica. 4–5.
dc.relationMurdaca, A. M., Cuzzocrea, F., Oliva, P., & Larcan, R. (2014). Pedagogical-didactic training for an inclusive didactics: The precision teaching for strengthening of basic and integrating skills in intellectual disabilities. In Educational Technology Use and Design for Improved Learning Opportunities.
dc.relationMurray, T., Stephens, L., Woolf, B. P., Wing, L., Xu, X., & Shrikant, N. (2013). Supporting social deliberative skills online: The effects of reflective scaffolding tools. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 8029 LNCS, 313–322.
dc.relationNaranjo-Zolotov, M., Oliveira, T., & Casteleyn, S. (2019). Citizens’ intention to use and recommend e-participation: Drawing upon UTAUT and citizen empowerment. Information Technology and People, 32(2), 364–386.
dc.relationNaranjo-Zolotov, M., Oliveira, T., Casteleyn, S., & Irani, Z. (2019). Continuous usage of e-participation: The role of the sense of virtual community. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), 536–545.
dc.relationNasir, M. H. N., & Sahibuddin, S. (2011). Critical success factors for software projects: A comparative study. Scientific Research and Essays, 6(10), 2174–2186.
dc.relationNtaliani, M., Costopoulou, C., & Karetsos, S. (2017). Investigating the mobile side of e-participation. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 9(3–4), 210–228.
dc.relationO’Reilly, T. (2011). Government as a Platform. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 6(1), 13–40. https://doi.org/10.1162/INOV_a_00056
dc.relationOchara, N. M., Mawela, T., & Odhiambo, J. N. (2016). Citizen resistance to e-government adoption. Proceedings of the European Conference on E-Government, ECEG, 2016-Janua, 122–132.
dc.relationOECD. (2011). OECD Guide to Measuring the Information Society. In OECD Guide to Measuring the Information Society 2011. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264113541-en
dc.relationOECD. (2016). Recommendation of the Council on Water. OECD Legal Instruments, 17.
dc.relationOECD iLibrary. (2011). Choice Reviews Online, 48(07), 48-3639-48–3639. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.48-3639
dc.relationOlszowski, R. (2016). E-government 2.0: Web 2.0 in public administration. interdisciplinary postgraduate studies program. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics): Vol. 9934 LNCS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45982-0_6
dc.relationPaganelli, F., & Pecchi, F. (2013). Towards a reference model and a web-based framework for eParticipation services design. Information Resources Management Journal, 26(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.4018/irmj.2013040101
dc.relationPanopoulou, E., Tambouris, E., & Tarabanis, K. (2014). Success factors in designing eParticipation initiatives. Information and Organization, 24(4), 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2014.08.001
dc.relationParycek, P., Sachs, M., Sedy, F., & Schossböck, J. (2014). Evaluation of an E-participation project: Lessons learned and success factors from a cross-cultural perspective. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 8654).
dc.relationParycek, P., Sachs, M., Virkar, S., & Krimmer, R. (2017). Voting in E-participation: A set of requirements to support accountability and trust by electoral committees. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 10615 LNCS, 42–56.
dc.relationPerez Espes, C., Wimmer, M. A., & Moreno-Jimenez, J. M. (2014). A framework for evaluating the impact of e-participation experiences. Innovation and the Public Sector, 21, 20–29.
dc.relationPerez Perez, L. A. (2016). Metodolog�a para establecer la percepci�n de beneficios o de desventajas acad�micas del uso de redes sociales en educaci�n secundaria. 126. http://www.bdigital.unal.edu.co/56042/
dc.relationPina, V., Torres, L., & Royo, S. (2017). Comparing online with offline citizen engagement for climate change: Findings from Austria, Germany and Spain. Government Information Quarterly, 34(1), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.08.009
dc.relationPMI. (2019). Project Management Institute | PMI.
dc.relationPoorazizi, M. E., Steiniger, S., & Hunter, A. J. S. (2015). A service-oriented architecture to enable participatory planning: an e-planning platform. July. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2015.1008492
dc.relationPop, D., Moumtzi, V., & Farinos, J. (2014). The good, the bad and the beauty of advertisement for public sector services. Proceedings of the European Conference on E-Government, ECEG, 2014-Janua, 210–218.
dc.relationPorwol, L., Ojo, A., & Breslin, J. (2013). Harnessing the duality of e-participation-social software infrastructure design. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 289–298. https://doi.org/10.1145/2591888.2591941
dc.relationPorwol, L, Hassan, I., Ojo, A., & Breslin, J. (2015). Harnessing spontaneous participation on social media - Implementing the knowledge extraction component. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 27-30-May-, 333–334.
dc.relationPorwol, L, & Ojo, A. (2017). Barriers and desired affordances of social media based e-Participation - Politicians’ perspectives. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Part F1280, 78–86.
dc.relationPorwol, L, Ojo, A., & Breslin, J. (2014a). A semantic deliberation model for e-Participation. Innovation and the Public Sector, 21, 40–50.
dc.relationPorwol, L, Ojo, A., & Breslin, J. (2014b). A semantic model for e-participation - Detailed conceptualization and ontology. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 263–272.
dc.relationPorwol, L, Ojo, A., & Breslin, J. G. (2016). An ontology for next generation e-Participation initiatives. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), 583–594.
dc.relationPorwol, Lukasz, Ojo, A., & Breslin, J. G. (2018). Social Software Infrastructure for e-Participation. Government Information Quarterly, 35(4), S88–S98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.01.002
dc.relationPressman, R. (2010). Ingeniería del software - Un enfoque práctico.
dc.relationProceedings - 2016 International Conference on Software Security and Assurance, ICSSA 2016. (2017). Proceedings - 2016 International Conference on Software Security and Assurance, ICSSA 2016.
dc.relationProsser, A. (2012). eParticipation - Did we deliver what we promised? Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 7452 LNCS, 10–18.
dc.relationQuintero, D. (2018). Problem Areas in e-Participation (p. 10).
dc.relationQuintero, D. (2019). Metodología para la evaluación de las iniciativas gubernamentales de participación electrónica.
dc.relationRaya Al-Dalou’; Abu-shanab, E. (2013). E-Participation levels and Technologies. The 6th International Conference on Information Technology, May 2013, 1–8.
dc.relationRed de transaparencia y Acceso de la Información. (2014). Directrices – Participación pública y colaboración :
dc.relationRibeiro, M. M., Cunha, M. A., & Barbosa, A. F. (2018). E-participation, social media and digital gap: Challenges in the Brazilian context. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209281.3209373
dc.relationRose, J., & Sanford, C. (2016). Designing the e-Participation Artifact. March.
dc.relationSæbø, Ø., Rose, J., & Skiftenes Flak, L. (2008). The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area. Government Information Quarterly, 25(3), 400–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2007.04.007
dc.relationSaldaña, L., & García, J. M. (2013). Diseño, Creación Y Validación De Una Entrevista Para Obtener Datos Biográficos, De Carácter Deportivo- Militar, De Los Militares Que Participaron En Unos Juegos Olímpicos. Journal of Sport and Health Research J Sport Health Res ISSN Journal of Sport and Health Research. Journal of Sport and Health Research J Sport Health Res, 5(52), 157–166
dc.relationSánchez-Franco, M. J., Martín-Velicia, F. A., & Sanz-Altamira, B. (2011). Post-adoption behaviour, community satisfaction and PCS: An analysis of interaction effects in the tuenti community. WEBIST 2011 - Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies, 459–465.
dc.relationSánchez-Nielsen, E., Lee, D., Panopoulou, E., Delakorda, S., & Takács, G. (2014). Engaging citizens in policy issues: Multidimensional approach, evidence and lessons learned. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 8654).
dc.relationSánchez-Torres. (2006). Propuesta metodologica para evaluar las politicas publicas de promocion del e-government como campo de aplicacion de la Sociedad de la Informacion .Conceptualizacion y aplicacion empirica en el caso colombiano. 537.
dc.relationSánchez-Torres. (2019). Dinámica de generación de conocimiento.
dc.relationSánchez-Torres, J. M., & Miles, I. (2017). The role of future-oriented technology analysis in e-Government: a systematic review. European Journal of Futures Research, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40309-017-0131-7
dc.relationSanford, C., & Rose, J. (2007). Characterizing eParticipation. International Journal of Information Management, 27(6), 406–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2007.08.002
dc.relationSantamaría-Philco, A., Cerdá, J. C., Penadés, M. C., Quiroz, P., & Mendoza, D. M. (2016). A trust view for a method to eParticipation life cycle. 2016 3rd International Conference on EDemocracy and EGovernment, ICEDEG 2016, 118–120. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEDEG.2016.7461707
dc.relationSantamaría-Philco, A., & Wimmer, M. A. (2018). Trust in e-participation: An empirical research on the influencing factors. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209281.3209286
dc.relationSantamaría, A., Canós, J. H., & Penadés, M. C. (2014). Un método de soporte a los procesos de participación pública en procesos de decisión. Noveno Congreso de Ciencia y Tecnología, ESPE, 1390–4663, 231–237.
dc.relationSantini, R. M., & Carvalho, H. (2019). The rise of participatory despotism: a systematic review of online platforms for political engagement. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society.
dc.relationSaraguro-Bravo, R., Puente-Castro, S., Quimba-Herrera, S., Costa-Campuzano, J., & Desiderio-Sanchez, K. (2017). Digital Literacy proposal to improve eParticipation in urban marginal areas. 2017 4th International Conference on EDemocracy and EGovernment, ICEDEG 2017, 269–272. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEDEG.2017.7962548
dc.relationScarano, V., Malandrino, D., Baker, M., Détienne, F., Andriessen, J., Pardijs, M., Ojo, A., Hogan, M., Meijer, A., & Ruijer, E. (2017). Fostering citizens’ participation and transparency with social tools and personalization. Public Administration and Information Technology, 32, 197–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63743-3_8
dc.relationScherer, S., Liotas, N., Wimmer, M. A., Tambouris, E., & Tarabanis, K. (2010). Interoperability requirements, recommendations and standards in e-participation. In Interoperability in Digital Public Services and Administration: Bridging E-Government and E-Business.
dc.relationScherer, S., Neuroth, C., Schefbeck, G., & Wimmer, M. A. (2009). Enabling eparticipation of the youth in the public debate on legislation in austria: A critical reflection. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 5694 LNCS, 151–162.
dc.relationScherer, S., & Wimmer, M. A. (2016). A metamodel for the E-participation reference framework. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 9821 LNCS, 3–16.
dc.relationScherer, S., & Wimmer, M. A. (2014). Trust in e-participation: Literature review and emerging research needs. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 2014-Janua, 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1145/2691195.2691237
dc.relationScherer, S., Wimmer, M. A., & Ventzke, S. (2010). Hands-on guideline for E-participation initiatives. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 334, 49–61.
dc.relationSerov, I., & Leitner, M. (2017). An experimental approach to reputation in E-Participation. Proceedings - 2016 International Conference on Software Security and Assurance, ICSSA 2016, 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSA.2016.14
dc.relationSieber, R. E., Robinson, P. J., Johnson, P. A., & Corbett, J. M. (2016). Doing Public Participation on the Geospatial Web. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 106(5), 1030–1046.
dc.relationSlaviero, C., Maciel, C., Alencar, F. B., Santana, E. C., & Souza, P. C. (2010). Designing a platform to facilitate the development of virtual e-participation environments. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 385–386. https://doi.org/10.1145/1930321.1930408
dc.relationSneiders, E., Byungura, J. C., Henkel, M., & Perjons, E. (2017). Potential of language technology to support public organizations and their communication channels in a developing country. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Part F1280, 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1145/3047273.3047333
dc.relationSnoeck, M., Crompvoets, J., Habra, N., Simonofski, A., & Vanderose, B. (2017). Reexamining e-participation: systematic literature review on citizen participation in e-government service delivery. AMCIS 2017 - America’s Conference on Information Systems: A Tradition of Innovation, 2017-Augus.
dc.relationSousa, A. A., Agante, P., Gouveia, L. B., & Abrantes, S. (2018). Liberopinion - a web platform for public participation. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 199–208.
dc.relationSpiliotopoulou, L., Charalabidis, Y., Loukis, E. N., & Diamantopoulou, V. (2014). A framework for advanced social media exploitation in government for crowdsourcing. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 8(4), 545–568. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-01-2014-0002
dc.relationStieglitz, S., Brockmann, T., & Xuan, L. D. (2012). Usage of social media for political communication. Proceedings - Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, PACIS 2012.
dc.relationStortone, S., & De Cindio, F. (2014). BiPart" of participatory budgeting. A software platform for new political practices. In Innovation and the Public Sector (Vol. 21). https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-429-9-30
dc.relationSu, C., & Wen, R. (2016). Research on software project quality management based on CMMI. Proceedings - 2016 International Conference on Robots and Intelligent System, ICRIS 2016, 381–383. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRIS.2016.79
dc.relationSusha, I., & Grönlund, T. (2014). Context clues for the stall of the Citizens’ Initiative: Lessons for opening up e-participation development practice. Government Information Quarterly, 31(3), 454–465.
dc.relationSvobodová, L., & Bednarska-Olejniczak, D. (2019). SMART Cities and Applications Used for Communication with Citizens as Part of Sustainable Development: The Czech Local Scene. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 11684 LNAI, 518–529
dc.relationTambouris, E., Liotas, N., & Tarabanis, K. (2007). A framework for assessing eParticipation projects and tools. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2007.13
dc.relationTambouris, E., Macintosh, A., Wimmer, M., Vedel, T., Lippa, B., Dalakiouridou, E., Parisopoulos, K., Rose, J., & Winkler, R. (2007). Introducing eParticipation. DEMO-Net The Democracy Network. DEMO-Net Booklet Series.
dc.relationTaylor, P., Loukis, E., Wimmer, M., Loukis, E., & Wimmer, M. (2012). A Multi-Method Evaluation of Different Models of Structured Electronic Consultation on Government Policies. December 2014, 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716990
dc.relationTerán, L. (2015). Enhancing citizens’ participation via recommender systems. In Digital Solutions for Contemporary Democracy and Government.
dc.relationTerán, L., Kaskina, A., & Meier, A. (2016). Maturity model for cognitive cities: Three case studies. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, 63, 37–59.
dc.relationThiel, S.-K. (2016a). A review of introducing game elements to e-participation. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government, CeDEM 2016, 3–9.
dc.relationThiel, S.-K. (2016b). Gamers in public participation: A boon or bane? Influence of attitudes in gamified participation platforms. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 229–240.
dc.relationThiel, S.-K., & Fröhlich, P. (2017). Gamification as motivation to engage in location-based public participation? Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography, 399–421.
dc.relationToots, M. (2019). Why E-participation systems fail: The case of Estonia’s Osale.ee. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), 546–559.
dc.relationUNESCO. (2019). UNESCO Archives - UNESCO Digital Library.
dc.relationUnited Nation. (2002). Benchmarking E-government: A Global Perspective Assessing the Progress of the UN Member States. United Nations Division for Public Economics and Public Administration and American Society for Public Administration.
dc.relationUnited Nation. (2003). UN Global E-government Survey 2003. Undesa, 1–114.
dc.relationUnited Nation. (2018). UNITED NATIONS E-GOVERNMENT SURVEY 2018. https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/Portals/egovkb/Documents/un/2018-Survey/E-Government Survey 2018_FINAL for web.pdf
dc.relationUS GOVERNMENT. (1998). NII Cover Page.
dc.relationVaerst, T., Steffens, T., & Lokaiczyk, R. (2018). Concerns management, E-Government and E-participation: Experiences and findings from Germany. In E-Planning and Collaboration: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (Vols. 3–3).
dc.relationVan Meerkerk, I. (2019). Top-down versus bottom-up pathways to collaboration between governments and citizens: reflecting on different participation traps. Collaboration in Public Service Delivery, September. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788978583
dc.relationVeletsianos, G., Kimmons, R., Shaw, A., Pasquini, L., & Woodward, S. (2017). Selective openness, branding, broadcasting, and promotion: Twitter use in Canada’s public universities. Educational Media International, 54(1), 1–19.
dc.relationVicente, M. R., & Novo, A. (2014). An empirical analysis of e-participation. The role of social networks and e-government over citizens’ online engagement. Government Information Quarterly, 31(3), 379–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.12.006
dc.relationVILLANES, E. J. B. (2015). Método Para La Evaluación De Calidad De Software. Universidad San Martin De Porres.
dc.relationvon der Gracht, H. A. (2012). Consensus measurement in Delphi studies. Review and implications for future quality assurance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(8), 1525–1536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.013
dc.relationWahid, F., & Sæbø, Ø. (2015). Affordances and effects of promoting eparticipation through social media. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 9249). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22500-5_1
dc.relationWang, X., & Liu, Z. (2019). Online engagement in social media: A cross-cultural comparison. Computers in Human Behavior, 97, 137–150
dc.relationWeb of Science. (2018).
dc.relationWehn, U., Collins, K., Anema, K., Basco-Carrera, L., & Lerebours, A. (2018). Stakeholder engagement in water governance as social learning: lessons from practice. Water International, 43(1), 34–59.
dc.relationWehn, U., & Evers, J. (2015). The social innovation potential of ICT-enabled citizen observatories to increase eParticipation in local flood risk management. Technology in Society, 42, 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2015.05.002
dc.relationXenakis, A., & Loukis, E. (2010). An investigation of the use of structured e-forum for enhancing e-participation in parliaments. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 3(2), 134–147.
dc.relationYu, C.-C. (2016). A value-centric business model framework for managing open data applications. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 26(1–2), 80–115.
dc.relationZhang, L., Wei, Y., & Wang, H. (2004). Government Informatization: A Case Study. Hawke Research Institute Working Paper Series, 190(27), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres
dc.relationZheng, Y. (2017). Explaining Citizens’ E-Participation Usage: Functionality of E-Participation Applications. Administration and Society, 49(3), 423–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399715593313
dc.relationZheng, Y., & Schachter, H. L. (2018). The Impact of Administrator Willingness on Website E-Participation: Some Evidence from Municipalities. Public Performance and Management Review, 41(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2017.1400988
dc.relationolotov, M. N., Oliveira, T., & Casteleyn, S. (2018). Continued intention to use online participatory budgeting: The effect of empowerment and habit. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 209–216.
dc.relationZwattendorfer, B., Hillebold, C., & Teufl, P. (2013). Secure and privacy-preserving proxy voting system. Proceedings - 2013 IEEE 10th International Conference on e-Business Engineering, ICEBE 2013, 472–477.
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleMetodología para la evaluación de herramientas de software para la e-Participación
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestría


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución