dc.contributorUrdinola Contreras, Beatriz Piedad
dc.creatorGómez Lizarazú, David Eduardo
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-24T16:40:43Z
dc.date.available2020-07-24T16:40:43Z
dc.date.created2020-07-24T16:40:43Z
dc.date.issued2019-12-01
dc.identifierGómez, D. (2020). Comparación del comportamiento estadístico de índices de concentración en salud ante la presencia de contaminación en los datos. Tesis de maestría. Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/77847
dc.description.abstractEsta tesis busca responder a la pregunta de investigación ¿qué tan sensibles son los índices de concentración en salud a la contaminación en los datos y qué implicaciones tiene dicha sensibilidad sobre las propiedades estadísticas de los índices? Se propone una extensión al trabajo de Cowell & Flachaire (2007), quienes muestran que en el caso univariado las medidas de desigualdad presentan alta sensibilidad a la presencia de datos extremos y que, adicionalmente, se puede ver afectada la validez de la pruebas de hipótesis sobre los estimadores calculados a partir de estas muestras cuando hay datos atípicos en las mismas. Para extender los resultados de Cowell & Flachaire (2007) a índices de concentración en salud se utilizan algunas de las Funciones de Influencia calculadas por Heckley et al. (2016); las Funciones de Influencia son tomadas de la teoría de la estadística robusta y se constituyen en la principal herramienta que se usará para extender los hallazgos del caso univariado al caso bivariado. Adicionalmente se utiliza la conexión existente entre Funciones de Influencia y la estadística no paramétrica para analizar en un marco teórico unificado el comportamiento de los índices de concentración, entendidos estos como Estadisticos-V (Heckley et al., 2016).
dc.description.abstractThis thesis seeks to answer the research question: how sensitive are health concentration indices when there are contamination in the data and what kind of implications does this sensitivity have on the statistical properties of the indices? We follow the work of Cowell & Flachaire (2007), who show that in the univariate case the inequality measures present high sensitivity to the presence of extreme data and that, in addition, the validity of the hypothesis testing on the estimators can be affected. To extend the results of Cowell & Flachaire (2007) to health concentration indices, some of the Influence Functions calculated by Heckley et al. (2016) this document uses; Influence Functions are taken from the theory of robust statistics and they are the main tool that will be used to extend the findings of the univariate case to the bivariate case. In addition, it is used the link between Nonparametric statistics and the Influences Functions in order to analyse in a unified theory framework the behaivour of the health concentration indexes which are V-Statistics (Heckley et al., 2016)
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherBogotá - Ciencias - Maestría en Ciencias - Estadística
dc.publisherDepartamento de Estadística
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
dc.relationAchcar, J. A., Ramos, P. L. & Martinez, E. Z. (2017). Some computational aspects tofind accurate estimates for the parameters of the generalized Gamma distribution,Pesquisa Operacional37(2): 365–385.URL:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sciarttext&pid=S010174382017000200365&lng=en&tlng=en
dc.relationBenabou, R. (1996). Inequality and growth, MIT Press.
dc.relationCowell, A. (2009).Measuring inequality, LSE Perspectives in Economic Analysis, OxfordUniversity Press.
dc.relationCowell, A. & Victoria-Feser, M. (1996). Robustness properities of inequality measures, Econometrica64.
dc.relationCowell, F. A. & Flachaire, E. (2007). Income distribution and inequality measurement:The problem of extreme values, Journal of Econometrics141(2): 1044–1072.URL:http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0304407607000036
dc.relationCowell, Frank A. (2009).Measuring Inequality, LSE Perspectives in Economic Analysis,Oxford University Press.URL:http://darp.lse.ac.uk/Frankweb/MI3.htm
dc.relationDalton, H. (1920). The Measurement of the Inequality of Incomes,The Economic Journal30(119): 348–361.URL:https://www.ophi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/Dalton-1920.pdf
dc.relationDamgaard, C. & Weiner, J. (2000). Describing Inequality in Plant Size or Fecundity,Ecology81(4): 1139.URL:http://www.jstor.org/stable/177185?origin=crossref
dc.relationDavidson, R. & Duclos, J.-Y. (2000). Statistical inference for stochastic dominance andfor the measurement of poverty and inequality,Econometrica68(6): 31.URL:https://www.jstor.org/stable/3003995
dc.relationDavidson, R. & Flachaire, E. (2007). Asymptotic and bootstrap inference for inequalityand poverty measures,Journal of Econometrics.
dc.relationErreygers, G. (2009). Correcting the concentration index,Journal of Health Economics 28/2.
dc.relationErreygers, G. & Van Ourti, T. (2011). Measuring socioeconomic inequality in health,health care and health financing by means of rank-dependent indices: A recipe forgood practice,Journal of Health Economics30(4): 685–694.URL:http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167629611000427
dc.relationFellman, J. (2018). Income inequality measures,Theorical economics letters8: 557–574.URL:https://helda.helsinki.fi/dhanken/bitstream/handle/123456789/201968/TEL2018021315412915.pdf?sequence= 1isAllowed=y
dc.relationGini, C. (1912).Variabilit`a e Gini1: contributo allo studio delle distribuzioni e dellerelazioni statistiche. [|.], Tipogr. di P. Cuppini. Google-Books-ID: fqjaBPMxB9kC.
dc.relationGini, C. (1914).Sulla misura della concentrazione e della variabilit`a dei caratteri, Premiateofficine grafiche C. Ferrari.
dc.relationHaque, M. O. (1989). Estimation of engel elasticities from concentration curves,Journalof Economic Development14: 93–114.
dc.relationHaque, M. O. (2005).Income elasticity and economic development: methods andapplications, number v. 42 inAdvanced studies in theoretical and applied econometrics,Springer. OCLC: ocm60846348.
dc.relationHeckley, G., Gerdtham, U.-G. & Kjellsson, G. (2016). A general method for decomposingthe causes of socioeconomic inequality in health,Journal of Health Economics48: 89–106.URL:https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167629616300066
dc.relationIbragimov, M., Ibragimov, R., Karimov, J. & Yuldasheva, G. (2013). Robust analysis ofincome inequality dynamics in russia: T-statistic based approaches.URL:http://www.gdn.int/admin/uploads/editor/files/2013ConfPapers/RustamIbragimovPaper.pdf
dc.relationKakwani, N. C. (1980).Income inequality and poverty. Methods of estimation and policyapplications., World Bank.URL:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/456591468740159687/pdf/multi-page.pdf
dc.relationKakwani, N., Wagstaff, A. & Van Doorslaer, E. (1997). Socioeconomic inequalities inhealh: measurement, computation, and statistical inference,Journal of Econometrics77.
dc.relationKoolman, X. & Van Doorslaer, E. (2004). On the interpretation of a concentration indexof inequality,Health Economics13/7.
dc.relationKoski, T. (n.d.). Functionals of Distribution Functions, p. 25.
dc.relationKumar, D. (2017).The singh–maddala distribution: properties and estimation,International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management8: 1297–1311.URL:http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-017-0600-1
dc.relationLaha, R. G., Chakravarty, I. M. & Roy, J. (1960). A study of concentration curves as adescription of consumption patterns.
dc.relationLeclerc, A., Lert, F. & Fabien, C. (1990). Differential mortality: some comparissonsbetween england and wales, finland and france, based on inequality measures,International Journal of Epidemiology19.
dc.relationLehmann, E. L. (1999).Elements of large-sample theory, Springer texts in statistics,Springer, New York.
dc.relationMahalanobis, P. C. (1960).A method of fractile graphical analysis,Econometrica28(2): 325.URL:https://www.jstor.org/stable/1907724?origin=crossref
dc.relationMaltagliati, M. & Michelini, C. (1999). Equivalence scales and consumption inequality astudy of household consumption pattern in italy.
dc.relationMaronna, R., Martin, D. & Yohai, V. (2006).Robust statistics: Theory and methods, WileySeries in Probability and Statistics, John Wiley & Sons.
dc.relationMcDonald, J. B. & Ransom, M. (2008). The Generalized Beta Distribution as a Model forthe Distribution of Income: Estimation of Related Measures of Inequality,ModelingIncome Distributions and Lorenz Curves, Vol. 5 ofEconomic Studies in Equality,Social Exclusion and Well-Being, Springer
dc.relationMoghaddam, M. D., Liu, J., Holden, J. G. & Serota, R. A. (2019). Modeling responsetime distributions with generalized beta prime.URL:http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.00070
dc.relationMonti, A. (1991). The study of the Gini concentration ratio by means of the influencefunction,Statistica51.
dc.relationOrtiz, M. T. (2014).Estad ́ıstica Computacional.URL:https://tereom.github.io/est-computacional-2018/
dc.relationPradhan, M., Suryahadi, A., Sumarto, S. & Pritchett, L. (2000).Measurements of Povertyin Indonesia, 1996, 1999, and Beyond, Policy Research Working Papers, The WorldBank.URL:http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/book/10.1596/1813-9450-2438
dc.relationPreston, S., Haines, M. & Pamuk, E. (1981).Effects of indistrialization and urbanizationon mortality in developed countries, Solicited Papers Vol 2, International PopulationConference, Manila, IUSSP.
dc.relationRothenberg, R., Weaver, S., Dai, D., Stauber, C., Prasad, A. & Kano, M. (2014). A flexibleurban health index for small area disparities,Journal of Urban Health91(5).
dc.relationSarabia, J. M. (2008). Parametric Lorenz Curves: Models and Applications,ModelingIncome Distributions and Lorenz Curves, Vol. 5 ofEconomic Studies in Equality,Social Exclusion and Well-Being, Springer, New York, pp. 167–190.
dc.relationSingh, S. K. & Maddala, G. S. (1976). A Function for Size Distribution of Incomes,Econometrica44(5): 9.
dc.relationSydsæter, K. & Hammond, P. (2008).Essential Mathematics for Economic Analysis,Financial Times, Financial Times Prentice Hall.URL:https://books.google.com.co/books?id=dw7fE4RG6BwC
dc.relationVan Doorslaer, E. & Van Oirti, T. (2011).The Oxford handbook of health economics,Oxford University Press, chapter 35
dc.relationWagstaff, A. (2005).The Bounds of the Concentration Index When the Variableof Interest Is Binary, with an Application to Immunization Inequality.,HealthEconomics14: 429–432.URL:https://www.scirp.org/(S(czeh2tfqyw2orz553k1w0r45))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=1312143
dc.relationWagstaff, A., Paci, P. & Van Doorslaer, E. (1991). On the measurement of inequalities inhealth,Social Science and Medicine33/5.
dc.relationWang, Z., Ng, Y.-K. & Smyth, R. (2011). A General Method For Creating Lorenz Curves,Review of Income and Wealth57(3): 561–582.URL:https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revinw/v57y2011i3p561-582.html
dc.relationWasserman, L. (2006).All of nonparametric statistics, Springer texts in statistics,Springer, New York.
dc.relationWittebolle, L., Marzorati, M., Clement, L., Balloi, A., Daffonchio, D., Heylen, K.,De Vos, P., Verstraete, W. & Boon, N. (2009).Initial Community Evenness FavorsFunctionality under Selective Stress, Vol. 458.
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
dc.rightsAcceso abierto
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsDerechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.titleComparación del comportamiento estadístico de índices de concentración en salud ante la presencia de contaminación en los datos
dc.typeOtro


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución