dc.contributorFierro Ávila, Fernando
dc.contributorValero Halaby, Juan Javier
dc.contributorUnidad de Cirugía Pediátrica de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.creatorEcheverría Vargas, Laura Lorena
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-12T14:19:14Z
dc.date.available2021-02-12T14:19:14Z
dc.date.created2021-02-12T14:19:14Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-26
dc.identifierEcheverría Vargas, L. L. (2021). Factores de riesgo asociados a complicaciones con la colocación de catéteres permanentes en niños [Tesis de especialidad, Universidad Nacional de Colombia]. Repositorio Institucional.
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/79207
dc.description.abstractPermanent catheters are long term central vascular devices that facilitate the administration of crucial therapies for the treatment of complex and chronic diseases causing a high impact on the quality of life of the patient and their family. The objective of this research is to identify risk factors associated with complications of these devices in the Fundación Hospital Pediátrico la Misericordia – Bogotá. We conducted a retrospective cohort study, enroll the pediatric population that needed an insertion of permanent catheter (reservoir or two-way tunneled) between January 2015 and December 2017, with a follow-up until November 2020. 321 catheters were analyzed, the average age at time of insertion was 8.29 years old, the average observation time was 448.42 days. 24.92% had complications. The mean complication time was 1391 days. The complication rate was higher in the tunneled silicone catheter vs reservoir (2.09/1000 catheter days (CD) vs 0.22/1000 CD). No statistically significant relation was found between neutropenia at the time of catheter placement and the presence of complications. It´s concluded that: 1. The majority of complications occur after the first month, which emphasizes the importance of adequate training for the use and care of these devices 2. Preoperative neutropenia might not be a factor of postoperative complication in our institution. 3. We suggest to remove permanent catheters as soon as possible, especially the two-way silicone catheter, in order to reduce complications.
dc.description.abstractIntroducción: Los catéteres permanentes son dispositivos vasculares centrales de larga duración que facilitan la administración de terapias cruciales para el tratamiento de enfermedades crónicas complejas, generando un alto impacto en la calidad de vida del paciente y su familia. Objetivo: Buscar factores de riesgo asociados a complicaciones con la inserción de catéteres permanentes en niños operados en la Fundación Hospital Pediátrico la Misericordia (HOMI). Pacientes y métodos: Estudio analítico de cohorte retrospectivo. Muestra: pacientes menores de 18 años llevados a inserción de catéter (con reservorio o tunelizado de dos vias) entre enero de 2015 y diciembre de 2017, con seguimiento hasta noviembre de 2020. Resultados: Se analizaron 321 procedimientos realizados a 300 pacientes, la edad promedio al momento de la inserción fue de 8,29 años, el tiempo de observación promedio fue de 448,42 días. El 24,92% de los pacientes tuvo complicaciones. La media de tiempo de complicación fue de 1391 días. La tasa de complicaciones fue mayor en el catéter siliconado tunelizado respecto al catéter con reservorio (2,09/1000 dias catéter (DC) vs 0.22/1000 DC). Se identificó la edad menor a 3 años como factor para aumento de las complicaciones generales en 2,85 veces (1,78-4,54). Conclusiones: 1. la mayoria de complicaciones se presentan después del primer mes de la inserción. 2. Los pacientes menores de 3 años tienen mayor riesgo de complicaciones 3. La neutropenia preoperatoria podría no ser un factor de complicacion postquirurgica en nuestra institución 4. se sugiere retirar los cateteres permanentes tan pronto como sea posible, especialmente los siliconados de dos vias, con el fin de disminuir complicaciones.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherBogotá - Medicina - Especialidad en Cirugía Pediátrica
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
dc.relationGavin NC, Webster J, Chan RJ, Rickard CM. Frequency of dressing changes for central venous access devices on catheter-related infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2016(2). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009213.pub2
dc.relationJarboe M, Hirschl R. Vascular access. In: Davenport M, Geiger J, eds. Operative Pediatric Surgery. Eighth edi. Taylor & Francis; 2021:66-95.
dc.relationAfshar A, Steensma DP, Kyle RA. Werner Forssmann: A Pioneer of Interventional Cardiology and Auto-Experimentation. Mayo Clin Proc. 2018;93(9):e97-e98. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.08.026
dc.relationMighten J. Care and management of children with a totally implanted central venous access device: portacath. Nurs Child Young People. 2019;31(3):38-46. doi:10.7748/ncyp.2019.e799
dc.relationAres G, Hunter CJ. Central venous access in children: Indications, devices, and risks. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2017;29(3):340-346. doi:10.1097/MOP.0000000000000485
dc.relationMilford K, von Delft D, Majola N, Cox S. Long-term vascular access in differently resourced settings: a review of indications, devices, techniques, and complications. Pediatr Surg Int. 2020;36(5):551-562. doi:10.1007/s00383-020-04640-0
dc.relationChurch JT, Jarboe MD. Vascular Access in the Pediatric Population. Surg Clin North Am. 2017;97(1):113-128. doi:10.1016/j.suc.2016.08.007
dc.relationFarrelly JS, Stitelman DH. Complications in pediatric enteral and vascular access. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2016;25(6):371-379. doi:10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2016.10.006
dc.relationChesshyre E, Goff Z, Bowen A, Carapetis J. The prevention, diagnosis and management of central venous line infections in children. J Infect. 2015;71(S1):S59-S75. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2015.04.029
dc.relationJamshidi R. Central venous catheters: Indications, techniques, and complications. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2019;28(1):26-32. doi:10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2019.01.005
dc.relationBajaj M, Wells J, Liyanage A, Evans S, Hamill J. Radiation burden of pediatric ultrasound-guided percutaneous central venous access devices: A prospective cohort study. J Pediatr Surg. 2018;53(4):802-807. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.10.054
dc.relationLau CSM, Chamberlain RS. Ultrasound-guided central venous catheter placement increases success rates in pediatric patients: A meta-analysis. Pediatr Res. 2016;80(2):178-184. doi:10.1038/pr.2016.74
dc.relationFroehlich CD, Rigby MR, Rosenberg ES, et al. Ultrasound-guided central venous catheter placement decreases complications and decreases placement attempts compared with the landmark technique in patients in a pediatric intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(3):1090-1096. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819b570e
dc.relationUllman AJ, Marsh N, Mihala G, Cooke M, Rickard CM. Complications of central venous access devices: A systematic review. Pediatrics. 2015;136(5):e1331-e1344. doi:10.1542/peds.2015-1507
dc.relationTsotsolis N, Tsirgogianni K, Kioumis I, et al. Pneumothorax as a complication of central venous catheter insertion. Ann Transl Med. 2015;3(3):1-10. doi:10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.02.11
dc.relationOrsi F, Grasso RF, Arnaldi P, et al. Ultrasound Guided versus Direct Vein Puncture in Central Venous Port Placement. J Vasc Access. 2000;1(2):73-77. doi:10.1177/112972980000100209
dc.relationHaass C, Sorrentino E, Tempera A, et al. Cardiac tamponade and bilateral pleural effusion in a very low birth weight infant. J Matern Neonatal Med. 2009;22(2):137-139. doi:10.1080/14767050802509561
dc.relationRossi UG, Torcia P, Rigamonti P, et al. Tunneled central venous catheter exchange: Techniques to improve prevention of air embolism. J Vasc Access. 2016;17(2):200-203. doi:10.5301/jva.5000483
dc.relationWalshe C, Phelan D, Bourke J, Buggy D. Vascular erosion by central venous catheters used for total parenteral nutrition. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33(3):534-537. doi:10.1007/s00134-006-0507-9
dc.relationMermel LA, Allon M, Bouza E, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 update by the infectious diseases society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49(1):1-45. doi:10.1086/599376
dc.relationvan den Bosch CH, van der Bruggen JT, Frakking FNJ, et al. Incidence, severity and outcome of central line related complications in pediatric oncology patients; A single center study. J Pediatr Surg. 2019;54(9):1894-1900. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.10.054
dc.relationHartman C, Shamir R, Simchowitz V, et al. ESPGHAN/ESPEN/ESPR/CSPEN guidelines on pediatric parenteral nutrition: Complications. Clin Nutr. 2018;37(6):2418-2429. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2018.06.956
dc.relationCesaro S, Cavaliere M, Pegoraro A, Gamba P, Zadra N, Tridello G. A comprehensive approach to the prevention of central venous catheter complications: results of 10-year prospective surveillance in pediatric hematology-oncology patients. Ann Hematol. 2016;95(5):817-825. doi:10.1007/s00277-016-2634-x
dc.relationBell T, O’Grady NP. Prevention of Central Line–Associated Bloodstream Infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2017;31(3):551-559. doi:10.1016/j.idc.2017.05.007
dc.relationO’Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(9). doi:10.1093/cid/cir257
dc.relationGiordano P, Saracco P, Grassi M, et al. Recommendations for the use of long-term central venous catheter (CVC) in children with hemato-oncological disorders: management of CVC-related occlusion and CVC-related thrombosis. On behalf of the coagulation defects working group and the supportive the. Ann Hematol. 2015;94(11):1765-1776. doi:10.1007/s00277-015-2481-1
dc.relationMiliaraki M, Katzilakis N, Chranioti I, et al. Central line-associated bloodstream infection in childhood malignancy: Single-center experience. Pediatr Int. 2017;59(7):769-775. doi:10.1111/ped.13289
dc.relationCesca E, Dall’igna P, Boscolo-Berto R, et al. Impact of severe neutropenia and other risk factors on early removal of implanted central venous catheter (ICVC) in children with hematologic malignancies. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2014;36(7):541-544. doi:10.1097/MPH.0000000000000158
dc.relationAdler A, Yaniv I, Steinberg R, et al. Infectious complications of implantable ports and Hickman catheters in paediatric haematology-oncology patients. J Hosp Infect. 2006;62(3):358-365. doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2005.08.019
dc.relationVanHouwelingen LT, Veras L V., Lu M, et al. Neutropenia at the time of subcutaneous port insertion may not be a risk factor for early infectious complications in pediatric oncology patients. J Pediatr Surg. 2019;54(1):145-149. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.10.024
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
dc.rightsAcceso abierto
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsDerechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.titleFactores de riesgo asociados a complicaciones con la colocación de catéteres permanentes en niños
dc.typeOtro


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución