¿La cooperación tripartita entre Estado, Empresas y Universidad genera productividad en las empresas en Colombia?

dc.contributorHernán Dario, Enríquez
dc.contributorGustavo Adolfo, Junca Rodríguez
dc.creatorPatiño Moreno, María Camila
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-05T01:53:54Z
dc.date.available2020-08-05T01:53:54Z
dc.date.created2020-08-05T01:53:54Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-27
dc.identifierPatiño, M. C. (2020). ¿La cooperación tripartita entre Estado, Empresas y Universidad genera productividad en las empresas en Colombia? Bogotá.
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/77921
dc.description.abstractEl objetivo de este trabajo es indagar la incidencia de la cooperación tripartita entre Universidad, Empresa, Estado sobre los diferentes tipos de innovación y la productividad de las empresas en Colombia. Para esto se usa un modelo de ecuaciones múltiples con datos de la Encuesta de Desarrollo e Innovación Tecnológica (EDITV II) para los años 2015-2016 y datos de la Encuesta Anual Manufacturera para esos mismos años con el fin de evaluar el efecto de la inversión en Investigación y Desarrollo (I+D) sobre la innovación en las empresas y, en consecuencia, sobre su productividad, controlando por la posibilidad de cooperar. Los resultados muestran que la cooperación aumenta el gasto en I+D y la probabilidad de innovar de las empresas, esta última a su vez aumenta la productividad de las empresas en un promedio del 65%. Del mismo modo, la cooperación entre la empresa y la universidad o la empresa y el estado resulta más efectiva que la cooperación tripartita para el gasto en I + D, en cuanto a los demás factores analizados, cualquier forma de cooperación tiene una incidencia positiva en el gasto en I+D y en la probabilidad de innovar. Así mismo, otros factores como el personal altamente calificado, la naturaleza del capital de la empresa, el tamaño de la empresa, el registro de la propiedad intelectual y la producción de bienes de media-alta tecnología inciden en el gasto en I+D, la innovación y la productividad. Conforme a los resultados obtenidos en este estudio, el papel del Estado se debe enfocar en incentivar la inversión en I+D en las empresas, apoyar la elaboración de proyectos conjuntos entre Universidad, Empresa y Estado, y en generar redes que articulen a los actores de orden nacional y local.
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this work is to investigate the incidence of tripartite cooperation between the University, Company, State on the different types of innovation and firms’ productivity in Colombia. For this, a multiple equation model is used with data from the Technological Development and Innovation Survey (EDITV II) for the years 2015-2016 and data from the Annual Manufacturing Survey for those same years in order to evaluate the effect of the investment in Research and Development (R&D) on innovation in companies and, consequently, on their productivity, controlling for the possibility of cooperation. The results show that cooperation increases spending on R&D and the probability of innovating firms, the latter in turn increases the productivity of companies by an average of 65%. Similarly, cooperation between the company and the university or the company and the state is more effective than tripartite cooperation for R&D spending, as for the other factors analyzed, any form of cooperation has a positive impact on R&D spending and the probability of innovating. Likewise, other factors such as highly qualified personnel, the nature of the capital of the company, the size of the company, the registration of intellectual property and the production of medium-high-tech goods affect the expenditure on R&D, Innovation and productivity. According to the results obtained in this study, the role of the State should focus on encouraging investment in R&D in companies, supporting the development of joint projects between University, Company and State, and in generating networks that articulate the actors National and local order.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherBogotá - Ciencias Económicas - Maestría en Ciencias Económicas
dc.publisherEscuela de Economía
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
dc.relationAdegboye, A. C., & Iweriebor, S. (2018). Does Access to Finance Enhance SME Innovation and Productivity in Nigeria? Evidence from the World Bank Enterprise Survey. African Development Review 30(4).
dc.relationAghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1992). A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction. Econometrica 60, no. 2: 323-351.
dc.relationAlbis, N. (2015). DETERMINANTES DE LA INNOVACIÓN Y LA PRODUCTIVIDAD EN LAS SUBSIDIARIAS EXTRANJERAS Y LAS EMPRESAS EXPORTADORAS EN LA INDUSTRIA EN COLOMBIA. Revista de Estudios Empresariales.
dc.relationAmir, R., Evstigneev, I., & Wooders, J. (2003). Noncooperative versus versus cooperative R&D with endogenous spillover rates. Games and Economic Behavior 42.
dc.relationAnderson, M., & Lööf, H. (2012). Small business innovation: firm level evidence from Sweden. The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 37(5).
dc.relationArrow, K. (1962). Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources. Princeton University Press.
dc.relationArrow, K. (1962). The Economic Implications of Lcarning by Doing. Review of economic of Studies.
dc.relationBaden-Fuller, R. M. (1995). A Knowledge-Based Theory of Inter-Firm Collaboration.
dc.relationBarro, R., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (2004). Economic Growth. Londres
dc.relationBarro, S. (2015). La transferencia de I+D, la innovación y el emprendimiento en las universidades. Educación superior en Iberoamérica Informe 2015, 241-243.
dc.relationBelderbos, R., Carree, M., & Lokshin, B. (2004). Cooperative R&D and Firm Performance.
dc.relationBelderbosa, R., Carreeb, M., & Lokshinb, B. (2004). Cooperative R&D and firm performance.
dc.relationBogliacino, F., & Pianta, M. (2012). Profits, R&D, and innovation—a model and a test. Oxford University Press on behalf of Associazione ICC.
dc.relationBoldrin, M., & Levine, D. K. (2009). Market Size And Intellectual Property Protection
dc.relationBrouwer, E., & Kleinknecht, A. (1999). Innovative output, and a firm's propensity to patent.: An exploration of CIS micro data. Research Policy, vol. 28, issue 6, 615-624.
dc.relationBrundenius, C., Lundvall, B.-Å., & Sutz, J. (2009). The role of universities in innovation systems in developing countries: Developmental university systems - empirical, analytical and normative perspectives.
dc.relationBurnham. (1997). Evaluating industry/university research linkages.
dc.relationCaloghirou, Y., Kastelli, I., & Tsakanikas, A. ( 2004). Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: complements or substitutes for innovative performance? Technovation.
dc.relationCassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (1998). R&D COOPERATION AND SPILLOVERS: SOME EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE.
dc.relationCassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2002). R&D Cooperation and Spillovers: Some Empirical Evidence from Belgium.
dc.relationChesbrough, H. (2006). Open innovation: a new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. Researching a new paradigm, 400, 0-19.
dc.relationChudnovsky, D. A. (2006). Innovation and productivity in developing countries: A study of Argentine manufacturing firms' behavior. Research Policy.
dc.relationCin, B. C., Lee, H.-y., & Kim, J. (2015). Empirical analysis on the effect of technology innovation on employment in Korean Inno-Biz SMEs. Economics Bulletin, 35(4), 2258-2269.
dc.relationCirera, X., & Maloney, W. F. (2017). Innovation Paradox .
dc.relationCoad, A., Segarra, A., & Teruel, M. (2016). Innovation and firm growth: Does firm age play a role? Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 387-400.
dc.relationCohen & Levinthal. (1990). Abpsortive Capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation.
dc.relationCohen, & Klepper. (1996). Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: the case of process and product R&D. The Review of Economics and Statistics.
dc.relationCohen, W. (2010). Fifty years of empirical studies of innovative activity and performance.
dc.relationCrépon, B., Duguet, E., & Mairesse, J. (1998). Research, innovation and productivity: an econometric analysis at the firm level.
dc.relationCrespi, G., & Zuñiga, P. (2010). Innovation and Productivity. Inter-American Development Bank.
dc.relationCrespi, G., Criscuolo, C., & Haskel, J. (2007). Information Technology, Organisational Change. CEPR discussion journal n°783.
dc.relationCrespi, G., Tascir, E., & Vargas, F. (2016). Innovation Dynamics and Productivity. IDB, 37-70.
dc.relationCyert&Goodman. (1997). Creating Effective University-Industry Alliances.
dc.relationDANE. (2017). Encuesta de cultura política (ECP).
dc.relationDNP. (2016). Politica Nacional de Desarrollo Productivo.
dc.relationDNP. (2019). Comité Técnico Mixto de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación. Bogotá.
dc.relationDNP. (2019). Plan Nacional de Desarrollo 2018-2022.
dc.relationDosi, G. (2000). Innovation, Organization and Economic Dynamics: Selected Essays.
dc.relationDosi, G. (2000). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories.
dc.relationDuguet, E. (2006). Innovation height, spillovers and tfp growth at the firm level: Evidence from French manufacturing.
dc.relationEasterly, W., & Levine, R. (2002). IT'S NOT FACTOR ACCUMULATION:STYLIZED FACTS AND GROWTH MODELS.
dc.relationEchavarría, J. J., Arbeláez, M. A., & Rosales, M. F. (2006). La productividad y sus determinantes:. Revista Desarrollo y Sociedad, n.o 57 (2006): 77-122.
dc.relationEtzkowitz, H. (1998). Triple Helix Systems: An Analytical Framework for Innovation.
dc.relationEtzkowitz, H. (2008). The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation In Action London: Routledge.
dc.relationEtzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). “The Dynamics of Innovation: from National Systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Research Policy.
dc.relationExpósito, A., & Sanchis-Llopis, J. A. (2019). The relationship between types of innovation and SMEs' performance: a multi-dimensional empirical assessment. Eurasian Business Review, 9(2), 115-135.
dc.relationFreel, M. (2005). Patterns of innovation and skills in small firms. Technovation, Vol. 25.
dc.relationGalindo, F., & Verger, F. (2016). OECD Taxonomy of Economic Activities Based on R&D Intensity. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers.
dc.relationGallego, J. M., Gutiérrez, H., & Taborda, R. (2013). Innovation and Productivity in the Colombian Service Industry.
dc.relationGeorge, G. (2001). The effects of business–university alliances on innovative output and financial performance: a study of publicly traded.
dc.relationGoldberger, A. (1972). Structural equation methods in social sciences. Econometrica, 979-1001.
dc.relationGoldmark, L. (1996). Servicios de desarrollo empresarial: Un esquema de análisis.
dc.relationGriffith, R., Huergo, E., Mairesse, J., & Peters, B. (2006). Innovation and Productivity across Four European Countries. NBER Working Paper No. 12722.
dc.relationGrossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1991). Trade, Knowledge Spillovers, and Growth.
dc.relationGual, V. F., & Blasco, A. S. (2013). The Impact of Cooperation on R&D, Innovation and Productivity: an Analysis of Spanish Manufacturing and Services Firms.
dc.relationGuimón, J. (2013). Promoting University Industry Collaboration in Developing Countries. Banco Mundial.
dc.relationHall, B. (2002). ‘The financing of research and development. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18(1), 35–51.
dc.relationHall, B. H., & Lerner, J. (2009). The financing of R&D and innovation. In B. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.) Handbook of Economics of Innovation. Vol 1: National Bureau of Economic Research.
dc.relationHall, B. H., Lotti, F., & Mairesse, J. (2009). Innovation and productivity in SMEs: empirical evidence for Italy. Small Business Economics, 33(1), 13-33.
dc.relationHallward, M., & Nayyar, D. G. (2018). Trouble in the making? The future of manufacturing-Led Development.
dc.relationHans Lööf, J. M. (2016). Economics of Innovation and New Technology.
dc.relationHarmon. (1997). Mapping the university technology transfer process.
dc.relationHelpman, E. (1992). Endogenous macroeconomic growth theory.
dc.relationHill, D. &. (1996). Strategic Alliances and the Rate of New Product Development: An Empirical Study of Entrepreneurial Biotechnology Firms.
dc.relationHippel, E. v. (2009). Democratizing innovation: the evolving phenomenon of user innovation. International Journal of Innovation Science, 1(1).
dc.relationHuang, C., Arundel, A., & Hollanders, H. (2010). How firms innovate: R&D, non-R&D, and technology adoption.
dc.relationHuergo, E., & Jaumandreu, J. (2004). How Does Probability of Innovation Change with Firm Age? Small Business Economics 22(3_4):193-207 ·.
dc.relationJaffe, A., & Le, T. (2015). The impact of R&D subsidy on innovation: a study of New Zealand firms. Working Papers 15_08, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
dc.relationJanz, N., Lööf, H., & Peters, B. (2003). Firm Level Innovation and Productivity Is there a Common Story Across Countries?
dc.relationJefferson, G. H., Huamao, B., Xiaojing, G., & Xiaoyun, Y. (2006). R&D Performance in Chinese Industry. Economics of Innovation.
dc.relationJohansson, B., & Lööf, H. (2014). Innovation, R&D and Productivity - assessing alternative specifications of CDM-models. CESIS Electronic Working Paper Series.
dc.relationJudge, G. (1988). The theory and practice of econometrics.
dc.relationKim, J., & Park, S.-Y. (2015). The Effect of Innovation Activities and Governmental Support on Innovation Performance: Comparison between Innovative SMEs and General Companies. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 9(2).
dc.relationKleinknecht, A., & Reijnen, J. O. (1991). More Evidence on the Undercounting of Small Firm R&D.
dc.relationKlomp, L., & Leeuwen, G. (2006). On the Contribution of Innovation to Multi-Factor Productity Growth.
dc.relationKnell, M., Nås, S. O., Bloch, C., & Graversen, E. K. (2014). Innovation and growth in the Nordic economies (IGNOREd).
dc.relationKok, J. d., Brouwer, P., & Fris, P. (2006). On the relationship between firm age and productivity growth. EIM Business and Policy Research.
dc.relationKoschatzky, K., & Stahlecker, T. (2010). New forms of strategic research collaboration between firms and universities in the German research system. International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation.
dc.relationLevin, R., Klevorick, A., Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1987). Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development. Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings papers on economic activity, 1987(3), 783-831.
dc.relationLewis, J. D. (1990). Partnerships For Profit: Structuring and Managing Strategic Alliances.
dc.relationLeydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix---University-Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge Based Economic Development.
dc.relationLööf, H., & Heshmati, A. (2006). On the Relationship between Innovation and Performance: A Sensitivity Analysis. Economics of Innovation & New Technology.
dc.relationLööf, H., Heshmati, A., Asplund, R., & Nåås, S.-O. (2001). Performance in Manufacturing Industries: A Comparison of the Nordic Countries.
dc.relationMacLachlan. (1995). Trusting outsiders to do your research: how does industry learn to do it? Res.-Technol.
dc.relationMairesse, J. (2010). USING INNOVATIONS SURVEYS FOR ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS.
dc.relationMairesse, J., & Mohnen, P. (2010). Using innovations surveys for econometric analysis.
dc.relationMajumdar, S. K. (1997). The Impact of Size and Age on Firm-Level Performance: Some Evidence from India. Review of Industrial Organization 12(2): 231-241.
dc.relationMalerba, & Orsenigo. (1997). Technological regimes and sectoral patterns of innovative activities. Industrial and corporate change.
dc.relationMañez, J. A., Rochina-Barrachina, M. E., Sanchis, A., & Sanchis, J. A. (2009). Do process innovations boost SMEs productivity growth? Empirical Economics, 1-33.
dc.relationMarotta, D., Mark, M., Blom, A., & Thorn, K. (2007). Human Capital and University-Industry Linkages’ Role in Fostering Firm Innovation: An Empirical Study of Chile and Colombia. Banco Mundial .
dc.relationMasso, J., & Vahter, P. (2008). Technological Innovation and Productivity in Late-Transition Estonia: Econometric Evidence from Innovation Surveys.
dc.relationMasso, J., & Vahter, P. (2008). Technological Innovation and Productivity in Late-Transition Estonia: Econometric Evidence from Innovation Surveys. European Journal of Development Research.
dc.relationMasso, J., & Vahter, P. (2011). The link between innovation and productivity in Estonia's services sector.
dc.relationMetcalfe, J. S. (1987). The diffusion of innovation: an interpretative survey. University of Manchester, Department of Economics.
dc.relationMohnen, P. (2019). R&D, innovation and productivity. Maastricht Economic and social Research institute on Innovation and Technology (UNU‐MERIT).
dc.relationMohnen, P., & Hall, B. (2013). Innovation and productivity : an update.
dc.relationMonjon, S., & Waelbroeck, P. (2003). Assessing Spillovers from Universities to Firms: Evidence from French firm-level data.
dc.relationMonjon, S., & Waelbroeck, P. (2003). Assessing Spillovers from Universities to Firms: Evidence from French firm-level data.
dc.relationNelson&Sampat. (2001). Las instituciones como factor que regula el desempeño económico.
dc.relationNelson, R. R. (1995). Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change. Journal of Economic Literature.
dc.relationNieto, M. J., & Santamaría, L. (2007). The Importance of Diverse Collaborative Networks for the Novelty of Product Innovation.
dc.relationObservatorio de Ciencia, T. e. (2018). Indicadores de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación.
dc.relationOCDE. (2002). Bencchmarking Industry-Science Relationships. Publications OCDE.
dc.relationOCDE. (2015). Frascati Manual.
dc.relationOCDE. (2019). Production Transformation Policy Review of Colombia unleashing productivity
dc.relationOECD. (2016). OECD Taxonomy of Economic Activities Based on R&D Intensity.
dc.relationO'Sullivan, M. (2005). Finance and innovation. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press: Oxford, pp. 240–266.
dc.relationParida, V., Westerberg, M., & Frishammar, J. (2012). Inbound open innovation activities in high‐tech SMEs: the impact on innovation performance. Journal of small business management.
dc.relationPavitt, K. (1982). Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory.
dc.relationPeters, B., Roberts, M. J., Vuong, V. A., & Fryges, H. (2017). Estimating dynamic R&D choice: an analysis of costs and long‐run benefits.
dc.relationPetersen, B. C., & Himmelberg, C. P. (1994). R&D and internal finance: A panel study of small firms in high-tech industries. The Review of Economics and Statistics.
dc.relationPolanyi, M. (1967). Tha Tacit Dimension. New York: Anchor Books.
dc.relationPolder, M., Leeuwen, G. v., & Mohnen, P. (2009). Productivity effects of innovation modes. Statistics Netherlands Working Paper 09033.
dc.relationRammer, C., Czarnitzki, D., & Spielkamp, A. (2009). Innovation success of non-R&D-performers: substituting technology by management in SMEs. Small Business Economics, 33(1).
dc.relationRaymond, L., & St-Pierre, J. (2010). R&D as a Determinant of Innovation in Manufacturing SMEs: An Attempt at Empirical Clarification. Technovation 30(1):48-56.
dc.relationRomer, P. (1980). Endogenous technologial change. The economic journal, 98 (5), pp. S71-S102.
dc.relationRomer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous Technological Change. The Journal of Political Economy is currently published by The University of Chicago Press.
dc.relationSadowski, B., & Sadowski-Rasters. (2006). On the innovativeness of foreign affiliates: Evidence from companies in The Netherlands.
dc.relationSalazar, M. d., & Valderrama, M. G. (2010). La Alianza Universidad-Empresa-Estado: una estrategia para promover la innovación. Bogotá.
dc.relationSantoro, G., Vrontis, D., Thrassou, A., & Dezi, L. (2017). The Internet of Things: Building a knowledge management system for open innovation and knowledge management capacity.
dc.relationSchumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: an inquiry into profits,capital, credit, interest and the business cycle. Harvard Economic Studies, Vol. 46, Harvard College, Cambridge, MA. .
dc.relationSheshinski, E. (1967). Optimal Accumulation with Learning by Doing.
dc.relationSilva, M. J. (2017). Innovation and productivity: empirical evidence for Brazilian industrial enterprises.
dc.relationSilva, M. J., & Leitao, J. (2009). cooperation in innovation practices among firms in Portugal: do external partners stimulate innovative advance.
dc.relationSpithoven, A., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Roijakkers, N. (2013). Open innovation practices in SMEs and large enterprises.
dc.relationStefano Breschi, F. M. (2000). Technological Regimes and Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation.
dc.relationSuh, Y., & Kim, M.-S. (2012). Effects of SME collaboration on R&D in the service sector in open. Innovation: Organization & Management 14(3):349-362 .
dc.relationTether, B. S. (2002). Who co-operates for innovation, and why: an empirical analysis. Research policy, 31(6).
dc.relationThe conference Board. (2016).
dc.relationTorrado, M. P., & Arbelaez, M. A. (2011). Innovation, Research and Development Investment.
dc.relationUniversidad EAFIT . (2017). eafit.edu.co. Obtenido de http://www.eafit.edu.co/sitionoticias/2017/eafit-recibe-primera-patente-internacional
dc.relationVahter, P., & Masso, J. (2008). Technological innovation and productivity in late-transition Estonia: Econometric evidence from innovation surveys.
dc.relationVance, R. J. (2006). Marginal Effects and Significance Testing with Heckman’s Sample Selection Model: A Methodological Note. RWI Discussion Paper.
dc.relationVarian. (1987). Microeconomia Avanzada.
dc.relationVeugelers, R., & Cassimanb, B. (2003). R&D Cooperation between Firms and Universities Some empirical evidence from Belgian manufacturing.
dc.relationWeil, D. (2012). Economic Growth. Pearson 3nd Edtion.
dc.relationWest, M., & Altink., W. M. (1996). Innovation in organizations. European journal of work and organizational psychology.
dc.relationWooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data.
dc.relationWorld Management Survey. (2014). 2014 Regional Manufacturing Reports.
dc.relationWu & Ho. (1997). Financial ratio adjustment: industry-wide effects or strategic management.
dc.relationYusuf, S., & Nabeshima, K. (2007). How universities promote economic growth.
dc.relationZeng, S. X., Xie, X. M., & Tam, C. M. (2010). Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs.
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
dc.rightsAcceso abierto
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsDerechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.title¿La cooperación tripartita entre Estado, Empresas y Universidad genera productividad en las empresas en Colombia?
dc.typeDocumento de trabajo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución