dc.contributor | Vallejo Cabrera, Franco Alirio | |
dc.contributor | Ortiz Grisales, Sanín | |
dc.contributor | Mejoramiento Genético, Agronomía y Producción de Semillas de Hortalizas | |
dc.creator | Contreras Rojas, Mayra | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-02-24T13:08:26Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-09-21T17:19:39Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-02-24T13:08:26Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-09-21T17:19:39Z | |
dc.date.created | 2022-02-24T13:08:26Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.identifier | https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/81050 | |
dc.identifier | Universidad Nacional de Colombia | |
dc.identifier | Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia | |
dc.identifier | https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/ | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3399790 | |
dc.description.abstract | Se realizó un cruzamiento dialélico entre seis genotipos de habichuela (Phaseolus vulgaris
L.) con el objetivo de estimar la habilidad combinatoria y los componentes de varianza. Los
genotipos se evaluaron en dos ambientes, utilizando un diseño experimental de bloques
completos al azar con cuatro repeticiones. Se analizaron siete características del cultivo.
El análisis dialélico se realizó mediante el método 2, modelo 1 de Griffing y Hayman. Los
resultados mostraron que la acción genética aditiva fue importante para días a floración
(DAF), longitud de la vaina (LDV) y peso promedio de la vaina (PPV), mientras la acción
genética no aditiva fue importante para días a cosecha (DAC), número de vainas por planta
(NVP), número de semillas por vaina (NSV) y producción por planta (PPP). Las
estimaciones de los efectos de Habilidad Combinatoria General (HCG) sugirieron que los
progenitores 1 (Blue Lake), 5 (G16806), y 6 (Unapal Milenio) son los más adecuados para
usar 'per se' en programas de fitomejoramiento para los caracteres relacionados con
rendimiento y calidad de las vainas, mientras que las combinaciones híbridas 1x2, 1x6,
2x6, 4x5, y 5x6, mostraron las mejores estimaciones de Habilidad Combinatoria Especifica
(HCE) para los caracteres evaluados, lo que sugiere una alta probabilidad de obtener
genotipos superiores. Con la metodología de Hayman el análisis gráfico evidencio la
predominancia de efectos genéticos de sobredominancia para los caracteres días a
cosecha (DAC) y número de vainas por planta (NVP), mientras que para días a floración
(DAF) dominancia incompleta y para longitud de la vaina (LDV) dominancia completa. (Texto tomado de la fuente) | |
dc.description.abstract | A diallelic cross was made between six bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes to estimate
combining ability and variance components. The genotypes were evaluated in two
environments, using a randomized complete block experimental design with four
replications. Seven crop characteristics were analyzed. Diallelic analysis was performed
using Griffing's method 2, model 1 and Hayman. Results showed that additive gene action
was significant for days to flowering (DAF), pod length (LDV) and mean pod weight (PPV),
while non-additive gene action was significant for days to harvest (DAC), number of pods
per plant (NVP), number of seeds per pod (NSV) and yield per plant (PPP). Estimates of
General Combinatorial Ability (GCA) effects suggested that parents 1 (Blue Lake), 5
(G16806), and 6 (Unapal Milenio) are the most suitable for use 'per se' in breeding
programs for yield and pod quality related traits, while the hybrid combinations 1x2, 1x6,
2x6, 4x5, and 5x6, showed the best estimates of Specific Combinatorial Ability (SCA) for
the characters evaluated, suggesting a high probability of obtaining superior genotypes.
With Hayman's methodology, the graphical analysis showed the predominance of genetic
effects of overdominance for the characters days to harvest (DAC) and number of pods per
plant (NVP), while for days to flowering (DAF) incomplete dominance and for pod length
(LDV) complete dominance. | |
dc.language | spa | |
dc.publisher | Universidad Nacional de Colombia | |
dc.publisher | Palmira - Ciencias Agropecuarias - Doctorado en Ciencias Agrarias | |
dc.publisher | Doctorado en Ciencias Agrarias | |
dc.publisher | Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias | |
dc.publisher | Palmira | |
dc.publisher | Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Palmira | |
dc.relation | Abou Sen, T. M. (2020). Gene Action and Combining Ability Analysis in some Soybean Quantitative Characters. Journal of Plant Production, 11(7), 579–586. https://doi.org/10.21608/jpp.2020.110543 | |
dc.relation | Acosta-Gallegos, J., Kelly, J., & Gepts, P. (2007). Prebreeding in common bean and use of genetic diversity from wild germplasm. Crop Science, 47(3), 44–59. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2007.04.0008IPBS | |
dc.relation | Adams, M. R., Golden, D. L., Chen, H., Register, T. C., & Gugger, E. T. (2006). Nutrition and Disease A Diet Rich in Green and Yellow Vegetables Inhibits Atherosclerosis in Mice. The Journal of Nutrition, 136(7), 1886–1889. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/136.7.1886 | |
dc.relation | Agronet. (2017). Área cosechada, producción y rendimiento de Habichuela. En: http://www.agronet.gov.co/Documents/16-HABICHUELA_2017.pdf | |
dc.relation | Agudelo, O., & Montes de Oca, G. (1988). El cultivo de la habichuela. Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario (ICA)., 76–91 | |
dc.relation | Amegbor, I. K., Badu-Apraku, B., & Annor, B. (2017). Combining ability and heterotic patterns of extra-early maturing white maize inbreds with genes from Zea diploperennis under multiple environments. Euphytica, 213(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-016-1823 | |
dc.relation | Araújo, L. C. D., Gravina, G. D. A., Marinho, C. D., Almeida, S. N. C. D., Daher, R. F., & Amaral Júnior, A. T. D. (2012). Contribution of components of production on snap bean yield. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 12(3), 206–210. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-70332012000300007 | |
dc.relation | Arumuganathan, K., & Earle, E. D. (1991). Nuclear DNA content of some important plant species. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 9(3), 208–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02672069 | |
dc.relation | Arunga, E. E., & Van Rheenen, H. A., Owuoche, J. O. (2010). Diallel analysis of Snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties for important traits. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 5(15), 1951–1957. http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/164 | |
dc.relation | Asociación Hortifrutícola de Colombia, A. (2018). ASOHOFRUCOL. Balance del sector hortifrutícola en 2018. Bogotá, Colombia. Recuperado de http://www.asohofrucol.com.co/imagenes/BALANCE_DEL_SECTOR_HORTIFRUTICULTURA_2018.pdf. | |
dc.relation | Atnaf, M., Tesfaye, K., Dagne, K., & Mohammed, H. (2014). Hyman’s diallel analysis to study genetic parameters of phenological traits in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Int J Agric Sci Nat Resour, 1(4), 65–71. | |
dc.relation | Ayo-Vaughan, M. A., Ariyo, O. J., & Alake, C. O. (2013). Combining ability and genetic components for pod and seed traits in cowpea lines. Italian Journal of Agronomy, 8:e10, 73–78. https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2013.e10 | |
dc.relation | Barelli, M. A. A., Vidigal, M. C. G., do Amaral Júnior, A. T., Vidigal Filho, P. S., & Silvério, L. (1999). Genetic control on number of days to flowering and yield components in common bean (Phaseol vulgaris L.). Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 21, 423–427. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v21i0.4252 | |
dc.relation | Becerra-Velásquez, V., & Gepts, P. (1994). RFLP diversity of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in its centres of origin. Genome, 37(2), 256–263. https://doi.org/10.1139/g94-036 | |
dc.relation | Bennett, M. D., & Leitch, I. J. (2011). Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms: Targets, trends and tomorrow. Annals of Botany, 107(3), 467–590. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcq258 | |
dc.relation | Blair, M. W., Chaves, A., Tofiño, A., Calderón, J. F., & Palacio, J. D. (2010). Extensive diversity and inter-genepool introgression in a world-wide collection of indeterminate snap bean accessions. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 120(7), 1381–1391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-010-1262-4 | |
dc.relation | Campos, R., Flor, C. A., Ospina, H. F., & Temple, S. R. (1977). Cruzamiento del fríjol [conjunto audiotutorial]. | |
dc.relation | Castillo, F. S. D., Paredes, Durán, M., Moreno Pérez, E. D. C., & Magdaleno Villar, J. J. (2017). Variedades y densidades de población de frijol ejotero cultivado bajo invernadero e hidroponía. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas, 8(5), 1187–1193. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v8i5.117 | |
dc.relation | Corporación Colombiana Internacional, C. (2010). Análisis internacional del sector Hortofrutícola para Colombia. 1a ed. Bogotá. | |
dc.relation | Crumpacker, D. W., & Allard, R. W. (1962). A Diallel cross analysis of heading date in wheat. Hilgardia, 32(6), 275–319. https://doi.org/10.3733/hilg.v32n06p275. April 1962. | |
dc.relation | Cruz, C. D. (2020). Programa GENES. Aplicativo Computacional em Genética e Estatística. Disponible desde Internet en: www.ufv.br/dbg/genes/genes.htm (con acceso 05/02/2021). Universidade Federal de Viçosa. | |
dc.relation | Cruz, C. D., Regazzi, A. J., & Carneiro, P. C. S. (2004). Modelos biométricos aplicados ao melhoramento genético. 3a ed. Viçosa: Editora UFV. p.688. | |
dc.relation | Cruz, C. D., Regazzi, A. J., & Carneiro, P. C. S. (2012). Modelos Biométricos Aplicados ao Melhoramento Genético.4a ed. Viçosa: Editora UFV. p.514. | |
dc.relation | Cruz, D. P., Gravina, G. A., Oliveira, T. R. A., Gomes, A. B. S., Silva, C. Q., Vivas, M., & Silva, V. B. (2018). Selection of progenies of snap beans using mixed models (REML/BLUP). Genetics and Molecular Research, 17(2) | |
dc.relation | Currence, T. M. (1930). Inheritance studies in Phaseolus vulgaris. Tech Bull Minnesota Agric Exp Stn, 68, 3–28. | |
dc.relation | Da Silva, V. P., Barelli, M. A. A., Felipin-Azevedo, R., Poletine, J. P., & Bernini, C. S. (2020). Agronomic Performance and Heterosis in Common Bean Genotypes. Journal of Agricultural Studies, 8(4), 387–399. https://doi.org/10.5296/jas.v8i4.17329 | |
dc.relation | DANE. (2016). Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística. Tercer Censo Nacional Agropecuario. Recuperado de https://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-tema/agropecuario/censo-nacional-agropecuario-2014#10. | |
dc.relation | De Carvalho, A. C. P. P., Leal, N. R., Rodrigues, R., & Costa, F. A. (1999). Capacidade de combinação para oito caracteres agronômicos em cultivares de feijão-de-vagem de crescimento determinado. Horticultura Brasileira, 17(2), 102–105. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-05361999000200005 | |
dc.relation | Delgado-Salinas, A. O. (1985). Systematics of the Genus Phaseolus (Leguminosae) in North and Central America. University of Texas Austin. | |
dc.relation | Dickinson, A. G., & Jinks, J. L. (1956). A Generalised Analysis of Diallel Crosses. Genetics, 41(1), 65. | |
dc.relation | Dickson, M. H. (1967). Diallel Analysis of Seven Economic Characters in Snap Beans. Crop Science, 7(2), 121-124. | |
dc.relation | dos Santos Trindade, R., do Amaral Júnior, A. T., Rodrigues, R., Viana, J. M. S., & Pereira, M. G. (2011). Combining ability for morphoagronomic traits in common bean and snap bean. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6(29), 6240–6245. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR11.1585 | |
dc.relation | Drijfhout, E. (1978). Inheritance of temperature-dependent string formation in common bean. Annu Rep Bean Improv Coop, 21, 33–34. | |
dc.relation | Drijfhout, E. . (1970). Influence of temperature on string formation of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). Euphytica, 19, 145–151. | |
dc.relation | Eberhart, S. A., & Gardner, C. O. (1966). A General Model for Genetic Effects. Biometrics, 22(4), 864–881. https://doi.org/10.2307/2528079 | |
dc.relation | Echeverri, A., Ceballos, H., & Vallejo Cabrera, F. A. (1999). Análisis dialélico de algunos caracteres cuantitativos en pimentón (Capsicum annuum L.). Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía, 52(2), 611–642. | |
dc.relation | Emerson, R. A. (1904). Heredity in bean hybrids. Ann Rep Nebr Agric Exp St, 17, 33-78. | |
dc.relation | ENA. (2019). DANE, Encuesta nacional agropecuaria (ENA) – Históricos [En línea], Recuperado de: https://www.https://www.dane.gov.co/files/investigaciones/agropecuario/enda/ena/2019/boletin_ena_2019.pdf. | |
dc.relation | Ertiro, B. T., Zeleke, H., Friesen, D., Blummel, M., & Twumasi, A. S. (2013). Relationship between the performance of parental inbred lines and hybrids for food-feed traits in maize (Zea mays L.) in Ethiopia. Field Crops Research, 153, 86–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2013.02.008 | |
dc.relation | Espitia, M. M., Vallejo, F. A., & Baena, D. (2006). Efectos Heteróticos y Habilidad Combinatoria para el rendimiento por planta en Cucurbita moschata DUCH. Ex Poir. Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía Medellín, 59(1), 3105–3121. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0304-28472006000100004&lng=en&tlng=es | |
dc.relation | Falconer, D. S., & Mackay, T. F. C. (1996). Introduction to quantitative genetics (4th ed.). Pearson. Harlow, England. | |
dc.relation | Fasahat, P., Rajabi, A., Rad, J., & Derera, J. (2016). Principles and utilization of combining ability in plant breeding. Biometrics Biostatistics International Journal, 4(1), 1–24. | |
dc.relation | Filgueira, F. A. R. (2013). Parte II-Olericultura especial. Novo manual de olericultura: agrotecnologia moderna na produção e comercialização de hortaliças (Filgueira FAR, ed.). 3rd edn. UFV, Viçosa. | |
dc.relation | Font Quer, P. (2001). Diccionario de Botánica. 2nda ed. Ediciones Península s.a. Barcelona, España. | |
dc.relation | Francelino, F. M., de Amaral Gravina, G. Manhães, C. M., Cardoso, P. M., & de Araújo, L. C. (2011). Evaluation of Promising of snap bean to the North and Northwest Fluminense. Revista Ciência Agronômica, 42(2), 554–562. | |
dc.relation | Franco, M. C., Cassini, S. T., Oliveira, V. R., Vieira, C., & Tsai, S. M. (2001). Combining ability for nodulation in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes from Andean and Middle American gene pools. Euphytica, 118(3), 265–270. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017560118666 | |
dc.relation | Freytag, G. F., & Debouck, D. G. (2002). Taxonomy, Distribution, and Ecology of the Genus Phaseolus (Leguminosae-Papilionodeae) in North America, Mexico and Central America. Taxonomía, distribución y ecología del género Phaseolus (Leguminosae-Papilionodeae) en Norteamérica, México y Centroaméric. In U. Editorial Forth Worth, TX, Botanical Research Institute of Texas (Ed.), Botanical Miscellany (p. 298). SIDA, Botanical Miscellany. | |
dc.relation | Gao, Y., & Wang, H. (2007). Inositol pentakisphosphate mediates Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 282(36), 26490–26502. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M702106200 | |
dc.relation | Gardner, C., & Eberhart, S. (1966). Analysis and interpretation of the variety cross diallel and related populations. Biometrics, 439–452. https://doi.org/10.2307/2528181 | |
dc.relation | Gentry, H. S. (1969). Origin of the common bean,Phaseolus vulgaris. Springer, 23(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02862972 | |
dc.relation | Gepts, P. (1998). Origin and evolution of common bean: past events and recent trends. HortScience, 33(7), 1124–1130. | |
dc.relation | Gepts, P., & Bliss, F. A. (1986). Phaseolin variability among wild and cultivated common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) from Colombia. Economic Botany, 40(4), 469–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02859660 | |
dc.relation | Gepts, P., & Bliss, F. A. (1988). Dissemination pathways of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, Fabaceae) deduced from phaseolin electrophoretic variability. II. Europe and Africa. Econ. Bot, 42(1), 86–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02859038 | |
dc.relation | Gepts, P., Osborn, T. C., Rashka, K., & Bliss, F. A. (1986). Phaseolin-protein variability in wild forms and landraces of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris): evidence for multiple centers of domestication. Economic Botany, 40(4), 451–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02859659 | |
dc.relation | Geraldi, I. O., & De Miranda-Filho, J. B. (1988). Adapted models for the analysis of combining ability of varieties in partial diallel crosses. Revista Brasileira de Genética, 11(2), 419–430. | |
dc.relation | Getachew, E. A., & Tesfaye, A. (2015). Impact ofsowing date and plant spacing on yield, qualityand disease incidence of snap bean(Phaseolus vulgaris l.) varieties at Jimma Southwestern, Ethiopia. Global AdvancedRes. J. Educational Res. and Review, 4(5), 81–89. | |
dc.relation | Gilbert, N. E. G. (1958). Diallel cross in plant breeding. Nature.Com, 12(4), 477. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1958.48 | |
dc.relation | Gomes, A. B. S., Oliveira, T. R. A., Gravina, G. A., Cruz, D. P., Sant’Anna, C. Q. S. S. Daher, R. F., Araújo, L. C., Araújo, K. C., Oliveira, G. H. F., Rocha, R. S., & Pereira, I. M. (2019). Combining ability in snap bean lines in Brazil. Genetics and Molecular Research, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.4238/gmr18214 | |
dc.relation | Gomes, G. R., Furlan, F. F., Freiria, G. H., Gonçalves, L. S. A., & Takahashi, L. S. A. (2017). Production components and yield of bushing snap bean in conventional and organic production systems. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, 38(5), 3353-3361. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n5p3353 | |
dc.relation | Griffing, B. (1956). Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences, 9(4), 463–493. https://doi.org/10.1071/BI9560463 | |
dc.relation | Hallauer, A. R., & Miranda, F. (1988). Quantitative genetics maize breeding (2nd ed.). Iowa State Univ. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600086974 | |
dc.relation | Hamad, I. (1975). Inheritance of Yield, Yield Components, Number of Days to Flowering, Plant Height and Incidence of Interlocular Cavitation of Pods in Snap Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin--Madison. | |
dc.relation | Hayat, I., Ahmad, A., Masud, T., Ahmed, A., & Bashir, S. (2014). Nutritional and health perspectives of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.): an overview. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 54(5), 580–592. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2011.596639 | |
dc.relation | Hayman, B. I. (1954). The analysis of variance of diallel tables. Biometrics, 10(2), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001877 | |
dc.relation | Hayman, B. I. (1958). The Theory and analysis of diallel crosses. II. Genetics, 43(1), 63–85. | |
dc.relation | Hayman, B. I. (1960). The theory and analysis of diallel crosses III. Genetics, 45, 155–172.
IBPGR. (2001). (IPGRI) Descritores para Phaseolus vulgaris. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute. Rome. | |
dc.relation | ICONTEC. (2001). Instituto Colombiano de Normas Tecnicas y Certificación. NTC 1253. Habichuela. Bogotá. | |
dc.relation | Janssen, W. (1987). El cultivo de la habichuela en varios paises de America Latina. Memorias de Un Taller, CIAT, Cali, Colombia, 11 Al 15 de Mayo de 1987. | |
dc.relation | Jhanavi, D. R., Patil, H. B., Justin, P., Hadimani, R. H., Mulla, S. W. R., & Sarvamangala, C. (2018). Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance studies in french bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes. Indian J. Agric. Res, 52(2), 162–166. https://doi.org/10.18805/IJARe.A-4923 | |
dc.relation | Jinks, J. L., & Hayman, B. . (1953). The analysis of diallel crosses. Maize Genetics Cooperation Newsletter, 27, 48–54. | |
dc.relation | Joosten, J. H. . (1927). Een onderzoek naar het kenmerk der “draadloosheid” bij verschillende boonenrassen [Investigations concerning the “stringlessness” of varieties of beans]. Mededelingen van de Landbouwhogeschool Wageningen, 31, 1–49. | |
dc.relation | Kaplan, L. (1981). What is the origin of the common bean? Springer, 35(2), 240–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02858692 | |
dc.relation | Kaplan, L., & Kaplan, L. N. (1988). Phaseolus in Archaeology. In Gepts, P. (ed) Genetic Resources of Phaseolus Beans (pp. 125–142). Kluwer Academic. Dordrecht, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2786-5 | |
dc.relation | Kempthorne, O. (1955). The theory of the diallel cross. Genetics, 41, 451–459. | |
dc.relation | Kolonel, L. N., Hankin, J. H., Whittemore, A. S., Wu, A. H., Gallagher, R. P., Wilkens, L. R., John, E. M., Howe, G. R., Dreon, D. M., & West, D. W. (2000). Vegetables, fruits, legumes and prostate cancer: a multiethnic case-control study. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Biomarkers, 9(8), 795–804. | |
dc.relation | Krause, W., Rodrigues, R., & Leal, N. R. (2012). Capacidade combinatória para características agronômicas em feijão-de-vagem. Revista Ciência Agronômica, 43(3), 522–531. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-66902012000300015 | |
dc.relation | Lamz-Piedra, A., Cárdenas-Travieso, R. ., Ortiz-Pérez, R., Eladio-Alfonzo, L., & Sandrino-Himely, A. (2017). Evaluación preliminar de líneas de frijol común (Phaselus vulgaris L.) promisorios para siembras tempranas en Melena del Sur. Cultivos Tropicales, 38(4), 111–118. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0258-59362017000400016&lng=es&tlng=es | |
dc.relation | Leal, N. R., Hamad, I. A., & Bliss, F. A. (1982). Avaliação de progenitores e linhas avançadas de melhoramento de feijão-de-vagem de crescimento determinado. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 17,(2), 225–231. | |
dc.relation | Leite, P. H. M. P., Barelli, M. A. A., Neves, L. G., da Silva, C. R., & de Oliveira, T. C. (2015). Genetic divergence among common bean cultivars from precocious group. Científica, 43(2), 143–148. https://doi.org/10.15361/1984-5529.2015v43n2p143-148 | |
dc.relation | Leite, P. H. M. P., da Silva, V. P., Gilio, T. A. S., Azevedo, R. F., de Oliveira, T. C., & Barelli, M. A. A. (2019). Diversidade genética em cultivares e linhagens de feijão comum (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) utilizando análises multivariadas. Revista Cultura Agronômica, 28(3), 268–279. https://doi.org/10.32929/2446-8355.2019v28n3p268-279 | |
dc.relation | Linnaeus, C. (1753). Species Plantarum, exhibitentes plantas rita cognitas, ad genera relatas, cum differentiis specificis nominibus triviabilibus, synonymis selectis, locis natalibus, secundum Systema Sexuala digestas.In 2 volumes. Tomus I, pp. [xi], 1–560, Tomus II, pp. 561. | |
dc.relation | Lizarralde, R. . (2013). Dirección de cadenas productivas. Cadena Agroalimentaria de Las Hortalizas. Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural. https://sioc.minagricultura.gov.co/Hortalizas/Documentos/2013-11-30 Cifras Sectoriales.pdf | |
dc.relation | Machado, A. T. (2014). Construção histórica do melhoramento genético de plantas: do convencional ao participativo. Revista Brasileira de Agroecologia, 9(1), 35–50. | |
dc.relation | Márquez, S. F. (1988). Genotecnia vegetal. Tomo II. Editor AGT. México. 563. | |
dc.relation | Mashiqa, P., Moatshe, O., Tiroesele, B., Lekgari, L., & Molosiwa, O. (2019). Response of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes to varying planting dates in Botswana. Journal of Agricultural and Crop Research, 7(2), 26–30. | |
dc.relation | Mather, K., & Jinks, J. I. (1971). Biometrical Genetics. (2nd ed.). Chapman & Hall. https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.19730150511 | |
dc.relation | McIntosh, M. S. (1983). Analysis of Combined Experiments. Agronomy Journal, 75(1), 153–155. | |
dc.relation | Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural. (2017). Anuario estadististico del sector agropecuario y pesquero. Recuperado el 12 de 02 de 2020, de. https://www.agronet.gov.co/estadistica/reportes/EVA/story_content/external_files_/ANUARIO 2017.pdf | |
dc.relation | Mounir, A. M., El-Yazid, A. A., Orabi, I. O. A., Zahran, A. A., & El-Oksh, I. I. (2015). Effect of sowing date, gamma irradiation and intracultivar differences on growth, pod characteristics and some endogenous plant growth regulators in snap Beans. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 11(6), 380–390. | |
dc.relation | Myers, J. ., & Baggett, J. . (1999). Improvement of snap bean. In Common bean improvement in the twenty-first century (pp. 289–329). Springer. | |
dc.relation | Myers, J. ., & Kmiecik, K. (2017). Common Bean: Economic Importance and Relevance to Biological Science Research. In: Pérez de la Vega M., Santalla M., Marsolais F. (eds) The Common Bean Genome. Compendium of Plant Genomes. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63526-2_1 | |
dc.relation | Nienhuis, J., & Singh, S. P. (1986). Combining Ability Analyses and Relationships Among Yield, Yield Components, and Architectural Traits in Dry Bean. Crop Science, 26(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1986.0011183X002600010005x | |
dc.relation | Owusu, E. Y., Amegbor, I. K., Darkwa, K., Oteng-Frimpong, R., & Sie, E. K. (2018). Gene action and combining ability studies for grain yield and its related traits in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Cogent Food & Agriculture, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2018.1519973 | |
dc.relation | Owusu, E. Y., Mohammed, H., Manigben, K. A., Adjebeng-Danquah, J., Kusi, F., Karikari, B., & Sie, E. K. (2020). Diallel Analysis and Heritability of Grain Yield, Yield Components, and Maturity Traits in Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.). The Scientific World Journal, 9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9390287 | |
dc.relation | Pandey, B., & Singh, Y. V. (2010). Combining ability for yield over environment in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. Legume Research, 33(3), 190–195. | |
dc.relation | Pimentel-Gomes, F. (2009). Curso de estatística experimental. 12a. ed., Fundação de Estudos Agrários Luiz de Queiroz. 451 p. | |
dc.relation | Prakken, R. (1934). Inheritance of colours and pod characters in Phaseolus vulgaris L. Genetica, 16, 177–296. | |
dc.relation | Ramalho, M. A. P., Santos, J. B., & Pinto, C. A. B. P. (2008). Genética na Agropecuária. Editora UFLA. In Lavras. | |
dc.relation | Ramírez, L. (2006). Mejora de plantas alógamas. Universidad Pública de Navarra. Pamplona–España,. | |
dc.relation | Raut, D. M., Tamnar, A. B., Burungale, S. V., & Badhe, P. L. (2017). Half diallel analysis in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 6(7), 1807–1819. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.607.218 | |
dc.relation | Rocha, F. D., Stinghen, J. C., Gemeli, M. S., Coimbra, J. L. M., & Guidolin, A. F. (2014). Diallel analysis as a tool when selecting parents for beans. Revista Ciência Agronômica, 45(1), 74–81. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-66902014000100010 | |
dc.relation | Rodrigues, R., Leal, N. R., & Pereira, M. G. (1998). Análise dialélica de seis características agronômicas em Phaseolus vulgaris L. Bragantia, Campinas, 57(2), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0006-87051998000200005 | |
dc.relation | Rojas, B. A., & Sprague, G. F. (1952). A comparison of variance components in corn yield trials III. General and specific combining ability and their interactions with locations and years. Agronomy Journal, 44(9), 562–566. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1952.00021962004400090002x | |
dc.relation | Ruiz, C. M. (2012). Obtención de un híbrido de frijol arbustivo para una cosecha mecanizada. Tecnología En Marcha, 25(2), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.18845/tm.v25i2.311 | |
dc.relation | Santalla, M., Rodiño, A., & De Ron, A. (2002). Allozyme evidence supporting southwestern Europe as a secondary center of genetic diversity for common bean. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 104(6–7), 934–944. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-001-0844-6 | |
dc.relation | Servicio Nacional de Inspección y Certificación de semillas. (2017). Servicio Nacional de Inspección y Certificación de semillas. Guía Técnica para la Descripción Varietal de frijol (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). | |
dc.relation | Sheikh, F. A., Sofi, P. A., Wani, S. H., Khan, M. N., Dar, Z. A., & Lone, J. A. (2016). Stability analysis in bush type Rajmash (Phaseolus vulgaris l.) under temperate Kashmir conditions. International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Biotechnology, 9(5), 745. https://doi.org/10.5958/2230-732X.2016.00097.8 | |
dc.relation | Silbernagel, M. J. (1986). Snap Bean Breeding. In Breeding Vegetable Crops (J. Bassett, pp. 243–292). | |
dc.relation | Silva, M. P. da, Amaral Júnior, A. T. do, Rodrigues, R., Pereira, M. G., & Viana, A. P. (2004). Genetic control on morphoagzronomic traits in snap bean. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 47(6), 855–862. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132004000600004 | |
dc.relation | Singh, A., & Saini, S. (1982). A note on combining ability in French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Haryana Journal of Horticultural Science, 11(3–4), 270–273. | |
dc.relation | Singh, B. K., & Singh, B. (2015). Breeding perspectives of snap beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Vegetable Science, 42(1), 1–17. | |
dc.relation | Singh, I., Badaya, S. N., & Tikka, S. B. S. (2006). Combining ability for yield over environments in cowpea. Indian Journal of Crop Science, 1(1–2), 205–206. | |
dc.relation | Singh, S. P., Gepts, P., & Debouck, D. G. (1991). Races of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, Fabaceae). Economic Botany, 45(3), 379–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02887079 | |
dc.relation | Singh, S. P., & Voysest, O. (1997). Ampliación de la base genetica de los cultivares de frijol: hibridación interespecífica en Phaseolus especies. In Taller de Mejoramiento de Frijol para el siglo XXI. Bases para una Estrategia para América Latina (p. 559). | |
dc.relation | Singh S. (2001). Broadening the genetic base of common bean cultivars. Crop Science, 41(6), 1659–1675. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2001.1659 | |
dc.relation | Sprague, G. F., & Tatum, L. A. (1942). General vs. Specific Combining Ability in Single Crosses of Corn. Agronomy Journal, 34(10), 923–932. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1942.00021962003400100008x | |
dc.relation | Sprague, G. S., & Tatum, I. . (1942). General vs. Specific combining ability in single crosess of corn. J. Amer. Soc. Agron., 34, 923–932. | |
dc.relation | Taha, N. M. (2019). Genotype× environment interaction and stability analysis for some economic characters in snap bean. Arab Universities Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 27(2), 1541-1558. https://doi.org/10.21608/AJS.2019.11880.1016 | |
dc.relation | Tohme, J., Gonzalez, D. O., Beebe, S., & Duque, M. C. (1996). AFLP analysis of gene pools of a wild bean core collection. Crop Sci., 36(5), 1375–1384. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183X003600050048x | |
dc.relation | Tschermak, E. V. (1916). Über den gegenwärtigen Stand der Gemüsezüchtung. Zeitschrift Für Pflanzenzüchtung, 4, 65–104. | |
dc.relation | Tuba Bıçer, B. T., & Şakar, D. (2008). Heritability and gene effects for yield and yield components in chickpea. Hereditas, 145(5), 220–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.2008.02061.x | |
dc.relation | Uddin, F. J., Kashem, M. A., Islam, A. M., & Sarkar, M. A. R. (2017). Optimizing sowing date for French bean varieties under Bangladesh condition. Annual Research & Review in Biology, 21(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.9734/ARRB/2017/38096 | |
dc.relation | USDA. (2019). Disponibilidad y consumo de alimentos del USDA. [(consultado el 12 de julio de 2019)];Disponible en línea: https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/ag-and-food-statistics-charting-the-essentials/food-availability-and-consumption/ | |
dc.relation | Vale, N. M. D., Barili, L. D., Oliveira, H. M. D., Carneiro, J. E. D. Carneiro, P. C. S., & Silva, F. L. D. (2015). Escolha de genitores quanto à precocidade e produtividade de feijão tipo carioca. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 50(2), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2015000200006 | |
dc.relation | Vallejo, F. ., & Estrada, E. . (2016). Mejoramiento genético de plantas. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. (Segunda ed). | |
dc.relation | Vallejo, F. A., Espitia, M., Estrada, E., & Ramirez, H. (2010). Genética vegetal. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Palmira, Colombia. 383. | |
dc.relation | Vallejo, F. A., & Estrada, E. I. (2004). Producción de hortalizas de clima cálido. Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Palmira. | |
dc.relation | Vallejo, F. A., Gutierrez, A., Estrada, E. I., Cardozo, C. I., García, M. A., Sánchez, M. S., & Baena, D. (2004). Cultivo de habichuela: variedad UNAPAL milenio. Editorial UN. http://www.uneditorial.net/uflip/Cultivo-de-habichuela-variedad-UNAPAL-milenio/pubData/source/Cultivo-de-habichuela-variedad-UNAPAL-milenio.PDF | |
dc.relation | Vaz, D. D. C., Morais-Júnior, O. P. D., & Peixoto, N. (2017). Agro-morphological characterization and genetic divergence assessment in bush snap bean genotypes. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical, 47(2), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-40632016v4743525 | |
dc.relation | Viana, J. M. S., Cruz, C. D., & Cardoso, A. A. (1999). Theory and analysis of partial diallel crosses. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 22(4), 591–599. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-47571999000400021 | |
dc.relation | Vidyakar, V., Lal, G. M., Singh, M. K., & Kumar, A. (2017). Study on genetic diversity in French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, New Delhi, 6(6), 184–187. | |
dc.relation | Wade, B. L. (1937). Breeding and improvement of peas and beans. In United States Department of Agriculture: Yearbook of Agriculture (pp. 251–282). | |
dc.relation | Whankate, R.A.; Garande, V.K.; Shinde, U.S.; Dhumal, S.S.; Sonawane, P.N.; SARVADE, S.A.; Ambad, S.N. (2021). Growth and Yield Performance of French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Germplasm under Sub-Montane Zone of Maharashtra. Legume Research: An International Journal, 44(2): 138–144.
https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-4249 | |
dc.relation | Wellensiek, S. J. (1922). De erfelikheid van het al of niet bezit van “draad” bij rassen van Phaseolus vulgaris L. Genetica, 4, 443–446. | |
dc.relation | Yordanov, M. (1983). Heterosis in the Tomato (pp. 189–219). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-81977-3_7 | |
dc.relation | Zdravković, M., Zdravković, J., Stanković, L., Pavlović, N., Zdravković, J., Stanković, L., & Pavlović, N. (2005). Combining abilities of inheriting first pod height of some french bean lines (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Genetika, 37(1), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.2298/GENSR0501065Z | |
dc.relation | Zeffa, D. M., Perini, L. J., Constantino, L. V., Freiria, G. H., & Gonçalves, L. S. A. (2020). A New Classification proposal of coefficients of variation for morpho-agronomic traits in Snap Beans. Functional Plant Breeding Journal, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.35418/2526-4117/v2n2a3 | |
dc.rights | Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional | |
dc.rights | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.title | Estimación de la habilidad combinatoria y componentes de la variación genética de los caracteres relacionados con producción y calidad de la vaina en habichuela (Phaseolus vulgaris L) | |
dc.type | Tesis | |