Incidencia de las capacidades de exploración y explotación en la innovación. El rol de los factores culturales

dc.contributorNaranjo Valencia, Julia Clemencia
dc.contributorCULTURA ORGANIZACIONAL Y GESTION HUMANA
dc.creatorJurado Salgado, Jorge Iván
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-19T21:10:58Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-21T16:56:48Z
dc.date.available2021-01-19T21:10:58Z
dc.date.available2022-09-21T16:56:48Z
dc.date.created2021-01-19T21:10:58Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifierJurado S. Jorge I. Incidencia de las capacidades de exploración y explotación en la innovación. El rol de los factores culturales.Tesis investigación presentada(o) como requisito parcial para optar al título de: Doctor en Ingeniería- Industria y Organizaciones. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Ingeniería y Arquitectura, Departamento de Ingeniería Industrial Manizales, Colombia 2020
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/78828
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3396727
dc.description.abstractThe present study evaluates the impact of exploration and exploitation capacities on radical and incremental innovation, respectively. Recent studies have indicated the importance of examining said relationship in further depth, through the incorporation of moderating elements, such as culture. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the moderating effect of adaptability and alignment, cultural factors, on the relationship between exploration and exploitation and innovation capacities. On one hand, the moderating effect of adaptability, on the relationship between exploration and radical innovation, was evaluated. On the other, the moderating effect of alignment on the relationship between exploitation and incremental innovation was examined. These relationships were analyzed in a sample of large Colombian companies, from both the industrial and service sectors, by way of structural equation modeling, in Smartpls3. The results indicate a positive relationship between exploration and radical innovation, as well as between exploitation and incremental innovation. Regarding the moderation of cultural factors, it was found that alignment moderated the relationship between exploitation and incremental innovation, but adaptability did not moderate the relationship between exploration and radical innovation. On a practical level, this study may guide companies in their management of cultural factors, in an effort to enhance innovation.
dc.description.abstractEste estudio evalúa el impacto de las capacidades de exploración y explotación en la innovación radical e incremental, respectivamente. Estudios recientes han señalado la importancia de profundizar en la relación incorporando elementos moderadores como la cultura. El propósito de este estudio es determinar el efecto moderador de los factores culturales adaptabilidad y alineación, en la relación entre capacidades de exploración y explotación e innovación. Por un lado, se evalúa el efecto moderador de la adaptabilidad en la relación entre exploración e innovación radical. Por otro lado, se evalúa el efecto moderador de la alineación en la relación entre explotación e innovación incremental. Estas relaciones fueron analizadas en una muestra de grandes empresas colombianas tanto del sector industrial como del sector servicios, mediante Structural Equation Modeling in Smartpls3. Los resultados señalan una relación positiva entre exploración e innovación radical, como también entre explotación e innovación incremental. Sobre la moderación de los factores culturales, se encontró que la alineación modera la relación entre explotación e innovación incremental, pero la adaptabilidad no modera la relación entre exploración e innovación radical. A nivel práctico, el estudio orienta las organizaciones sobre la gestión de los factores culturales para mejorar la innovación.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherManizales - Ingeniería y Arquitectura - Doctorado en Ingeniería - Industria y Organizaciones
dc.publisherDepartamento de Ingeniería Industrial
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Manizales
dc.relationAbernathy, W., & Clark, K. (1985). Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Research Policy, 14(1), 3–22.
dc.relationAhuja, G., & Morris, C. (2001). Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 521–543.
dc.relationAlbis, N., & Álvarez, I. (2017). A comparative analysis of the innovation performance between foreign subsidiaries and owned domestic firms in Colombian manufacturing sector. Journal Globalization, Competitiveness and Governability, 11(2), 20–41.
dc.relationAlegre, J., & Chiva, R. (2013). Linking entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: The role of organizational learning capability and innovation performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 51(4), 491-507. tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.111/jsbm.12005.
dc.relationAlegre, J., Sengupta, K., & Lapiedra, R. (2013). Knowledge management and innovation performance in a high-tech SMEs industry. International Small Business Journal, 31(4), 454–470.
dc.relationAlexiev, A., Jansen, J., Van den Bosch, F., & Volberda, H. (2010). Top management team advice seeking and exploratory innovation: The moderating role of TMT heterogeneity. Journal of Management Studies, 47(7), 1343-1364.
dc.relationAli, M., & Park, K. (2016). The mediating role of an innovative culture in the relationship between absorptive capacity and technical and non-technical innovation. Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1669–1675.
dc.relationAncona, D., Goodman, P., Lawrence, B., & Tushman, M. (2001). Time: A new research lens. Academy of Management Review, 26(4), 645–663.
dc.relationANDI. (2018). Ranking de innovación empresarial. Bogotá: Asociación Nacional de Industriales.
dc.relationANDI. (2019). Insigths del ranking de innovación empresarial. Bogotá: Asociación Nacional de Industriales.
dc.relationArbeláez, M., & Parra, M. (2011). Innovation, R&D Investment and Productivity in Colombian Firms. IDB Working Paper No. IDB-WP-251. Bogotá: Fedesarrollo - Inter-American Development Bank.
dc.relationArias, J. A., & Lozada, N. (2018). Capacidad de innovación de producto y desempeño innovador: efectos moderadores de síndromes organizacionales. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 23(81), 235-252.
dc.relationArnold, T., Fang, E., & Palmatier, R. (2011). The effects of customer acquisition and retention orientations on a firm’s radical and incremental innovation performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(2), 234–251.
dc.relationArranz, N., & De Arroyabe, J. F. (2012). Effect of formal contracts, relational norms and trust on performance of joint research and development projects. British Journal of Management, 23(4), 575-588.
dc.relationAtuahene, K. (2005). Resolving the Capability–Rigidity Paradox in New Product Innovation. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 61–83.
dc.relationBaker, W., & Sinkula, J. (2007). Does market orientation facilitate balanced innovation programs? An organizational learning perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(4), 316-334.
dc.relationBalachandra, R., & Friar, J. (1997). Factors for success in R&D projects and new product innovation: a contextual framework. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 44(3), 276–287.
dc.relationBanker, R., Chang, H., & Kemerer, C. (1994). Evidence on economies of scale in software development. Information and Software Technology, 36(5), 275–282.
dc.relationBarney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120.
dc.relationBaum, J. A., Li, S., & Usher, J. (2000). Making the Next Move: How Experiential and Vicarious Learning Shape the Locations of Chains’ Acquisitions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(4), 766-811.
dc.relationBeckman, C. (2006). The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 741–758.
dc.relationBenner, M., & Tushman, M. (2002). Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 676–707.
dc.relationBenner, M., & Tushman, M. (2003). Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited. The Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238-256.
dc.relationBerraies, S., & El Abidine, S. (2019). Do leadership styles promote ambidextrous innovation? Case of knowledge-intensive firms. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(5), 836-859.
dc.relationBeugelsdijk, S., Koen, C., & Noorderhaven, N. (2009). A dyadic approach to the impact of differences in organizational culture on relationship performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 38(3), 312-323.
dc.relationBiazzo, S. (2009). Flexibility, structuration, and simultaneity in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(3), 336–353.
dc.relationBooz Allen & Hamilton. (1982). New Product Management for the 1980s. New York: Booz Allen & Hamilton.
dc.relationBoumgarden, P; Nickerson, J & Zenger, T.R (2012). Sailing into the wind: exploring the relationships among ambidexterity, vacillation, and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(6), 587-610
dc.relationBrem, A., & Voigt, K. (2009). Integration of market pull and technology push in the corporate front end and innovation management—Insights from the German software industry. Technovation, 29(5), 351–367.
dc.relationBryman, A. (1988). Quantity y Quality in Social Research. New York: Ed . Routledge.
dc.relationBuccier, D., Javalg, R., & Cavusgil, E. (2020). International new venture performance: Role of international entrepreneurial culture, ambidextrous innovation, and dynamic marketing capabilities. International Business Review, 29, 1-15
dc.relationBüschgens, T., Bausch, A., & Balkin, D. (2010). Organizational culture and climate:An integrative review. In Annual Meetings of the Academy of Management.
dc.relationBüschgens, T., Bausch, A., & Balkin, D. (2013). Organizational Culture and Innovation: A Meta-Analytic Review. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(4), 763–781.
dc.relationBusom, I., & Vélez, J. (2017). Innovation, Public Support, and Productivity in Colombia. A Cross-industry Comparison. World Development, 99, 75–94.
dc.relationCameron, K., & Quinn, R. (1999). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework. New York: Addison-Wesley.
dc.relationCamio, M. I. (2012). La dimensión emocional en las culturas innovadoras. Un estudio de casos de Pymes de software. Faedpyme international review, 1(2), 53-61.
dc.relationCamisón, C., Boronat, M., & Forés, B. (2018). The interplay between firms’ internal and external capabilities in exploration and exploitation. Management Decision, 56(7), 1559–1580.
dc.relationCamisón, C., Forés, B., & Boronat, M. (2016). Cluster and firm-specific antecedents of organizational innovation. Current Issues in Tourism, 20(6), 617–646.
dc.relationCao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., & Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects. Organization Science, 20(4), 781–796.
dc.relationCarmeli, A., & Halevi, M. (2009). How top management team behavioral integration and behavioral complexity enable organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of contextual ambidexterity. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(2), 207-218. doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.01.011.
dc.relationChandy, R., & Tellis, G. (1998). Organizing for Radical Product Innovation: The Overlooked Role of Willingness to Cannibalize. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(4), 474-487.
dc.relationChandy, R., & Tellis, G. (2000). The incumbent’s curse? Incumbency, size, and radical product innovation. Journal of Marketing, 64(3), 1-17. doi:www.jstor.org/stable/3203484.
dc.relationChatman, J., Caldwell, D., O’Reilly, C., & Doerr, B. (2014). Parsing organizational culture: How the norm for adaptability influences the relationship between culture consensus and financial performance in high‐technology firms. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(6), 785-808.
dc.relationCho, H., & Pucik, V. (2005). Relationship between innovativeness, quality, growth, profitability and market value. Strategic Management Journal, 26(6), 555-575.
dc.relationChudnovsky, D., López, A., & Pupato, G. (2006). Innovation and productivity in developing countries: A study of Argentine manufacturing firms’ behavior (1992–2001). Research Policy, 35(2), 266–288.
dc.relationCirera, X., & Maloney, W. (2017). The innovation paradox: Developing-country capabilities and the unrealized promise of technological catch-up. New York: The World Bank.
dc.relationCohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
dc.relationCohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.
dc.relationCooper, R., & De Brentani, U. (1991). New industrial financial services: What distinguishes the winners? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 8(2), 75-90.
dc.relationCórdoba, J., & Naranjo, J. (2017). Incidencia de la inversión en innovación en las ventas de productos innovadores. Evidencia empírica en empresas manufactureras de Colombia. Información Tecnológica, 28(2), 153–166.
dc.relationCostanza, D., Blacksmith, N., Coats, M., Severt, J., & DeCostanza, A. (2015). The Effect of Adaptive Organizational Culture on Long-Term Survival. Journal Bus Psycholgie - Springer Science+Business, DOI 10.1007/s10869-015-9420-y.
dc.relationCoy, D., Ruiz, O. & Botero, L. (2016). Experiencia de co-creación para la generación de cultura de innovación: hacia la formulación de una estrategia de innovación para una institución universitaria. En COGESTEC, Comunidad de Gestión Tecnológica y de la Innovación. Medellín: COGESTEC.
dc.relationCrespi, G., & Zuñiga, P. (2012). Innovation and productivity: Evidence from six latin american countries. World Development, 40(2), 273–290.
dc.relationCrossan, M., & Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi‐dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1154–1191.
dc.relationCuevas, G., Cabello, C., & Carmona, A. (2014). Product Innovation: Do They Always Work Well Together? British Journal of Management, 25(2), 266-284.
dc.relationDamanpour, F. (1991). Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis Of Effects Of Determinants and Moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555–590.
dc.relationDamanpour, F. (1996). Organizational Complexity and Innovation: Developing and Testing Multiple Contingency Models. Management Science, 42, 693-716.
dc.relationDamanpour, F., & Gopalakrishnan, S. (2001). The dynamics of the adoption of products and process innovations in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 38, 45-65.
dc.relationDANE. (2018). Octava Encuesta Nacional de Innovación y Desarrollo Tecnológico (Sector Servicios) 2016-2017. Obtenido de Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística: http://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-tema/tecnologia-e-innovacion/encuestade-desar
dc.relationDANE. (2019). Octava Encuesta Nacional de Innovación y Desarrollo Tecnológico (Industria Manufacturera) 2017-2018. Obtenido de Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística: http://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-tema/tecnologia-e-innovacion/encuestade-desar
dc.relationde Araújo, A. L., Knudsen, M. P., & Søndergaard, H. A. (2014). Neither invented nor shared here: The impact and management of attitudes for the adoption of open innovation practices. Technovation, 34(3), 149-161.
dc.relationDe Clercq, D., Thongpapanl, N., & Dimov, D. (2014). Contextual ambidexterity in SMEs: the roles of internal and external rivalry. Small Business Economics, 42(1), 191–205.
dc.relationDe Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2007). How leaders influence employees’ innovative behaviour. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(1), 41–64.
dc.relationDellana, S., & Hauser, R. (1999). Toward defining the quality culture. Engineering Management Journal, 11(2), 11-15.
dc.relationDenison, D. (1990). Corporate culture and organizational effectiveness. New York: Wiley.
dc.relationDenison, D., & Mishra, A. (1995). Toward a Theory of Organizational Culture and Effectiveness. Organization Science, 6(2), 204–223.
dc.relationDouglas, T., & Judge, W. (2001). Total Quality Management Implementation and Competitive Advantage: The Role of Structural Control and Exploration. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 158-169.
dc.relationDroge, C., Calantone, R., & Harmancioglu, N. (2008). New product success: Is it really controllable by managers in highly turbulent environments? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(3), 272-286.
dc.relationEisenhardt, K., & Martin, J. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10‐11), 1105–1121.
dc.relationFalk, R., & Miller, N. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. University of Akron Press.
dc.relationFelício, J., Caldeirinha, V., & Dutra, A. (2019). Ambidextrous capacity in small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Business Research, 101, 607–614.
dc.relationFischer, T. A., Huber, T. L., & Dibbern, J. (2011). Contractual and relational governance as substitutes and complements–explaining the development of different relationships. In Theory-guided modeling and empiricism in information systems research (pp. 65-83). Physica-Verlag HD.
dc.relationFornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics. Journal of Marketing research, 18(3), 382-388. doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313.
dc.relationGalbraith, J. (1973). Designing complex organizations. Boston: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.
dc.relationGallego, J., Gutiérrez, L., & Taborda, R. (2015). Innovation and Productivity in the Colombian Service and Manufacturing Industries. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 51(3), 612–634.
dc.relationGarcía, D., & Gálvez, E. (2012). Impacto de la innovación sobre el rendimiento de la MIPYME: Un estudio empírico en Colombia. Estudios gerenciales, 28(122), 11-27.
dc.relationGarcía, D., Gálvez, E., & Maldonado, G. (2016). Efecto de la innovación en el crecimiento y el desempeño de las Mipymes de la Alianza del Pacífico. Un estudio empírico. Estudios Gerenciales, 32(141), 326-335.
dc.relationGarcía, R., & Calantone, R. (2002). A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19(2), 110-32.
dc.relationGatignon, H., Tushman, M., Smith, W., & Anderson, P. (2002). A Structural Approach to Assessing Innovation: Construct Development of Innovation Locus, Type, and Characteristics. Management Science, 48(9), 1103–1122.
dc.relationGattermann, M., Hoffmann, C., Jiménez, D., & Cegarra, J. (2016). Network Effects on Radical Innovation and Financial Performance: An Open-mindedness Approach. BAR (Brazilian Administration Review), 13(4), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2016160057.
dc.relationGefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(1), doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.00407.
dc.relationGhoshal, S., & Bartlett, C. (1994). Linking organizational context and managerial action: The dimensions of quality of management. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S2), 91–112.
dc.relationGibson, C., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterit. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226. doi.org/10.5465/20159573.
dc.relationGil, M., & Moreno, M. (2013). Driving human resources towards quality and innovation in a highly competitive environment. International Journal of Manpower, 34(8), 839–860. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-07-2013-0183.
dc.relationGómez, H., & Mitchell, D. (2014). Innovación y emprendimiento en Colombia-Balance, perspectivas y recomendaciones de política: 2014-2018. Cuadernos de Fedesarrollo, 73.
dc.relationGordon, G. G. (1985). The relationship of corporate culture to industry sector and corporate performance. Gaining control of the corporate culture, 103, 125.
dc.relationGordon, G., & DiTomaso, N. (1992). Predicting corporate performance from organizational culture. Journal of Management Studies, 29(6).
dc.relationGrazzi, M., & Pietrobelli, C. (2016). El desempeño de las empresas en América Latina y el Caribe: factores microeconómicos y el rol de la innovación. La Política de innovación en América Latina y el Caribe, 25.
dc.relationHair, J., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152.
dc.relationHair, J., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Los Ángeles: SAGE.
dc.relationHalevi, M., Carmeli, A., & Brueller, N. (2015). Ambidexterity in SBUs: TMT behavioral integration and environmental dynamism. Human Resource Management, 54, 2-16. doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21665.
dc.relationHarmancioglu, N., Grinstein, A., & Goldman, A. (2010). Innovation and performance outcomes of market information collection efforts: The role of top management team involvement. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27(1), 33–43. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2009.09.005.
dc.relationHe, Z., & Wong, P. (2004). Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481–494. doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0078.
dc.relationHelfat, C. (2007). Stylized facts, empirical research and theory development in management. Strategic Organization, 5(2), 185–192. doi.org/10.1177/1476127007077559.
dc.relationHenseler, J., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.
dc.relationHernandez, M., Molina, F., & Rodriguez, A. (2012). Learning processes, their impact on innovation performance and the moderating role of radicalness. European Journal of Innovation Management. 15(1), 77-98.
dc.relationHernández, R., & Mendoza, C. (2018). Metodología de la Investigación: Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. México: McGraw-Hill, Interamericana.
dc.relationHernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, P. (2010). Metodología de la Investigación. México: McGrawHill.
dc.relationHill, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2014). Ambidexterity and Survival in Corporate Venture Units. Journal of Management, 40(7), 1899–1931. doi.org/10.1177/0149206312445925.
dc.relationHofstede, G. (2010). The GLOBE debate: Back to relevance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(8), 1339–1346. doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2010.31.
dc.relationHogan, S. J., & Coote, L. V. (2014). Organizational culture, innovation, and performance: A test of Schein's model. Journal of business research, 67(8), 1609-1621.
dc.relationHollander, S. (1965). The sources of increased efficiency: A study of DuPont rayon plants. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press Books.
dc.relationHolmqvist, M. (2004). Experiential learning processes of exploitation and exploration within and between organizations: an empirical study of product development. Organization Science, 15(1), 70-81.
dc.relationHu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.
dc.relationHurley, R., & Hult, G. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: An integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 42–54.
dc.relationIm, G., & Rai, A. (2008). Knowledge Sharing Ambidexterity in Long-Term Interorganizational Relationships. Management Science, 54(7), 1281–1296. doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1080.0902.
dc.relationJansen, J., Tempelaar, M., van den Bosch, F., & Volberda, H. (2009). Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: The mediating role of integration mechanisms. Organization Science, 20(4), 797–811. doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0415.
dc.relationJansen, J., Van den Bosch, F., & Volberda, H. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation and performance: effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661-1674.
dc.relationJaramillo, L., Fuentes, N., Ramírez, A., & López, A. (2016). Diagnóstico de la cultura empresarial de innovación en empresas de Medellín-Colombia. En COGESTEC, Comunidad de Gestión Tecnológica y de la Innovación. Medellín: COGESTEC.
dc.relationJiménez, D., & Sanz, R. (2012). Efectos de la estrategia de innovación en el éxito de los nuevos productos: el papel moderador del entorno. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de La Empresa, 21(4), 323–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rede.
dc.relationJunni, P., Sarala, R., Taras, V., & Tarba, S. (2013). Organizational Ambidexterity and Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 299–312. doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0015.
dc.relationKang, S., & Snell, S. (2009). Intellectual capital architectures and ambidextrous lerning: a framework for human resource management. Journal of Management, 65-92. doi.org/10.11/j.1467-6486.2008.00776.x.
dc.relationKauppila, O. (2010). Creating ambidexterity by integrating and balancing structurally separate interorganizational partnerships. Strategic Organization, 8(4), 283–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127010387409.
dc.relationKhan, S., & Mir, A. (2019). Ambidextrous culture, contextual ambidexterity and new product innovations: The role of organizational slack and environmental factors. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(4), 652–663. doi.org/10.1002/bse.2287.
dc.relationKhazanchi, S., Lewis, M., & Boyer, K. (2007). Innovation-supportive culture: The impact of organizational values on process innovation. Journal of Operations Management, 25(4), 871–884. doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2006.08.003.
dc.relationKyriakopoulos, K., & Moorman, C. (2004). Tradeoffs in marketing exploitation and exploration strategies: The overlooked role of market orientation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(3), 219–240. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2004.01.001.
dc.relationLaursen, K., & Slater, A. (2006). Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among u.k. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 131–150.
dc.relationLavie, D., Stettner, U., & Tushman, M. (2010). Exploration and Exploitation Within and Across Organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 109–155. doi.org/10.1080/19416521003691287.
dc.relationLee, C., & Huang, Y. (2012). Knowledge stock, ambidextrous learning, and firm performance. Management Decision, 20(6), 1096-1116.
dc.relationLee, K., Woo, H., & Joshi, K. (2017). Pro-innovation culture, ambidexterity and new product development performance: Polynomial regression and response surface analysis. European Management Journal, 35(2), 249–26
dc.relationLee, R., Lee, J.-H., & Garrett, T. (2019). Synergy effects of innovation on firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 99, 507–515. doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.08.032.
dc.relationLeifer, R., O’Connor, G., & Rice, M. (2001). Implementing radical innovation in mature firms: The role of hubs. Academy of Management Perspectives, 15(3), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2001.5229646.
dc.relationLennerts, S., Schulze, A., & Tomczak, T. (2020). The asymmetric effects of exploitation and exploration on radical and incremental innovation performance: An uneven affair. European Management Journal, 38(1), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.06.
dc.relationLevinthal, D., & March, J. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2), 95–112. doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250141009.
dc.relationLi, W., Ing, H., Wei, H., & Pey, D. (2019) Aligning organizational culture and operations strategy to improve innovation outcomes: An integrated perspective in organizational management. Journal of Organizational Change Management,
dc.relationLichtenthaler, U., & Ernst, H. (2006). Attitudes to externally organising knowledge management tasks: a review, reconsideration and extension of the NIH syndrome. R&D Management, 36(4), 367-386.
dc.relationLim, E., & António, N. S. (2020). National culture as a moderator in ambidexterity-performance relationships: a meta-analysis. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 21(1), 128-149.
dc.relationLópez, E., Garcia, F., & García, S. (2012). De la organización que aprende a la organización ambidiestra: Evolución teórica del aprendizaje organizativo. Cuadernos de Administración, 25(45), 11–37.
dc.relationMadanmohan, T. (2005). Incremental Technicak innovations and their determinants. International Journal of Innovation Management (Ijim), 09(04), 481–510.
dc.relationMalaver, F., & Vargas, M. (2011). Formas de innovar, desempeño innovador y competitividad industrial. Un estudio a partir de la segunda encuesta de innovación en la industria de Bogotá y Cundinamarca. Bogotá: Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.
dc.relationMarch, J. (1991). Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71.
dc.relationMarsh, H., Hau, K., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), 320-341.
dc.relationMatzler, K., Abfalter, D., Mooradian, T., & Bailom, F. (2013). Corporate culture as an antecedent of successful exploration and exploitation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 17(05), doi.org/10.1142/S1363919613500254.
dc.relationMay, T. (2011). Social research: Issues, methods and process. New York, NY & Berkshire, England: McGraw-Hill University Press.
dc.relationMcLaughlin, P., Bessant, J., & Smart, P. (2008). Developing an organisation culture to facilitate radical innovation. International Journal of Technology Management, 44(3/4), 298-323. doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2008.021041.
dc.relationMenguc, B., & Auh, S. (2010). Development and return on execution of product innovation capabilities: The role of organizational structure. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(5), 820-831.
dc.relationMenon, A., G., S., Bharadwaj, P., Tej, A., & Steven W., E. (1999). Antecedents and Consequences of Marketing Strategy Making: A Model and a Test. Journal of Marketing, 63 (April), 18-40.
dc.relationMiles, R., & Snow, C. (1978). Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process. Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 546–562. doi.org/10.5465/amr.1978.4305755.
dc.relationMolina, F., Jiménez, D., & Munuera, J. (2011). Product competence exploitation and exploration strategies: The impact on new product performance through quality and innovativeness. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(7), 1172–1182.
dc.relationMom, T., Fourné, S., & Jansen, J. (2015). Managers’ Work Experience, Ambidexterity, and Performance: The Contingency Role of the Work Context. Human Resource Management, 54(S1), s133–s153. doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21663.
dc.relationMoon, H., Quigley, N. R., & Marr, J. C. (2012). How interpersonal motives explain the influence of organizational culture on organizational productivity, creativity, and adaptation: The ambidextrous interpersonal motives (AIM) model of organizational culture. Organizational Psychology Review, 2(2), 109-128.
dc.relationMyers, S., & Marquis, D. (1969). Successful industrial innovations. A study of factors underlying innovation in selected firms. Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation.
dc.relationNaranjo, J. C., Valle, R., & Jiménez, D. (2010). Organizational culture as determinant of product innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 13(4), 466-480.
dc.relationNaranjo, J., Calderón, G., Jiménez, D., & Sanz, R. (2018). Entrepreneurship and innovation: Evidence in colombian SMEs. En Handbook of Research on Intrapreneurship and Organizational Sustainability in SMEs (págs. 294–316). IGI Global.
dc.relationNaranjo, J., Jimenez, D., & Sanz, R. (2017a). Impact of Organisational Culture on New Product Success: an Empirical Study of Spanish Firms. European Management Review, 14(4), 377–390. doi.org/10.1111/emre.12116.
dc.relationNaranjo, J. C., Jiménez‐Jiménez, D. & Sanz‐Valle, R. (2017b). Organizational culture and radical innovation: Does innovative behavior mediate this relationship?. Creativity and Innovation Management, Vol. 26, pp. 407-417.
dc.relationNaranjo, J., Valle, R., & Jiménez, D. (2010). Organizational culture as determinant of product innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management.
dc.relationNaranjo, J., Vidal, R., & Calderón, G. (2019). Characterization of Innovation Research Published in Latin American Journals Indexed in WoS. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), 16(07), 1–38.
dc.relationNatarajan, R. (2002). Computer-aided power system analysis. CRC Press.
dc.relationNaveh, E., & Erez, M. (2004). Innovation and attention to detail in the quality improvement paradigm. Management Science, 50(11), 1576-1586.
dc.relationNewburry, W., McIntyre, J., & Xavier, W. (2016). Exploring the interconnections between institutions, innovation, geography, and internationalization in emerging markets. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 11(2), https://doi.org/10.1108/IJoEM-04-2015-0080.
dc.relationNunnally, J., & Berenstein, I. H. (1967). Teoría psicométrica. Nueva York: McGraw Hill.
dc.relationO’Connor, G. (2008). Major Innovation as a Dynamic Capability: A Systems Approach. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(4), 313–330. doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00304.x.
dc.relationO’Reilly, C., & Tushman, M. (2013). Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present, and Future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324–338. doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0025.
dc.relationO’Reilly, C., Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. (1991). People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person–organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 487–516.
dc.relationOcampo, A., Naranjo, J., & Calderón, H. (2020). How the Perception of Obstacles to Innovation Affects Innovation Results. Evidence in a Developing Country. In press.
dc.relationOCDE. (2005). Manual de Oslo: Directrices para la recogida e interpretación de información sobre innovación. Madrid: Grupo Trasga.
dc.relationOCDE. (2013). Estudio de la OCDE de las políticas de innovación en Colombia - punto de evaluación general y recomendaciones. Bogotá: Observatorio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación.
dc.relationOCDE. (2018). Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation. 4th edition. Paris/Eurostat, Luxembourg. The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, OECD Publishing.
dc.relationPara, L., Jiménez, D., & Martínez, A. (2018). Exploring the mediating effects between transformational leadership and organizational performance. Employee Relations, 40(2), 412–432.doi.org/10.1108/ER-10-2016-0190.
dc.relationPelagio, R., & Hechanova, M. (2014). A Study of Culture Dimensions, Organizational Ambidexterity, and Perceived Innovation in Teams. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 9(3), 21–33.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242014000300002.
dc.relationPérez, A., & Cambra, J. (2013). Listen to the market: Do its complexity and signals make companies more innovative? Technovation, 33(6–7), 180–192. doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2013.03.001.
dc.relationPérez, A., Alegre, J., & Valle, R. (2019). The role of tacit knowledge in connecting knowledge exchange and combination with innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 31(2), 186–198.
dc.relationPérez, A., Gopalakrishnan, S., & Cabrera, R. (2014). Innovation and Performance: The Role of Environmental Dynamism on the Success of Innovation Choices. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 61(3), 499–510. doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2014.2318085.
dc.relationPopadiuk, S. (2012). Scale for classifying organizations as explorers, exploiters or ambidextrous. International Journal of Information Management, 32(1), 75–87. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.07.001.
dc.relationPrajogo, D. (2006). The relationship between innovation and business performance: A comparative study between manufacturing and service firms. Knowledge and Process Management, 13(3), 218-225.
dc.relationPrajogo, D., & McDermott, C. (2005). The relationship between total quality management practices and organizational culture. The International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(11), 1101-1122.
dc.relationQuinn, R. (1984). Applying the competing values approach to leadership: Toward an integrative framework. En D. M. J. G. Hunt, Leaders and managers: International perspectives on managerial behavior and leidership (págs. 10-27). New York: Pergamon Press.
dc.relationQuinn, R. (1988). Beyond rational management: Managing the paradoxes and competing demands of high performance. San Francisco: Jossey – Bass.
dc.relationQuinn, R., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach to organisational analysis. Management Science, 29(3), 363–377.
dc.relationReid, S., & de Brentani, U. (2004). The Fuzzy Front End of New Product Development for Discontinuous Innovations: A Theoretical Model. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21(3), 170–184. doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-6782.2004.00068.x.
dc.relationRoberts, P., & Amit, R. (2003). The dynamics of innovative activity and competitive advantage: The case of Australian retail banking, 1981-1995. Academy of Management Journal, 27(1), 25-41.
dc.relationRodríguez, J., & Castellanos, O. (2016). La metamorfosis de una organización que innova. En COGESTEC, Comunidad de Gestión Tecnológica y de la Innovación. Medellín: COGESTEC.
dc.relationRuano, L., Echeverri, R., Rodríguez, H., Castellanos, T., & Pineda, D. (2016). Public Policy for the promotion of innovation in the Food Sector in Colombia. Cuadernos de Administración (Universidad Del Valle), 32(56), 100–114.
dc.relationRubera, G., & Droge, C. (2013). Technology versus design innovation’s effects on sales and Tobin’s Q: The moderating role of branding strategy. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(3), 448–464.
dc.relationRubera, G., Chandrasekaran, D., & Ordanini, A. (2016). Open innovation, product portfolio innovativeness and firm performance: the dual role of new product development capabilities. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(2), 166–184. doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0423-4.
dc.relationSchoonhoven, C. (1993). The innovation marathon: lessons from high technology firms. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
dc.relationSheremata, W. (2000). Centrifugal and centripetal forces in radical new product development under time pressure. Academy of Management Review, 25(2), 389–408.
dc.relationShi, X; Su, L & Peng, A (2020). A meta-analytic study on exploration and exploitation. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 35 (1), 97-115.
dc.relationSilveira, E., Rosseto, C., Lima, N., & Torres, S. (2014). Strategic behavior and ambidexterity : a study applied along the Brazilian wineries. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 16(52), 392–415. doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v16i52.1540.
dc.relationSim, E., Griffin, A., Price, R., & Vojak, B. (2007). Exploring Differences between Inventors, Champions, Implementers and Innovators in Creating and Developing New Products in Large, Mature Firms. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(4), 422–436. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00457.x.
dc.relationSolís, M., Hernández, M., & Rodríguez, A. (2020). Governance and performance in co-exploitation and co-exploration projects. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing. 875-894
dc.relationSolís, M., Hernández, M., & Rodríguez, A. (2018). Performance implications of organizational ambidexterity versus specialization in exploitation or exploration: The role of absorptive capacity. Journal of Business Research, 91, 181–194. doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.06.001.
dc.relationSolís, M., Hernández, M., & Rodríguez, A. (2017). Impact of SENA on innovation of manufacturing companies in Colombia: From the Ambidextrous Organizational perspective. Informador Técnico, 81 (1), 9-23.
dc.relationSong, X., Thieme, R., & Xie, J. (1998). The Impact of Cross-Functional Joint Involvement across Product Development Stages: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(4), 289-303.
dc.relationSorensen, J., & Stuart, T. (2000). Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(1), 81–112.
dc.relationSubramaniam, M., & Youndt, M. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 450–463.
dc.relationSubramanian, A., & Nilakanta, S. (1996). Organizational innovativeness: Exploring the relationship between organizational determinants of innovation, types of innovations, and measures of organizational performance. Omega, 24(6), 631-647.
dc.relationSundbo, J., Orfila, F., & Sorensen, F. (2007). The innovative behaviour of tourism firms – Comparative studies of Denmark and Spain. Research Policy, 36(1), 88–106.
dc.relationSzydło, J., & Grześ-Bukłaho, J. (2020). Relations between National and Organisational Culture—Case Study. Sustainability, 12(4), 1522.
dc.relationTabeau, K., Gemser, G., Hultink, E., & Wijnberg, N. (2017). Exploration and exploitation activities for design innovation. Journal of Marketing Management, 33(3–4), 203–225.
dc.relationTeece, D. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and entrepreneurial management in large organizations: Toward a theory of the (entrepreneurial) firm. European Economic Review, 86, 202–216.
dc.relationTeece, D., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z.
dc.relationTellis, G., Prabhu, J., & Chandy, R. (2009). Radical innovation across nations: The preeminence of corporate culture. Journal of Marketing, 73, 3–23.
dc.relationThieme, R., Song, X., & Shin, G. (2003). Project Management Characteristics and New Product Survival. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20(2), 104–119. doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.2002004.
dc.relationTian, M., Deng, P., Zhang, Y., & Salmador, M. P. (2018). How does culture influence innovation? A systematic literature review. Management Decision.
dc.relationTiwana, A. (2010). Systems development ambidexterity: Explaining the complementary and substitutive roles of formal and informal controls. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(2), 87-126.
dc.relationTorres, J., Drago, C., & Aqueveque, C. (2015). Knowledge inflows effects on middle managers’ ambidexterity and performance. Management Decision, 53(10), 2303 - 2330.
dc.relationTroy, L., Szymanski, D., & Varadarajan, P. (2001). Generating New Product Ideas: An Initial Investigation of the Role of Market Information and Organizational Characteristics. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29(1), 89–101. doi.org/10.1177/0092070301291006.
dc.relationTushman, M., & Nadler, D. (1986). Organizing for innovation. California Management Review, 28(3), 74-92.
dc.relationValverde, D., Fisher, A., Ferreira, M., & de Almeida, K. (2012). A Relação Entre Cultura Organizacional, Liderança E Inovação Para Construção De Ciclos De Crescimento Sustentáveis. Obtenido de Mirage: http://repositorio.uninove.br/xmlui/
dc.relationVerganti, R. (2011). Radical design and technology epiphanies: A new focus for research on design management. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(3), 384–388.
dc.relationVesga, R. (2009). Emprendimiento e innovación en Colombia: ¿qué nos está haciendo falta? Obtenido de Observatorio de Competitividad Del Centro de Estrategia y Competitividad: http://relidera.com/blog/27-emprendimiento-e-innovacion-en-colombia-que-nos-esta-haciendo-falta.html
dc.relationVillalobos, M-A. & Romo, A. (2015) Diseño y validación de cuestionario para la exploración de capacidades de innovación para empresas de alta tecnología de México. Revista QUID (25) 33-40.
dc.relationWang, C., & Rafiq, M. (2014). Ambidextrous Organizational Culture, Contextual Ambidexterity and New Product Innovation: A Comparative Study of UK and Chinese High-tech Firms. British Journal of Management, 25(1), 58–76. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2012.00832.x.
dc.relationWei, Z., Yi, Y., & Guo, H. (2014). Organizational Learning Ambidexterity, Strategic Flexibility, and New Product Development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 832–847. doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12126.
dc.relationWolpert, J. (2002). Breaking out of the innovation box. Harvard Business Review, 80(8), 76–83.
dc.relationWu, Y., & Wu, S. (2016). Managing ambidexterity in creative industries: A survey. Journal of Business Research, 69(7), 2388–2396. doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.008.
dc.relationWuyts, S., Dutta, S., & Stremersch, S. (2004). Portfolios of Interfirm Agreements in Technology-Intensive Markets: Consequences for Innovation and Profitability. Journal of Marketing, 68(2), 88–100. doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.2.88.27787.
dc.relationYalcinkaya, G., Calantone, R., & Griffith, D. (2007). An Examination of Exploration and Exploitation Capabilities: Implications for Product Innovation and Market Performance. Journal of International Marketing, 15(4), 63–93. doi.org/10.1509/jimk.15.4.63.
dc.relationZahra, S., Ireland, R., & Hitt, M. (2000). International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 925–950.
dc.relationZhang, H., Wu, F., & Cui, A. (2015). Balancing market exploration and market exploitation in product innovation: A contingency perspective. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 32(3), 297–308.
dc.relationZuñiga, A., Perdomo, G., & Lozada, N. (. (2018). Analysis of the relationship between assimilation capabilities and organisational performance. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 16(3), 388-398.
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
dc.rightsAcceso abierto
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsDerechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.titleIncidencia de las capacidades de exploración y explotación en la innovación. El rol de los factores culturales
dc.typeOtros


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución