Evaluación experimental de la confianza en productores de Cadenas de Suministro agroalimentarias de la región Cundiboyacense

dc.contributorChicaiza Becerra, Liliana Alejandra
dc.contributorGrupo Interdisciplinario en Teoría e Investigación Aplicada en Ciencias Económicas
dc.creatorFigueroa Hernández, Diana Paola
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-21T15:39:38Z
dc.date.available2020-08-21T15:39:38Z
dc.date.created2020-08-21T15:39:38Z
dc.date.issued2020-04-24
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/78151
dc.description.abstractObjective: Verify through an experiment if the producers’ level of confidence varies between different agrifood Supply Chains in the departments of Cundinamarca and Boyacá in Colombia. Methodology: An experiment based on Berg's trust game (1995) was designed to determine the levels of Confidence (quantities sent) and Reciprocity (quantities returned) of two samples of individuals whose main economic activity is the transformation of fruits and vegetables: 14 belonging to a long supply chain (in Boyacá) and 26 to a short supply chain (in Bogotá). Sample size was estimated using G*power. A survey and a trust game were applied. The game was double-blind, single-round, with complete information, equal initial endowments (8000 COP), multiplication factor 3, non-simulated counterpart and non-random payment. The results were processed in R software and descriptive statistics were analyzed. The assumptions for the application of parametric and non-parametric tests were checked. Through linear and Tobit regressions, possible descriptive variables of confidence and reciprocity were obtained, which were validated or refuted through the non-parametric Mann-Whitney-Wicolxon test (W) for two independent samples. Results: The quantities sent and returned by long supply chain producers were 4286 (standard deviation 2928) and 4857 (standard deviation 3024). The quantities sent and returned by short supply chain producers were 5231 (standard deviation 2088) and 6923 (standard deviation 4734). Positive offers were maintained by almost all participants. These results indicate positive Confidence and Reciprocity that broadly coincide with general measures of Confidence as DANE (2019), European Social Survey (2018) and The World Values Survey (2009). Conclusions: Confidence (W = 36 p-value 0.4601, α = 5%) and Reciprocity (W = 34 p-value 0.3767, α = 5%) are not different between the two samples. However, it is not rejected that Trust may be related to the type of housing (W = 64, p-value = 0.06628, α = 10%) and marital status (W = 11, p-value = 0.09548, α = 10%), and that Reciprocity may be related to the educational level (W = 21.5, p-value = 0.05894, α = 10%). Further research is recommended to establish causal relationships.
dc.description.abstractObjetivo: Verificar a través de un experimento si el nivel de confianza de los productores varía entre diferentes Cadenas de Suministro agroalimentarias de la región Cundiboyacense. Metodología: Se diseñó un experimento basado en el juego de la confianza de Berg (1995) para determinar los niveles de Confianza (cantidades enviadas) y Confiabilidad (cantidades regresadas) de dos muestras de individuos cuya actividad económica principal es la transformación de frutas y verduras: 14 pertenecientes a una cadena de suministro larga (en Boyacá) y 26 a una cadena de suministro corta (en Bogotá). El tamaño de la muestra se estimó utilizando G*power. Se aplicó una encuesta y un juego de la confianza doble ciego, de una única ronda, con información completa, dotaciones iguales (8000 COP), con factor de multiplicación 3, contraparte no simulada y pago no aleatorio. Los resultados se procesaron en el software R y se analizaron estadísticas descriptivas. Se comprobaron los supuestos para la aplicación de pruebas paramétricas y no paramétricas. A través de regresiones lineales y de Tobit, se obtuvieron indicios de posibles variables descriptoras de la confianza y confiabilidad, que fueron validados o refutados a través de la prueba no paramétrica Mann-Whitney-Wicolxon (W) para dos muestras independientes. Resultados: Las cantidades enviadas y regresadas por productores de la cadena de suministro larga fueron 4286 (desviación estándar 2928) y 4857 (desviación estándar 3024). Las cantidades enviadas y regresadas por productores de cadena de suministro corta fueron 5231 (desviación estándar 2088) y 6923 (desviación estándar 4734). Casi todos los participantes mantuvieron ofertas positivas. Estos resultados indican Confianza y Confiabilidad positivas que coinciden a grandes rasgos con medidas generales de confianza como DANE (2019), European Social Survey (2018) y The World Values Survey (2009). Conclusiones: La Confianza (W=36 p-valor 0.4601, α=5%) y la Confiabilidad (W=34 p-valor 0.3767, α=5%) no son muy diferentes entre las dos muestras. Sin embargo, no se descarta que la Confianza pueda estar relacionada con el tipo de vivienda (W=64, p-valor=0.06628, α=10%) y el estado civil (W=11,p-valor=0.09548, α= 10%), y que la Confiabilidad pueda estar relacionada con el nivel educativo (W=21.5, p-valor=0.05894, α=10%). Se recomienda mayor investigación para establecer relaciones causales.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherBogotá - Ciencias Económicas - Maestría en Administración
dc.publisherEscuela de Administración y Contaduría Pública
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
dc.relationAbass, O., & Ghinea, G. (2006). Integrating Confidence in Electronic Negotiations : Perspectives from an Empirical Investigation. In IEEE International Conference on e-Business Engineering.
dc.relationAbdullah, Z., & Musa, R. (2014). The Effect of Trust and Information Sharing on Relationship Commitment in Supply Chain Management. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 130, 266–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.031
dc.relationAcedo-Carmona, C., & Gomila, A. (2014). Personal Trust Increases Cooperation beyond General Trust. PLoS ONE, 9(8), e105559. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105559
dc.relationAgronet. (2014). Estadísticas Agrícolas: Área, producción, rendimiento y participación. Retrieved from http://www.agronet.gov.co/estadistica/Paginas/default.aspx
dc.relationAgronet. (2018). Participación Departamental en la Producción y en el Área Cosechada. Retrieved from https://www.agronet.gov.co/estadistica/Paginas/home.aspx?cod=2
dc.relationAgronet. (2019). PIB Agropecuario Nacional. Retrieved from https://www.agronet.gov.co/produccion-y-agronegocios/Paginas/ProduccionNacional.aspx
dc.relationAkai, K., & Netzer, R. J. (2012). Trust and reciprocity among international groups: Experimental evidence from Austria and Japan. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 41(2), 266–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2011.08.028
dc.relationAkmal, S., Sinulingga, S., Napitupulu, H., & Matondang, N. (2020). Effect of information technology in the implementation of electronics supply chain management to improve competitive advantage and company performance. Test Engineering and Management, 83, 3696–3700.
dc.relationAl-Ississ, M., & Bohnet, I. (2016). Risk mitigation and trust: Experimental Evidence from Jordan and the United States. Journal of Economic Psychology, 53, 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2015.12.010
dc.relationAlam, M. C., & Supriana, T. (2018). Analysis of supply chain management of shallots in Medan. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 122(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/122/1/012015
dc.relationAlós-Ferrer, C., & Farolfi, F. (2019). Trust Games and Beyond. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 13, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00887
dc.relationAndreoni, J., & Sanchez, A. (2019). Fooling myself or fooling observers? Avoiding social pressures by manipulating perceptions of deservingness of others. Economic Inquiry, 58(1), 12–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12777
dc.relationAnsink, E., Tesfaye, A., Bouma, J., & Brouwer, R. (2017). Cooperation in watershed management: A field experiment on location, trust, and enforcement. Resource and Energy Economics, 50, 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2017.07.004
dc.relationAquilar, F., & Galluccio, M. (2011). Psychological and political strategies for peace negotiation: A cognitive approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7430-3
dc.relationAttanasi, G., Battigalli, P., & Manzoni, E. (2016). Incomplete-Information Models of Guilt Aversion in the Trust Game. Management Science, 62(3), 648–667. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2154
dc.relationBaber, W. W., & Fletcher-Chen, C. C.-Y. (2015). Practical Business Negotiation (1st ed.). Taylor & Francis Ltd;Routledge.
dc.relationBadraoui, I., Van der Vorst, J., & Boulaksil, Y. (2020). Horizontal logistics collaboration: an exploratory study in Morocco’s agri-food supply chains. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 23(1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2019.1604646
dc.relationBallou, R. H. (2004). Logística. Admiministración de la cadena de suministro (5th ed.). Pearson Educación de México.
dc.relationBarabanova, M., Lebedeva, L., Rastova, Y., & Uvarov, S. (2018). Use of system dynamics tools in value-oriented approach in management. Economic Annals-XXI, 173(9–10), 32–37. https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V173-05
dc.relationBarboza, G. (2019). Social collateral, dynamic incentives, and joint liability in a two‐step trust game: Lending to the unbankable. Economic Notes, 48(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecno.12132
dc.relationBarr, A., & Serneels, P. (2004). Wages and Reciprocity in the Workplace. Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford, 1–31.
dc.relationBarratt, M. (2004). Understanding the meaning of collaboration in the supply chain. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9(1), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540410517566
dc.relationBauer, D. F. (1972). Constructing confidence sets using rank statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 67(339), 687–690. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1972.10481279
dc.relationBchir, M. A., Rozan, A., & Willinger, M. (2012). Does higher trust lead to higher performance? An experimental investigation. Economics Bulletin, 32(3), 1873–1877.
dc.relationBell, V., Robinson, B., Katona, C., Fett, A. K. J., & Shergill, S. S. (2019). When trust is lost: The impact of interpersonal trauma on social interactions. Psychological Medicine, 49(6), 1041–1046. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291718001800
dc.relationBellemare, C., Sebald, A., & Suetens, S. (2019). Guilt aversion in economics and psychology. Journal of Economic Psychology, 73(452), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2019.05.002
dc.relationBelli, S. R., Rogers, R. D., & Lau, J. Y. F. (2012). Adult and adolescent social reciprocity: Experimental data from the Trust Game. Journal of Adolescence, 35(5), 1341–1349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.05.004
dc.relationBellucci, G., Hahn, T., Deshpande, G., & Krueger, F. (2019). Functional connectivity of specific resting-state networks predicts trust and reciprocity in the trust game. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 19(1), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-018-00654-3
dc.relationBen-Ner, A., & Halldorsson, F. (2010). Trusting and trustworthiness: What are they, how to measure them, and what affects them. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(1), 64–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2009.10.001
dc.relationBen-Ner, A., & Putterman, L. (2009). Trust, communication and contracts: An experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 70(1–2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2009.01.011
dc.relationBerg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 122–142. https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1995.1027
dc.relationBhaskar, V., & Thomas, C. (2019). Community enforcement of trust with bounded memory. Review of Economic Studies, 86(3), 1010–1032. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdy048
dc.relationBlue, P. R., Hu, J., Peng, L., Yu, H., Liu, H., & Zhou, X. (2019). Whose promises are worth more? How social status affects trust in promises. European Journal of Social Psychology, (August 2017), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2596
dc.relationBogliacino, F., Gómez, C., & Grimalda, G. (2019). Crime-Related Exposure to Violence and Social Preferences: Experimental Evidence from Bogotá. Documentos FCE-CID Escuela de Economía.
dc.relationBogliacino, F., Grimalda, G., Jiménez, L., Galvis, D. R., & Codagnone, C. (2019). Trust and trustworthiness after a land restitution program: Lab-in-the-field evidence from Colombia. HICN Households in Conflict Network. Brighton.
dc.relationBogliacino, F., Jiménez Lozano, L., & Grimalda, G. (2018a). Consultative democracy and trust. Supplement. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics.
dc.relationBogliacino, F., Jiménez Lozano, L., & Grimalda, G. (2018b). Consultative democracy and trust. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 44, 55–67. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2017.10.004
dc.relationBogliacino, F., Jiménez Lozano, L., & Reyes, D. (2018). Socioeconomic stratification and stereotyping: lab-in-the-field evidence from Colombia. International Review of Economics, 65(1), 77–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-017-0285-4
dc.relationBohnet, I., Greig, F., Herrmann, B., & Zeckhauser, R. (2008). Betrayal Aversion: Evidence from Brazil, China, Oman, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United States. American Economic Review, 98(1), 294–310. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.1.294
dc.relationBoza García, |Andres, Francisco Cruz, L. E., & Cuenca Gonzalez, L. (2003). Gestión de la Confianza en la Cadena de Suministro. In V Congreso de Ingeniería de Organización. Retrieved from http://adingor.es/congresos/web/articulo/detalle/a/1339
dc.relationBrañas-Garza, P., Espín, A. M., & Lenkei, B. (2016). BMI is not related to altruism, fairness, trust or reciprocity: Experimental evidence from the field and the lab. Physiology & Behavior, 156, 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.01.008
dc.relationBrañas-garza, P., Rossi, M., & Zaclicever, D. (2016). Individual’s Religiosity Enhances Trust : Latin American Evidence for the Puzzle. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 41(2/3), 555–566.
dc.relationBreusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1979). A Simple Test for Heteroscedasticity and Random Coefficient Variation. Econometrica, 47(5), 1287–1294. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1911963 .
dc.relationBuelens, M., van De Woestyne, M., Mestdagh, S., & Bouckenooghe, D. (2008). Methodological issues in negotiation research: A state-of-the-art-review. Group Decision and Negotiation, 17(4), 321–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-007-9097-3
dc.relationBurns, J. (2012). Race, diversity and pro-social behavior in a segmented society. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 81(2), 366–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.11.006
dc.relationBuskens, V., Raub, W., van Miltenburg, N., Montoya, E. R., & van Honk, J. (2016). Testosterone Administration Moderates Effect of Social Environment on Trust in Women Depending on Second-to-Fourth Digit Ratio. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 27655. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27655
dc.relationCai, S., Goh, M., de Souza, R., & Li, G. (2013). Knowledge sharing in collaborative supply chains: twin effects of trust and power. International Journal of Production Research, 51(7), 2060–2076. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2012.701780
dc.relationCalcutt, S. E., Proctor, D., Berman, S. M., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2019). Chimpanzees ( Pan troglodytes ) Are More Averse to Social Than Nonsocial Risk. Psychological Science, 30(1), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618811877
dc.relationCámara de Comercio de Bogotá. (2017). Tablero de Indicadores de Bogotá y Cundinamarca. Bogotá.
dc.relationCapaldo, A., & Giannoccaro, I. (2015). How does trust affect performance in the supply chain? The moderating role of interdependence. International Journal of Production Economics, 166, 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.04.008
dc.relationCárdenas, J. C. (2003). En Vos Confio : An Experimental Exploration on the Micro-Foundations of Trust, Reciprocity & Social Distance in Colombia (“Obstacles to Robust Negotiated Settlements of Civil Conflicts”).
dc.relationCárdenas, J. C. (2005). Bringing the Lab to the Field and the Field to the Lab: More than Changing Subjects. Bogotá. Retrieved from http://economia.uniandes.edu.co/es/content/download/7218/35618/file/Cardenas MoreThanChangingSubjects june2005.pdf
dc.relationCárdenas, J. C., & Carpenter, J. (2008). Behavioural development economics: Lessons from field labs in the developing world. Journal of Development Studies, 44(3), 311–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380701848327
dc.relationCárdenas, J. C., Chong, A., & Ñopo, H. (2009). To What Extent Do Latin Americans Trust, Reciprocate, and Cooperate?: Evidence from Experiments in Six Latin American Countries. Inter-American Development Bank Research Department Working paper series (Vol. 9). https://doi.org/10.1353/eco.0.0027
dc.relationCárdenas, J. C., Dreber, A., Von Essen, E., & Ranehill, E. (2014). Gender and cooperation in children: Experiments in Colombia and Sweden. PLoS ONE, 9(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090923
dc.relationCárdenas, J. C., & Ramos, P. A. (2006). Manual de juegos económicos para el análisis del uso colectivo de los recursos naturales (1st ed.). Peru: Centro Internacional de la Papa (CIP).
dc.relationCárdenas, J. C., Rodríguez, L. A., & Johnson, N. (2009). Collective Action for Watershed Management: Field Experiments in Colombia and Kenya. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1543826
dc.relationCarpenter, J. P. (2000). Negotiation in the commons: Incorporating field and experimental evidence into a theory of local collective action. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 156(4), 661–683.
dc.relationCastillo, D., Bousquet, F., Janssen, M. A., Worrapimphong, K., & Cárdenas, J. C. (2011). Context matters to explain field experiments: Results from Colombian and Thai fishing villages. Ecological Economics, 70(9), 1609–1620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.05.011
dc.relationCastillo, D., & Saysel, A. K. (2005). Simulation of common pool resource field experiments: a behavioral model of collective action. Ecological Economics, 55(3), 420–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.014
dc.relationChandrasekaran, N., & Raghuram, G. (2014). Agribussiness Supply Chain Management. Taylor & Francis Group.
dc.relationCharness, G., Gneezy, U., & Kuhn, M. A. (2013). Experimental methods: Extra-laboratory experiments-extending the reach of experimental economics. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 91, 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.04.002
dc.relationChen, J. V., Yen, D. C., Rajkumar, T. M., & Tomochko, N. A. (2011). The antecedent factors on trust and commitment in supply chain relationships. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 33(3), 262–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2010.05.003
dc.relationChernonog, T. (2020). Inventory and marketing policy in a supply chain of a perishable product. International Journal of Production Economics, 219, 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.06.019
dc.relationChopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2015). Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning, and Operation. Pearson Education.
dc.relationChristopher, M., & Lee, H. (2004). Mitigating supply chain risk through improved confidence. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 34(5), 388–396. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030410545436
dc.relationChu, C. L., & Leon, V. J. (2008). Single-vendor multi-buyer inventory coordination under private information. European Journal of Operational Research, 191(2), 484–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.06.046
dc.relationCiriolo, E. (2007). Inequity aversion and trustees’ reciprocity in the trust game. European Journal of Political Economy, 23(4), 1007–1024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2006.01.001
dc.relationCockroft, J. D., Adams, S. M., Matlock, D., & Dietrich, M. S. (2019). Reliability and construct validity of 3 psychometric trust scales for women seeking substance abuse treatment in a community setting. Substance Abuse, 10. https://doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2019.1635967
dc.relationCohen, B. J. (1977). Negotiation. In Organizing the World’s Money (pp. 254–268). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04006-3_9
dc.relationCohen, J. (1988). Statistics Power Analisis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). New york: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
dc.relationColeman, E. A., & Lopez, M.-C. (2010). Reconstructing Cooperation from Civil Conflict: Experimental Evidence from Colombian Development Policy. Working Paper, 1–34.
dc.relationCorgnet, B., Espín, A. M., Hernán-González, R., Kujal, P., & Rassenti, S. (2016). To trust, or not to trust: Cognitive reflection in trust games. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 64, 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2015.09.008
dc.relationCosta-Gomes, M. A., Huck, S., & Weizsäcker, G. (2014). Beliefs and actions in the trust game: Creating instrumental variables to estimate the causal effect. Games and Economic Behavior, 88, 298–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2014.10.006
dc.relationCox, A. (2001). Understanding buyer and supplier power : A framework for procurement and suppy competence. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 37(1), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2001.tb00094.x
dc.relationCox, J. C., Kerschbamer, R., & Neururer, D. (2016). What is trustworthiness and what drives it? Games and Economic Behavior, 98, 197–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2016.05.008
dc.relationDANE. (2018). Encuesta Anual Manufacturera. Retrieved from http://formularios.dane.gov.co/encuestas/eam/index.htm
dc.relationDANE. (2019). Boletín Técnico Encuesta de Cultura Política (ECP). Bogotá. Retrieved from https://www.dane.gov.co/files/investigaciones/ecpolitica/bol_ECP_19-capital-social.pdf
dc.relationDastyar, H., Rippel, D., Pannek, J., Thoben, K.-D., & Freitag, M. (2020). A Numerical Study on the Effects of Trust in Supplier Development. Processes, 8(3), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8030300
dc.relationDavidson, R., & MacKinnon, J. G. (1984). Convenient specification tests for logit and probit models. Journal of Econometrics, 25(3), 241–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(84)90001-0
dc.relationDavis, D. D., & Holt, C. A. (1993). Experimental Economics : Methods , Problems , and Promise. Estudios Económicos, 8(2), 179–212.
dc.relationDelbufalo, E. (2012). Outcomes of inter‐organizational trust in supply chain relationships: a systematic literature review and a meta‐analysis of the empirical evidence. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(4), 377–402. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541211246549
dc.relationDi Bartolomeo, G., Dufwenberg, M., & Papa, S. (2019). The sound of silence: A license to be selfish. Economics Letters, 182, 68–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2019.05.045
dc.relationDiccionario de la Real Academia Española. (2019). Altruismo. Retrieved from https://dle.rae.es/altruismo
dc.relationDietmeyer, B., & Kaplan, R. (2004). Strategic Negotiation: A breakthrough 4-step process for effective business negotiation (4th ed.). Dearborn Financial Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2006.01.003
dc.relationDoroudi, R., Sequeira, P., Marsella, S., Ergun, O., Azghandi, R., Kaeli, D., … Griffin, J. (2020). Effects of trust-based decision making in disrupted supply chains. PLoS ONE, 15(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224761
dc.relationDuffy, R., & Fearne, A. (2004). Buyer-supplier relationships: An investigation of moderating factors on the development of partnership characteristics and performance. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 7(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.8116
dc.relationDuque Oliva, E. J. (2014). Cooperación universidad - empresa: Un modelo de antecedentes y consecuencias. Universidad de Valencia.
dc.relationDurbin, J., & Watson, G. S. (1971). Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression. Biometrika, 58(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/58.1.1
dc.relationDurlauf, S. N., & Blume, L. E. (2010). Microeconometrics, The New Palgrave Economics Collection. Microeconometrics (2nd ed.). Macmillan Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230280816_29
dc.relationEconomic Organisation for Co-operation and Development. (2019). The OECD measurement of social capital project and question databank. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/sdd/social-capital-project-and-question-databank.html
dc.relationEmmanouilidis, C., Taisch, M., & Kiritsis, D. (Eds.). (2013). Advances in Production Management Systems. Competitive Manufacturing for Innovative Products and Services. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology (Vol. 398). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40361-3
dc.relationEngelmann, J. B., Schmid, B., De Dreu, C. K. W., Chumbley, J., & Fehr, E. (2019). On the psychology and economics of antisocial personality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(26), 12781–12786. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1820133116
dc.relationErmisch, J., & Gambetta, D. (2010). Do strong family ties inhibit trust? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 75(3), 365–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2010.05.007
dc.relationEsnouf, C., Russel, M., & Bricas, N. (2010). Food system sustainability: Insights from dualine. Food System Sustainability: Insights from Dualine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139567688
dc.relationEspín, A. M., Exadaktylos, F., & Neyse, L. (2016). Heterogeneous motives in the trust game: A tale of two roles. Appendix. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00728
dc.relationEuropean Social Survey. (2018). European Social Survey, Data and Documentation by Year. Retrieved from https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/data/round-index.html
dc.relationEuropean Values Study. (2019). European Values Study, About EVS. Retrieved from https://europeanvaluesstudy.eu/about-evs/
dc.relationExadaktylos, F., Espín, A. M., & Brañas-Garza, P. (2013). Experimental subjects are not different. Scientific Reports, 3, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01213
dc.relationFairley, K., Sanfey, A., Vyrastekova, J., & Weitzel, U. (2016). Trust and risk revisited. Journal of Economic Psychology, 57, 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2016.10.001
dc.relationFAO, & MinSalud. (2013). Perfil Nacional de Consumo de Frutas y Verduras. FAO. Bogotá. Retrieved from http://www.osancolombia.gov.co/doc/Perfil_Nacional_Consumo_FyV_Colombia_2012.pdf
dc.relationFaure, G. O. (2003). How People Negociate Resolving Disputes in Different Cultures. Advances in Group Decision and Negociation (Vol. 1). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0989-8
dc.relationFehr, D., & Sutter, M. (2019). Gossip and the efficiency of interactions. Games and Economic Behavior, 113, 448–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2018.10.003
dc.relationFernandez Jardón, C. M. (2019). Heterocedasticidad: Estimadores, test y posibles soluciones factibles. Retrieved from http://cjardon.webs.uvigo.es/Transparencias/Unidad7.pdf
dc.relationFinseraas, H., Hanson, T., Johnsen, Å. A., Kotsadam, A., & Torsvik, G. (2019). Trust, ethnic diversity, and personal contact: A field experiment. Journal of Public Economics, 173, 72–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.02.002
dc.relationFitzgerald, C. J., & Wickwire, J. H. (2012). Religion and political affiliation’s influence on trust and reciprocity among strangers. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 6(2), 158–180. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099217
dc.relationFrey, V., Buskens, V., & Corten, R. (2019). Investments in and returns on network embeddedness: An experiment with trust games. Social Networks, 56(November 2018), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2018.07.006
dc.relationGallucci, M., & Perugini, M. (2000). An Experimental Test of a Game - Theoretical Model of Reciprocity. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 367–389.
dc.relationGervais, S., & Goldstein, I. (2007). The positive effects of biased self-perceptions in firms. Review of Finance, 11(3), 453–496. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfm022
dc.relationGhosh, A., & Fedorowicz, J. (2008). The role of trust in supply chain governance. Business Process Management Journal, 14(4), 453–470. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150810888019
dc.relationGlaeser, E. L., Laibson, D. I., Scheinkman, J. A., & Soutter, C. L. (2000). Measuring Trust*. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 811–846. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300554926
dc.relationGobernación de Boyacá. (2019). Municipios de Boyacá. Retrieved from https://www.boyaca.gov.co/
dc.relationGobernación de Cundinamarca. (2019). Municipios de Cundinamarca. Retrieved from http://www.cundinamarca.gov.co/Home/Cundinamarca.gc/ascundi_municipioscontenidos/ccundi_municipios+
dc.relationGong, X., Brazil, I. A., Chang, L. J., & Sanfey, A. G. (2019). Psychopathic traits are related to diminished guilt aversion and reduced trustworthiness during social decision-making. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43727-0
dc.relationGreiner, B., & Zednik, A. (2019). Trust and age: An experiment with current and former students. Economics Letters, 181, 37–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2019.04.004
dc.relationGrolleau, G., El Harbi, S., Saadaoui, H., & Sutan, A. (2016). The Interplay of Inequality and Reference Dependence With Trust an Experimental Study. Bulletin of Economic Research, 68(2), 117–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/boer.12049
dc.relationGujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2009). Basic Econometrics. The McGraw-Hill Series Economics (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
dc.relationGüth, W., Ockenfels, P., & Wendel, M. (1997). Cooperation based on trust. An experimental investigation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18(1), 15–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4870(96)00045-1
dc.relationHaile, D., Sadrieh, A., & Verbon, H. A. A. (2008). Cross-racial envy and underinvestment in South African partnerships. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 32(5), 703–724. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/ben011
dc.relationHajikhameneh, A., & Rubin, J. (2019). Exchange in the Absence of Legal Enforcement: Reputation and Multilateral Punishment under Uncertainty. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 35(1), 192–237. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewy026
dc.relationHeinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf. (2019). G*Power: Statistical Power Analyses for Windows and Mac. Düsseldorf. Retrieved from http://www.psychologie.hhu.de/arbeitsgruppen/allgemeine-psychologie-und-arbeitspsychologie/gpower.html
dc.relationHerrera, D., & Hernández, J. (2005). Cadenas alimentarias Políticas para la competitividad. Comuniica Online, (3), 17–23. Retrieved from http://webiica.iica.ac.cr/prensa/comuniica/2005/n3-esp/Pdfs/n3.pdf
dc.relationHesterberg, T., Choi, N. H., Meier, L., & Fraley, C. (2008). Least angle and ℓ 1 penalized regression: A review. Statistics Surveys, 2, 61–93. https://doi.org/10.1214/08-SS035
dc.relationHingley, M. (2005). Power imbalance in the UK agri-food supply channels: learning to live with the supermarkets. Journal of Marketing Management, 1376(December 2011), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1362/0267257053166758
dc.relationHollander, M., Wolfe, D. A., & Chicken, E. (2014). Nonparametric Statistical Methods (3rd ed.). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
dc.relationHooper, J. J., Sutherland, C. A. M., Ewing, L., Langdon, R., Caruana, N., Connaughton, E., … Rhodes, G. (2019). Should I trust you? Autistic traits predict reduced appearance‐based trust decisions. British Journal of Psychology, 110(4), 617–634. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12357
dc.relationHouser, D., Schunk, D., & Winter, J. (2010). Distinguishing trust from risk: An anatomy of the investment game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 74(1–2), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2010.01.002
dc.relationHugh-Jones, D., Ron, I., & Zultan, R. (2019). Humans reciprocate by discriminating against group peers. Evolution and Human Behavior, 40(1), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.08.005
dc.relationIBM Knowledge Center. (2019). Tipo de variable SPSS. Retrieved from https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/es/SSLVMB_sub/statistics_mainhelp_ddita/spss/base/define_variable_type_howto.html
dc.relationJohansson-Stenman, O., Mahmud, M., & Martinsson, P. (2013). Trust, trust games and stated trust: Evidence from rural Bangladesh. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 95, 286–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.06.022
dc.relationJohnson, N. D., & Mislin, A. A. (2011). Trust games: A meta-analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(5), 865–889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.05.007
dc.relationKeltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110(2), 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.265
dc.relationKhoja, F., Adams, J., & Kauffman, R. (2011). The inside story of relationship development: Power asymmetry in a buyer-supplier relationship. International Journal of Integrated Supply Management, 6(1), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISM.2011.038333
dc.relationKim, P. H., Pinkley, R. L., & Fragale, A. R. (2005). Power dynamics in negotiation. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 799–822. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2005.18378879
dc.relationKugler, T., Ye, B., Motro, D., & Noussair, C. N. (2019). On Trust and Disgust: Evidence From Face Reading and Virtual Reality. Social Psychological and Personality Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619856302
dc.relationLambert, D. M., & Cooper, M. C. (2000). Issues in Supply Chain Management. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(99)00113-3
dc.relationLaMorte, W. W. (2017a). Introduction to Nonparametric Testing. Retrieved from http://sphweb.bumc.bu.edu/otlt/mph-modules/bs/bs704_nonparametric/BS704_Nonparametric3.html#headingtaglink_1
dc.relationLaMorte, W. W. (2017b). Mann Whitney U Test (Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test). Retrieved from http://sphweb.bumc.bu.edu/otlt/mph-modules/bs/bs704_nonparametric/BS704_Nonparametric4.html
dc.relationLee, C.-F., & Lee, A. C. (2006). Negotiation. In Encyclopedia of Finance (p. 188). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-26336-5_1382
dc.relationLemmers-Jansen, I. L. J., Fett, A. K. J., Shergill, S. S., van Kesteren, M. T. R., & Krabbendam, L. (2019). Girls-Boys: An Investigation of Gender Differences in the Behavioral and Neural Mechanisms of Trust and Reciprocity in Adolescence. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 13(August). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00257
dc.relationLevitt, S. D., & List, J. A. (2009). Field experiments in economics: The past, the present, and the future. European Economic Review, 53(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2008.12.001
dc.relationLi-juan, W., Hong-wei, W., & Xi-chao, S. (2012). Inventory control model for fresh agricultural products on Weibull distribution under inflation and delay in payment. Kybernetes, 41(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1108/03684921211275306
dc.relationLi, Q., Kang, Y., Tan, L., & Chen, B. (2020). Modeling formation and operation of collaborative green innovation between manufacturer and supplier: A game theory approach. Sustainability, 12(6), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062209
dc.relationLi, X., & Wang, Q. (2007). Coordination mechanisms of supply chain systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 179(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.06.023
dc.relationList, J. A. (2008). Introduction to field experiments in economics with applications to the economics of charity. Experimental Economics, 11(3), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-008-9201-9
dc.relationMa, F., Wylie, B. E., Luo, X., He, Z., Jiang, R., Zhang, Y., … Evans, A. D. (2019). Apologies repair trust via perceived trustworthiness and negative emotions. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(APR), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00758
dc.relationMa, X., & Wu, Z.-X. (2019). Do sacred texts glorifying Allah facilitate Muslims’ trust and trustworthiness? Evidence from field experiments in China. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 83(July 2018), 101466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2019.101466
dc.relationMacready, A. L., Hieke, S., Klimczuk-Kochańska, M., Szumiał, S., Vranken, L., & Grunert, K. G. (2020). Consumer trust in the food value chain and its impact on consumer confidence: A model for assessing consumer trust and evidence from a 5-country study in Europe. Food Policy, 92(February), 101880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101880
dc.relationMadigan, D. (2019). Logistic & Tobit Regression. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~madigan/
dc.relationMarshall, G. R. (2004). Farmers cooperating in the commons? A study of collective action in salinity management. Ecological Economics, 51(3–4), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.016
dc.relationMartini, S., & Torcal, M. (2019). Trust across political conflicts: Evidence from a survey experiment in divided societies. Party Politics, 25(2), 126–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068816685933
dc.relationMigheli, M. (2017). The Gospel and Economic Behaviour: Experimental Evidence From a Trust Game. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 88(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12139
dc.relationMin, H., & Zhou, G. (2002). Supply chain modeling: Past, present and future. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 43(1–2), 231–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-8352(02)00066-9
dc.relationMinisterio de la Protección Social. (2008). Resolución 2378 de 2008 Ministerio de la Protección Social. Retrieved from https://www.alcaldiabogota.gov.co/sisjur/normas/Norma1.jsp?i=31169
dc.relationMinisterio de Salud. (1993). Resolución 8430 de 1993 Ministerio de Salud. Retrieved from https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/DE/DIJ/RESOLUCION-8430-DE-1993.PDF
dc.relationMontgomery, D. C., Peck, E. A., & Vining, G. G. (2006). Introducción al análisis de Regresión Lineal. (CECSA, Ed.) (3rd ed.). México: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
dc.relationMoss Kanter, R. (2004). Confidence How winnining streaks and losing streaks begin and end. Crown Publishing Group.
dc.relationMüller, J., & Schwieren, C. (2019). Big Five personality factors in the Trust Game. Journal of Business Economics, (0123456789), 19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-019-00928-3
dc.relationMyers, C. D., & Tingley, D. (2016). The Influence of Emotion on Trust. Political Analysis, 24(4), 492–500. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpw026
dc.relationNasution, S. P., Supriana, T., & Lubis, Z. (2019). Supply chain analysis of papaya in Central Market, Medan Tuntungan Subdistrict, Medan City. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 260(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/260/1/012026
dc.relationNejma, M., & Cherkaoui, A. (2020). Enabling multi-tier collaboration between supply chain dyads: a conceptual modelling framework. Supply Chain Forum, 21(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2019.1702444
dc.relationNielsen, K., Bhattacharya, P., Kagel, J. H., & Sengupta, A. (2019). Teams promise but do not deliver. Games and Economic Behavior, 117, 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2019.07.013
dc.relationNishina, K., Takagishi, H., Takahashi, H., Sakagami, M., & Inoue-Murayama, M. (2019). Association of polymorphism of arginine-vasopressin receptor 1A (AVPR1a) gene with trust and reciprocity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 13(July), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00230
dc.relationNooteboom, B. (2010). La Dinámica De La Confianza: Comunicación, Acción Y Terceras Partes. Revista de Economía Institucional, 12, 111–133. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/rei/v12n23/v12n23a6.pdf
dc.relationOrjuela Castro, J. A. (2018). Incidencia del diseño de la cadena de suministro alimentaria en el equilibrio de flujos logísticos. Retrieved from http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/69976/
dc.relationOrjuela Castro, J. A., Calderón, M. E., & Buitrago Hernández, S. P. (2007). La cadena agroindustrial de frutas Uchuva y Tomate de Árbol. (Fondo de Publicaciones Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, Ed.).
dc.relationOrjuela Castro, J. A., Castañeda Calderón, C. A., & Calderón, M. E. (2008). Análisis de la Cadena de Valor en las Estructuras Productivas de Uchuva y Tomate de Árbol en la Provincia de Sumapaz y el Distrito Capital. Revista Científica y Tecnológica de La Facultad de Ingeniería Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, 13(2), 4–12.
dc.relationOstrom, E. (1998). A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action: Presidential Address, American Political Science Association, 1997. American Political Science Review, 92(01), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/2585925
dc.relationPan, X., & Houser, D. (2019). Why trust out-groups? The role of punishment under uncertainty. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 158, 236–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2018.11.020
dc.relationPardo Merino, A., & Ruiz Díaz, M. Á. (2005). Análisis de regresión lineal : El procedimiento Regresión lineal. In Análisis de datos con SPSS 13 Base (pp. 337–377). Madrid: McGraw-Hill.
dc.relationPeralta, A., & Shupp, R. (2017). Trust, Trust Attitudes and Group Membership. Journal of International Development, 29(6), 681–699. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3294
dc.relationPotts, S. R., McCuddy, W. T., Jayan, D., & Porcelli, A. J. (2019). To trust, or not to trust? Individual differences in physiological reactivity predict trust under acute stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 100(September 2018), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.09.019
dc.relationPROCOLOMBIA. (2019). Inversión en el sector Agroindustria en Colombia. Retrieved from https://www.inviertaencolombia.com.co/sectores/agroindustria
dc.relationQingsong, R., & Dayong, L. (2010). Comparative Analysis of Trust Games between China and America Experimental Research. In 2010 International Conference on E-Business and E-Government (pp. 5118–5121). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEE.2010.1284
dc.relationRățală, C. E., Fallon, S. J., van der Schaaf, M. E., ter Huurne, N., Cools, R., & Sanfey, A. G. (2019). Catecholaminergic modulation of trust decisions. Psychopharmacology, 236(6), 1807–1816. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-019-5165-z
dc.relationReed, L. I., Matari, Y., Wu, M., & Janaswamy, R. (2019). Emotional Tears: An Honest Signal of Trustworthiness Increasing Prosocial Behavior? Evolutionary Psychology, 17(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704919872421
dc.relationRoberts, I. D., Krajbich, I., & Way, B. M. (2019). Acetaminophen influences social and economic trust. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40093-9
dc.relationRobinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1991). Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes (1st ed.). Academic Press Inc. https://doi.org/10.1300/J103v11n02_05
dc.relationRodrigo-González, A., Caballer-Tarazona, M., & García-Gallego, A. (2019). Active learning on trust and reciprocity for undergraduates. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164399
dc.relationRomero Granja, C., & Wollni, M. (2018). Opportunistic Behaviour and Trust: Experimental Results from Broccoli Farmers in Ecuador. Journal of Agricultural Economics. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12271
dc.relationRompf, S. A. (2015). Trust and Rationality. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07327-5
dc.relationRosati, A. G., Benjamin, N., Pieloch, K., & Warneken, F. (2019). Economic trust in young children. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 286(1907). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.0822
dc.relationRoss, W., & LaCroix, J. (1996). Multiple Meanings of Trust in Negotiation Theory and Research: A Literature Review and Integrative Model. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 7(4), 314–360. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb022786
dc.relationRudnicki, K., De Backer, C. J. S., & Declerck, C. (2019). The effects of celebrity gossip on trust are moderated by prosociality of the gossipers. Personality and Individual Differences, 143(July 2018), 42–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.010
dc.relationRychlowska, M., van der Schalk, J., Gratch, J., Breitinger, E., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2019). Beyond actions: Reparatory effects of regret in intergroup trust games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 82(June 2018), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.01.006
dc.relationSaadaoui, H., El Harbi, S., & Ibanez, L. (2019). Do people trust more when they are happy or when they are sad? Evidence from an experiment. Managerial and Decision Economics, 40(4), 374–383. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3008
dc.relationSantoyo Velasco, C., & López Corral, E. (2005). Integración de la Información del Contexto, Perspectiva y Confianza en una situación de Negociación. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 22(2), 455–467. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=243020634009
dc.relationSchechter, L. (2007). Traditional trust measurement and the risk confound: An experiment in rural Paraguay. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 62(2), 272–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2005.03.006
dc.relationSchweinsberg, M., Ku, G., Wang, C. S., & Pillutla, M. M. (2012). Starting high and ending with nothing: The role of anchors and power in negotiations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 226–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.07.005
dc.relationSene, O. (2017). Measures of Trust and Participation in Collective Actions: Evidence from Rural Senegal. African Development Review, 29(3), 498–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8268.12285
dc.relationSERIES. (2019). Servicios de Información Espacial Shapes Departamentos de la República de Colombia. Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/site/seriescol/shapes
dc.relationShapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965). An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples). Biometrika, 52(3/4), 591. https://doi.org/10.2307/2333709
dc.relationSheather, S. J. (2009). A Modern Approach to Regression with R. (G. Casella, S. Fienberg, & I. Olkin, Eds.), Springer Texts in Statistics. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09608-7
dc.relationSheskin, D. J. (2004). Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures (3rd ed.). CHAPMAN & HALL/CRC. https://doi.org/10.2307/2685909
dc.relationSheu, C., Rebecca Yen, H., & Chae, B. (2006). Determinants of supplier‐retailer collaboration: evidence from an international study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26(1), 24–49. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570610637003
dc.relationSlonim, R., & Guillen, P. (2010). Gender selection discrimination: Evidence from a Trust game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 76(2), 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2010.06.016
dc.relationSmeltzer, L. R. (1997). The Meaning and Origin of Trust in Buyer-Supplier Relationships. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 33(4), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493x.1997.tb00024.x
dc.relationSmith, V. L., & Wilson, B. J. (2017). Sentiments, Conduct and Trust in the Laboratory. Social Philosophy and Policy, 34(1), 25–55. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052517000024
dc.relationSobral, F. J. B. de A. (2010). Relação Dinâmica entre Confiança, Competitividade e o Processo de Tomada de Decisão Ética em Negociação. RAE Eletrônica, 9(2), 27. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1676-56482010000200011
dc.relationSoh, L. K., & Li, X. (2008). Investigating adaptive, confidence-based strategic negotiations in complex multiagent environments. Web Intelligence and Agent Systems, 6(3), 313–326. https://doi.org/10.3233/WIA-2008-0143
dc.relationSridharan, R., & Simatupang, T. M. (2013). Power and trust in supply chain collaboration. International Journal of Value Chain Management, 7(1), 76–96. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJVCM.2013.057344
dc.relationStangroom, J. (2019). Pearson Correlation Coefficient Calculator. Retrieved from https://www.socscistatistics.com/tests/pearson/
dc.relationSterman, J. D. (2000). Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. McGraw Hill. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270210417646
dc.relationSullivan, B. A., O’Connor, K. M., & Burris, E. R. (2006). Negotiator confidence: The impact of self-efficacy on tactics and outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(5), 567–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.09.006
dc.relationSun, H., Verbeke, W. J. M. I., Pozharliev, R., Bagozzi, R. P., Babiloni, F., & Wang, L. (2019). Framing a trust game as a power game greatly affects interbrain synchronicity between trustor and trustee. Social Neuroscience, 14(6), 635–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2019.1566171
dc.relationThe R Foundation. (n.d.-a). RDocumentation .pearson. Retrieved from https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/colocr/versions/0.1.0/topics/.pearson
dc.relationThe R Foundation. (n.d.-b). RDocumentation bptest. Retrieved from https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/lmtest/versions/0.9-37/topics/bptest
dc.relationThe R Foundation. (n.d.-c). RDocumentation durbinWatsonTest. Retrieved from https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/car/versions/3.0-3/topics/durbinWatsonTest
dc.relationThe R Foundation. (n.d.-d). RDocumentation lm. Retrieved from https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/tram/versions/0.3-1/topics/Lm
dc.relationThe R Foundation. (n.d.-e). RDocumentation shapiro.test. Retrieved from https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/stats/versions/3.6.1/topics/shapiro.test
dc.relationThe R Foundation. (n.d.-f). RDocumentation stepAIC. Retrieved from https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/MASS/versions/7.3-51.4/topics/stepAIC
dc.relationThe R Foundation. (n.d.-g). RDocumentation wilcox.test. Retrieved from https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/stats/versions/3.6.1/topics/wilcox.test
dc.relationThe R Foundation. (2019). The R Project for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.r-project.org/
dc.relationThe World Values Survey. (2009). Results WV5 Colombia 2005-2006. Retrieved from http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV5.jsp
dc.relationThe World Values Survey. (2014). Results WV6 Colombia 2012-2014. Retrieved from http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV6.jsp
dc.relationThe World Values Survey. (2019). World Value Survey, Who we are? Retrieved from http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSContents.jsp
dc.relationThibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The Social Psychology of Groups. American Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092954
dc.relationThompson, L. L., Wang, J., & Gunia, B. C. (2010). Negotiation. Annual Review of Psychology, 61(1), 491–515. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100458
dc.relationTobin, J. (1958). Estimation of Relationships for Limited Dependent Variables. Econometrica, 26(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907382
dc.relationTu, Q., & Bulte, E. (2010). Trust, Market Participation and Economic Outcomes: Evidence from Rural China. World Development, 38(8), 1179–1190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.12.014
dc.relationUkko, J., Saunila, M., & Rantala, T. (2020). Connecting relational mechanisms to performance measurement in a digital service supply chain. Production Planning and Control, 31(2–3), 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1631466
dc.relationUniversitat de Barcelona. (2009). Contrastes de normalidad. Retrieved from http://www.ub.edu/aplica_infor/spss/cap5-6.htm
dc.relationvan Nieuwenburg, D., de Groot, J. H. B., & Smeets, M. A. M. (2019). The Subtle Signaling Strength of Smells: A Masked Odor Enhances Interpersonal Trust. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01890
dc.relationVenta, A., Ha, C., Vanwoerden, S., Newlin, E., Strathearn, L., & Sharp, C. (2019). Paradoxical Effects of Intranasal Oxytocin on Trust in Inpatient and Community Adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 48(5), 706–715. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2017.1399401
dc.relationVermue, M., Meleady, R., & Seger, C. R. (2019). Member-to-member generalisation in trust behaviour: How do prior experiences inform prosocial behaviour towards novel ingroup and outgroup members? Current Psychology, 38(4), 1003–1020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00289-8
dc.relationVoigt, G., & Inderfurth, K. (2012). Supply chain coordination with information sharing in the presence of trust and trustworthiness. IIE Transactions, 44(8), 637–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/0740817X.2011.635179
dc.relationWang, Z., Ye, F., & Tan, K. H. (2014). Effects of managerial ties and trust on supply chain information sharing and supplier opportunism. International Journal of Production Research, 52(23), 7046–7061. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.932931
dc.relationWooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (2nd ed.). London: MIT Press.
dc.relationWoolley, K., & Fishbach, A. (2017). A recipe for friendship: Similar food consumption promotes trust and cooperation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2016.06.003
dc.relationWu, J., Balliet, D., Kou, Y., & van Lange, P. A. M. (2019). Gossip in the dictator and ultimatum games: Its immediate and downstream consequences for cooperation. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(MAR). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00651
dc.relationYusianto, R., Sundana, S., Marimin, & Djatna, T. (2020). Method and mapping of trust and trustworthiness in agroindustry logistic and supply chain: A systematic review. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 9(1), 397–410.
dc.relationZak, P. J., & Kugler, J. (2011). Neuroeconomics and International Studies: A New Understanding of Trust. International Studies Perspectives, 12(2), 136–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-3585.2011.00424.x
dc.relationZapata Jaramillo, C. M., & Rojas López, M. D. (2010). Una revisión crítica al modelado de la confianza a nivel organizacional. Estudios Gerenciales, 26(116), 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0123-5923(10)70129-7
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
dc.rightsAcceso abierto
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsDerechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.titleEvaluación experimental de la confianza en productores de Cadenas de Suministro agroalimentarias de la región Cundiboyacense
dc.typeOtro


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución