Implementación de un método de verificación de tratamientos IMRT utilizando archivos MLCLogs

dc.contributorVásquez Mejía, Jaider
dc.contributorVeloza Salcedo, Luz Stella
dc.creatorNieto Lenes, Javier Alberto
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-27T14:39:27Z
dc.date.available2020-10-27T14:39:27Z
dc.date.created2020-10-27T14:39:27Z
dc.date.issued2015-08-15
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/78564
dc.description.abstractIn this work we investigated and implemented a method of verifying the dose distribution for intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) using the DynaLogs files. DynaLogs files record information every 20 to 50ms of the planned and executed positions of the mechanical components of the linear accelerator. This information is used to reconstruct the administered fluence and recalculate the absorbed dose on the patient's anatomy. For the treatment plans selected in the present work, a maximum variation of 0.650% was found, which does not imply a significant variation between the planned dose and the dose delivered during treatment. The implementation of this method allows to validate IMRT treatments on the patient's anatomy.
dc.description.abstractEn este trabajo se investigó e implemento un método de verificación de la distribución de dosis para la radioterapia de intensidad modulada (IMRT) utilizando los archivos DynaLogs. Los archivos DynaLogs registran información cada 20 o 50ms de la posiciones planeadas y ejecutadas de los componentes mecánicos del acelerador lineal. Esta información es utilizada para reconstruir la fluencia administrada y recalcular la dosis absorbida sobre la anatomía del paciente. Para los planes de tratamiento seleccionados en el presente trabajo, se encontró una variación de 0.650% máximo, lo que no implica una variación significativa entre la dosis planeada y la dosis suministrada durante el tratamiento. La implementación de este método permite validar los tratamientos IMRT sobre la anatomía del paciente.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherBogotá - Ciencias - Maestría en Ciencias - Física
dc.publisherDepartamento de Física
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
dc.relationNational Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA). Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM), 2014
dc.relationFundamentos y evidencia de la radioterapia de Intensidad modulada. Asociación de Colaboración Cochrane Iberoamericana.
dc.relationJA Calama Santiago, MA Infante Utrilla, and ME Lavado Rodríguez. Aplicación de un método para la verificación de tratamientos de imrt sobre la anatomía del paciente utilizando archivos dynalog. Rev. Fis. Med., 12(3):209–214, 2011.
dc.relationC E Agnew, R B King, A R Hounsell, and C K McGarry. Implementation of phantom-less IMRT delivery verification using Varian DynaLog files and R/V output. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 57(21):6761, 2012.
dc.relationBaozhou Sun, Dharanipathy Rangaraj, Geethpriya Palaniswaamy, Sridhar Yaddanapudi, Omar Wooten, Deshan Yang, Sasa Mutic, and Lakshmi Santanam. Initial experience with TrueBeam trajectory log files for radiation therapy delivery verification. Practical Radiation Oncology, 3(4):e199–e208, 2013. doi:10.1016/j.prro.2012.11.013.
dc.relationDaniel A. Low, Jean M. Moran, James F. Dempsey, Lei Dong, and Mark Oldham. Dosimetry tools and techniques for IMRT. Medical Physics, 38(3):1313–1338, 2011. doi:10.1118/1.3514120.
dc.relationDale W Litzenberg, Jean M Moran, and Benedick A Fraass. Verification of dynamic and segmental IMRT delivery by dynamic log file analysis. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 3(2):63–72, 2002.
dc.relationAlejandra Rangel and Peter Dunscombe. Tolerances on MLC leaf position accuracy for IMRT delivery with a dynamic MLC. Medical physics, 36(7):3304–3309, 2009.
dc.relationC. E. Agnew, D. M. Irvine, and C. K. McGarry. Correlation of phantom-based and log file patient-specific QA with complexity scores for VMAT. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 15(6):4994, 2014.
dc.relationMaceira Rozas MC, GarcÌa Caeiro AL AL, Rey Liste MT, and M Castro Bern·rdez. Radioterapia de intensidad modulada. Axencia de AvaliaciÛn de TecnoloxÌas Sanitarias de Galicia.
dc.relationSeymour H. Levitt and Carlos A. Perez. Evolutions of Computerized Radiotherapy in Radiation Oncology. Potential Problems and Solution. Radiation Oncology, 70:978–986, 2008.
dc.relationPh.D. Jatinder R. Palta, Ph.D. Chihray Liu, and Ph.D. Jonathan G. Li. Quality assurance of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy. Radiation Oncology. Radiation Oncology, 71:108–11, 2008.
dc.relationJean M.Moran and Delanie Dempsey. Safety considerations for IMRT. Practical Radiation Oncology, 2011.
dc.relationJames L. Bedford and Alan P. Warrington. Commissioning of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT). International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 73(2):537–545, August 2008.
dc.relationAndrea Molineu, David S. Followill, Peter A. Balter, William F. Hanson, Michael T. Gillin, M. Saiful Huq, Avraham Eisbruch, and Geoffrey S. Ibbott. Design and implementation of an anthropomorphic quality assurance phantom for intensity-modulated radiation therapy for the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 63(2):577–583, 2015/06/08 2005. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.05.021.
dc.relationC X Yu. Intensity-modulated arc therapy with dynamic multileaf collimation: an alternative to tomotherapy. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 40(9):1435, 1995.
dc.relationKarl Otto. Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc. Medical Physics, 35(1):310–317, 2008. doi:10.1118/1.2818738.
dc.relationJatinder R. Palta; James A. Deye; Geoffrey S. Ibbott; James A. Purdy; Marcia M. Urie. Credentialing of institutions for IMRT in clinical trials. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 59, 2004. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.03.007.
dc.relationEnzhuo M. Quan; Xiaoqiang Li; Yupeng Li; XiaochunWang; Rajat J. Kudchadker; Jennifer L. Johnson; Deborah A. Kuban; Andrew K. Lee; Xiaodong Zhang. A Comprehensive Comparison of IMRT and VMAT Plan Quality for Prostate Cancer Treatment. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 83, 2012. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.09.015.
dc.relationM. Alber, B. Mijnheer, D. Georg, European Society for Therapeutic Radiology, and Oncology. Guidelines for the Verification of IMRT. European guidelines for quality assurance in radiotherapy. ESTRO, 2008.
dc.relationAnn Van Esch, Dominique P. Huyskens, Claus F. Behrens, Eva Samsøe, Maria Sjölin, Ulf Bjelkengren, David Sjöström, Christian Clermont, Lionel Hambach, and François Sergent. Implementing RapidArc into clinical routine: A comprehensive program from machine QA to TPS validation and patient QA. Medical Physics, 38(9):5146–5166, 2011. doi:10.1118/1.3622672.
dc.relationA Van Esch, L Tillikainen, J Pyykkonen, M Tenhunen, H Helminen, S Siljamaki, J Alakuijala, M Paiusco, M Lori, and DP Huyskens. Testing of the analytical anisotropic algorithm for photon dose calculation. Med Phys, 4(11):130–148, 2006.
dc.relationJon J. Kruse. On the insensitivity of single field planar dosimetry to IMRT inaccuracies. Medical Physics, 37(6):2516–2524, 2010. doi:10.1118/1.3425781.
dc.relationHeming Zhen, Benjamin E. Nelms, and Wolfgang A. Tomé. Moving from gamma passing rates to patient DVH-based QA metrics in pretreatment dose QA. Medical Physics, 38(10):5477–5489, 2011. doi:10.1118/1.3633904.
dc.relationJianguo Qian, Lei Xing, Wu Liu, and Gary Luxton. Dose verification for respiratory-gated volumetric modulated arc therapy. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 56(15):4827, 2011.
dc.relationJonathan Li et al. Validation of dynamic MLC-controller log files using a twodimensional diode array. Medical Physics, 30:799, 2003. doi:10.1118/1.1567951.
dc.relationNational Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA). Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM), 2011. Fecha de consulta: 6 de junio de 2015.
dc.relationNational Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA). Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM), 2015. Fecha de consulta: 6 de junio de 2015.
dc.relationNational Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA). Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM), 2015. Fecha de consulta: 6 de junio de 2015.
dc.relationB.S. Baxter, L.E. Hitchner, G.Q. Maguire, and American Assoc. of physicists in medicine. A Standard Format for Digital Image Exchange. AAPM report. American Institute of Physics for American Association of Physicists in Medicine, 1982.
dc.relationMichael Neumann. {DICOM} – Current status and future developments for radiotherapy. Zeitschrift für Medizinische Physik, 12(3):171–176, 2002. doi:10.1016/S0939-3889(15)70464-2.
dc.relationNational Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA). DICOM in Radiotherapy. Fecha de consulta: 6 de junio de 2015.
dc.relationDICOM Standards Committee and Working Group 7, Radiotherapy. Supplement 11: Radiotherapy Objects. Technical report, 1300 N. 17th Street Rosslyn, Virginia, USA, 1997.
dc.relationDICOM Standards Committee and Working Group 7, Radiotherapy. Supplement 29: Radiotherapy Treatment Records and Radiotherapy Media Extensions. Technical report, 1300 N. 17th Street Rosslyn, Virginia, USA, 1997.
dc.relationDICOM Standards Committee and Working Group 7, Radiotherapy. Supplement 102: Radiotherapy Extensions for Ion Therapy. Technical report, 1300 N. 17th Street Rosslyn, Virginia, USA, 2006.
dc.relationP. Mayles, A. Nahum, and J.C. Rosenwald. Handbook of Radiotherapy Physics: Theory and Practice. Taylor & Francis, 2007.
dc.relationI.J. Kalet. Principles of Biomedical Informatics. Elsevier Science, 2013.
dc.relationV Nelms B; Jarry G; Chan M; Hampton C; Watanabe Y; Feygelman. Real-world examples of sensitivity failures of the 3%/3mm pass rate metric and published action levels when used in IMRT/VMAT system commissioning. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 444, 06 2013. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/444/1/012086.
dc.relationM. Stasi, S. Bresciani, A. Miranti, A. Maggio, V. Sapino, and P. Gabriele. Pretreatment patient-specific IMRT quality assurance: A correlation study between gamma index and patient clinical dose volume histogram. Medical Physics, 39(12):7626–7634, 2012. doi:10.1118/1.4767763.
dc.relationA. Mans, M. Wendling, L. N. McDermott, J.-J. Sonke, R. Tielenburg, R. Vijlbrief, B. Mijnheer, M. van Herk, and J. C. Stroom. Catching errors with in vivo EPID dosimetry. Medical Physics, 37(6):2638–2644, 2010. doi:10.1118/1.3397807.
dc.relationSasa Mutic, R. Scott Brame, Swetha Oddiraju, Parag Parikh, Melisa A. Westfall, Merilee L. Hopkins, Angel D. Medina, Jonathan C. Danieley, Jeff M. Michalski, Issam M. El Naqa, Daniel A. Low, and Bin Wu. Event (error and near-miss) reporting and learning system for process improvement in radiation oncology. Medical Physics, 37(9):5027–5036, 2010. doi:10.1118/1.3471377.
dc.relationElizabeth A. Miles, Catharine H. Clark, M. Teresa Guerrero Urbano, Margaret Bidmead, David P. Dearnaley, Kevin J. Harrington, Roger A’Hern, and Christopher M. Nutting. The impact of introducing intensity modulated radiotherapy into routine clinical practice. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 77(3):241–246, 2005. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2005.10.011.
dc.relationBaozhou Sun, Dharanipathy Rangaraj, Sunita Boddu, Murty Goddu, Deshan Yang, Geethpriya Palaniswaamy, Sridhar Yaddanapudi, Omar Wooten, and Sasa Mutic. Evaluation of the efficiency and effectiveness of independent dose calculation followed by machine log file analysis against conventional measurement based IMRT QA. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 13(5), 2012.
dc.relationE Ford, S Terezakis, Y Yang, K Harris, and S Mutic. WE-C-214-05: A Quantification of the Effectiveness of Standard QA Measures at Preventing Errors in Radiation Therapy and the Promise of in Vivo EPID-Based Portal Dosimetry. Medical Physics, 38(6):3808–3808, 2011.
dc.relationJ Charles Smith, Sonja Dieterich, Colin G Orton, et al. It is STILL necessary to validate each individual IMRT treatment plan with dosimetric measurements before delivery. Medical physics, 38(2):553–555, 2011.
dc.relationChester; Dube Scott; Hendee William R. Ramsey. It is necessary to validate each individual IMRT treatment plan before delivery. Medical Physics, 30, 2003. doi:10.1118/1.1600740.
dc.relationJon J. Kruse and Charles S. Mayo. Comment on “Catching errors with patientspecific pretreatment machine log file analysis”. Practical Radiation Oncology, 3(2):91–92, 2013. doi:10.1016/j.prro.2012.05.007.
dc.relationBenjamin E Nelms, Heming Zhen, andWolfgang A Tomé. Per-beam, planar IMRT QA passing rates do not predict clinically relevant patient dose errorsa). Medical physics, 38(2):1037–1044, 2011.
dc.relationJianguo Qian, Louis Lee,Wu Liu, Karen Chu, Edward Mok, Gary Luxton, Quynh-Thu Le, and Lei Xing. Dose reconstruction for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using cone-beam CT and dynamic log files. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 55(13):3597, 2010.
dc.relationLouis Lee, Quynh-Thu Le, and Lei Xing. Retrospective IMRT Dose Reconstruction Based on Cone-Beam CT and MLC Log-File. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 70(2):634–644, 2015/06/04 2007. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.09.054.
dc.rightsReconocimiento 4.0 Internacional
dc.rightsAcceso abierto
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsDerechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.titleImplementación de un método de verificación de tratamientos IMRT utilizando archivos MLCLogs
dc.typeOtro


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución