Insumos y resultados de innovación: Un análisis estructural del Índice Departamental de Innovación para Colombia 2019

dc.contributorSánchez Rodriguez, Erika Celene
dc.contributorJunca Rodriguez, Gustavo Adolfo
dc.creatorCalderón Lesmes, Gina Marcela
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-06T18:07:14Z
dc.date.available2021-10-06T18:07:14Z
dc.date.created2021-10-06T18:07:14Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/80402
dc.identifierUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifierRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/
dc.description.abstractEl Índice Departamental de Innovación para Colombia – IDIC es un ejercicio de medición de las condiciones que promueven o restringen la innovación en el país, cuya estructura metodológica ha sido adaptada del Índice Global de Innovación – GII. Sin embargo, tomando como referente el estudio desarrollado por Sohn, Kim, & Jeon (2015), estos índices pueden omitir posibles relaciones estructurales entre los factores que intervienen en el desempeño innovador de los departamentos. En este trabajo de grado se plantea un modelo de ecuaciones estructurales (SEM) aplicando el método de mínimos cuadrados parciales (PLS). Utilizando los datos empíricos del IDIC 2019 se encontró que, los constructos de instituciones y capital humano e investigación guardan una relación (directa e indirecta) con la mayoría los pilares del IDIC, por lo que la focalización de intervenciones de política pública sobre estos factores tiene un efecto multiplicador en el fortalecimiento del ecosistema innovador de los departamentos de Colombia. (Texto tomado de la fuente).
dc.description.abstractThe Departmental Innovation Index for Colombia - IDIC is an exercise to measure the conditions that promote or restrict innovation in the country, whose methodological structure has been adapted from the Global Innovation Index - GII. However, taking as a reference the study developed by Sohn, Kim, & Jeon (2015), these indexes may omit possible structural relationships between the factors involved in the innovative performance of the departments. In this degree work, a structural equation model (SEM) is proposed by applying the partial least squares (PLS) method. Using the empirical data of the IDIC 2019, it was found that the constructs of institutions and human capital and research have a relationship (direct and indirect) with most of the IDIC pillars, so that the targeting of public policy interventions on these factors has a multiplier effect in strengthening the innovative ecosystem of the Colombian departments.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.publisherBogotá - Ciencias Económicas - Maestría en Ciencias Económicas
dc.publisherEscuela de Economía
dc.publisherFacultad de Ciencias Económicas
dc.publisherBogotá, Colombia
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
dc.relationAbubakar, A., Kassim, S. H. J., & Yusoff, M. B. (2015). Financial Development, Human Capital Accumulation and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, 96–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.341
dc.relationAdam, I. O. (2020). ICT development, e-government development, and economic development: Does institutional quality matter? Information Technologies and International Development, 16(16), 1–19.
dc.relationAdobe. (2018). Creative and technology in the age of AI.
dc.relationAmin, M., & Mattoo, A. (2008). Human capital and the changing structure of the Indian economy. En World Bank Policy Research Paper (Número March)
dc.relationAnantrasirichai, N., & Bull, D. (2020). Artificial intelligence in the creative industries: A review. arXiv, 1–67.
dc.relationAslam, A. (2020). The hotly debate of human capital and economic growth: why institutions may matter? Quality and Quantity, 54(4), 1351–1362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-00989-5
dc.relationAsongu, S. A., & Nwachukwu, J. C. (2016). The Mobile Phone in the Diffusion of Knowledge for Institutional Quality in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Development, 86, 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.05.012
dc.relationBalconi, M. (2004). De la codification de la connaissance technologique et de l’automation informatisée: impact sur le travail et les entreprises industrielles.
dc.relationBaptista, R., & Swann, P. (1998). Do firms in clusters innovate more? Research Policy, 27(5), 525–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00065-1
dc.relationBatabyal, A. A., & Nijkamp, P. (2015). Digital technologies, knowledge spillovers, innovation policies, and economic growth in a creative region. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 25(5), 470–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2015.1073485
dc.relationBayliss, D. (2006). The Rise of the Creative City: Culture and Creativity in Copenhagen. European Planning Studies, 15(7). https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310701356183
dc.relationBBC Mundo. (2020, marzo 4). ONU en Colombia | “Los asesinatos de líderes sociales son crímenes políticos”: Michel Forst, relator especial para los derechos humanos - BBC News Mundo. https://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-america-latina-51745651
dc.relationBekana, D. M. (2019). Political institutions, human capital and innovation: evidence from sub-Saharan Africa. Democratization, 26(4), 666–708. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1574296
dc.relationBianchi, C. G., Borini, F. M., & Ogasavara, M. H. (2015). Creative industry internationalisation: The impact of regulative, normative and cognitive institutions in developed and developing economies. Journal for Global Business Advancement, 8(4), 451–468. https://doi.org/10.1504/JGBA.2015.074031
dc.relationBorrás, S., & Edquist, C. (2015). Innovation policy for knowledge production an R&D. En The economics of knowledge, innovation and systemic technology policy (pp. 361–382).
dc.relationCINEP. (2020). Controversia No. 217: Implementación de los Acuerdos de Paz en Colombia. https://www.cinep.org.co/Home2/component/k2/841-controversia-no-217-implementacion-de-los-acuerdos-de-paz-en-colombia.html
dc.relationCirera, X., & Maloney, W. F. (2017). The Innovation Paradox: Developing-Country Capabilities and the Unrealized Promise of Technological Catch-Up (W. Bank (ed.)). https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1160-9
dc.relationCohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). the Economicjournal Innovation and Learning: the Two Faces of R&D. The Economic Journal, 99(September), 569–596.
dc.relationConsejo Privado de Competitividad. (2019). Informe de Competitividad 2019. En Informe de competitividad 2019 (Vol. 0, Número 0). https://www.compite.pe/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/informe-de-competitividad-2019.pdf
dc.relationCornell University, WIPO, & INSEAD. (2019). The Global Innovation Index 2019 : Creating Healthy Lives - The Future of Medical Innovation. World Intellectual Property Organization.
dc.relationCornell University, WIPO, & INSEAD. (2020). The Global Innovation Index 2020: Who Will Finance Innovation? En World Intellectual Property Organization. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2019-chapter1.pdf
dc.relationCorso, M., Martini, A., Pellegrini, L., & Paolucci, E. (2003). Technological and Organizational Tools for Knowledge Management: In Search of Configurations. Small Business Economics, 21(4), 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026123322900
dc.relationCupani, M. (2012). Análisis de Ecuaciones Estructurales: conceptos, etapas de desarrollo y un ejemplo de aplicación. Revista Tesis, 1, 186–199. http://www.revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/tesis/article/download/2884/2750
dc.relationDANE. (2017). Metodología General Encuesta de Desarrollo e Innovación Tecnológica en la Industria Manufacturera –EDIT.
dc.relationDNP. (2019). La Agenda 2030 en Colombia - Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible. https://www.ods.gov.co/es
dc.relationDNP Colombia. (2020). (42) Índice Departamental de Innovación para Colombia - YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIE7Zis0-Po&feature=emb_logo
dc.relationDNP, & OCyT. (2015). Índice Departamental para Colombia (IDIC), 2015. www.c-230.com
dc.relationDNP, & OCyT. (2017). Índice Departamental de Innovación para Colombia (IDIC), 2017. www.dnp.gov.co
dc.relationDNP, & OCyT. (2018). Indice de Innovación para Colombia (IDIC), 2018. Departamento Nacional de Planeacion, 1–158. https://colaboracion.dnp.gov.co/CDT/Prensa/IndiceDepartamentalInnovacionColombia2018.pdf
dc.relationDNP, & OCyT. (2019). Índice Departamental de Innovación para Colombia, IDIC 2019.
dc.relationEccles, R. G., & Williamson, O. E. (1987). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(4). https://doi.org/10.2307/2392889
dc.relationFlorida, R. (2003). Cities and the Creative Class. City & Community, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6040.00034
dc.relationFochler, M. (2016). Beyond and between academia and business: How Austrian biotechnology researchers describe high-tech startup companies as spaces of knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(2), 259–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716629831
dc.relationFombang, M. P. S., & Adjasi, C. K. (2018). Access to finance and firm innovation. Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 10(1), 73–94. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFEP-10-2016-0070
dc.relationForay, D., & Lundvall, B. Å. (2009). The knowledge-based economy: From the economics of knowledge to the learning economy. En The Economic Impact of Knowledge. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-7506-7009-8.50011-2
dc.relationGaviria, C. (2016). Parciales P LS Aplicada a Datos Variedad Valuados. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, sede Medellín.
dc.relationGhassib, H. B. (2010). Where Does Creativity Fit into a Productivist Industrial Model of Knowledge Production? Gifted and Talented International, 25(1), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2010.11673540
dc.relationGómez-giraldo, J. C., & Hernández-rodríguez, J. C. (2009). Libertad de prensa en Colombia entre la amenaza y la manipulación. Palabra Clave, 12(1), 13–35. https://doi.org/10.5294/1450
dc.relationHair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babib, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (Prentice Hall (ed.); 7th Editio).
dc.relationHair Jr, J., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) - Joseph F. Hair, Jr., G. Tomas M. Hult, Christian Ringle, Marko Sarstedt. En Sage.
dc.relationHair Jr, J., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) - Joseph F. Hair, Jr., G. Tomas M. Hult, Christian Ringle, Marko Sarstedt. En Sage.
dc.relationHeimeriks, G., Li, D., Lamers, W., Meijer, I., & Yegros, A. (2019). Scientific knowledge production in European regions: patterns of growth, diversity and complexity. European Planning Studies, 27(11), 2123–2143. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1645814
dc.relationIvanov, A., & Voinikanis, E. (2017). A century of experimentation: Institutional approaches to knowledge production in russia from 1917 to 2017 and their implications for ip and competition equilibrium. Antitrust Bulletin, 62(4), 752–769. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603X17735194
dc.relationJibir, A., & Abdu, M. (2020). Human Capital and Propensity to Protect Intellectual Properties as Innovation Output: the Case of Nigerian Manufacturing and Service Firms. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00657-x
dc.relationJoint Research Centre-European Commission. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators. En OECD publishing (Número 03). http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/5lgmz9dkcdg4.pdf?expires=1471336777&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=158391DADFA324416BB9015F3E4109AF
dc.relationJung, J. (2020). The fourth industrial revolution, knowledge production and higher education in South Korea. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 42(2), 134–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2019.1660047
dc.relationKahn, J. H. (2006). Factor Analysis in Counseling Psychology Research, Training, and Practice: Principles, Advances, and Applications. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(5), 684–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006286347
dc.relationKaraev, A., Koh, S. C. L., & Szamosi, L. T. (2007). The cluster approach and SME competitiveness: A review. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 18(7), 818–835. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410380710817273
dc.relationKendall, J. (2009). Local financial development and growth. Journal of Banking and Finance, 36(5), 1548–1562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.01.001
dc.relationKhalifa, A. Ben. (2019). Direct and Complementary Effects of Investment in Knowledge-Based Economy on Innovation Performance in Tunisian Firms. 561–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-017-0481-1
dc.relationKoh, C. E., Ryan, S., & Prybutok, V. R. (2005). Creating value through managing knowledge in an e-government to constituency (G2C) environment. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 45(4), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2005.11645853
dc.relationKudo, H. (2008). Does e-government guarantee accountability in public sector? Experiences in Italy and Japan. Public Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 93–120.
dc.relationLa república. (2019, febrero 19). El consumo per cápita de energía fue de 1.159 kWh durante el año pasado. https://www.larepublica.co/especiales/efecto-hidroituango/el-consumo-per-capita-de-energia-fue-de-1159-kwh-durante-el-ano-pasado-2829778
dc.relationLee, S. Y., Florida, R., & Gates, G. (2010). Innovation, human capital, and creativity. International Review of Public Administration, 14(3), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2010.10805158
dc.relationLohmöller, J.-B. (1989). Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares. En Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-52512-4
dc.relationLott, J. R., & North, D. C. (1992). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.2307/3325144
dc.relationLubart, T., & Zenasni, F. (2010). A New Look at Creative Giftedness. Gifted and Talented International, 25(1), 53–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2010.11673549
dc.relationLundvall, B.-Å. (2016). The Learning Economy and the Economics of Hope. En The Learning Economy and the Economics of Hope. https://doi.org/10.26530/oapen_626406
dc.relationLundvall, B.-Å., Johnson, B., Andersen, E. S., & Dalum, B. (2002). National systems of production, innovation and competence building. Communications of the Korean Mathematical Society, 27(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.4134/CKMS.2012.27.1.037
dc.relationMadsen, J. B. (2016). HEALTH, HUMAN CAPITAL FORMATION and KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION: TWO CENTURIES of INTERNATIONAL EVIDENCE. En Macroeconomic Dynamics (Vol. 20, Número 4). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1365100514000650
dc.relationMalmberg, A., & Power, D. (2005). (How) do (Firms in) clusters create knowledge? Industry and Innovation, 12(4), 409–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710500381583
dc.relationMartínez Ávila, M., & Fierro Moreno, E. (2018). Aplicación de la técnica PLS-SEM en la gestión del conocimiento: un enfoque técnico práctico / Application of the PLS-SEM technique in Knowledge Management: a practical technical approach. En RIDE Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo (Vol. 8, Número 16). https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v8i16.336
dc.relationMartínez, M., & Fierro, E. (2018). Aplicación de la técnica PLS-SEM en la gestión del conocimiento: un enfoque técnico práctico. RIDE - Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo, 8(16), 130–164. https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v8i16.336
dc.relationMcCluskey, K. W. (2010). Comments on Ghassib’s “Where Does Creativity Fit into a Productivist Industrial Model of Knowledge Production?” Gifted and Talented International, 25(1), 23–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2010.11673542
dc.relationMichael, S. C., & Pearce, J. A. (2009). The need for innovation as a rationale for government involvement in entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 21(3), 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620802279999
dc.relationNour, S. S. O. M. (2010). The impact of ICT in the transformation and production of knowledge in Sudan. En Working paper series (Núm. 063; #2010). https://doi.org/10.20955/r.85.67
dc.relationNowotny, H., Scott, P. B., & Gibbons, M. T. (2013). Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. (J. W. & Sons (ed.)).
dc.relationOCDE/Eurostat. (2005). Manual de Oslo GUÍA PARA LA RECOGIDA E INTERPRETACIÓN DE DATOS SOBRE INNOVACIÓN Tercera edición.
dc.relationOECD/Eurostat. (2018). Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation, 4th Edition, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, OECD. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en
dc.relationOECD. (2010). SMEs, Entrepreneurship and Innovation. OECD Studies.
dc.relationOECD, & World Bank. (2000). Korea and the Knowledge-based Economy: Making the Transition. OECD.
dc.relationOlofsdotter, K. (1998). Foreign direct investment, country capabilities and economic growth. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 134(3), 534–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02707929
dc.relationOwen-Smith, J. (2003). From separate systems to a hybrid order: Accumulative advantage across public and private science at Research One universities. Research Policy, 32(6), 1081–1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00111-7
dc.relationPerez Monclus, R. (2016). Public banking for the cultural sector: financial instruments and the new financial intermediaries. International Review of Social Research, 5(2), 88–101. https://doi.org/10.1515/irsr-2015-0008
dc.relationPolder, M., Van Leeuwen, G., Zand, F., & Van Beers, C. (2012a). Complementarities between Information Technologies and Innovation Modes in the Adoption and Outcome Stage : A Micro-Econometric Analysis for the Netherlands. CAED Conference, 1–38. http://doku.iab.de/fdz/events/2012/Polder.pdf
dc.relationPolder, M., Van Leeuwen, G., Zand, F., & Van Beers, C. (2012b). Complementarities between Information Technologies and Innovation Modes in the Adoption and Outcome Stage : A Micro-Econometric Analysis for the Netherlands. CAED Conference, 1–38.
dc.relationRocha, H. O. (2004). Entrepreneurship and development: The role of clusters. Small Business Economics. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137298263
dc.relationSallatu, M. A., & Indarti, N. (2018). Determining Factors of Firm Survivability a Study of University Spin-Offs in Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 33(2), 143. https://doi.org/10.22146/jieb.30209
dc.relationSanchez-Serra, D. (2014). Talent and creative economy in French local labour systems. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32(3), 405–425. https://doi.org/10.1068/c11152r
dc.relationSchumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory ofEconomic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital Credit, Interests, and the Business Cycles.
dc.relationShane, S., & Cable, D. (2002). Network ties, reputation, and the financing of new ventures. Management Science, 48(3), 364–381. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.3.364.7731
dc.relationShapin, S. (2008). The Scientific Life: A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation (University of Chicago Press (ed.)).
dc.relationSingh, H., Das, A., & Joseph, D. (2007). Country-Level Determinants of E-Government Maturity. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 20. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.02040
dc.relationSmith, K. (2002). What is the’Knowledge Economy’? Knowledge intensity and distributed knowledge bases. Knowledge Creation Diffusion Utilization, June, 32. http://eprints.utas.edu.au/1235/
dc.relationSohn, S. Y., Kim, D. H., & Jeon, S. Y. (2015). Re-evaluation of global innovation index based on a structural equation model. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 28(4), 492–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2015.1104412
dc.relationSørheim, R., Widding, L. Ø., Oust, M., & Madsen, Ø. (2011). Funding of university spin-off companies: A conceptual approach to financing challenges. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 18(1), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626001111106433
dc.relationSpiezia, V. (2011). Are ICT users more innovative? an analysis of ICT-enabled innovation in OECD firms. OECD Journal: Economic Studies, 2011, 99–119. https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-2011-5kg2d2hkn6vg
dc.relationSrivastava, S. C., & Teo, T. S. H. (2007). E-government payoffs: Evidence from cross-country data. Journal of Global Information Management, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.4018/jgim.2007100102
dc.relationStiglitz, J. E. (2000). Economics of the Public Sector.
dc.relationStock, J. H., & Watson, M. m. (2012). Introductión to Econometrics. En British Journal of Cancer (Vol. 3).
dc.relationUNCTAD. (2008). Creative Economy Report 2008. The Challenge of Assessing the Creative Economy: towards Informed Policy-making. En Harvard Business Review (Vol. 8, Número 9). http://unctad.org/en/Docs/ditc20082cer_en.pdf%5Cnhttp://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/35/56/2101733.pdf%5Cnhttp://unctad.org/en/pages/PublicationWebflyer.aspx?publicationid=1595%5Cnhttp://www.isc.hbs.edu/Innov_9211.pdf
dc.relationUNESCO. (2013). Creative Economy Report 2013 Special Edition.
dc.relationVenturini, S., & Mehmetoglu, M. (2019). plssem: A Stata Package for Structural Equation Modeling with Partial Least Squares. 88(8), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v000.i00
dc.relationWallsten, S. J. (2000). The effects of government-industry R & D programs on private R & D : the case of the Small Business Innovation Research program. Tha RAND Journal of Economics, 31(1), 82–100.
dc.relationWeston, R., & Gore, P. A. (2006). A Brief Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006286345
dc.relationWold, H. (1975). Path Models with Latent Variables: The NIPALS Approach. En Quantitative Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-103950-9.50017-4
dc.relationWright, M., Lockett, A., Clarysse, B., & Binks, M. (2006). University spin-out companies and venture capital. Research Policy, 35(4), 481–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.01.005
dc.relationWright, P. M., & Barney, J. B. (1998). On becoming a strategic partner: the role of human resources in gaining competitive advantage. Human Resource Management, 37(1), 31–46.
dc.relationZhao, K., O’Mahony, M., & Qamar, A. (2020). Bridging the gap in creative economy and ICT research: a regional analysis in Europe. Applied Economics, 52(29), 3153–3166. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2019.1706718
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleInsumos y resultados de innovación: Un análisis estructural del Índice Departamental de Innovación para Colombia 2019
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestría


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución