dc.contributorArango Bayer, Gloria Lucía
dc.contributorPolíticas, recursos humanos y resultados en salud
dc.creatorPeña Alfaro, Bairon
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-01T17:07:52Z
dc.date.available2022-02-01T17:07:52Z
dc.date.created2022-02-01T17:07:52Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/80839
dc.identifierUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifierRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/
dc.description.abstractEl entorno laboral de los profesionales de enfermería es un área temática de gran interés para organizaciones internacionales en salud, organizaciones profesionales internacionales y locales, académicos, investigadores y directores o gerentes de enfermería, por la mediación o el impacto que estos entornos pueden tener en los resultados personales y profesionales de los enfermeros, en la calidad de la atención que se brinda a los pacientes y en los resultados de las organizaciones proveedoras de servicios de salud. Por lo anterior, existe el gran desafío de establecer entornos laborales saludables para mejorar la práctica de los enfermeros. Para promover la investigación empírica de los entornos laborales saludables de los enfermeros de práctica asistencial en el ámbito hospitalario, se desarrolló el instrumento ENLASA-Enfermería empleando un diseño de métodos mixtos secuencial exploratorio de tres fases. En la primera fase se adelantó la definición del concepto y la identificación de sus características, iniciando con una sub-fase de revisión teórica, continuando con una sub-fase de abordaje cualitativo con enfermeros y finalmente una sub-fase analítica para interconectar los hallazgos teóricos y cualitativos. En la segunda fase se generó un banco de ítems organizado en dos dimensiones (parte A: componentes estructurales organizacionales y parte B: dimensión de procesos organizacionales) que fue sometido a una revisión por expertos para estimar la validez facial y de contenido, y posteriormente se realizó una prueba piloto con una muestra de 22 enfermeros. Finalmente, en la tercera fase se aplicó el instrumento a una muestra de 307 enfermeros clínicos del ámbito hospitalario de diferentes municipios y ciudades de Colombia, con lo cual se realizó una evaluación de las propiedades métricas en términos de validez de constructo y confiabilidad. Los resultados obtenidos permitieron clasificar cada una de las partes de ENLASA-Enfermería como satisfactorias en términos de validez facial y de contenido con índices globales superiores a 0,80 en las variables evaluadas por cada parte; con consistencia interna satisfactoria (Alfa de Cronbach parte A: 0,930 y parte B: 0,944) y con una estructura interna que permitió reconocer los elementos conceptuales de un entorno laboral saludable que respaldan su contenido. Se concluyó que ENLASA-Enfermería es un instrumento válido y confiable, prometedor para la investigación y la evaluación de los entornos laborales saludables de enfermeros clínicos en el ámbito hospitalario en Colombia. (Texto tomado de la fuente).
dc.description.abstractThe work environment of nursing professionals is a subject area of great interest to international health organizations, international and local professional organizations, academics, researchers and nursing directors or managers due to the mediation or the impact that these environments may have in the results of the professionals nursing, in the quality of care provided to patients and in the results of health service provider organizations. Therefore, there is the great challenge of establishing healthy work environments to improve the practice of professionals nursing. To promote empirical research on healthy work environments for nurses in care practice in the hospital setting, the ENLASA-Nursing instrument was developed using a three-phase exploratory sequential mixed methods design. In the first phase, the definition of the concept and the identification of its characteristics were advanced, starting with a sub-phase of theoretical review, continuing with a sub-phase of qualitative approach with nurses and finally an analytical sub-phase to interconnect the theoretical findings and qualitative. In the second phase, a bank of items organized in two dimensions (part A: organizational structural components and part B: organizational processes dimension) was generated, which was subjected to a review by experts to estimate facial and content validity and subsequently carried out a pilot test with a sample of 22 nurses. Finally, in the third phase, the instrument was applied to a sample of 307 clinical nurses from the hospital environment of different municipalities and cities in Colombia, with which an evaluation of the metric properties in terms of construct validity and reliability was carried out. The results obtained allowed classifying each of the parts of ENLASA-Nursing as satisfactory in terms of facial validity and content with indices global above 0.80 in the variables evaluated; with satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach's Alpha part A: 0,930 and part B: 0,944) and with an internal structure that demonstrated relationships between items, subdimensions and dimensions, confirming the existence of the healthy work environment construct measured by the instrument. It was concluded that ENLASA-Nursing is a valid and reliable instrument, promising for the research, establishment and evaluation of healthy work environments of clinical nurses in the hospital setting in Colombia.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.publisherBogotá - Enfermería - Doctorado en Enfermería
dc.publisherDepartamento de Enfermería
dc.publisherFacultad de Enfermería
dc.publisherBogotá, Colombia
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá
dc.relationBireme
dc.relationAboshaiqah, A. E. (2015). Nursing work environment in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Nursing Management, 23(4), 510–520. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12164
dc.relationAiken, L. H., & Patrician, P. A. (2000). Measuring organizational traits of hospitals: The revised nursing work index. Nursing Research, 49(3), 146–153. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-200005000-00006
dc.relationAl-Hamdan, Z., Manojlovich, M., & Tanima, B. (2017). Jordanian Nursing Work Environments, Intent to Stay, and Job Satisfaction. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 49(1), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12265
dc.relationAlspach, G. (2009). Craft your own healthy work environment: Got your BFF? Critical Care Nurse, 29(2), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2009931
dc.relationAmerican Association of Critical-Care Nurses. (2005). AACN standards for estableshing and sustaining healthy work environments: a journey to excellence. American Journal of Critical Care, 14(800), 187–197
dc.relationAmerican Nurses Association. (2018a). Bill of Rights FAQs. Retrieved October 8, 2018, from https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/work-environment/health-safety/bill-of-rights-faqs/
dc.relationAmerican Nurses Association. (2018b). Healthy Work Environment. Retrieved October 8, 2018, from https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/work-environment/
dc.relationAmerican Nurses Credentialing Center. (2018). ANCC Magnet Recognition Program®. Retrieved October 8, 2018, from https://www.nursingworld.org/organizational-programs/magnet/
dc.relationAreskoug, K., Avby, G., Andersson, M., & Kjellström, S. (2018). Workers’ experiences of healthy work environment indicators at well-functioning primary care units in Sweden: a qualitative study. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 36(4), 406–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2018.1523987
dc.relationBackhaus, R., Rossum, E. van, Verbeek, H., Halfens, R. J. G., Tan, F. E. S., Capezuti, E., & Hamers, J. P. H. (2017). Work environment characteristics associated with quality of care in Dutch nursing homes: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 66, 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.12.001
dc.relationBai, J. (2016). Does job satisfaction mediate the relationship between healthy work environment and care quality? Nursing in Critical Care, 21(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.12122
dc.relationBai, J., Hsu, L., & Zhang, Q. (2015). Validation of the Essentials of Magnetism II in Chinese critical care settings. Nursing in Critical Care, 20(3), 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.12041
dc.relationBai, J., Zhang, Q., Wang, Y., Yu, L.-P., Pei, X.-B., Cheng, L., & Hsu, L. (2015). Work environment for Chinese nurses in different types of ICUs: a multisite cross-sectional survey. Journal of Nursing Management, 23(4), 498–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12163
dc.relationBalsanelli, A. P., & Cunha, I. C. K. O. (2015). Nursing leadership in intensive care units and its relationship to the work environment. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 23(1), 106–113. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-1169.0150.2531
dc.relationBatista-foguet, J. M., Coenders, G., & Alonso, J. (2004). Análisis factorial confirmatorio . Su utilidad en la validación de cuestionarios relacionados con la salud. 122(Supl 1), 60–62
dc.relationBlake, N., Leach, L. S., Robbins, W., Pike, N., & Needleman, J. (2013). Healthy work environments and staff nurse retention: The relationship between communication, collaboration, and leadership in the pediatric intensive care unit. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 37(4), 356–370. https://doi.org/10.1097/NAQ.0b013e3182a2fa47
dc.relationBlanco, J., & Maya, J. (2005). Fundamentos de Salud Pública. Salud pública. (2da edición; C. para instituciones Biológicas., Ed.). Medellin Colombia.
dc.relationBragadóttir, H. (2016). Identifying indicators of healthy work environments in nursing as determinants of health in the 21st century. Creative Nursing, 22(4), 218–225. https://doi.org/10.1891/1078-4535.22.4.218
dc.relationBrunet, L. (2002). El clima de trabajo en las organizaciones. (5ta reimpr; Trillas, Ed.). México D.F.
dc.relationBueno Robles, L. S. (2011). Aspectos ontológicos y epistemológicos de las visiones de enfermería inmersas en el quehacer profesional. Cienc. Enferm, 17(1), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95532011000100005
dc.relationBurga, A. A. (2006). La unidimensionalidad de un instrumento de medición: perspectiva factorial. Revista de Psicologia, 24(1), 53–80. Retrieved from http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/psicologia/article/download/642/629
dc.relationCardona, L. (2011). Validación de la versión en español del instrumento practice environment scale of the nursing work index (PES- NWI o“entorno laboral de la práctica de enfermeria”). Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
dc.relationCasas, S. B., & Klijn, T. P. (2006). Promoción de la salud y un entorno laboral saludable. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 14(1), 136–141.
dc.relationCASPe ©. (2020). CASPe | Programa de Habilidades en Lectura Crítica Español Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Español. Retrieved June 17, 2020, from http://www.redcaspe.org/
dc.relationChiavenato, I. (2009). Comportamiento organizacional. La dinámica del éxito de las organizaciones. (2da Edició; S. A. McGRAW-HILL/INTERAMERICANA EDITORES, Ed.). México, D.F.: McGRAW-HILL/INTERAMERICANA EDITORES, S.A.
dc.relationChiavenato, I. (2011). Administración de recursos humanos. El capital humano de las organizaciones (Novena Edi; McGRAW-HILL/INTERAMERICANA EDITORES S.A., Ed.). México, D.F.
dc.relationChoi, J., Bakken, S., Larson, E., & Stone, P. W. (2004). Perceived Nursing Work Environment of Critical Care Nurses. Nursing Research, 53(6), 370–378. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-200411000-00005
dc.relationClark, C. M., Sattler, V. P., & Barbosa-Leiker, C. (2016). Development and testing of the healthy work environment inventory: A reliable tool for assessing work environment health and satisfaction. Journal of Nursing Education, 55(10), 555–562. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20160914-03
dc.relationCohen, J., Stuenkel, D., & Nguyen, Q. (2009). Providing a healthy work environment for nurses: The influence on retention. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 24(4), 308–315. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0b013e3181a4699a
dc.relationCongreso de la República de Colombia. Ley 266 de 1996. Por la cual se reglamenta la profesión de Enfermería en Colombia y se dictan otras disposiciones. , Diario Oficial No. 42.710 § (1996).
dc.relationCongreso de la República de Colombia. Ley 911 de 2004. Por la cual se dictan disposiciones en materia de responsabilidad deontológica para el ejercicio de la profesión de Enfermería en Colombia; se establece el régimen disciplinario correspondiente y se dictan otras disposiciones. , Diario Oficial No. 45.693 de 6 de octubre (2004)
dc.relationCongreso de la República de Colombia. Ley estatuaria 1751 de 2015. Por medio de la cual se regula el derecho fundamental a la salud y se dictan otras disposiciones, Diario Oficial No. 49.427 de 16 de febrero (2015)
dc.relationConnor, A. J., Ziniel, S. I., Porter, C., Doherty, D., Moonan, M., Dwyer, P., … Hickey, P. A. (2018). Interprofessional use and validation of the aacn healthy work environment assessment tool. AJCC American Journal of Critical Care, 27(5), 363–371
dc.relationConsejo Internacional de Enfermeras. (2007). Entornos de práctica favorables: lugares de trabajo de calidad=atención de calidad al paciente. Ginebra - Suiza.
dc.relationCornett, P. A., & O’Rourke, M. W. (2009). Building organizational capacity for a healthy work environment through role-based professional practice. Critical Care Nursing Quarterly, 32(3), 208–220. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CNQ.0000356819.47395.a4
dc.relationCreswell, J., & Creswell, D. (2018). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (Fifth Edit). Los Angeles, USA: SAGE Publications, Inc
dc.relationCreswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (Third Edit; SAGE Publications Inc, Ed.). Los Angeles, USA
dc.relationCuff, L. (2016). Project of thesis: Healthy Work Environment: Essentials for Outcome Improvement. Walden University College
dc.relationCuff, L. E. (2016). Healthy Work Environment: Essentials for Outcome Improvement (Walden University). Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1833187900?accountid=150292
dc.relationDe Brouwer, B. J. M., Kaljouw, M. J., Kramer, M., Schmalenberg, C., & van Achterberg, T. (2014). Measuring the nursing work environment: Translation and psychometric evaluation of the Essentials of Magnetism. International Nursing Review, 61(1), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.12073
dc.relationDiaz Monroy, L. G., & Morales Rivera, M. A. (2012). Análisis estadístico de datos multivariados. (Primera Ed). Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Facultad de Ciencias.
dc.relationDirik, H. F., & Intepeler, S. S. (2017). The work environment and empowerment as predictors of patient safety culture in Turkey. Journal of Nursing Management, 25(4), 256–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12458
dc.relationDonabedian, A. (1990). Garantía y monitoria de la calidad de la atención médica: un texto introductorio. México D.F.
dc.relationDonabedian, A. (2001). La calidad de la asistencia. ¿Cómo podría ser evaluada? Revista de Calidad Asistencial, 16, S80–S87.
dc.relationDonabedian, A. (2003). An Introduction to Quality Assurance in Health Care (1ra Edición). New York.
dc.relationDuran de Villalobos, M. M. (2005). La ciencia, la ética y el arte de enfermería a partir del conocimiento personal. Aquichan, 5(1), 86–95. https://doi.org/10.5294/62
dc.relationEnns, V., Currie, S., & Wang, J. L. (2015). Professional autonomy and work setting as contributing factors to depression and absenteeism in Canadian nurses. Nursing Outlook, 63(3), 269–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2014.12.014
dc.relationEscobar, J., & Cuervo, Á. (2008). Validez de contenido y juicio de expertos: una aproximación a su utilización. Avances En Medición, 6, 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861(78)90049-6
dc.relationEscurra M, L. M. (1988). Cuantificación de la validez de contenido por criterio de jueces. Revista de Psicología, 6(1–2), 103–111.
dc.relationEsteban Sepúlveda, S. (2017). Evolución del entorno laboral percibido por las enfermeras del Sistema Nacional de Salud en España entre los años 2009-2014
dc.relationFawcett, J. (2005). Contemporary nursing knowledge. Analysis and Evaluation of Nursing Models and Theories (2nd ed.; Copyright © 2005 by F. A. Davis Company, Ed.). https://doi.org/0803613636
dc.relationGarcía, B. (2009). Manual de métodos de investigación para las ciencias sociales: un enfoque de enseñanza basado en proyectos. (1ra edición). México D.F.
dc.relationGiordano-Mulligan, M., & Eckardt, S. (2019). Authentic Nurse Leadership Conceptual Framework: Nurses’ Perception of Authentic Nurse Leader Attributes. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 43(2), 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000344
dc.relationGómez, O., & Gutierrez, E. (2011). La situación de Enfermería: fuente y contexto del conocimiento de Enfermería. (1ra edición; Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Ed.). Bogotá - Colombia
dc.relationGriffon, D. (1995). “Crowning the Edifice” Ethel Fenwich and State Registration. In Nursing History Review (Vol. 3, pp. 201–212). Philadelphia: The American Association for the History of Nursing.
dc.relationGrove, S. K., Gray, J. R., & Burns, N. (2015). Understanding Nursing Research: Building an Evidence-Based Practice (6ta Edición). St. Louis, Missouri.
dc.relationGu, L. Y., & Zhang, L. J. (2014). Assessment tools of nursing work environment in magnet hospitals: A review. International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 1(4), 437–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2014.10.013
dc.relationHarrison, G. D., & Zavotsky, K. E. (2018). Are critical care nurses more likely to leave after a merger? Nursing Management, 49(9), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NUMA.0000544462.60366.c3
dc.relationHayes, B., Douglas, C., & Bonner, A. (2015). Work environment, job satisfaction, stress and burnout among haemodialysis nurses. Journal of Nursing Management, 23(5), 588–598. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12184
dc.relationHeath, J., Johanson, W., & Blake, N. (2004). Healthy work environments: A validation of the literature. Journal of Nursing Administration, 34(11), 524–530. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005110-200411000-00009
dc.relationHernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, M. (2014). Metodología de la investigación (Sexta; S. A. D. C. V. McGRAW-HILL / INTERAMERICANA EDITORES, Ed.). México DF.
dc.relationHernández Sampieri, R., Méndez, S., & Contreras, R. (2014). Construcción de un instrumento para medir el clima organizacional en función del modelo de los valores en competencia. Rev Contaduría y Administración [revista en Internet] 2014 [acceso 3 de enero de 2018]; 59(1): [229-257]. Contaduría y Administración, 59(1), 229–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0186-1042(14)71250-1
dc.relationHuddleston, P. (2014). Healthy Work Environment Framework Within an Acute Care Setting. Journal of Theory Construction & Testing, 18(2), 50–54
dc.relationHuddleston, P. (2015). Measuring direct care nurses’ and nurse leaders’ perceptions of a healthy work environment within acute care settings. (The University of Texas at Arlington). https://doi.org/10.1145/3132847.3132886
dc.relationHuddleston, P., & Gray, J. (2016a). Describing Nurse Leaders’ and Direct Care Nurses’ Perceptions of a Healthy Work Environment in Acute Care Settings, Part 2. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 46(9), 462–467. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000000376
dc.relationHuddleston, P., & Gray, J. (2016b). Measuring Nurse Leaders’ and Direct Care Nurses’ Perceptions of a Healthy Work Environment in an Acute Care Setting, Part 1: A Pilot Study. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 46(7–8), 373–378. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000000361
dc.relationHuddleston, P., Mancini, M. E., & Gray, J. (2017). Measuring Nurse Leaders’ and Direct Care Nurses’ Perceptions of a Healthy Work Environment in Acute Care Settings, Part 3. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 47(3), 140–146. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000000456
dc.relationInternational Centre on Nurse Migration. (2018). Policy Brief: Nurse Retention (p. 28). p. 28. Philadelphia.
dc.relationIsaza Serrano, A. T. (2014). Garantía de la calidad en salud. Cómo organizar una empresa del sector salud. (2da. edición; Ediciones de la U, Ed.). Bogotá.
dc.relationJohansen, M. L., de Cordova, P. B., & Weaver, S. H. (2019). Nurse Workforce Environment Staffing Councils: An Innovative Approach. Nurse Leader, 17(2), 141–146. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mnl.2018.07.001
dc.relationJurkovich, P., Karpiuk, K., & King, C. A. (2010). Magnet Recognition: Examples of Perioperative Excellence. AORN Journal, 91(2), 292–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aorn.2009.11.063
dc.relationKelly, L., & Todd, M. (2017). Compassion Fatigue and the Healthy Work Environment. AACN Advanced Critical Care, 28(4), 351–358. https://doi.org/10.4037/aacnacc2017283
dc.relationKim, L. Y., Rose, D. E., Ganz, D. A., Giannitrapani, K. F., Yano, E. M., Rubenstein, L. V, & Stockdale, S. E. (2019). Elements of the Healthy Work Environment Associated with Lower Primary Care Nurse Burnout. Nursing Outlook. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2019.06.018
dc.relationKramer, B. M., Schmalenberg, C., & Maguire, P. (2008). Essentials of a Magnetic work environment. Nursing 2008 Career Directory, pp. 23–27.
dc.relationKramer, M., Brewer, B. B., & Maguire, P. (2013). Impact of Healthy Work Environments on New Graduate Nurses’ Environmental Reality Shock. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 35(3), 348–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945911403939
dc.relationKramer, M., Maguire, P., & Brewer, B. B. (2011). Clinical nurses in Magnet hospitals confirm productive, healthy unit work environments. Journal of Nursing Management, 19(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01211.x
dc.relationKramer, M., Maguire, P., & Schmalenberg, C. (2006). Excellence Through Evidence: The What, When, and Where of Clinical Autonomy. J Nurs Adm, 36(10), 479–491. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005110-200610000-00009
dc.relationKramer, M., & Schmalenberg, C. (2004). Development and Evaluation of Essentials of Magnetism Tool. Journal of Nursing Administration, 34(7), 365–378. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005110-200407000-00010
dc.relationKramer, M., & Schmalenberg, C. (2008). Confirmation of a healthy work environment. Critical Care Nurse, 28(2), 56–63.
dc.relationKugler, C., Akca, S., Einhorn, I., Rebafka, A., & Russell, C. L. (2016). Transplant Nurses’ Work Environment: A Cross-Sectional Multi-Center Study. Annals of Transplantation, 21, 550–557.
dc.relationLake, E. T. (2002). Development of the practice environment scale of the nursing work index. Research in Nursing and Health, 25(3), 176–188. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.10032
dc.relationLake, E. T. (2007). The nursing practice environment: Measurement and evidence. Medical Care Research and Review, 64(2 SUPPL.). https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558707299253
dc.relationLasater, K. B., & Mchugh, M. D. (2016). Nurse staffing and the work environment linked to readmissions among older adults following elective total hip and knee replacement. International Journal for Quality in Health Care : Journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 28(2), 253–258. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzw007
dc.relationLin, L.-C., Lee, H.-F., & Yen, M. (2017). Establishing a Measurement Tool for a Nursing Work Environment in Taiwan. Research and Theory for Nursing Practice, 31(1), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1891/1541-6577.31.1.75
dc.relationLiu, J., You, L., Zheng, J., Ross, A. M., & Liu, K. (2016). Effects of work environment on quality of care in ICUs: A multisite survey in China. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 31(3), E1–E8. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000160
dc.relationLloret-Segura, S., Ferreres-Traver, A., Hernández-Baeza, A., & Tomás-Marco, I. (2014). El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems : una guía práctica , revisada y actualizada. Anales De Psicología, 30(3), 1151–1169. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.199361
dc.relationMa, C., & Park, S. H. (2015). Hospital Magnet Status, Unit Work Environment, and Pressure Ulcers. Journal of Nursing Scholarship : An Official Publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing, 47(6), 565–573. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12173
dc.relationMays, M. Z., Hrabe, D. P., & Stevens, C. J. (2011). Reliability and validity of an instrument assessing nurses’ attitudes about healthy work environments in hospitals. Journal of Nursing Management, 19(1), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01135.x
dc.relationMéndez Martínez, C., & Rondón Sepúlveda, M. A. (2012). Metodología de Investigación: Introducción al Análisis factorial exploratorio. Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría, 41(1), 197–207.
dc.relationMinisterio de salud de Chile. (2013). Entornos de trabajo saludables. Definición y Modelo propuesto por la OMS (pp. 1–9). pp. 1–9.
dc.relationMinisterio de Salud y Protección Social de Colombia. Entorno laboral saludable como incentivo al talento humano en salud. , (2016).
dc.relationMinisterio de Salud y Protección Social de Colombia. Resolución 2646 DE 2008. Por la cual se establecen disposiciones y se definen responsabilidades para la identificación, evaluación, prevención, intervención y monitoreo permanente de la exposición a factores de riesgo psicosocial en el trabajo y para la d., (2008).
dc.relationMinisterio de Salud y Protección Social de Colombia. Resolución 3200 de 2016. Por la cual se adopta el manual metodológico para la elaborar e implementar las rutas Integrales de Atención en Salud RIAS,(2016).
dc.relationMinisterio de Salud y Protección Social de Colombia. Política Nacional de Talento Humano en Salud,(2018).
dc.relationMinisterio de Salud y Protección Social de Colombia. Resolución Número 3100 De 2019. Por la cual se definen los procedimientos y condiciones de inscripción de los prestadores de servicios de salud y de habilitación de los servicios de salud y se adopta el Manual de Inscripción de Prestadores y Habilitación, Diario Oficial (2019).
dc.relationMuñiz, J. (2010). La Teoría de los Test: Teoría Clásica y Teoría de Respuesta a los Ítems. Papeles Del Psicólogo., 31(1), 57–66.
dc.relationMuñiz, José, & Fonseca-Pedrero, E. (2019). Ten steps for test development. Psicothema, 31(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2018.291
dc.relationMurray, E. (2017). Nursing leadership and management for patient safety and quality care. (1ra edición; FA Davis Company, Ed.). Philadelphia.
dc.relationNantsupawat, A., Kunaviktikul, W., Nantsupawat, R., Wichaikhum, O. A., Thienthong, H., & Poghosyan, L. (2017). Effects of nurse work environment on job dissatisfaction, burnout, intention to leave. International Nursing Review, 64(1), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.12342
dc.relationNoreña-Peña, A., Alcaraz Moreno, N., Rojas, J. G., & Rebolledo-Malpica, D. M. (2012). Aplicabilidad de los criterios de rigor y éticos en la investigación Cualitativa. Aquichan, 12(3), 263–274. Retrieved from https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4322420
dc.relationNorman, G., & Streiner, D. (2014). Biostatistics. The bare essentials. In PMPH-USA Ltd. (Ed.), Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (Fourth Edi, Vol. 53). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
dc.relationOlds, D. M., Aiken, L. H., Cimiotti, J. P., & Lake, E. T. (2017). Association of nurse work environment and safety climate on patient mortality: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 74, 155–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.06.004
dc.relationOrganización Mundial de la Salud. (2010). Entornos Laborales Saludables: Fundamentos y Modelo de la OMS. Contextualización, prácticas y literatura de apoyo. https://doi.org/10.4321/S0465-546X2007000400012
dc.relationOrganización Panamericana de la Salud. (2018). Ampliación del rol de las enfermeras y enfermeros en la atención primaria de salud (OPS, Ed.). Retrieved from https://iris.paho.org/bitstream/handle/10665.2/34959/9789275320037_spa.pdf?sequence=5&isAllowed=y
dc.relationOrganización Panamericana de la Salud. (2019). Orientación estratégica para enfermería en la Región de las Américas (OPS, Ed.). Retrieved from https://iris.paho.org/handle/10665.2/50956
dc.relationOrganización Panamericana de la Salud - Consejo Directivo. Plan de acción sobre recursos humanos para el acceso universal a la salud y la cobertura universal de salud 2018-2023, (2018).
dc.relationOshodi, T. O., Crockett, R., Bruneau, B., & West, E. (2017). The nursing work environment and quality of care: A cross-sectional study using the Essentials of Magnetism II Scale in England. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 26(17–18), 2721–2734. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13783
dc.relationPalese, A., Dante, A., Tonzar, L., & Balboni, B. (2014). The N2N instrument to evaluate healthy work environments: An italian validation. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 87(2), 217–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-013-0851-3
dc.relationParra, D. I., Rey de Cruz, N., Amaya Díaz, H. C., Cárdenas, M. V., Arboleda, L. B., Jurado, Y. C., & Vargas Gómez, C. P. (2016). Percepción de las enfermeras sobre la aplicación del código deontológico de enfermería en Colombia. Rev. Cuid. (Bucaramanga. 2010), 7(2), 1310–1317. https://doi.org/10.15649/cuidarte.v7i2.335
dc.relationPatterson, M. (2012). Defining a HEALTHY WORK ENVIRONMENT. Med - Surg Matters, 21(3/4), 1,11. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1024798896?accountid=150292
dc.relationPearson, A., Pallas, L. O., Thomson, D., Doucette, E., Tucker, D., Wiechula, R., … Jordan, Z. (2006). Systematic review of evidence on the impact of nursing workload and staffing on establishing healthy work environments. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 4(4), 337–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-6988.2006.00055.x
dc.relationPedrosa, I., Suárez Álvarez, J., & García Cueto, E. (2013). Evidencias sobre la Validez de Contenido: Avances Teóricos y Métodos para su Estimación. Acción Psicológica, 10(2), 4–11.
dc.relationPeña, D. (2002). Análisis de datos multivariantes. McGraw-Hill Interamericana de España.
dc.relationPérez, E. R., & Medrano, L. (2010). Análisis Factorial Exploratorio : Bases Conceptuales y Metodológicas. Revista Argentina de Ciencias Del Comportamiento, 2(1889), 58–66.
dc.relationPetit Dit Dariel, O., & Regnaux, J. P. (2015). Do Magnet®-accredited hospitals show improvements in nurse and patient outcomes compared to non-Magnet hospitals: a systematic review. JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, 13(6), 168–219. https://doi.org/10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2262
dc.relationPfettscher, S. A. (2011). Florence Nightingale: La enfermería moderna. In Elsevier (Ed.), Modelos y teorías en enfermería. (Séptima Ed, pp. 71–90). Barcelona: Elsevier.
dc.relationPolit, D., & Beck, C. (2012). Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. (Ninth edit; W. Kluwer, Ed.). Philadelphia.
dc.relationPolit, D., & Beck, C. (2017). Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. (Tenth edit; Wolters Kluwer., Ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
dc.relationPolit, D., & Beck, C. (2018). Investigación en enfermería. Fundamentos para el uso de la evidencia en la práctica de enfermería. (9° edición; Wolter Kluwer, Ed.). Philadelphia.
dc.relationReal Academia Española. (2020). Definición de - Diccionario de la lengua española - Edición del Tricentenario. Retrieved June 5, 2020, from https://dle.rae.es/entorno
dc.relationRitter, D. (2011). The relationship between healthy work environments and retention of nurses in a hospital setting. Journal of Nursing Management, 19(1), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01183.x
dc.relationRoss, J. (2017). Organizational Support, Workload, and Intent to Stay: Work Environment Perceptions in Perianesthesia Nursing Units. Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing : Official Journal of the American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses, 32(4), 287–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2015.07.001
dc.relationRuiz, A., & Gomez, C. (2015). Epidemiología clínica, Investigación Clínica aplicada. (2da Edición; E. médica Panamericana, Ed.). Bogotá - Colombia.
dc.relationSánchez, J. (2014). Afinación del instrumento para medir entornos de la práctica de Enfermería: “Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index PES - NWI.” Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
dc.relationSchmalenberg, C., & Kramer, M. (2007). Types of intensive care units with the healthiest, most productive work environments. AJCC AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 16(5), 458–468.
dc.relationSchmalenberg, C., & Kramer, M. (2008). Essentials of a productive nurse work environment. Nursing Research, 57(1), 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NNR.0000280657.04008.2a
dc.relationSevilla-Zeigen, N. (2016). A Grounded Theory Approach to Healthy Work Environment: Its Impact on Nurses, Patient Safety, and Significance in Healthcare Settings (University of San Diego). Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1840916821?accountid=150292
dc.relationSherwood, G., Koshy Cherian, U., Horton-Deutsch, S., Kitzmiller, R., & Smith-Miller, C. (2018). Reflective practices: meaningful recognition for healthy work environments. Nursing Management (2014+), 24(10), 30. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.7748/nm.2018.e1684
dc.relationShirey, M. R. (2006). Authentic Leaders Creating Healthy Work Environments for Nursing Practice. American Journal of Critical Care, 15(3), 256–267.
dc.relationSidani, S., & Irvine, D. (1999). A conceptual framework for evaluating the nurse practitioner role in acute care settings. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 30(1), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.01049.x
dc.relationSmith, J. G., Morin, K. H., & Lake, E. T. (2018). Association of the nurse work environment with nurse incivility in hospitals. Journal of Nursing Management, 26(2), 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12537
dc.relationSpence Laschinger, H. K., Zhu, J., & Read, E. (2016). New nurses’ perceptions of professional practice behaviours, quality of care, job satisfaction and career retention. Journal of Nursing Management, 24(5), 656–665. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12370
dc.relationStalpers, D., de Brouwer, B. J. M., Kaljouw, M. J., & Schuurmans, M. J. (2015). Associations between characteristics of the nurse work environment and five nurse-sensitive patient outcomes in hospitals: a systematic review of literature. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 52(4), 817–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.01.005
dc.relationStalpers, D., Van Der Linden, D., Kaljouw, M. J., & Schuurmans, M. J. (2017). Nurse-perceived quality of care in intensive care units and associations with work environment characteristics: a multicentre survey study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 73(6), 1482–1490. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13242
dc.relationStichler, J. F. (2009). Healthy, Healthful, and Healing Environments. Critical Care Nursing Quarterly, 32(3), 176–188. https://doi.org/10.1097/cnq.0b013e3181ab9149
dc.relationSuarez, B., Lopera, A., Vargas, B. C., Ramirez, A., & Bonilla, R. (2013). Enfermería disciplina social y profesión liberal: Desarrollo de competencias del profesional de enfermería. Academia Nacional de Medicina - Comisión de Educación MSyPS, 1, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
dc.relationSupo, J. (2013). Cómo validar un instrumento: La guía para validar un instrumento en 10 pasos. In México DF.
dc.relationSwiger, P. A., Loan, L. A., Raju, D., Breckenridge-Sproat, S. T., Miltner, R. S., & Patrician, P. A. (2018). Relationships between Army nursing practice environments and patient outcomes. Research in Nursing & Health, 41(2), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21855
dc.relationSwiger, P. A., Patrician, P. A., Miltner, R. S. S., Raju, D., Breckenridge-Sproat, S., & Loan, L. A. (2017). The Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index: An updated review and recommendations for use. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 74, 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.06.003
dc.relationTamburri, L. M. (2017). Creating Healthy Work Environments for Second Victims of Adverse Events. American Association of Critical Care Nurses, 28(4), 366–374. https://doi.org/10.4037/aacnacc2017996
dc.relationTei-Tominaga, M., & Sato, F. (2016). Effect of nurses’ work environment on patient satisfaction: A cross-sectional study of four hospitals in Japan. Japan Journal of Nursing Science, 13(1), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/jjns.12091
dc.relationTornimbeni, S., Pérez, E., & Olaz, F. (2008). Introducción a la psicometría. (1ra Edició). Buenos Aires: Editorial Paidos.
dc.relationToro Álvarez, F. (2001). El clima organizacional. Perfil de Empresas Colombianas (1ra Edición; Cincel LTDA, Ed.). Medellín - Colombia.
dc.relationToro Álvarez, F. (2009). Clima Organizacional. Una aproximación a su dinámica en las empresa latinoamericana (CINCEL). Medellín Colombia.
dc.relationUlrich, B., Barden, C., Cassidy, L., & Varn-Davis, N. (2019). Critical Care Nurse Work Environments 2018: Findings and implications. Critical Care Nurse, 39(2), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.4037/CCN2019605
dc.relationUlrich, B. T., Lavandero, R., Woods, D., & Early, S. (2014). Critical Care Nurse Work Environments 2013: A Status Report. Critical Care Nurse, 34(4), 64–79.
dc.relationUniversity of Bern. (2009). Declaración STROBE: Inicio. Retrieved June 17, 2020, from https://www.strobe-statement.org/index.php?id=strobe-home
dc.relationVelásquez Jiménez, C. M., Rico González, G., Ayala de Calvo, L. E., Vargas, B. C., Gutiérrez, M. del C., Molina de Uriza, J., … Munar Jiménez, E. F. Política Nacional De Talento Humano En Enfermería y Plan Estratégico 2020-2030. Resignificando la profesión de Enfermería en Colombia. , (2020).
dc.relationWei, H., Sewell, K. A., Woody, G., & Rose, M. A. (2018). The state of the science of nurse work environments in the United States: A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 5(3), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2018.04.010
dc.relationWeinert, A. B. (1985). Manual de Psicología de la Organización. La conducta humana en las organizaciones (1ra edición; E. Herder, Ed.). Barcelona.
dc.relationWoolforde, L. (2019). Beyond Clinical Skills: Advancing the Healthy Work Environment. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development, 35(1), 48–49. https://doi.org/10.1097/NND.0000000000000510
dc.relationWynendaele, H., Willems, R., & Trybou, J. (2019). Systematic review: Association between the patient–nurse ratio and nurse outcomes in acute care hospitals. Journal of Nursing Management, 27(5), 896–917. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12764
dc.relationYildirim, D., Kisa, S., & Hisar, F. (2012). Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Essentials of Magnetism Scale (EOM II). International Nursing Review, 59(4), 570–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-7657.2012.01007.x
dc.relationYokoyama, M., Suzuki, M., Takai, Y., Igarashi, A., Noguchi-Watanabe, M., & Yamamoto-Mitani, N. (2016). Workplace bullying among nurses and their related factors in Japan: a cross-sectional survey. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 25(17–18), 2478–2488. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13270
dc.relationZangaro, G. A., & Jones, K. (2019). Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index: A Reliability Generalization Meta-Analysis. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 41(11), 1658–1684. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945918823779
dc.relationZhang, L.-F., You, L.-M., Liu, K., Zheng, J., Fang, J.-B., Lu, M.-M., … Bu, X.-Q. (2014). The association of Chinese hospital work environment with nurse burnout, job satisfaction, and intention to leave. Nursing Outlook, 62(2), 128–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2013.10.010
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleDesarrollo y validación del instrumento ENLASA-Enfermería para la evaluación de un entorno laboral saludable en el ámbito hospitalario
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Doctorado


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución