Representación de efectos de políticas de innovación transformativa en el desempeño sostenible de los sistemas de innovación

dc.contributorRuiz Castañeda, Walter Lugo
dc.contributorMinisterio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación - Minciencias
dc.contributorINNOVACIÓN Y GESTIÓN TECNOLÓGICA
dc.creatorHormecheas Tapia, Karen Cristina
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-27T16:48:35Z
dc.date.available2021-04-27T16:48:35Z
dc.date.created2021-04-27T16:48:35Z
dc.date.issued2021-04-25
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/79418
dc.identifierUniversidad Nacional -Sede Medellín
dc.identifierRepositorio Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/
dc.description.abstractLa política de innovación transformativa es un nuevo paradigma dentro de los marcos de política de ciencia, tecnología e innovación, para afrontar los desafíos sociales, económicos y ambientales contemporáneos. Actualmente, se empieza a reconocer que esta política podría direccionar los sistemas de innovación hacia un desempeño sostenible que favorezca las transiciones de sostenibilidad. Sin embargo, precisar posibles efectos que tendría este tipo de política en un sistema de innovación es complejo, dado que se hace frente a un sistema complejo adaptable conformado por agentes heterogéneos que se relacionan contingentemente y co-evolucionan en el tiempo. Estas características generan la necesidad de hacer un análisis dinámico y longitudinal, que se ha suplido en esta tesis con un modelo basado en agentes. El Modelo propuesto fue validado con el caso de los cafés especiales en Antioquia, Colombia y permite simular varios escenarios de políticas de innovación transformativa. Mediante las simulaciones realizadas puede concluirse que una política enfocada en apoyar las capacidades de innovación de los agentes que están promoviendo una transición a los cafés especiales, favorece un desempeño sostenible del sistema de innovación que emerge en la cadena productiva del café; ya que permite un cambio significativo en las practicas, rutinas y formas de innovar de los agentes. Además, se ratifica que, en el contexto Latinoamericano, el enfoque de las capacidades es crucial para que las transiciones sucedan, teniendo en cuenta que se presentan brechas entre agentes que limitan el componente sistémico de la innovación y un cambio de direccionalidad. Por último, no hay que pasar por alto que las transiciones implican transformaciones sociales y culturales profundas que presionen cambios en los sistemas de innovación.
dc.description.abstractTransformative innovation policy is a new paradigm developed within the frameworks of science, technology and innovation policy, to address today’s social, economic and environmental challenges. Currently, it is beginning to be recognized that this policy could lead innovation systems towards a sustainable performance that favors sustainability transitions. However, specifying possible effects of this type of policy on innovation systems is a complex task, as they face with adaptive complex systems made up of heterogeneous agents that are contingently related and co-evolving over time. These characteristics create the necessity to develop a dynamic and longitudinal analysis, that has been pleased in this thesis with an agent-based model. The proposed Model was validated for the case of specialty coffees in Antioquia, Colombia and it allows to simulate various scenarios of transformative innovation policies. Through the conducted simulations, it can be concluded that a policy focused on supporting the innovation capabilities of agents who are promoting a transition to specialty coffees stimulates a sustainable performance of the innovation system that emerges in the coffee productive chain, allowing a significant change in the practices, routines and ways of innovate of the agents. In addition, it is proved once again that in the Latin American context, the approach to capabilities is crucial for transitions to happen, given the existence of gaps that arises between agents which limit the systemic component of innovation and the change in directionality. Finally, it should not be overlooked that transitions imply profound social and cultural transformations to put pressure for changes in innovation systems
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.publisherMedellín - Minas - Maestría en Ingeniería Administrativa
dc.publisherDepartamento de Ingeniería de la Organización
dc.publisherFacultad de Minas
dc.publisherMedellín
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellín
dc.relationArocena, R., Göransson, B., & Sutz, J. (2017). Developmental universities in inclusive innovation systems: Alternatives for knowledge democratization in the Global South. In Developmental Universities in Inclusive Innovation Systems: Alternatives for Knowledge Democratization in the Global South. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64152-2
dc.relationArocena, R., & Sutz, J. (2009). Sistemas de innovación e inclusión social. Pensamiento Iberoamericano, 5(2), 99–120.
dc.relationArocena, R., & Sutz, J. (2020). The need for new theoretical conceptualizations on National Systems of Innovation , based on the experience of Latin America. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 0(0), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2020.1719640
dc.relationArond, E., Ramirez, M., Yepes, C., Chavarro, D., & Romero, O. (2017). Transformative Innovation Learning History: Colombia Transformative Innovation Policy in/for Specialty Coffees. Bogotá.
dc.relationAzomahou, T. T., Goedhuys, M., & Verspagen, B. (2012). Introduction to the special issue on ‘Innovation, inclusive growth and sustainable development.’ SI: Firm Dynamics and SI: Globelics Conference, 23(4), 403–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2012.08.003
dc.relationBatterink, M., Wubben, E., Klerkx, L., & Omta, S. (2010). No TitleOrchestrating innovation networks: The case of innovation brokers in the agri-food sector. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 22(1), 47–76.
dc.relationBergman, N., Haxeltine, A., Whitmarsh, L., Köhler, J., Schilperoord, M., & Rotmans, J. (2008). Modelling socio-technical transition patterns and pathways. Jasss, 11(3).
dc.relationBianchi, F., & Squazzoni, F. (2019). Modelling and social science Problems and promises. In E. A. Moallemi & F. J. De Haan (Eds.), Modelling Transitions: Virtues, Vices, Visions of the future. Routledge Studies in Sustainability Transitions.
dc.relationBoons, F., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2013). Business models for sustainable innovation: State-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.007
dc.relationBorshchev, A., & Filippov, A. (2004). From System Dynamics and Discrete Event to Practical Agent Based Model: Reasons, Techniques, Tools. The 22nd International System Dynamics Conference.
dc.relationCarlsson, B., Jacobsson, S., Holmen, M., & Rickne, A. (2002). Innovation systems: Analytical and methodological issues. Research Policy, 31(2), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00138-X
dc.relationChataway, J., Daniels, C., Kanger, L., Ramirez, M., Schot, J., & Steinmueller, E. (2017). Developing and Enacting Transformative Innovation Policy: A Comparative Study. 8th International Sustainability Transitions Conference.
dc.relationCoenen, L., Benneworth, P., & Truffer, B. (2012). Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 41(6), 968–979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.014
dc.relationCoenen, L., Raven, R., & Verbong, G. (2010). Local niche experimentation in energy transitions: A theoretical and empirical exploration of proximity advantages and disadvantages. Technology in Society, 32(4), 295–302. Retrieved from 10.1016/j.techsoc.2010.10.006
dc.relationColciencias. (2018). Libro verde 2030 – Colciencias – El Libro Verde 2030 presenta la Política Nacional de Ciencia e Innovación que a través de un enfoque transformativo busca aportar a la solución de los grandes desafíos sociales, ambientales y económicos expresados en los O. Retrieved from http://libroverde2030.gov.co/
dc.relationDe Haan, F. (2019). Making it a science: aspirations and apprehensions of transitions research. In E. A. Moallemi & F. J. De Haan (Eds.), Modelling Transitions: Virtues, Vices, Visions of the future. Routledge Studies in Sustainability Transitions.
dc.relationDenes, D., & Sieglinde, S. (2019). Transformative innovation policy for solar energy : particularities of a developing country. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, (0123456789). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-019-01764-3
dc.relationDiercks, G., Larsen, H., & Steward, F. (2019). Transformative innovation policy: Addressing variety in an emerging policy paradigm. Research Policy, 48(4), 880–894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.028
dc.relationDodgson, M. (1993). Organizational learning: a review of some literatures. Organization Studies, 14(3), 375–394.
dc.relationDosi, G., Freeman, R., Nelson, G., Silverberg, & Soete. (1990). Technical change and economic theory. London: Pinter Publisher.
dc.relationDutrénit, G., & Sutz, J. (2014). National Innovation Systems, Social Inclusion and Development The Latin American Experience. Edward Elgar Publishing.
dc.relationEdo, M. (2002). Amartya Sen y el desarrollo como libertad : la viabilidad de una alternativa a las estrategias de promoción del desarrollo. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella.
dc.relationEdquist, C. (1997). System of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organisations. London: Pinter/Cassell.
dc.relationErnst, D., Mytelka, L., & Ganiatsos, T. (1998). Technological capabilities in the context of export-led growth. A conceptual framework. In D. Ernst, T. Ganiatsos, & L. Mytelka (Eds.), Technological Capabilities and Export Success in Asia. London and New York: Routledge.
dc.relationEuropean Commission. (2020). Horizon 2020. Retrieved October 30, 2020, from https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en
dc.relationFagerberg, J. (2018). Mobilizing innovation for sustainability transitions: a comment on transformative innovation policy. Research Policy. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.%0A2018.08.012.
dc.relationFalagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2007). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus,Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J., 32, 338–342.
dc.relationFederación Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia (FNC). (2019). Producción de café de Colombia cerró el 2019 en 14,8 millones de sacos. Retrieved October 13, 2020, from https://federaciondecafeteros.org/wp/listado-noticias/produccion-de-cafe-de-colombia-cerro-el-2019-en-148-millones-de-sacos/
dc.relationFederación Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia (FNC). (2020). Investigación científica y desarrollo tecnológico. Retrieved October 14, 2020, from https://federaciondecafeteros.org/wp/servicios/investigacion-cientifica-y-desarrollo-tecnologico/
dc.relationFischer, M. M. (2000). Innovation, knowledge creation and systems of innovation. The Annals of Regional Science, 2, 15–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-35981-8
dc.relationFoxon, T. J., Hammond, G. P., & Pearson, P. J. G. (2010). Technological Forecasting & Social Change Developing transition pathways for a low carbon electricity system in the UK. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 77(8), 1203–1213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.04.002
dc.relationFreeman, C. (1982). Technological infrastructure and international competitiveness. Draft Paper Submitted to the OECD Ad Hoc Group on Science, Technology and Competitiveness.
dc.relationFreeman, C. (1987). Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.
dc.relationFressoli, M., Arond, E., Abrol, D., Smith, A., Ely, A., & Dias, R. (2014). When grassroots innovation movements encounter mainstream institutions : implications for models of inclusive innovation. Innovation & Development.
dc.relationFressoli, M., Dias, R., & Thomas, H. (2014). Innovation and Inclusive Development in the South: A critical perspective. Beyond Imported Magic: Essays on Science, Technology, and Society in Latin America, 47.
dc.relationGeels, F., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of transition pathways in socio-technical systems. Research Policy, 36(3), 399–417.
dc.relationGeels, F. W. (2006). Major system change through stepwise reconfiguration: a multi-level analysis of the transformation of American factory production (1850–1930). Technology in Society, 28(4), 445–476.
dc.relationGeels, Frank. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31, 1257–1274.
dc.relationGeels, Frank. (2004). From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy, 33(6–7), 897–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015
dc.relationGeels, Frank. (2005a). Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: Refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72(6), 681–696.
dc.relationGeels, Frank. (2005b). Technological transitions and system innovations: A Co-evolutionary and Socio-Technical Analysis. Edward Elgar Publishing.
dc.relationGeels, Frank. (2006). The hygienic transition from cesspools to sewer systems (1840–1930): the dynamics of regime transformation. Research Policy, 35(7), 1069–1082.
dc.relationGhosh, B., Kivimaa, P., Ramirez, M., Schot, J., & Torrens, J. (2020). Transformative outcomes: Assessing and reorienting experimentation with transformative innovation policy (No. TIPCWP 2020-02). Retrieved from http://www.tipconsortium.net/%0Awp-content/uploads/2020/07/Transformation-outcomes-TIPC-working-paper.pdf
dc.relationGhosh, B., & Torrens, J. (2020). Towards a Transformative Innovation Policy (TIP) research agenda (No. TIPCWP 2020-03). Retrieved from http://www.tipconsortium.net/doc_type/working-paper/
dc.relationGilbert, N., Pyka, A., & Ahrweiler, P. (2001). Innovation Networks - a Simulation Approach. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 4(3), 1–8.
dc.relationGilbert, N., & Troitzsch, K. (2005). Simulation for the Social Scientist (2nd ed.). New York: Open University Press.
dc.relationGilsing, V., & Nooteboom, B. (2006). Exploration and exploitation in innovation systems: The case of pharmaceutical biotechnology. Research Policy, 35(1), 1–23.
dc.relationGrant, R. (1991). The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation. California Management Review, 114–135.
dc.relationGriggs, D. (2013). Sustainable development goals for people and planet. Nature, 495, 305–307.
dc.relationGriggs, D., Smith, M. S., Rockström, J., Öhman, M. C., Gaffney, O., Glaser, G., & Kanie, N. (2014). An integrated framework for sustainable development goals. Ecology and Society, 19(4), 49.
dc.relationGrupo Banco Mundial. (2018). Densidad de nuevas empresas (registros nuevos por cada 1.000 personas entre 15 y 64 años). Retrieved October 8, 2020, from Datos website: https://datos.bancomundial.org/indicador/IC.BUS.NDNS.ZS?view=chart
dc.relationGuan, J., & Ma, N. (2003). Innovative capability and export performance of Chinese firms. Technovation, 23, 737–747.
dc.relationGupta, A. K. (1995, September). People’s Knowledge for Survival: Grassroots Innovations for Sustainable Natural Resource Management. 16–23.
dc.relationHafeez, K., Zhang, Y., & Malak, N. (2002). Determining key capabilities of a firm using analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Production Economics, 76, 39–51.
dc.relationHansen, P., Liu, X., & Morrison, G. M. (2019). Energy Research & Social Science Agent-based modelling and socio-technical energy transitions : A systematic literature review. Energy Research & Social Science, 49(November 2018), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.10.021
dc.relationHartmann, S., & Frigg, R. (2006). Models in science. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford: Stanford University.
dc.relationHaxeltine, A., Whitmarsh, L., Bergman, N., Rotmans, J., Schilperoord, M., & Kohler, J. (2008). A conceptual framework for transition modelling. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 3(1–2), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISD.2008.018195
dc.relationHekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. E. H. M. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(4), 413–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002
dc.relationHobday, M. (1997). Innovation in East Asia. The Challenge to Japan. Cheltenham and Lyme: Edward Elgar.
dc.relationHolland, J. H. (2004). El Orden Oculto: De cómo la adaptación crea la complejidad (T. Torres-Alexander, Ed.). México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
dc.relationHoltz, G., & Chappin, É. J. L. (2019). Considering actor behaviour Agent-based modelling of transitions. In E. A. Moallemi & F. J. De Haan (Eds.), Modelling Transitions: Virtues, Vices, Visions of the future. Routledge Studies in Sustainability Transitions.
dc.relationHormecheas-Tapia, K. C., Legarda-López, M., Ruiz-Castañeda, W. L., & Villalba-Morales, M. L. (2020). Participación de la sociedad civil en las dinámicas de innovación para el logro de los ODS. Iberoamerican Journal of Development Studies, 9(1), 120–145. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs
dc.relationInstituto Colombiano Agropecuario (ICA). (2020). Historia y antecedentes. Retrieved October 14, 2020, from https://www.ica.gov.co/el-ica/historia
dc.relationJensen, M. B., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., & Lundvall, B. A. (2007). Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy, 36, 680–693.
dc.relationKanger, L., & Schot, J. (2019). Deep transitions: Theorizing the long-term patterns of socio-technical change. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 32(August 2018), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.07.006
dc.relationKaro, E., & Lember, V. (2016). Emergence of societal challenges-based innovation policies in market-based innovation systems: lessons from Estonia. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 11(1–3), 126–147. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijfip.2016.078366
dc.relationKim, L. (1997). Imitation to Innovation. The Dynamics of Korea’s Technological Learning. Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
dc.relationKuhlmann, S., & Arnold, E. (2001). RCN in the Norwegian Research and Innovation System.
dc.relationLeach, M., Rockström, J., Raskin, P., Scoones, I., Stirling, A. C., Smith, A., … Olsson, P. (2012). Transforming innovation for sustainability. Ecology and Society, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04933-170211
dc.relationLoorbach, D., & Rotmans, J. (2010). Towards a better understanding of transitions and their governance: A systemic and reflexive approach. In J. Grin, J. Rotmans, & J. W. Schot (Eds.), Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change (Routledge). New York: Routledge.
dc.relationLoos, H. Z. A. Van Der, Negro, S. O., & Hekkert, M. P. (2020). Energy Research & Social Science Low-carbon lock-in ? Exploring transformative innovation policy and o ff shore wind energy pathways in the Netherlands. Energy Research & Social Science, 69(June), 101640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101640
dc.relationLopolito, A., Morone, P., & Taylor, R. (2013). Emerging innovation niches : An agent based model. Research Policy, 42(6–7), 1225–1238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.03.002
dc.relationLundvall, B.-A. (1992). National systems of innovation : towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter Publishers.
dc.relationLundvall, B.-Å. (1985). Product Innovation and User-Producer Interaction. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press. Magro, E. (2017). Políticas Regionales de Innovación. Bogotá.
dc.relationMarkard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41(6), 955–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013
dc.relationMarkard, J., & Truffer, B. (2008). Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework. Research Policy, 37(4), 596–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.004
dc.relationMetcalfe, S. (1995). The economic foundations of technology policy: equilibrium and evolutionary perspectives. In P. Stoneman (Ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change (pp. 409–512). London: Blackwell.
dc.relationMohamad, M., & Songthaveephol, V. (2020). Technological Forecasting & Social Change Clash of titans : The challenges of socio-technical transitions in the electrical vehicle technologies – the case study of Thai automotive industry. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 153(October 2019), 119772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119772
dc.relationMonaghan, A. (2009). Conceptual niche management of grassroots innovation for sustainability : The case of body disposal practices in the UK. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 76(8), 1026–1043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2009.04.003
dc.relationMongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106, 213–228.
dc.relationMüller, B., Bohn, F., Dreßler, G., Groeneveld, J., Klassert, C., Martin, R., … Schwarz, N. (2013). Describing human decisions in agent-based models - ODD+D, an extension of the ODD protocol. Environmental Modelling and Software, 48, 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.06.003
dc.relationNadler, D. A., & Tushman, M. L. (1997). The Power of Organization Arquitecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.relationNelson, R, & Winter, S. (1973). Toward an evolutionary theory of economic capabilities. In American Economic Association.
dc.relationNelson, R, & Winter, S. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
dc.relationNelson, R, & Winter, S. (2002). Evolutionary theorizing in economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(2).
dc.relationNelson, Richard, & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. In Cambridge MA Belknap (Vol. 93). https://doi.org/10.2307/2232409
dc.relationOCDE. (2005). “Manual de Oslo” Guía para la recogida e interpretación de datos sobre Innovación.
dc.relationONU. (2015). La Asamblea General adopta la Agenda 2030 para el Desarrollo Sostenible - Desarrollo Sostenible. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/es/2015/09/la-asamblea-general-adopta-la-agenda-2030-para-el-desarrollo-sostenible/
dc.relationOspina, A. (2017). La industria de los cafés de especialidad. Relación entre certificaciones de calidad o especialidad, y los ingresos de los caficultores en Colombia. 1989 - 2015 (Universidad del Rosario). Retrieved from https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstream/handle/10336/13770/La industria de los cafés de especialidad.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
dc.relationPadgett, J. F. (1997). The emergence of simple ecologies of skill: a hypercycle approach to economic organization. In W. B. Arthur, S. N. Durlauf, & D. A. Lane (Eds.), The Economy as an Evolving Complex System II. Addison-Wesley: Reading MA. Pérez, C. (2013). Revoluciones Tecnológicas y Cambios de Paradigmas. Retrieved May 19, 2020, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CVxDtzeGT4g
dc.relationPonsiglione, C., Quinto, I., & Zollo, G. (2014). Bridging the SKIN model to the debate on territorial innovation systems: the proposal of an agent-based model of self-sustaining regional innovation systems. SKIN 3 Workshop Joining Complexity Science and Social Simulation for Policy. Budapest: Eötvös Lorán University.
dc.relationQuintero, S., Ruiz, W., Giraldo, D., Vélez, L., Marín, B., Cubillos, S., & Cárdenas, A. (2019). Modelo de transferencia de tecnología para las cadenas productivas agropecuarias: Análisis comparativo de las cadenas del café y el aguacate en Antioquia. Medellín: UPB, Colciencias, Universidad Nacional.
dc.relationQuintero, S., Ruiz, W. L., Giraldo, D. P., Velez, L. M., Marín, B. M., Cubillos, S., & Cárdenas, A. Y. (2019). Modelo de transferencia de tecnología para las cadenas productivas agropecuarias : Análisis comparativo de las cadenas del café. Medellín.
dc.relationRahmandad, H., & Sterman, J. (2008). Heterogeneity and Network Structure in the Dynamics of Diffusion: Comparing Agent-Based and Differential Equation Models. Manage. Sci., 54(5), 998–1014.
dc.relationRip, A., & Kemp, R. (1998). Technological change. In E. L. Rayner, S., Malone (Ed.), Human Choice and Climate Change – Resources and Technology (pp. 327–399). Battelle Press, Columbus.
dc.relationRogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations (4th ed.). New York: Simon and Schuster.
dc.relationRosca, E., Arnold, M., & Bendul, J. C. (2017). Business models for sustainable innovation – an empirical analysis of frugal products and services. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 5133–5145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.050
dc.relationRothwell, R. (1992). Successful Industrial Innovation: Critical Factors for the 1990s. R&D Management, 22(3).
dc.relationRotmans, J., Kemp, R., & Van Asselt, M. (2001). More evolution than revolution: Transition management in public policy. Foresight, 3(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680110803003
dc.relationRuiz, W., Quintero, S., & Robledo, J. (2016). Impacto de los Intermediarios en los Sistemas de Innovación. J. Technol. Manag. Innov, 11(2), 130–138.
dc.relationSabato, J. (1975). El pensamiento latinoamericano en la problemática ciencia – tecnología – desarrollo – dependencia. Buenos Aires: Editorial PAIDOS.
dc.relationSamara, E., Georgiadis, P., & Bakouros, I. (2012). Technovation The impact of innovation policies on the performance of national innovation systems : A system dynamics analysis. Technovation, 32(11), 624–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.06.002
dc.relationSampedro, J. L., & Díaz, C. (2016). Innovación para el desarrollo inclusivo: Una propuesta para su análisis. Economía Informa, 396, 34–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECIN.2016.01.002
dc.relationSargent, R. G. (2005). Verification and Validation of Simulation Models. In M. E. Kuhl, N. M. Steiger, F. B. Armstrong, & J. A. Joines (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2005 Winter Simulation Conference (pp. 130–143).
dc.relationSchot, J., & Geels, F. W. (2008). Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys : theory , findings , research agenda , and policy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 7325(June). https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320802292651
dc.relationSchot, J., Ramirez, M., Arroyave, F., Bernal, P., Liliana, M., Romero, O., & Alvial, C. (2020). Transformando nuestro mundo: Implementación de los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible. Retrieved from http://www.tipconsortium.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Informe-Extendido-para-la-Misión-de-Sabios_TIPC_March-2020.pdf
dc.relationSchot, J., & Steinmueller, W. E. (2018). Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy, 47(9), 1554–1567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011
dc.relationSeyfang, G., Hielscher, S., Hargreaves, T., Martiskainen, M., & Smith, A. (2014). A grassroots sustainable energy niche? Reflections on community energy in the UK. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 13, 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2014.04.004
dc.relationSeyfang, G., & Longhurst, N. (2013). Desperately seeking niches : Grassroots innovations and niche development in the community currency field. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 881–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.02.007
dc.relationSeyfang, G., & Longhurst, N. (2016). What influences the diffusion of grassroots innovations for sustainability? Investigating community currency niches. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 28(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2015.1063603
dc.relationSeyfang, G., & Smith, A. (2007). Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agenda. Environmental Politics, 16(4), 584–603. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010701419121
dc.relationSmith, A., Fressoli, M., & Thomas, H. (2014). Grassroots innovation movements: challenges and contributions. Special Volume: Sustainable Production, Consumption and Livelihoods: Global and Regional Research Perspectives, 63, 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.025
dc.relationSmith, A., Voß, J., & Grin, J. (2010). Innovation studies and sustainability transitions : The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges. Research Policy, 39, 435–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.023
dc.relationSquazzoni, F. (2012). Agent-Based Computational Sociology. Chichester: Wiley.
dc.relationSrinivas, S., & Sutz, J. (2008). Developing countries and innovation: Searching for a new analytical approach. Technology in Society, 30(2), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2007.12.003
dc.relationSteffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., … Sörlin, S. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347(6223). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855
dc.relationSterman, J. D. (2000). Business Dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Irwin: McGraw- Hill.
dc.relationSteward, F. (2012). Transformative innovation policy to meet the challenge of climate change: Sociotechnical networks aligned with consumption and end-use as new transition arenas for a low-carbon society or green economy. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 24(4), 331–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2012.663959
dc.relationSutz, J. (2010). Ciencia, Tecnología, Innovación e Inclusión Social: una agenda urgente para universidades y políticas. Psicología, Conocimiento y Sociedad, 1, 3–49.
dc.relationTIPC. (2019). Transformando la experimentación: Intervenciones expermientales en materia de políticas y sus alcances transformadores. Retrieved June 15, 2020, from http://www.tipconsortium.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/4536_TIPC_experimentation_brief_spanish_online.pdf
dc.relationTransformative Innovation Policy Consortium (TIPC). (2019). Tip criteria.
dc.relationvan Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2011). Text Mining and Visualization using VOSviewer. ISSI Newsl, 7, 50–54.
dc.relationVelásquez, C., & Travéz, M. (2019). Café especial, una alternativa para el sector cafetero en Colombia (Universidad Eafit). Retrieved from http://repository.eafit.edu.co/handle/10784/15236
dc.relationVera-cruz, A. O., & Dutrenit, G. (2016). Sistema de Innovacion del sector agropecuario en México. Tendiendo puentes entre los actores (A. O. Vera-cruz & G. Dutrenit, Eds.). México: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Unidad Xochimilco.
dc.relationVilla, E., Valencia, D., Valencia-Arias, A., Hormechea, K., & García, J. (2020). Transformative Innovation Policy, SDGs, and the Colombian University. In M. V. Nhamo G. (Ed.), Sustainable Development Goals and Institutions of Higher Education. Springer, Cham.
dc.relationVilla, Eliana, Hormecheas, K., & Robledo, J. (2017). De la innovación competitiva a la innovación inclusiva: El rol de la universidad latinoamericana. ALTEC.
dc.relationWang, C. hsien, Lu, I. yuan, & Chen, C. bein. (2008). Evaluating firm technological innovation capability under uncertainty. Technovation, 28(6), 349–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.10.007
dc.relationWatts, C., & Binder, C. R. (2012). Simulating Shocks with the Hypercycles Model of Economic Production. In R. Seppelt, A. A. Voinov, S. Lange, & D. Bankamp (Eds.), International Environmental Modelling and Software Society (iEMSs) 2012 International Congress on Environmental Modelling ans Software Managing Resources of a limited Planet. Leipzig: Sixth Biennial Meeting.
dc.relationWeber, K. M., & Rohracher, H. (2012). Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive “failures” framework. Research Policy, 41(6), 1037–1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.015
dc.relationWeisbuch, G., Buskens, V., & Vuong, L. (2008). Heterogeneity and increasing returns may drive socio-economic transitions. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 14(4), 376–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-008-9033-3
dc.relationWilensky, U. (1999). NetLogo. Retrieved from Evanstone, IL: Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwesten University: El Laboratorio de Aprendizaje de Netlogo. Retrieved from Recursos para el Modelador con Netlogo website: /online.%0Asfsu.edu/jjohnson/NetlogoTranslation/proceso_modelado.html
dc.relationYepes, M. (2018). El papel de las políticas públicas y las estrategias sectoriales en la transición del café como commodity hacia cafés especiales. El Caso del Suroeste Antioqueño. Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
dc.relationYuan, J., Xu, Y., Hu, Z., Yu, Z., Liu, J., Hu, Z., & Xu, M. (2012). Managing electric power system transition in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(8), 5660–5677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.05.046
dc.relationZupic, I., & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organ. Res. Methods, 18, 429–472.
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleRepresentación de efectos de políticas de innovación transformativa en el desempeño sostenible de los sistemas de innovación
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestría


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución