dc.contributorNéstor Javier, Mancera Rodríguez
dc.contributorEcología y Conservación de Fauna Silvestre
dc.creatorGarizábal Carmona, Jaime Andrés
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-19T20:54:41Z
dc.date.available2020-08-19T20:54:41Z
dc.date.created2020-08-19T20:54:41Z
dc.date.issued2020-08-14
dc.identifierGarizábal-Carmona, Jaime A. 2020. Effects of urban green spaces composition and structure on local bird diversity: A study case in Colombian Northern Andes. Tesis de Maestría para optar por el título de Magister en Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo. Facultad de Minas, Universidad Nacional de Colombia - sede Medellín. Medellín, Colombia
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/78091
dc.identifierUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifierRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/
dc.description.abstractIn the Northern region of Tropical Andes biodiversity hotspot, urban planning is formulated without background information on ecosystems dynamics, as urbanization is transforming natural ecosystems at accelerated rates. Structural and compositional traits of urban green spaces were used as proxies of local biodiversity patterns and species-specific tolerance to urbanization in urban and peri-urban areas of the Aburrá Valley-Colombia. Bird surveys were performed from 2014 to 2019 at 222 sampling points along with land cover description using Geographic Information System tools. Also, a vegetation assessment was made at 44 of those points where local responses of bird richness were evaluated using generalized linear models. 137 resident bird species were found, plus two exotics and 27 migrants, with 32 species categorized as urban exploiters, 65 as adapters, and 33 as avoiders, based on incidence and frequency data. We found 255 plant species, with only 20% shared between trees and regeneration vegetation levels, and most native species and individuals found in unmanaged sites. According to alpha and beta-biodiversity analysis, urbanization is causing biotic homogenization and decreasing local biodiversity, despite some urban neighborhoods having similar species richness than peri-urban areas, and some local policies prompt the increasing of plant richness and habitat heterogeneity. This study suggests that promoting retention of native understory vegetation and reducing urban compactation affecting green spaces size and perimeter/area ratio, along with conservation strategies that protect forest remnants in city periphery, could mitigate the local species loss caused by urbanization in the region
dc.description.abstractEn el norte de los Andes Tropicales la planificación urbana se formula sin información base sobre las dinámicas ecosistémicas, mientras la urbanización transforma los ecosistemas naturales aceleradamente. Se evaluaron efectos de composición y estructura de zonas verdes urbanas sobre patrones de diversidad local y tolerancia urbana de especies en el Valle de Aburrá-Colombia. Se hicieron muestreos de aves entre 2014-2019 en 222 puntos de conteo, describiendo las coberturas del uso del suelo de la tierra con Sistemas de Información Geográfica e inventariando la vegetación en 44 de los puntos, donde la riqueza de aves fue evaluada usando modelos lineales generalizados. Se encontraron 137 especies de aves residentes, dos exóticas y 27 migratorias: 32 categorizadas como especies que explotan la ciudad, 65 como especies adaptables a la ciudad y 33 como especies que repelen la ciudad, con datos de ocurrencia (presencia) y frecuencia. Se encontraron 255 especies de plantas, con solo el 20% compartidas entre regeneración y árboles, y la mayoría de especies e individuos nativos encontrados en sitios sin manejo silvicultural. Según análisis de diversidad alfa y beta, la urbanización esta causando homogenización biótica y disminuyendo la diversidad local de aves, aunque algunos barrios tienen riquezas similares a áreas peri-urbanas, existiendo políticas locales que promueven el aumento de la riqueza de plantas y la heterogeneidad de hábitat con manejo silvicultural. Este estudio sugiere que la retención de la vegetación nativa autóctona a nivel de sotobosque, además del incremento del tamaño y la reducción de la relación perímetro/área de zonas verdes, junto con estrategias de conservación que protejan los remanentes de bosque nativos en alrededores de las zonas más desarrolladas, podrían mitigar la pérdida local de especies de aves en ciudades andinas (Texto tomado de la fuente)
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.publisherMedellín - Minas - Maestría en Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo
dc.publisherDepartamento de Geociencias y Medo Ambiente
dc.publisherFacultad de Minas
dc.publisherMedellín, Colombia
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellín
dc.relationAlberico, M., C. Saavedra-R, and H. García-Paredes (2005). House bats of Cali, Colombia. Caldasia 27:117–126
dc.relationAmador-Oyola, L. A. (2015). Fauna urbana de Guayaquil: el caso de los anfibios y reptiles, nuestros vecinos menospreciados. Yachana Revista Científica 4:181–188
dc.relationAndersson, E., and J. Colding (2014). Understanding how built urban form influences biodiversity. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 13:221–226. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2013.11.002
dc.relationAndrade, G. I., F. Remolina, and D. Wiesner (2013). Assembling the pieces: a framework for the integration of multi-functional ecological main structure in the emerging urban region of Bogotá, Colombia. Urban Ecosystems 16:723–739. doi: 10.1007/s11252-013-0292-5
dc.relationArbeláez-Cortés, E. (2013). Knowledge of Colombian biodiversity: published and indexed. Biodivers Conserv 22:2875–2906. doi: 10.1007/s10531-013-0560-y
dc.relationAristizábal, E., and S. Yokota (2008). Evolución geomorfológica del Valle de Aburrá y sus implicaciones en la ocurrencia de movimientos en masa. Boletín de Ciencias de la Tierra 24:5–18
dc.relationAronson, M. F. J., C. A. Lepczyk, K. L. Evans, M. A. Goddard, S. B. Lerman, J. S. MacIvor, C. H. Nilon, and T. Vargo (2017). Biodiversity in the city: key challenges for urban green space management. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 15:189–196. doi: 10.1002/fee.1480
dc.relationAronson, M. F. J., F. A. La Sorte, C. H. Nilon, M. Katti, M. A. Goddard, C. A. Lepczyk, P. S. Warren, N. S. G. Williams, S. Cilliers, B. Clarkson, C. Dobbs, et al. (2014). A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers. Proceedings of the Royal Society 281:1–8. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.3330
dc.relationArteaga, W. (2017). Diversidad de aves del campus universitario de la Universidad Central del Ecuador, Quito. Siembra 4:172–182
dc.relationAsociación Bogotana de Ornitología (2000). Aves de la Sabana de Bogotá, guía de campo (Birds of Bogotá, a field guide). In. Asociación Bogotána de Ornitología y Corporación Autonóma Regional de Cundinamarca, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia
dc.relationAvendaño, J. E., J. O. Cortés-Herrera, E. R. Briceño-Lara, and D. A. Rincón-Guarín (2013). Crossing or bypassing the Andes: a commentary on recent range extensions of cis-Andean birds to the West of the Andes of Colombia. Orinoquia 17:207–214
dc.relationAyerbe-Quiñones, F. (2018). Guía ilustrada de la avifauna colombiana (An illustrated field guide to the birds of Colombia). In. WSC, Cali, Colombia
dc.relationBarbault, R. (1995). Biodiversity dynamics: from population and community ecology approaches to a landscape ecology point of view. Landscape and Urban Planning 31:89–98
dc.relationBarbosa de Toledo, M. C., R. J. Donatelli, and G. Teixeira Batista (2012). Relation between green spaces and bird community structure in an urban area in Southeast Brazil. Urban Ecosystems 15:111–131. doi: 10.1007/s11252-011-0195-2
dc.relationBarrantes, G., and L. Sandoval (2009). Conceptual and statistical problems associated with the use of diversity indices in ecology. Revista de Biologia Tropical 57:451–460. doi: 10.15517/rbt.v57i3.5467
dc.relationBax, V., and W. Francesconi (2019). Conservation gaps and priorities in the Tropical Andes biodiversity hotspot: Implications for the expansion of protected areas. Journal of Environmental Management 232:387–396. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.086
dc.relationBecker, C. D., T. M. Loughin, and T. Santander (2008). Identifying forest-obligate birds in tropical moist cloud forest of Andean Ecuador. Journal of Field Ornithology 79:229–244. doi: 10.1111/j.1557-9263.2008.00184.x
dc.relationBecker, P. H. (2003). Biomonitoring with birds. In Bioindicators and biomonitors (M. K. Rooks, S. Aramco, K. Snyder, L. Wilson, J. Fleming and M. Wisnewski, Editors). 1st edition. Elsevier Science Ltd, pp. 677–736. doi: 10.1016/S0927-5215(03)80149-2
dc.relationBellocq, M. I., L. M. Leveau, and J. Filloy (2017). Urbanization and bird communities: spatial and temporal patterns emerging from Southern South America. In Ecology and Conservation of Birds in Urban Environments (E. Murgui and M. Hedblom, Editors). 1st edition. Springer International Publishing, pp. 35–54. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-43314-1
dc.relationBeninde, J., M. Veith, and A. Hochkirch (2015). Biodiversity in cities needs space: A meta-analysis of factors determining intra-urban biodiversity variation. Ecology Letters 18:581–592. doi: 10.1111/ele.12427
dc.relationBennie, J., K. Anderson, and A. Wetherelt (2011). Measuring biodiversity across spatial scales in a raised bog using a novel paired-sample diversity index. Source: Journal of Ecology 99:482–490. doi: 10.1111/j.l365-2745.2010.01762.x
dc.relationBiamonte, E., L. Sandoval, E. Chacón, and G. Barrantes (2011). Effect of urbanization on the avifauna in a tropical metropolitan area. Landscape Ecology 26:183–194. doi: 10.1007/s10980-010-9564-0
dc.relationBibby, C., M. Jones, and S. Marsden (1998). Expedition Field Techniques: Bird Surveys. In. Expedition Advisory Centre, Royal Geographical Society, London
dc.relationBlair, R. B. (1996). Land use and species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecological Applications 6:506–519
dc.relationBlair, R. B., and E. M. Johnson (2008). Suburban habitats and their role for birds in the urban-rural habitat network: Points of local invasion and extinction? Landscape Ecology 23:1157–1169. doi: 10.1007/s10980-008-9267-y
dc.relationBorcard, D., F. Gillet, and P. Legendre (2011). Numerical Ecology with R. In. Springer Science+Business Media, New York
dc.relationBotzat, A., L. K. Fischer, and I. Kowarik (2016). Unexploited opportunities in understanding liveable and biodiverse cities. A review on urban biodiversity perception and valuation. Global Environmental Change 39:220–233. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.04.008
dc.relationBuchanan, G. M., P. F. Donald, and S. H. M. Butchart (2011). Identifying priority areas for conservation: A global assessment for forest-dependent birds. PLoS ONE 6:1–10. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029080
dc.relationCAF (2017). Crecimiento urbano y acceso a oportunidades: un desafío para América Latina (Urban sprawl and oportunities access: a Latin American challenge). In. Corporación Andina de Fomento, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia
dc.relationCalcagno, V., and C. de Mazancourt (2010). glmulti: An R package for easy automated model selection with (generalized) linear models. Journal of Statistical Software 34:1–29. doi: 10.18637/jss.v034.i12
dc.relationCallaghan, C. T., R. E. Major, W. K. Cornwell, A. G. B. Poore, J. H. Wilshire, and M. B. Lyons (2019). A continental measure of urbanness predicts avian response to local urbanization. Ecography 42:1–11. doi: 10.1111/ecog.04863
dc.relationCallaghan, C. T., R. E. Major, M. B. Lyons, J. M. Martin, and R. T. Kingsford (2018). The effects of local and landscape habitat attributes on bird diversity in urban greenspaces. Ecosphere 9:e02347. doi: 10.1002/ecs2.2347
dc.relationCarrus, G., M. Scopelliti, R. Lafortezza, G. Colangelo, F. Ferrini, F. Salbitano, M. Agrimi, L. Portoghesi, P. Semenzato, and G. Sanesi (2015). Go greener, feel better? The positive effects of biodiversity on the well-being of individuals visiting urban and peri-urban green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning 134:221–228. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.022
dc.relationCarvajal-Castro, J. D., A. María Ospina-L, Y. Toro-Ló pez, A. Pulido-G, L. Ximena Cabrera-Casas, S. Guerrero-Peláez, V. Hugo García-Merchá, and F. Vargas-Salinas (2019). Birds vs bricks: Patterns of species diversity in response to urbanization in a Neotropical Andean city. Plos One 14:e0218775. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218775
dc.relationCastaño-Villa, G. J., and J. C. Patiño-Zabala (2007). The composition of avian communities in fragmented forest in Santa Elena region, Central Colombian Andes. Boletín Científico Museo Historia Natural 11:47–60
dc.relationde Castro Pena, J. C., F. Martello, M. C. Ribeiro, R. A. Armitage, R. J. Young, and M. Rodrigues (2017). Street trees reduce the negative effects of urbanization on birds. PLoS ONE 12:1–19. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174484
dc.relationChace, J. F., and J. J. Walsh (2006). Urban effects on native avifauna: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning 74:46–69. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.08.007
dc.relationChang, H.-Y., and Y.-F. Lee (2016). Effects of area size, heterogeneity, isolation, and disturbances on urban park avifauna in a highly populated tropical city. Urban Ecosystems 19:257–274. doi: 10.1007/s11252-015-0481-5
dc.relationChao, A., N. J. Gotelli, T. C. Hsieh, E. L. Sander, K. H. Ma, R. K. Colwell, and A. M. Ellison (2014). Rarefaction and extrapolation with Hill numbers: A framework for sampling and estimation in species diversity studies. Ecological Monographs 84:45–67. doi: 10.1890/13-0133.1
dc.relationChaparro-Herrera, S., M. Á. Echeverry-Galvis, S. Córdoba-Córdoba, and A. Sua-Becerra (2013). Listado actualizado de las aves endémicas y casi-endémicas de Colombia (Endemic and near-endemic birds of Colombia). Biota Colombiana 14:235–272
dc.relationCharre, G. M., J. A. Zavala Hurtado, G. Néve, A. Ponce-Mendoza, and P. Corcuera (2013). Relationship Between Habitat Traits and Bird Diversity and Composition in Selected Urban Green Areas of Mexico City. Ornitologia Neotropical 24:275–293
dc.relationChong, K. Y., S. Teo, B. Kurukulasuriya, Y. F. Chung, S. Rajathurai, H. Tiang, and W. Tan (2014). Not all green is as good: Different effects of the natural and cultivated components of urban vegetation on bird and butterfly diversity. Biological Conservation 171:299–309. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.01.037
dc.relationCiach, M., and A. Fröhlich (2016). Habitat type, food resources, noise and light pollution explain the species composition, abundance and stability of a winter bird assemblage in an urban environment. doi: 10.1007/s11252-016-0613-6
dc.relationCincotta, R. P., J. Wisnewski, and R. Engelman (2000). Human population in the biodiversity hotspots. Nature 404:990–992. doi: 10.1038/35010105
dc.relationClergeau, P., S. Croci, J. Jokimäki, M. L. Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki, and M. Dinetti (2006). Avifauna homogenisation by urbanisation: Analysis at different European latitudes. Biological Conservation 127:336–344. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.06.035
dc.relationClergeau, P., J. P. L. Savard, G. Mennechez, and G. Falardeau (1998). Bird abundance and diversity along an urban-rural gradient: a comparative study between two cities on different continents. The Condor 100:413–425.
dc.relationCohen, J. E. (2003). Human population: the next half century. Science 302:1172–1175. doi: 10.1126/science.1088665
dc.relationCollas, L., R. E. Green, A. Ross, J. H. Wastell, and A. Balmford (2017). Urban development , land sharing and land sparing : the importance of considering restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 54:1865–1873. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12908
dc.relationConcepción, E. D., M. Moretti, F. Altermatt, M. P. Nobis, and M. K. Obrist (2015). Impacts of urbanisation on biodiversity: The role of species mobility, degree of specialisation and spatial scale. Oikos 124:1571–1582. doi: 10.1111/oik.02166
dc.relationConole, L. E., and J. B. Kirkpatrick (2011). Functional and spatial differentiation of urban bird assemblages at the landscape scale. Landscape and Urban Planning 100:11–23. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.11.007
dc.relationCordero, P., S. Vanegas, and M. A. Hermida (2015). La biodiversidad urbana como síntoma de una ciudad sostenible. Estudio de la zona del Yanuncay en Cuenca, Ecuador. MASKANA 6:107–130
dc.relationDale, S. (2018). Urban bird community composition influenced by size of urban green spaces, presence of native forest, and urbanization. Urban Ecosystems 21:1–14. doi: 10.1007/s11252-017-0706-x
dc.relationDavis, K. (1955). The Origin and Growth of Urbanization in the World. American Journal of Sociology 60:429–437
dc.relationDelgado-V, C. A., and J. C. Correa-H (2013). Estudios ornitológicos urbanos en Colombia: revisión de literatura (Urban ornithological studies in Colombia: a literature review). Ingeniería y Ciencia 9:215–236. doi: 10.17230/ingciecia.9.18.12
dc.relationDiefenbach, D. R., D. W. Brauning, and J. A. Mattice (2003). Variability in grassland bird counts related to observer differences and species detection rates. The Auk 120:1168–1179
dc.relationDooling, S., G. Simon, and K. Yocom (2006). Place-based urban ecology: A century of park planning in Seattle. Urban Ecosystems 9:299–321. doi: 10.1007/s11252-006-0008-1
dc.relationDoroski, D. A., A. J. Felson, M. A. Bradford, M. P. Ashton, E. E. Oldfield, R. A. Hallett, and S. E. Kuebbing (2018). Factors driving natural regeneration beneath a planted urban forest. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 29:238–247. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.11.019
dc.relationDymond, C. C., D. J. Mladenoff, and V. C. Radeloff (2002). Phenological differences in Tasseled Cap indices improve deciduous forest classification. Remote Sensing of Environment 80:460–472. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00324-8
dc.relationElías Domínguez-López, M., and R. Ortega-Álvarez (2014). The importance of riparian habitats for avian communities in a highly human-modified Neotropical landscape. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 85:1217–1227. doi: 10.7550/rmb.43849
dc.relationEscobar-Ibáñez, J. F., and I. Macgregor-Fors (2016). Peeking into the past to plan the future: Assessing bird species richness in a neotropical city. Urban Ecosystems 19:657–667. doi: 10.1007/s11252-015-0517-x
dc.relationEstevo, C. A., M. B. Nagy-Reis, and W. R. Silva (2017). Urban parks can maintain minimal resilience for Neotropical bird communities. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 27:84–89. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.06.013
dc.relationEtter, A., C. Mcalpine, and H. Possingham (2008). Historical Patterns and Drivers of Landscape Change in Colombia since 1500: A Regionalized Spatial Approach. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 98:2–23
dc.relationEvans, K. L., S. E. Newson, and K. J. Gaston (2009). Habitat influences on urban avian assemblages. Ibis 151:19–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2008.00898.x
dc.relationFaeth, S. H., P. S. Warren, E. Shochat, and W. A. Marussich (2005). Trophic Dynamics in Urban Communities. BioScience 55:399–407
dc.relationFerenc, M., O. Sedláček, and R. Fuchs (2014a). How to improve urban greenspace for woodland birds: site and local-scale determinants of bird species richness. Urban Ecosystems 17:625–640. doi: 10.1007/s11252-013-0328-x
dc.relationFerenc, M., O. Sedláček, R. Fuchs, M. Dinetti, M. Fraissinet, and D. Storch (2014b). Are cities different? Patterns of species richness and beta diversity of urban bird communities and regional species assemblages in Europe. Global Ecology and Biogeography 23:479–489. doi: 10.1111/geb.12130
dc.relationFernández-Juricic, E. (2000). Local and regional effects of pedestrians of forest birds in a fragmented landscape. The Condor 102:247–255
dc.relationFernández-Juricic, E., and J. Jokimäki (2001). A habitat island approach to conserving birds in urban landscapes: case studies from southern and northern Europe. Biodiversity and Conservation 10:2023–2043
dc.relationFischer, J. D., S. C. Schneider, A. A. Ahlers, and J. R. Miller (2015). Categorizing wildlife responses to urbanization and conservation implications of terminology. Conservation Biology 29:1246–1248. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12451
dc.relationFontana, S., T. Sattler, F. Bontadina, and M. Moretti (2011). How to manage the urban green to improve bird diversity and community structure. Landscape and Urban Planning 101:278–285. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.033
dc.relationGarizábal, J. A., C. A. Gutiérrez-Vásquez, and S. David (2014). Diversidad de aves en cuatro localidades con bosques fragmentados en el municipio de Medellín (Bird diversity in four locations with fragmented forests in Medellín). In Más bosques para Medellín: sembrando árboles para la vida (C. A. Gutiérrez-Vásquez, Editor). Alcaldía de Medellín, Fundación CIPAV, Medellín, pp. 164–199
dc.relationGonzález-Oreja, J. A. (2011). Birds of different biogeographic origins respond in contrasting ways to urbanization. Biological Conservation 144:234–242. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.08.021
dc.relationGonzález-Oreja, J. A., A. L. Barillas-Gómez, C. Bonache-Regidor, D. Buzo-Franco, J. García-Guzmán, and L. Hernández-Santín (2012). Does habitat heterogeneity affect bird community structure in urban parks? In Urban bird ecology and conservation. Studies in avian biology (C. A. Lepczyk and P. S. Warren, Editors). 1st edition. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 1–15
dc.relationGRASS-Development-Team (2017). Geographic Resources Analysis Support System (GRASS) Software. [Online.] Available at https://grass.osgeo.org/
dc.relationGutiérrez-Tapia, P., M. I. Azócar, and S. A. Castro (2018). A citizen-based platform reveals the distribution of functional groups inside a large city from Southern Hemisphere: e-Bird and the urban birds of Santiago (Central Chile). Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 91:1–16. doi: 10.1186/s40693-018-0073-x
dc.relationGutiérrez-Vásquez, C. A., and L. F. Osorio-Vélez (2014). Más bosques para Medellín: sembrando árboles para Medellín. In. Alcaldía de Medellín, Fundación CIPAV, Medellín
dc.relationHelzer, C. J., and D. E. Jelinski (1999). The relative importance of patch area and perimeter-area ratio to grassland breeding birds. Ecological Applications 9:1448–1458. doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[1448:TRIOPA]2.0.CO;2
dc.relationHilty, S. L., and W. L. Brown (1986). A guide to the Birds of Colombia. In. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
dc.relationHorák, J. (2016). Suitability of biodiversity-area and biodiversity-perimeter relationships in ecology: a case study of urban ecosystems. Urban Ecosystems 19:131–142. doi: 10.1007/s11252-015-0492-2
dc.relationHsieh, T. C., K. H. Ma, and A. Chao (2016). iNEXT: an R package for rarefaction and extrapolation of species diversity (Hill numbers). Methods in Ecology and Evolution 7:1451–1456. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12613
dc.relationIgnatieva, M., G. H. Stewart, C. Meurk, M. Ignatieva, G. H. Stewart, and C. Meurk (2011). Planning and Design of Ecological Networks in Urban Areas. Landscape and Ecological Engineering 7:17–25. doi: 10.1007/s11355-010-0143-y
dc.relationIUCN (2020). IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Versión 2020-1. [Online.] Available at http://www.iucnredlist.org/
dc.relationIves, C. D., G. C. Hose, D. A. Nipperess, and M. P. Taylor (2011). Environmental and landscape factors influencing ant and plant diversity in suburban riparian corridors. Landscape and Urban Planning 103:372–382. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.08.009
dc.relationJenkins, C. N., S. L. Pimm, and L. N. Joppa (2013). Global patterns of terrestrial vertebrate diversity and conservation. PNAS:2602–2610. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1302251110
dc.relationJokimäki, J., and M. L. Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki (2003). Spatial similarity of urban bird communities: a multiscale approach. Journal of Biogeography 30:1183–1193
dc.relationKang, W., E. S. Minor, C.-R. Park, and D. Lee (2015). Effects of habitat structure, human disturbance, and habitat connectivity on urban forest bird communities. Urban Ecosystems 18:857–870. doi: 10.1007/s11252-014-0433-5
dc.relationKolde, R. (2019). Package “pheatmap.” [Online.] Available at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pheatmap/index.html
dc.relationKowarik, I. (2011). Novel urban ecosystems, biodiversity, and conservation. Environmental Pollution 159:1974–1983. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.02.022
dc.relationLarondelle, N., and D. Haase (2013). Urban ecosystem services assessment along a rural-urban gradient: A cross-analysis of European cities. Ecological Indicators 29:179–190. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.12.022
dc.relationLees, A. C., and N. G. Moura (2017). Taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity of an urban Amazonian avifauna. Urban Ecosystems 20:1019–1025. doi: 10.1007/s11252-017-0661-6
dc.relationLegendre, P., and L. Legendre (2012). Numerical Ecology. In. Third Ed. Elsevier B. V., Amsterdam
dc.relationLepczyk, C. A., M. F. J. Aronson, K. L. Evans, M. A. Goddard, S. B. Lerman, and J. S. Macivor (2017a). Biodiversity in the City: Fundamental Questions for Understanding the Ecology of Urban Green Spaces for Biodiversity Conservation. BioScience 67:799–807. doi: 10.1093/biosci/bix079
dc.relationLepczyk, C. A., F. A. La Sorte, M. F. J. Aronson, I. MacGregor-Fors, C. H. Nilon, and P. S. Warren (2017b). Global patterns and drivers of urban bird diversity. In Ecology and Conservation of Birds in Urban Environments (E. Murgui and M. Hedblom, Editors). 1st edition. Springer International Publishing, pp. 13–33. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-43314-1
dc.relationLeveau, L. M., F. I. Isla, and M. I. Bellocq (2015). Urbanization and the temporal homogenization of bird communities: a case study in central Argentina. Urban Ecosystems 18:1461–1476. doi: 10.1007/s11252-015-0469-1
dc.relationLeveau, L. M., C. M. Leveau, M. Villegas, J. A. Cursach, and C. G. Suazo (2017). Bird Communities Along Urbanization Gradients: a Comparative Analysis Among Three Neotropical Cities. Ornitologia Neotropical 28:77–87
dc.relationLiu, J., G. C. Daily, P. R. Ehrlich, and G. W. Luck (2003). Effects of household dynamics on resource consumption and biodiversity. Nature 421:530–533
dc.relationLuppi, M., O. Dondina, V. Orioli, and L. Bani (2018). Local and landscape drivers of butterfly richness and abundance in a human-dominated area. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 254:138–148. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2017.11.020
dc.relationMacGregor-Fors, I. (2011). Misconceptions or misunderstandings? On the standardization of basic terms and definitions in urban ecology. Landscape and Urban Planning 100:347–349. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.01.013
dc.relationMacgregor-Fors, I., S. Avendaño-Reyes, V. M. Bandala, S. Chacón-Zapata, M. H. Díaz-Toribio, F. González-García, F. Lorea-Hernández, J. Martínez-Gómez, E. Montes De Oca, L. Montoya, E. Pineda, et al. (2015). Multi-taxonomic diversity patterns in a neotropical green city: a rapid biological assessment. Urban Ecosystems 18:633–647. doi: 10.1007/s11252-014-0410-z
dc.relationMacGregor-Fors, I., L. Morales-Pérez, and J. E. Schondube (2010). Migrating to the City: Responses of Neotropical Migrant Bird Communities to Urbanization. The Condor 112:711–717. doi: 10.1525/cond.2010.100062
dc.relationMacGregor-Fors, I., and R. Ortega-Álvarez (2013). Ecología urbana: Experiencias en América Latina (Urban ecology: experiences in Latin America). In. Primera ed. D.R., Ciudad de México
dc.relationMalkinson, D., D. Kopel, and L. Wittenberg (2017). From rural-urban gradients to patch – matrix frameworks: Plant diversity patterns in urban landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 169:260–268. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.09.021
dc.relationMarín Gómez, O. H. (2005). Avifauna del campus de la Universidad del Quindio (Birds of Quindio University Campus). Boletín SAO 15:42–60
dc.relationMartin, L. J., B. Blossey, and E. Ellis (2012). Mapping where ecologists work: biases in the global distribution of terrestrial ecological observation. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10:195–201
dc.relationMarzluff, J. M. (2005). Island biogeography for an urbanizing world: how extinction and colonization may determine biological diversity in human-dominated landscapes. Urban Ecosystems 8:157–177. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-73412-5
dc.relationMarzluff, J. M., R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly (2001). A historical perspective on urban bird research: trends, terms, and approaches. In Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 1–15
dc.relationMatsuba, M., S. Nishijima, and K. Katoh (2016). Effectiveness of corridor vegetation depends on urbanization tolerance of forest birds in central Tokyo, Japan. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 18:173–181. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.05.011
dc.relationMatthies, S. A., S. Rüter, F. Schaarschmidt, and R. Prasse (2017). Determinants of species richness within and across taxonomic groups in urban green spaces. Urban Ecosystems 20:897–909. doi: 10.1007/s11252-017-0642-9
dc.relationMcdonald, R. I., R. T. T. Forman, P. Kareiva, R. Neugarten, D. Salzer, and J. Fisher (2009). Urban effects, distance, and protected areas in an urbanizing world. Landscape and Urban Planning 93:63–75. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.06.002
dc.relationMcdonald, R. I., P. Kareiva, and R. T. T. Forman (2008). The implications of current and future urbanization for global protected areas and biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation 141:1695–1703. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.04.025
dc.relationMcDonnell, M. J. (2011). The History of Urban Ecology: An Ecologist’s Perspective. In Urban Ecology (J. Niemelä, J. H. Breuste, T. Elmqvist, G. Guntenspergen, P. James, N. E. Mcintyre and M. J. Mcdonnell, Editors). Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 5–13
dc.relationMcgill, B. J., M. Dornelas, N. J. Gotelli, and A. E. Magurran (2015). Fifteen forms of biodiversity trend in the Anthropocene. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 30:104–113. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.11.006
dc.relationMcIntyre, N. E., K. Knowles-Y, D. Hope, K. Knowles-Yánez, and D. Hope (2000). Urban ecology as an interdisciplinary field: differences in the use of “urban” between the social and natural sciences. Urban Ecosystems 4:5–24
dc.relationMckinney, M. L. (2008). Effects of urbanization on species richness: A review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosystems 11:161–176. doi: 10.1007/s11252-007-0045-4
dc.relationMcKinney, M. L. (2002). Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. BioScience 52:883–890
dc.relationMcKinney, M. L. (2006). Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biological Conservation 127:247–260. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.005
dc.relationMejía, M. A. (2016). Naturaleza urbana: Plataforma de experiencias (Urban nature: an experience platform). In. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia
dc.relationMelles, S., S. Glenn, and K. Martin (2003). Urban Bird Diversity and Landscape Complexity: Species– environment Associations Along a Multiscale Habitat Gradient. Conservation Ecology 7:5–27
dc.relationMelo, A. S., T. F. L. V. B. Rangel, and J. A. F. Diniz-Filho (2009). Environmental drivers of beta-diversity patterns in New-World birds and mammals. Ecography 32:226–236. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2008.05502.x
dc.relationMiller, J. R., and R. J. Hobbs (2002). Conservation Where People Live and Work. Conservation Biology 16:330–337
dc.relationMills, G. S., J. B. Dunning, and J. M. Bates (1989). Effects of Urbanization on Breeding Bird Community Structure in Southwestern Desert. The Condor 91:416–428. doi: 10.2307/1368320
dc.relationMolina-Franco, D. A. (2015). Los árboles se toman la ciudad: el proceso de modernización y la transformación del paisaje en Medellín, 1890-1950 (The trees are taking the city: the process of modernization and landscape transformation in Medellín, 1890-1950). In. Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
dc.relationMorelli, F., Y. Benedetti, J. D. Ibáñez-Álamo, J. Jokimäki, R. Mänd, P. Tryjanowski, and A. P. Møller (2016). Evidence of evolutionary homogenization of bird communities in urban environments across Europe. Global Ecology and Biogeography 25:1284–1293. doi: 10.1111/geb.12486
dc.relationMüller, A., P. K. Bøcher, C. Fischer, and J. C. Svenning (2018). ‘Wild’ in the city context: Do relative wild areas offer opportunities for urban biodiversity? Landscape and Urban Planning 170:256–265. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.09.027
dc.relationMuñoz, M. C., K. Fierro-Calderón, and H. Rivera-Gutierrez (2007). Las aves del campus de la universidad del Valle, una isla verde urbana en Cali, Colombia (The birds of the Universidad del Valle campus, a green island in the city of Cali, Colombia). Ornitologia Colombiana 5:5–20
dc.relationMyers, N., R. A. Mittermeier, C. G. Mittermeier, G. A. B. Da Fonseca, and J. Kent (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858
dc.relationNaranjo, L. G., J. D. Amaya, D. E. Eusse-González, and Y. Cifuentes-Sarmiento (2012). Guía de las Especies Migratorias de la Biodiversidad en Colombia. Aves (A guide to migratory species of Colombian biodiversity: birds). In. Vol 1. Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible / WWF, Bogotá
dc.relationNielsen, A. B., M. van den Bosch, S. Maruthaveeran, and C. K. van den Bosch (2013). Species richness in urban parks and its drivers: A review of empirical evidence. Urban Ecosystems. doi: 10.1007/s11252-013-0316-1
dc.relationNiemeï, J. (2014). Ecology of urban green spaces: The way forward in answering major research questions. Landscape and Urban Planning 125:298–303. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.07.014
dc.relationNiemelä, J. (1999). Ecology and urban planning. Biodiversity and Conservation 8:119–131
dc.relationNolazco, S. (2013). Diversidad de aves silvestres y correlaciones con la cobertura vegetal en parques y jardines de la ciudad de Lima. In. Editoras, Guzlop, Lima
dc.relationNoreña-P, A., A. González Muñoz, J. Mosquera-Rendón, K. Botero, and M. A. Cristancho (2018). Colombia, an unknown genetic diversity in the era of Big Data. BMC Genomics 19:61–73
dc.relationNowak, D. J. (2012). Contrasting natural regeneration and tree planting in fourteen North American cities. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 11:374–382. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2012.02.005
dc.relationOksanen, J., F. Guillaume, M. Friendly, R. Kindt, P. Legendre, D. McGlinn, P. R. Minchin, R. B. O’Hara, G. L. Simpson, P. Solymos, M. H. Stevens, et al. (2019). Vegan: Community Ecology Package. [Online.] Available at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/vegan.pdf
dc.relationOlden, J. D., and T. P. Rooney (2006). On Defining and Quantifying Biotic Homogenization. Global Ecology and Biogeography 15:113–120
dc.relationOrtega-Álvarez, R., and I. Macgregor-Fors (2011). Dusting-off the file: A review of knowledge on urban ornithology in Latin America. Landscape and Urban Planning 101:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.12.020
dc.relationOrtega-Álvarez, R., and I. MacGregor-Fors (2009). Living in the big city: Effects of urban land-use on bird community structure, diversity, and composition. Landscape and Urban Planning 90:189–195. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.11.003
dc.relationOrtiz, R. del C., and A. Idárraga Piedrahita (2019). Catálogo de las Plantas Vasculares del Departamento de Antioquia (The Catalogue of the Vascular Plants of the Department of Antioquia, Colombia). Tropicos, Botanical Information System at the Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, USA. [Online.] Available at http://tropicos.org/projectwebportal.aspx?pagename=Home&projectid=11&langid=66
dc.relationOsorio-Olarte, J. (2012). Aves migratorias neotropicales en parques y jardines de Bogotá: 1945-2005 (migratory birds in parks and gardens of Bogotá). Nodo 6:67–82
dc.relationOuyang, J. Q., C. Isaksson, C. Schmidt, P. Hutton, F. Bonier, and D. Dominoni (2018). A New Framework for Urban Ecology: An Integration of Proximate and Ultimate Responses to Anthropogenic Change. Integrative and comparative biology 58:915–928. doi: 10.1093/icb/icy110
dc.relationPalliwoda, J., I. Kowarik, and M. Von Der Lippe (2017). Human-biodiversity interactions in urban parks: The species level matters activities of visitors on park grass lands in Berlin. Landscape and Urban Planning 157:394–406. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.09.003
dc.relationPape Møller, A., M. Díaz, E. Flensted-Jensen, T. Grim, J. Diego Ibáñez-Álamo, J. Jokimäki, R. Mänd, · Gábor, · M., P. Tryjanowski, A. P. Møller, et al. (2015). Urbanized birds have superior establishment success in novel environments. Oecologia 178:943–950. doi: 10.1007/s00442-015-3268-8
dc.relationPauchard, A., M. Aguayo, E. Peña, and R. Urrutia (2006). Multiple effects of urbanization on the biodiversity of developing countries: The case of a fast-growing metropolitan area (Concepción, Chile). Biological Conservation 127:272–281. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.05.015
dc.relationPaz Silva, C., C. E. García, S. A. Estay, and O. Barbosa (2015). Bird Richness and Abundance in Response to Urban Form in a Latin American City: Valdivia, Chile as a Case Study. PLoS ONE 10:1–16. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138120
dc.relationPeña-Nuñez, J. L., and A. F. Claros-Morales (2016). Estudio preliminar de la avifauna en el campus de la Universidad de la Amazonia, en Florencia, Caquetá, Colombia. Revista Biodiversidad Neotropical 6:85–92. doi: 10.18636/bioneotropical.v6i1.352
dc.relationPeterson, B. G., P. Carl, K. Boudt, R. Bennet, J. Ulrich, E. Zivot, D. Cornilly, E. Hung, M. Lestel, K. Balkissoon, D. Wertz, et al. (2019). Package “PerformanceAnalytics.” [Online.] Available at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/PerformanceAnalytics/index.html
dc.relationPickett, S. T. A., W. R. Burch Jr., S. E. Dalton, T. W. Foresman, J. M. Grove, R. Rowntree, W. R. Burch, S. E. Dalton, T. W. Foresman, J. M. Grove, and R. Rowntree (1997). A conceptual framework for the study of human ecosystems in urban areas. Urban Ecosystems 1:185–199. doi: 10.1023/A:1018531712889
dc.relationPickett, S. T. A., and M. L. Cadenasso (2006). Advancing urban ecological studies: Frameworks, concepts, and results from the Baltimore Ecosystem Study. Austral Ecology 31:114–125. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2006.01586.x
dc.relationPickett, S. T. A., M. L. Cadenasso, J. M. Grove, C. G. Boone, P. M. Groffman, E. Irwin, S. S. Kaushal, V. Marshall, B. P. McGrath, C. H. Nilon, R. V Pouyat, et al. (2011). Urban ecological systems: Scientific foundations and a decade of progress. Journal of Environmental Management 92:331–362. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.08.022
dc.relationPuppim De Oliveira, J. A., O. Balaban, C. N. H. Doll, R. Moreno-Peñaranda, A. Gasparatos, D. Iossifova, and A. Suwa (2011). Cities and biodiversity: Perspectives and governance challenges for implementing the convention on biological diversity (CBD) at the city level. Biological Conservation 144:1302–1313. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.12.007
dc.relationQuantum-GIS-Development-Team (2018). Quantum GIS Geographic Information System. [Online.] Available at http://qgis.osgeo.org
dc.relationQuintero, E., A. M. Benavides, N. Moreno, and S. Gonzalez-Caro (2017). Bosques Andinos: Estado actual y retos para su conservación en Antioquia (Andean forests: conservation status and challenges in Antioquia). In. 1ra edition. Fundación Jardín Botánico de Medellín Joaquín Antonio Uribe- Programa Bosques Andinos (COSUDE), Medellín
dc.relationQuinton, J. M., P. N. Duinker, J. W. N. Steenberg, and J. D. Charles (2020). The living among the dead: Cemeteries as urban forests, now and in the future. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 48:126564. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126564
dc.relationR Core Team (2019). The R Stats Package. [Online.] Available at https://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-devel/library/stats/html/00Index.html
dc.relationRahbek, C., M. K. Borregaard, R. K. Colwell, B. Dalsgaard, B. G. Holt, N. Morueta-Holme, D. Nogues-Bravo, R. H. Whittaker, and J. Fjeldsa (2019). Humboldt’s enigma: What causes global patterns of mountain biodiversity? Science 365:1108–1113. doi: 10.1126/science.aax0149
dc.relationRamírez-Cháves, H. E., W. A. Pérez, O. Mejía-Egas, H. F. Tobar-Tosse, A. Muñoz, and A. Trujillo-Lozada (2010). Biodiversidad en el campus de la Universidad del Cauca, Popayán, Colombia. Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias 8:104–117
dc.relationReis, E., G. M. López-Iborra, and R. T. Pinheiro (2012). Changes in bird species richness through different levels of urbanization: Implications for biodiversity conservation and garden design in Central Brazil. Landscape and Urban Planning 107:31–42. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.04.009
dc.relationRenfijo, L. M., M. F. Gómez, J. Velásquez-Tibatá, Á. M. Amaya-Villarreal, G. H. Kattan, J. D. Amaya-Espinel, and J. Burbano-Girón (2014). Libro rojo de aves de Colombia, Vol I: Bosques húmedos de los Andes y la costa pacífica (Red list of Colombian birds: humid forest and pacific coast). In. Primera ed. Editorial Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, D.C.
dc.relationRenjifo, L. M., A. M. Amaya-Villarreal, and S. H. M. Butchart (2020). Tracking extinction risk trends and patterns in a mega-diverse country: A Red List Index for birds in Colombia. PLoS ONE 15:1–19. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227381
dc.relationRousseau, J. S., J.-P. L. Savard, and R. Titman (2015). Shrub-nesting birds in urban habitats: their abundance and association with vegetation. Urban Ecosystems 18:871–884. doi: 10.1007/s11252-014-0434-4
dc.relationRoy, S., J. Byrne, and C. Pickering (2012). A systematic quantitative review of urban tree benefits, costs, and assessment methods across cities in different climatic zones. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 11:351–363. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2012.06.006
dc.relationSamarawickrama, U., D. Piyaratne, and M. Ranagalage (2017). Relationship between NDVI with Tasseled cap Indices : A Remote Sensing based Analysis. International Journal of Innovative Research in Technology 3:13–19
dc.relationSandström, U. G., P. Angelstam, and G. Mikusiński (2006). Ecological diversity of birds in relation to the structure of urban green space. Landscape and Urban Planning 77:39–53. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.01.004
dc.relationSanz, V., and S. Caula (2015). Assessing bird assemblages along an urban gradient in a Caribbean island (Margarita, Venezuela). Urban Ecosystems 18:729–746. doi: 10.1007/s11252-014-0426-4
dc.relationSAO (2014). Inventario de la diversidad de aves en dos áreas protegidas urbanas del Valle de Aburrá: APU Piamonte - Bello, APU Cerro La Asomadera - Medellín
dc.relationSavard, J. P. L., P. Clergeau, and G. Mennechez (2000). Biodiversity concepts and urban ecosystems. Landscape and Urban Planning 48:131–142. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00037-2
dc.relationSax, D. F., and S. D. Gaines (2003). Species diversity: From global decreases to local increases. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18:561–566. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00224-6
dc.relationSchnitter, P., M. L. Giraldo, and J. M. Patiño (2006). La ocupación del territorio en el proceso de urbanización del área metropolitana del valle de Aburrá, Colombia (Urbanization process in the Metropolitan Area of Aburrá Valley, Colombia). Revista electrónica de geografía y ciencias sociales 10:83–90
dc.relationSchütz, C., W. Reckendorfer, and C. H. Schulze (2017). Local quality versus regional connectivity—habitat requirements of wintering woodpeckers in urban green spaces. Journal of Urban Ecology 3:1–11. doi: 10.1093/jue/jux019
dc.relationSeto, K. C., M. Fragkias, B. Gü Neralp, and M. K. Reilly (2011). A Meta-Analysis of Global Urban Land Expansion. PLoS ONE 6. doi: 10.1371/
dc.relationShih, W. Y. (2018). Bird diversity of greenspaces in the densely developed city centre of Taipei. Urban Ecosystems 21:379–393. doi: 10.1007/s11252-017-0720-z
dc.relationShochat, E., P. S. Warren, S. H. Faeth, N. E. Mcintyre, and D. Hope (2006). From patterns to emerging processes in mechanistic urban ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21:186–191. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2005.11.019
dc.relationShwartz, A., A. Muratet, L. Simon, and R. Julliard (2013). Local and management variables outweigh landscape effects in enhancing the diversity of different taxa in a big metropolis. Biological Conservation 157:285–292. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.09.009
dc.relationShwartz, A., S. Shirley, and S. Kark (2008). How do habitat variability and management regime shape the spatial heterogeneity of birds within a large Mediterranean urban park? Landscape and Urban Planning 84:219–229. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.08.003
dc.relationSmith, T. M., and R. L. Smith (2006). Elements of Ecology. In. 6th edition. Pearson Education, Inc., San Francisco
dc.relationSoga, M., K. J. Gaston, T. F. Koyanagi, K. Kurisu, and K. Hanaki (2016). Urban residents’ perceptions of neighbourhood nature: Does the extinction of experience matter? Biological Conservation 203:143–150. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.09.020
dc.relationSol, D., C. González-Lagos, D. Moreira, J. Maspons, and O. Lapiedra (2014). Urbanisation tolerance and the loss of avian diversity. Ecology Letters 17:942–950. doi: 10.1111/ele.12297
dc.relationLa Sorte, F. A., C. A. Lepczyk, M. F. J. Aronson, M. A. Goddard, M. Hedblom, M. Katti, I. MacGregor-Fors, U. Mörtberg, C. H. Nilon, P. S. Warren, N. S. G. Williams, and J. Yang (2018). The phylogenetic and functional diversity of regional breeding bird assemblages is reduced and constricted through urbanization. Diversity and Distributions:928–938. doi: 10.1111/ddi.12738
dc.relationLa Sorte, F. A., M. L. McKinney, and P. Pyšek (2007). Compositional similarity among urban floras within and across continents: Biogeographical consequences of human-mediated biotic interchange. Global Change Biology 13:913–921. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01329.x
dc.relationSouthon, G. E., A. Jorgensen, N. Dunnett, H. Hoyle, and K. L. Evans (2018). Perceived species-richness in urban green spaces: Cues, accuracy and well- being impacts. Landscape and Urban Planning 172:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.12.002
dc.relationStiles, F. G. (1990). La avifauna de la Universidad de Costa Rica y sus alrededores a través de veinte años (1968-1989) (Birds to the University of Costa Rica and surroundings during 20 years, 1968-1989). Rev. Biol. Trop 38:361–381
dc.relationStrohbach, M. W., S. B. Lerman, and P. S. Warren (2013). Are small greening areas enhancing bird diversity? Insights from community-driven greening projects in Boston. Landscape and Urban Planning 114:69–79. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.02.007
dc.relationSutherland, W. J., I. Newton, and R. E. Green (2004). Bird Ecology and Conservation: A Handbook of Techniques. In. Oxford University Press / USA, New York
dc.relationThrelfall, C. G., and D. Kendal (2018). The distinct ecological and social roles that wild spaces play in urban ecosystems. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 29:348–356. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.05.012
dc.relationThrelfall, C. G., L. Mata, J. A. Mackie, A. K. Hahs, N. E. Stork, N. S. G. Williams, and S. J. Livesley (2017). Increasing biodiversity in urban green spaces through simple vegetation interventions. Journal of Applied Ecology 54:1874–1883. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12876
dc.relationThrelfall, C. G., N. S. G. Williams, A. K. Hahs, and S. J. Livesley (2016). Approaches to urban vegetation management and the impacts on urban bird and bat assemblages. Landscape and Urban Planning 153:28–39. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.04.011
dc.relationTravez, J. J., and P. Yánez (2017). Diversidad y abundancia de avifauna en el campus de la UIDE y el Parque Metropolitano Guanguiltagua, Distrito Metropolitano de Quito, recomendaciones para su conservación (Bird diversity and abundance in UIDE campus and Guanguiltagua Metropolitan park). Boletín Técnico , Serie Zoológica 12–13:53–69
dc.relationTryjanowski, P., F. Morelli, P. Mikula, A. Krištín, P. Indykiewicz, G. Grzywaczewski, J. Kronenberg, and L. Jerzak (2017). Bird diversity in urban green space: A large-scale analysis of differences between parks and cemeteries in Central Europe. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 27:264–271. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.08.014
dc.relationUniversidad Nacional de Colombia (2005). Plan de ordenación y manejo de la cuenca del Río Aburrá (POMCA) (Territorial planning and management of the Aburrá River watershed). [Online.] Available at http://www.cornare.gov.co/documentos/POMCA_ABURRA.pdf
dc.relationVásquez-Muñoz, J., and G. Castaño-Villa (2008). Identificación de áreas prioritarias para la conservación de la avifauna en la zona urbana del municipio de Medellín, Colombia. Boletín Científico Museo Historia Natural 12:51–61
dc.relationVillarreal, H., M. Álvarez, S. Córdoba, F. Escobar, G. Fagua, F. Gast, H. Mendoza, M. Ospina, and A. Umaña (2004). Manual de métodos para el desarrollo de inventarios de biodiversidad. Programa de inventarios de biodiversidad (Biodiversity inventory methods). In. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia
dc.relationVitousek, P. M., H. A. Mooney, J. Lubchenco, and J. M. Melillo (1997). Human Domination of Earth’s Ecosystems. Science 277:494–499
dc.relationWalker, B. H. (1992). Biodiversity and Ecological Redundancy. Conservation Biology 6:18–23. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.610018.x
dc.relationWhite, J. G., M. J. Antos, J. A. Fitzsimons, and G. C. Palmer (2005). Non-uniform bird assemblages in urban environments: The influence of streetscape vegetation. Landscape and Urban Planning 71:123–135. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.02.006
dc.relationWilman, H., J. Belmaker, J. Simpson, C. de la Rosa, M. M. Rivadeneira, and W. Jetz (2014). Elton Traits 1.0: Species-level foraging attributes of the world’s birds and mammals. Ecology 95:1–14
dc.relationWolch, J. R., J. Byrne, and J. P. Newell (2014). Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities “just green enough.” Landscape and Urban Planning 125:234–244. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017
dc.relationXie, S., F. Lu, L. Cao, W. Zhou, and Z. Ouyang (2016). Multi-scale factors influencing the characteristics of avian communities in urban parks across Beijing during the breeding season. Scientific Reports 6:1–9. doi: 10.1038/srep29350
dc.relationYang, G., J. Xu, Y. Wang, X. Wang, E. Pei, X. Yuan, H. Li, Y. Ding, and Z. Wang (2015). Evaluation of microhabitats for wild birds in a Shanghai urban area park. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 14:246–254. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.02.005
dc.relationZipperer, W. C., J. Wu, R. V Pouyat, and S. T. A. Pickett (2000). The Application of Ecological Principles to Urban and Urbanizing Landscapes. Ecological Applications 10:685–688
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
dc.rightsAcceso abierto
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsDerechos reservados - Universidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.titleEffects of urban green spaces composition and structure on local bird diversity: a study case in Colombian Northern Andes
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Maestría


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución