dc.creatorOjeda Leal, Carolina Grace
dc.creatorJaque Castillo, Edilia
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-26T13:47:33Z
dc.date.available2021-10-26T13:47:33Z
dc.date.created2021-10-26T13:47:33Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier10.1007/978-3-030-32811-5_71-1
dc.identifier978-3030328115
dc.identifierhttps://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-030-32811-5_71-1
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/62873
dc.description.abstractIn this chapter, resilience is not considered to be a one-step process, as many policy frameworks have been proposed. We presented some trends in resilience and post-recovery management theoretical frameworks. Also, we suggested a possible cycle of post-disaster recovery that could be divided into three elementary principles: (1) encourage multihazard studies to understand the possible hazards that could impact the urban areas, (2) prioritize the investment in multiple platforms to encourage the monitoring in real time at high-risk areas including the social and ecological variables, and (3) promote the community resilience reinforcing the local-level volunteering and the three stages of resilience. Lastly, we presented two study cases from South Africa and Chile marked by the tsunamis and wetlands
dc.languageen
dc.publisherPalgrave Macmillan
dc.relationThe Palgrave Handbook of Climate Resilient Societies : Palgrave Macmillan, 2020, X, 1325 páginas
dc.rightsacceso restringido
dc.subjectHazard
dc.subjectDisaster risk management (DRM)
dc.subjectPost-disaster
dc.subjectGlobal South
dc.subjectResilient society
dc.subjectRecovery
dc.titleResilience is not a one-step process: The importance to focus on the post-recovery phases at the Global South.
dc.typecapítulo de libro


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución