Artículo de revista
Physical assessment of a mollisol under agroecological management in the Quillota valley, mediterranean central Chile
Fecha
2020Registro en:
Int. J. Agric. Nat. Resour. 47(3):261-279. 2020
10.7764/ijanr.v47i3.2290
Autor
Casanova Pinto, Manuel
Ticona, Berthin
Salazar Guerrero, Osvaldo
Gratacós, Eduardo
Pfeiffer Jakob, Marco
Ávila, Gonzalo
Tapia Fernández, Yasna
Seguel, Óscar
Sabaini, Carlo
Institución
Resumen
A number of agroecological practices have been proposed for assessing soil quality. Several
physical soil properties have been shown to be important for determining soil quality by using
the sustainability index (SI) and the cumulative rating approach. The main aim of the study was
to determine the effects of different agroecological managements on the physical properties of a
Mollisol in the Mediterranean central Chile. In addition, some physical properties were selected
to compare the soil quality among different agroecological management practices and highly
mechanized intensive systems by using the SI and cumulative rating approaches. An experimental
field was defined in an area of 3.5 ha in 2014. Four sites with different agroecological practices
were selected in 2019 to assess soil physical properties: rainfed Mediterranean annual prairie - no
tillage (1-S), irrigated perennial prairie with deep-root species - no tillage (2-N), irrigated annual
and perennial prairie - conventional tillage (4-S), irrigated vegetables and flowers - minimum
tillage (4-N); an avocado orchard with traditional management was used as the control. Soil
organic carbon and the following soil physical properties were selected to assess SI and CR:
bulk density, total porosity, void ratio, air capacity, fast-drainage pores, relative field capacity,
hydraulic conductivity, structural stability index and unavailable water pores. The applicability
of the selected physical indicators to the SIs of agroecological management practices compared
with the control was demonstrated. The cumulative rating index (CR) for each land use showed
that all agroecological practices constituted sustainable soil management (25≤CR<30), whereas
the avocado orchard showed the least sustainable management (30≤CR<40), and a change in
soil use is recommended.