Artículo de revista
Penile low intensity shock wave treatment for PDE5I refractory erectile dysfunction: a randomized double‑blind sham‑controlled clinical trial
Fecha
2020Registro en:
World Journal of Urology (2020)
10.1007/s00345-020-03373-y
Autor
Vinay Barriga, José Ignacio
Moreno, Daniel
Rajmil, Osvaldo
Ruiz Castañe, Eduard
Sánchez Curbelo, Josvany
Institución
Resumen
Purpose Over the last decade, penile low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy (LI-ESWT) has emerged as a promising
alternative for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). The aim of this trial is to assess the effect of electromagnetic
LI-ESWT on the erectile function of vascular phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE5I) refractory ED patients.
Methods Randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study. 76 patients with vascular PDE5I-refractory ED completed the
study. 40 men were treated with LI-ESWT (1 session/week for 4 weeks, 5000 shocks/session, 0.09 mJ/mm2 energy density)
and 36 were treated with a sham probe. Baseline and post-treatment (1, 3 and 6 months) evaluations were performed using
validated erectile function questionnaires (IIEF-EF, EHS, SEP2, SEP3 and GAQ1). The groups were compared using Mann–
Whitney–Wilcoxon and chi-squared tests, with results considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.
Results At the 3-month follow-up, median change in IIEF-EF score for active and sham groups was 3.5 (IQR 0–10) and
− 0.5 (IQR − 11 to 1), respectively (p < 0.05). Six months after treatment, 52.5% of patients (21/40) in the active group and
27.8% of patients (10/36) in the sham group presented an EHS > 2 (p < 0.05). At the same evaluation, 40.0% (16/40) and
13.9% (5/36) of patients had positive answers to GAQ-1, in the treated and sham groups, respectively (p < 0.05). No adverse
events were observed during the study.
Conclusion This study showed that penile electromagnetic shockwave therapy may improve erectile function, to a modest
extent, on certain patients that do not respond to PDE5I; making it an alternative for vascular ED patients that reject more
invasive therapies.