dc.creatorLoyola Fuentes, Gino
dc.creatorPortilla, Yolanda
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-27T20:04:11Z
dc.date.available2021-01-27T20:04:11Z
dc.date.created2021-01-27T20:04:11Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifierInternational Review of Economics and Finance 69 (2020) 994–1017
dc.identifier10.1016/j.iref.2020.04.007
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/178373
dc.description.abstractA well-known prescription in corporate governance is that high-powered incentive contracts such as performance bonuses are an optimal mechanism for aligning managers with shareholders on an efficient investment policy. However, if managers are able to manipulate profits in order to obtain the bonuses, such contracts become a double-edged sword. An agency model is proposed to analyze how compensation plans should be designed to counteract these perverse incentives while preserving the primary managerial incentives to select optimal investment projects. Implications of the results for real-world executive incentive plans are discussed and an analysis is conducted of regulatory policies such as penalties and bonus caps.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
dc.sourceInternational Review of Economics & Finance
dc.subjectEarning management
dc.subjectExecutive compensation
dc.subjectCorporate governance
dc.subjectBonus cap
dc.subjectMonotone likelihood ratio property
dc.titleManagerial compensation as a double-edged sword: Optimal incentives under misreporting
dc.typeArtículo de revista


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución