dc.creatorTimmermann, Cristian
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-17T19:08:02Z
dc.date.available2020-11-17T19:08:02Z
dc.date.created2020-11-17T19:08:02Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifierAsian Bioethics Review (2020)
dc.identifier10.1007/s41649-020-00140-4
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/177771
dc.description.abstractIn various responses to the COVID-19 pandemic, we can observe insufficient sensitivity towards the needs and circumstances of poorer citizens. Particularly in a context of high inequality, policy makers need to engage with the wider public in debates and consultations to gain better insights in the realities of the worst-off within their jurisdiction. When consultations involve members of traditionally underrepresented groups, these are not only more inclusive, which is in itself an ethical aim, but pool ideas and observations from a much more diverse array of inhabitants. Inclusivity increases the odds to identify a larger range of weak spots for health security and to design health interventions that are less burdensome on those worst-off.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
dc.sourceAsian Bioethics Review
dc.subjectCOVID-19 (Enfermedad)
dc.subjectPublic consultations
dc.subjectPandemic
dc.subjectPoverty-sensitive
dc.subjectCognitive diversity
dc.subjectEpistemic justice
dc.titleEpistemic ignorance, poverty and the COVID-19 pandemic
dc.typeArtículo de revista


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución