dc.creatorCornejo Rosas, Rodrigo
dc.creatorIturrieta, Pablo
dc.creatorOlegário, Tayran M. M.
dc.creatorKajiyama, Carolina
dc.creatorArellano Sepúlveda, Daniel
dc.creatorGuiñez, Dannette
dc.creatorCerda Jana, María
dc.creatorBrito, Roberto
dc.creatorGajardo Cortez, Abraham
dc.creatorLazo, Marioli
dc.creatorLópez, Lorena
dc.creatorMorais, Caio C. A.
dc.creatorGonzález, Sedric
dc.creatorZavala, Miguel
dc.creatorRojas Jara, Verónica
dc.creatorMedel Fernández, Juan
dc.creatorHurtado, Daniel E.
dc.creatorBruhn, Alejandro
dc.creatorRamos Gómez, Cristóbal
dc.creatorEstuardo Agurto, Nivia
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-05T19:03:08Z
dc.date.available2021-04-05T19:03:08Z
dc.date.created2021-04-05T19:03:08Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifierActa Anaesthesiol Scand. 2020;00:1–8
dc.identifier10.1111/aas.13723
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/178913
dc.description.abstractRationale Cyclic strain may be a determinant of ventilator-induced lung injury. The standard for strain assessment is the computed tomography (CT), which does not allow continuous monitoring and exposes to radiation. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is able to monitor changes in regional lung ventilation. In addition, there is a correlation between mechanical deformation of materials and detectable changes in its electrical impedance, making EIT a potential surrogate for cyclic lung strain measured by CT (Strain(CT)). Objectives To compare the global Strain(CT) with the change in electrical impedance (Delta Z). Methods Acute respiratory distress syndrome patients under mechanical ventilation (V-T 6 mL/kg ideal body weight with positive end-expiratory pressure 5 [PEEP 5] and best PEEP according to EIT) underwent whole-lung CT at end-inspiration and end-expiration. Biomechanical analysis was used to construct 3D maps and determine Strain(CT) at different levels of PEEP. CT and EIT acquisitions were performed simultaneously. Multilevel analysis was employed to determine the causal association between Strain(CT) and Delta Z. Linear regression models were used to predict the change in lung Strain(CT) between different PEEP levels based on the change in Delta Z. Main results Strain(CT) was positively and independently associated with Delta Z at global level (P < .01). Furthermore, the change in Strain(CT) (between PEEP 5 and Best PEEP) was accurately predicted by the change in Delta Z (R-2 0.855, P < .001 at global level) with a high agreement between predicted and measured Strain(CT). Conclusions The change in electrical impedance may provide a noninvasive assessment of global cyclic strain, without radiation at bedside.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
dc.sourceActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
dc.subjectComputed tomography
dc.subjectElectrical impedance tomography
dc.subjectLung strain
dc.subjectMechanical ventilation monitoring
dc.subjectVentilator&#8208
dc.subjectInduced lung injury
dc.titleEstimation of changes in cyclic lung strain by electrical impedance tomography: Proof-of-concept study
dc.typeArtículo de revista


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución