dc.creator | Bozzini, Giorgio | |
dc.creator | Berti, Lorenzo | |
dc.creator | Maltagliati, Matteo | |
dc.creator | Besana, Umberto | |
dc.creator | Calori, Alberto | |
dc.creator | Müller, Alexander | |
dc.creator | Sighinolfi, Maria Chiara | |
dc.creator | Micali, Salvatore | |
dc.creator | Pastore, Antonio Luigi | |
dc.creator | Ledezma Rojas, Rodrigo | |
dc.creator | Broggini, Paolo | |
dc.creator | Rocco, Bernardo | |
dc.creator | Buizza, Carlo | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-01-25T22:40:14Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-01-25T22:40:14Z | |
dc.date.created | 2021-01-25T22:40:14Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.identifier | World Journal of Urology Sep 2020 | |
dc.identifier | 10.1007/s00345-020-03442-2 | |
dc.identifier | https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/178328 | |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose To assess the effects of a new ejaculation-sparing thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ES-ThuLEP) technique on sexual functions and micturition, in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and to evaluate how the surgical technique of ES-ThuLEP can lead to ejaculation preservation. Methods A prospective study was carried out between January 2015 and January 2018 on patients with surgical indication for BPH, who wished to preserve ejaculation. The patients were treated with ES-ThuLEP and were evaluated before and 3 and 6 months after surgery. Three validated questionnaires (ICIQ-MLUTSsex, IIEF-5 and IPSS) were used to assess changes in ejaculation, erectile function and urinary symptoms. Uroflowmetry (Qmax and Qavg), post-void residual volume and voided volume were also evaluated, to assess micturition improvement. Patients with moderate to severe erectile dysfunction were excluded. Statistical analysis was performed with the Student'sttest, Chi-square test and logistic regression analysis. Results Two hundred and eighty three patients were enrolled. Ejaculation was spared in 203 and 219 patients at 3 and 6 months after surgery. No significant differences were observed between erectile function before and after surgery: baseline IIEF-5 = 16.2 +/- 4.47 vs 16.7 +/- 2.9 (p = 0.419) and 17.7 +/- 3.2 (p = 0.410) at 3 and 6 months. Significant improvement in urinary symptoms was achieved: baseline IPSS = 19.4 +/- 7.24 vs 5.8 +/- 4.3 (p = 0.032) and 3.9 +/- 4.1 (p = 0.029) at 3 and 6 months. Conclusion ES-ThuLEP effectively preserved ejaculation in over two thirds of the patients without compromising micturition improvement or erectile function. ES-ThuLEP could be a valid treatment option for BPH in young and sexually active men. | |
dc.language | en | |
dc.publisher | Springer | |
dc.rights | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/ | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile | |
dc.source | World Journal of Urology | |
dc.subject | Ejaculation | |
dc.subject | Ejaculatory dysfunction | |
dc.subject | Ejaculation sparing | |
dc.subject | Benign prostatic | |
dc.title | Ejaculation‑sparing thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ES‑ThuLEP): outcomes on a large cohort | |
dc.type | Artículo de revista | |