dc.creatorSan Juan, C.A.
dc.creatorTiznado, J.P.Z.
dc.date2009
dc.date2012-02-09T15:03:33Z
dc.date2012-02-09T15:03:33Z
dc.date2012-02-09
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-14T22:08:24Z
dc.date.available2021-06-14T22:08:24Z
dc.identifierUniversum, Vol. 27 , N°1, 81-86, 2009
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10925/626
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3301416
dc.descriptionThis work develops a proposed method for the analysis of penal sentences which allows them to be understood as a practice in discourse, and to be compared with other forms of social discourse. From a specialised corpus consisting of one hundred thirty-seven sentences handed down by Temuco Oral Tribunal in the penal area, and basing our work on van Dijk and the Grounded Theory methodology, we construct and structure to describe and model the internal organization of the decisions, facilitating the process of comparison and contrast with other discourses. The research helps to make it possible to study judicial discourse, highlighting the expectations of society which the judges consider legitimate and the practices of invisible violence which construct the idea of the delinquent as an enemy.
dc.formatPDF
dc.formatapplication/msword
dc.languagees
dc.sourceUniversum
dc.subjectNarración
dc.subjectSentencias judiciales
dc.subjectDiscurso judicial
dc.titleLa narración en las sentencias penales
dc.typeArtículo de Revista


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución