dc.creatorGloel, Matthias
dc.date2018
dc.date2021-04-30T16:25:24Z
dc.date2021-04-30T16:25:24Z
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-14T22:07:18Z
dc.date.available2021-06-14T22:07:18Z
dc.identifierUNIVERSUM-REVISTA DE HUMANIDADES Y CIENCIAS SOCIALES,Vol.33,117-143,2018
dc.identifierhttp://repositoriodigital.uct.cl/handle/10925/2505
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3300992
dc.descriptionThis study compares sovereignty discourses in Castile, Catalonia and Portugal during the reigns of the Habsburg dynasty. We will clarify in which way sovereignty has to be understood and that it lies in the prince, which is why these discourses focus mainly on this royal person. The aim of the discourses is to show that the prince of a territory does not recognize any other superior temporal power. First, we analyse the Castilian discourses, which, on the one hand, reject any subordination under the Holy Empire and, on the other hand, they do pretend that the Castilian king historically is the sovereign of all the Spanish kingdoms. The discourses in Catalonia and Portugal, by contrast, although they contain some rejections to the empire, focus mainly on emphasizing their sovereignty against Castile, which means that they reject this second discourse elaborated by the Castilian authors.
dc.languagees
dc.publisherUNIV TALCA. INST ESTUDIOS HUMANISTICOS JUAN IGNACIO MOLINA
dc.sourceUNIVERSUM-REVISTA DE HUMANIDADES Y CIENCIAS SOCIALES
dc.subjectHoly Empire
dc.subjectSpanish Monarchy
dc.subjectSovereignty
dc.subjectEarly Modern History
dc.title'Not recognizing any superior in the profane' - sovereignty discourses in the Spanish kingdoms under the Habsburgs
dc.typeArticle


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución