dc.creatorMartinez, Christopher A.
dc.date2018
dc.date2021-04-30T16:28:45Z
dc.date2021-04-30T16:28:45Z
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-14T22:00:38Z
dc.date.available2021-06-14T22:00:38Z
dc.identifierPSICOLOGIA CONOCIMIENTO Y SOCIEDAD,Vol.8,36-71,2018
dc.identifierhttp://repositoriodigital.uct.cl/handle/10925/2666
dc.identifier10.26864/PCS.v8.n1.3
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3298602
dc.descriptionIn this article, we use an experimental design to test the effects of gender stereotypes on candidate evaluation. We randomly assign 826 U.S. residents the task of reading a description of a fictional candidate: 391 participants received the script of a female candidate, whereas 435 read the same script but of a male candidate. Our results show that respondents are more likely to vote for the woman, to believe that she shares their concerns and to see her as more competent to deal with education and health care issues than the man. We also find that party affinity is consistently the strongest predictor of candidate evaluation. Interestingly, the effects of gender stereotypes partially weaken when partisanship is controlled for.
dc.languagees
dc.publisherUNIV REPUBLICA. FAC PSICOLOGIA
dc.sourcePSICOLOGIA CONOCIMIENTO Y SOCIEDAD
dc.subjectWomen candidates
dc.subjectExperimental method
dc.subjectGender stereotypes
dc.subjectAttitudes
dc.titleGender stereotypes and candidate evaluation in the United States: evidence from a survey-experiment
dc.typeArticle


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución