The practice of abduction and its application to the Ongwen’s case

dc.contributorClínica Jurídica Internacional
dc.creatorBuitrago, Lina
dc.creatorCeledón, Fabiola
dc.creatorGonzález, Yuri
dc.creatorRamírez, Karen
dc.creatorRestrepo, Laura
dc.creatorRodríguez, Ana Lucía
dc.creatorVillarraga, Luisa
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-21T20:24:55Z
dc.date.available2019-08-21T20:24:55Z
dc.date.created2019-08-21T20:24:55Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifierhttp://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/20145
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_20145
dc.description.abstractDominic Ongwen was born in Uganda in 1975. At the age of ten he was abducted by members of the Lord´s Resistance Army (LRA), who trained him to fight against the Ugandan government. 30 years later he became the Sinia brigade’s commander—one of the most important operational units in the LRA hierarchy— and a key element to the leader of the organization, Joseph Kony. The Clinic delimits the object of study to the abductions committed only against children by the Lord’s Resistance Army. The Clinic excludes possible crimes initially considered by the OPCV. The scope of study was defined by the Clinic based on the evidence found in the statements of the witnesses and other data collected from studies in Northern Uganda.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosario
dc.publisherFacultad de Jurisprudencia
dc.relationClínica Jurídica Internacional
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAbierto (Texto Completo)
dc.source1 . “Complicating Victims and Perpetrators in Uganda: On Dominic Ongwen”, Justice and Reconciliation. July 2008, http://justiceandreconciliation.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/JRP_FN7_Dominic-Ongwen.pdf. (accessed November 11, 2017)
dc.sourceInternational Criminal Court; Pre-Trial Chamber II, Case No. ICC-02/04-01/15, (The Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen) Decision on the confirmation of charges, 23 March 2016, para. 60-64.
dc.source“Uganda. Breaking God’s commands”: the destruction of childhood by the Lord’s Resistance Army”, Amnesty International, (September 18, 1997). https://www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/156000/afr590011997en.pdf
dc.sourceThe Lord’s Resistance Army, Myth and Reality, Tim Allen, (2010), Page 138
dc.sourceWorld Vision Uganda to a conference on Challenges to Reconciliation and the Protection of Human Rights in Gulu, on 7 July 1997, organized by the Foundation for Human Rights Initiative.
dc.sourceInternational Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, Trial Chamber, Case No. IT-95-14-T, (The Prosecutor v Blaškić), Judgement, 3 March 2000.
dc.sourceInternational Criminal Court; Pre-Trial Chamber, Case number ICC-01/09-02/11, (The Prosecutor v. Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta). Decision on the confirmation of charges, 23 January 2012, para. 269
dc.source8International Criminal Court; Trial Chamber I, Case No. ICC-01/04-01/06, (The Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga) Decision on Sentence pursuant to Article 76 of the Statute. 10 July 2012, para. 41
dc.sourceInternational Criminal Court; Pre-Trial Chamber I, Case No. ICC-01/04-01/07, (The Prosecutor v. Germain Katanga), Decision on the confirmation of charges, 30 September 2008, para. 449
dc.sourceSierra Leone: Recommendations on the draft Statute of the Special Court”, Amnesty International, (November 14, 2000). https://www1.essex.ac.uk/armedcon/story_id/000143.html (accessed on November 12, 2017)
dc.sourceFootnote 1056 of the Judgment of the Trial Chamber in the Charles Taylor Case, page 156
dc.sourceReport of the Secretary-General on the establishment of a Special Court for Sierra Leone, Security Council, U.N. Doc. S/2000/915, 4 October 2000
dc.sourceThe Prosecutor vs. Alex Tamba Brima, Brima Bazzy Kamara and Santigie Borbor Kanu), Judgment, 22 February 2008, para. 183.
dc.sourceInternational Criminal Court; Pre-Trial Chamber II, Case No. ICC-01/04-02/06, (The Prosecutor v. Bosco Ntaganda), Decision Pursuant to Article 61(7)(a) and (b) of the Rome Statute on the Charges, 9 June 2014, para. 65.
dc.sourceInternational Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia; Trial Chamber I, Case No. IT-00-39-T, (The Prosecutor v. Momcilo Krajisnik) Judgement, 27 September 2006, para. 734.
dc.sourceInternational Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia; Trial Chamber I, Case No. IT-95-16-T, (The Prosecutor v. Kupreškić et al.), Judgement, 14 January 2000, para. 621.
dc.sourceInternational Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia; Trial Chamber, Case No. IT-98-30/1-T, (The Prosecutor v. Kvocka et al.), Judgement, 2 November 2001, para. 185.
dc.sourceFausto Pocar, “Persecution as a Crime Under International Criminal Law” Journal Of National Security Law & Policy 2 (April 2008): 355-365.
dc.sourceInternational Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia; Trial Chamber I, Case No. IT-95-16-T, (The Prosecutor v. Kupreškić et al.), Judgement, 14 January 2000, para. 618-619.
dc.sourceInternational Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, Appeals Chamber, Case No. IT-95-14-A, (The Prosecutor v. Blaškić), Judgement, 29 July 2004, para.135.
dc.sourceInternational Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia; Trial Chamber I, Case No. IT-95-16-T, (The Prosecutor v. Kupreškić et al.), Judgement, 14 January 2000, para. 577.
dc.sourceConvention on the rights of the Child, Art.35, adopted 20 November of 1989, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 1577, p. 3
dc.sourceInter-American Court of Human Rights, (Case Contreras et al. vs. The State), Decision on Reparations and Costs of the Judgment, 31 August 2011, para. 82.
dc.sourceThe Impact of Armed Conflict on Children, Report of the Secretary-General's expert, Ms. Graça Machel, U.N. Doc. A / 51/306, 26 August 1996.
dc.sourceOffice of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Children and Armed Conflict, “The Six Grave Violations Against Children During Armed Conflict: The Legal Foundation”, October 2009 (Updated 2013).
dc.sourceOffice of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Children and Armed Conflict, “The Six Grave Violations Against Children During Armed Conflict: The Legal Foundation”, October 2009 (Updated 2013). "The Geneva Conventions Common Article 3 requirement of humane treatment for civilians implicitly but undeniably prohibits the abduction of children". https://childrenandarmedconflict.un.org/publications/WorkingPaper1_SixGraveViolationsLegalFoundation.p df (accessed March 12, 2018)
dc.sourceSecurity Council of United Nations, Res. 2225 13, U.N. Doc S/RES/2225, 18 June 2015
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.sourcereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
dc.subjectSecuestro
dc.subjectDominic Ongwen
dc.subjectCorte Penal Internacional
dc.subjectEstatuto de Roma
dc.subjectDesaparición forzada de personas
dc.subjectTomar rehenes
dc.titleThe practice of abduction and its application to the Ongwen’s case
dc.typeworkingPaper


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución