Caracterización clínica de las pacientes sometidas a corrección quirúrgica de prolapso genital, en HUM-Méderi, 2011- 2016

dc.contributorRincon, Johnattan
dc.creatorMartínez Castaño, Lina Rocío
dc.creatorMartínez Mendez, Henry Alberto
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-23T15:42:40Z
dc.date.available2019-07-23T15:42:40Z
dc.date.created2019-07-23T15:42:40Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifierhttp://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/19989
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_19989
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: genital prolapse is defined as the descent or displacement of the pelvic organs as a consequence of the failure of support and support structures (1). More than 50% of women in advanced age are affected in their quality of life by this entity and corresponds to 76% of the daily gynecological consultation (2). General Objective: to describe the clinical characteristics of patients with genital prolapse undergoing surgical correction in HUM-Mederi, from 2011 to 2016. Methodology: retrospective descriptive study of women taken to surgical correction of genital prolapse in HUM-Mederi between 2011-2016. A total sample of 282 patients was included in which description of clinical variables was made and the possible association of these for the development of reprolapse. Results: The average age was 64.9 years. The median number of pregnancies and vaginal deliveries was 3. 90.07% of the patients were in the postmenopause. 61.70% had a BMI> 29, 46% had involvement of 3 vaginal compartments and the most frequent degree of prolapse was 3 in 48% of cases. The urinary tract infection was the most frequent complication in 12.06%. A reprolapse rate of 14.5% was found. Conclusion: the clinical behavior of HUM Mederi patients is homogeneous to that reported in the literature. Patients with higher BMI, menopause and higher degree of prolapse the rate of reprolapse was higher.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosario
dc.publisherEspecialización en Ginecología y Obstericia
dc.publisherFacultad de Medicina
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAbierto (Texto Completo)
dc.rightsEL AUTOR, manifiesta que la obra objeto de la presente autorización es original y la realizó sin violar o usurpar derechos de autor de terceros, por lo tanto la obra es de exclusiva autoría y tiene la titularidad sobre la misma. PARGRAFO: En caso de presentarse cualquier reclamación o acción por parte de un tercero en cuanto a los derechos de autor sobre la obra en cuestión, EL AUTOR, asumirá toda la responsabilidad, y saldrá en defensa de los derechos aquí autorizados; para todos los efectos la universidad actúa como un tercero de buena fe. EL AUTOR, autoriza a LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO, para que en los términos establecidos en la Ley 23 de 1982, Ley 44 de 1993, Decisión andina 351 de 1993, Decreto 460 de 1995 y demás normas generales sobre la materia, utilice y use la obra objeto de la presente autorización. -------------------------------------- POLITICA DE TRATAMIENTO DE DATOS PERSONALES. Declaro que autorizo previa y de forma informada el tratamiento de mis datos personales por parte de LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO para fines académicos y en aplicación de convenios con terceros o servicios conexos con actividades propias de la academia, con estricto cumplimiento de los principios de ley. Para el correcto ejercicio de mi derecho de habeas data cuento con la cuenta de correo habeasdata@urosario.edu.co, donde previa identificación podré solicitar la consulta, corrección y supresión de mis datos.
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.sourceProlapso genital (actualizado junio 2013). Progresos Obstet y Ginecol. 2015;58(4):205–8
dc.sourceBarber MD. Pelvic organ prolapse. BMJ. 2016;i3853
dc.sourceHaylen BT, Ridder D De, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, et al. An International Urogynecological Association ( IUGA )/ International Continence Society ( ICS ) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. 2010;5–26
dc.sourceChow D, Rodrı L V. Epidemiology and prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse. 2013;293–8
dc.sourceIglesia CB, Smithling KR, Columbia D. Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Am Fam Physician. 2017;96(3):243–65
dc.sourceHendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I, Aragaki A, Barnabei V, McTiernan A. Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women’s Health Initiative: Gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(6):1160–6
dc.sourceBarber MD, Maher C. Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. 2013;1783–90
dc.sourceEspitia FJ, Hoz D. Factores de riesgo asociados con prolapso genital femenino : estudio de casos y controles. Med Reprod y Embriol Clínica [Internet]. 2015;24(1):12–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.uroco.2015.03.003
dc.sourceCastro AM. Prolapso genital en el Hospital Universitario de Cartagena. :231–5
dc.sourceLuna J. Epidemiología del prolapso genital. Rev Colomb Ginecol y Obstet. 1985;307–22
dc.sourcePlata M, Castaño JC, Caicedo JI, Bravo-balado A, Averbeck MA, Trujillo CG, et al. Trends in pelvic organ prolapse management in Latin America. 2017;(May)
dc.sourceANTONIO J. Prolapso de órganos pélvicos. Iatreia. 2002;15(1):56–67
dc.sourceBuchsbaum G, Gee Lee T. Vaginal Obliterative Procedures for Plevic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2017;72(3):175–83
dc.sourceDelancey JOL. What ’ s new in the functional anatomy of pelvic organ prolapse ? 2016
dc.sourcePelvic F, Prolapse O, You W, Know S. PROLAPSO GENITAL FEMENINO : FEMALE PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE : WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW. 2013;24(2):202–9
dc.sourceMaher CF, Baessler KK, Barber MD, Cheong C, Consten ECJ, Cooper KG, et al. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse. Climacteric [Internet]. 2019;22(3):229–35. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/13697137.2018.1551348
dc.sourceLensen EJM, Withagen MIJ, Kluivers KB, Milani AL, Vierhout ME. Surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: A historical review with emphasis on the anterior compartment. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(10):1593–602
dc.sourceBritih O, Of E, Bladderprolapse F. [july 23, 1898. 1898;232–4
dc.sourceBURCH JC. Urethrovaginal fixation to Cooper’s ligament for correction of stress incontinence, cystocele, and prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 1961;81(2):281–90. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(16)36367-0
dc.sourceWiskind AK, Creighton SM, Stanton SL. The incidence of genital prolapse after the Burch colposuspension. Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 1992;167(2):399–405. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(11)91419-7
dc.sourceTanagho EA. Colpocystourethropexy: the way we do it. J Urol. 1976;116(6):751–3.
dc.sourceDe Castro LG, Rocha SC, Fernandes SS, Chaves R, Aguirre EH, De Castro FA. Urinary incontinence of esfinterial deficiency effort. Salud Uninorte. 2018;34(3):784–96
dc.sourceGlazener CMA, Cooper K. Anterior vaginal repair for urinary incontinence in women | Vordere scheidenplastik bei harninkontinenz der frau. Praxis (Bern 1994). 2001;90(45)
dc.sourceDeLancey JOL. Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 1992;166(6 PART 1):1717–28. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(92)91562-O
dc.sourceReview AS. Graft Use in Transvaginal Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair. 2008;112(5):1131–42
dc.sourceDeffieux X, Thubert T, Donon L, Hermieu JF, Le Normand L, Trichot C. Chirurgie d’occlusion vaginale (colpocléisis) pour prolapsus génital: recommandations pour la pratique clinique. Prog en Urol [Internet]. 2016;26:S61–72. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1166-7087(16)30429-8
dc.sourceJohn A. Rock H w. JI, A.Rock J. Te Linde: Ginecología Quirúrgica. In: Te Linde: Ginecología quirúrgica. 2006. p. 1226
dc.sourceAbbasy S, Kenton K. Obliterative procedures for pelvic organ prolapse. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;53(1):86–98
dc.sourceReisenauer C, Oberlechner E, Schoenfisch B, Wallwiener D, Huebner M. Modified LeFort colpocleisis: Clinical outcome and patient satisfaction. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;288(6):1349–53
dc.sourceHill AJ, Walters MD, Unger CA. Perioperative adverse events associated with colpocleisis for uterovaginal and posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2016;214(4):501.e1-501.e6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.921
dc.sourceKrissi H, Aviram A, Eitan R, From A, Wiznitzer A, Peled Y. Risk factors for recurrence after Le Fort colpocleisis for severe pelvic organ prolapse in elderly women. Int J Surg. 2015;20:75–9
dc.sourceMikos T, Chatzipanteli M, Grimbizis GF, Tarlatzis BC. Enlightening the mechanisms of POP recurrence after LeFort colpocleisis. Case report and review. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(7):971–8
dc.sourceRoth TM. Pyometra and recurrent prolapse after Le Fort colpocleisis. Int Urogynecol J. 2007;18(6):687–8
dc.sourceErekson E, Murchison RL, Gerjevic KA, Meljen VT, Strohbehn K. Major postoperative complications following surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse: a secondary database analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]
dc.sourceTakase-Sanchez MM, Brooks HM, Hale DS, Heit MH. Obliterative Surgery for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Patient Survey on Reasons for Surgery Selection and Postoperative Decision Regret and Satisfaction. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015;21(6):325–31
dc.sourceWhiteside JL, Weber AM, Meyn LA, Walters MD. Risk factors for prolapse recurrence after vaginal repair. 2004
dc.sourceCulligan PJ, Priestley JL. Porcine Dermis Compared With Polypropylene Mesh for Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy. 2013;121(1):143–51
dc.sourceSiddiqui NY, Grimes CL, Casiano ER, Abed HT, Jeppson PC, Olivera CK, et al. Mesh sacrocolpopexy compared with native tissue vaginal repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(1):44–55
dc.sourceI. N, L. B, H.M. Z, G. C, H. R, M. G, et al. Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. JAMA - J Am Med Assoc [Internet]. 2013;309(19):2016–24. Available from: http://jama.jamanetwork.com/data/Journals/JAMA/926954/joc130046_2016_2024.pdf%0Ahttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=reference&D=emed15&NEWS=N&AN=368919314
dc.sourceGutman R, Maher C. Uterine-preserving pop surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(11):1803–13
dc.sourceGutman RE, Rardin CR, Sokol ER, Matthews C, Park AJ, Iglesia CB, et al. Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2017;216(1):38.e1-38.e11. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.08.035
dc.sourceDietz V, Van Der Vaart CH, Van Der Graaf Y, Heintz P, Schraffordt Koops SE. One-year follow-up after sacrospinous hysteropexy and vaginal hysterectomy for uterine descent: A randomized study. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(2):209–16
dc.sourceDetollenaere RJ, Den Boon J, Stekelenburg J, IntHout J, Vierhout ME, Kluivers KB, et al. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: Multicentre randomized non-inferiority trial. BMJ. 2015;351
dc.sourceDicker RC, Greenspan JR, Strauss LT, Cowart MR, Scally MJ, Peterson HB, et al. Complications of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy among women of reproductive age in the United States. The collaborative review of sterilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 1982;144(7):841–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(82)90362-3
dc.sourceLambrou NC, Buller JL, Thompson JR, Cundiff GW, Chou B, Montz FJ. Prevalence of perioperative complications among women undergoing reconstructive pelvic surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183(6):1355–60
dc.sourceStepp KJ, Barber MD, Yoo EH, Whiteside JL, Paraiso MFR, Walters MD. Incidence of perioperative complications of urogynecologic surgery in elderly women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(5 SPEC. ISS.):1630–6
dc.sourceBohlin KS, Ankardal M, Nüssler E, Lindkvist H, Milsom I. Factors influencing the outcome of surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(1):81–9
dc.sourceThubert T, Daché A, Leguilchet T, Benchikh A, Ravery V, Hermieu JF. Colpocléisis selon la technique de Lefort : Une série rétrospective. Prog en Urol. 2012;22(17):1071–6
dc.sourceFelipe A, Conchita M, Gustavo C. Prevalencia de prolapso del piso pélvico en pacientes con incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo. 2012
dc.sourceBoyles SH, Weber AM, Meyn L. Procedures for pelvic organ prolapse in the United. 2003;108–15
dc.sourceShah AD, Kohli N. The age distribution , rates , and types of surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in the USA. 2008;421–8
dc.sourceVergeldt TFM, Weemhoff M, Inthout J, Kluivers KB. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse and its recurrence : a systematic review. 2015;1559–73
dc.sourceNygaard I, Bradley C, Brandt D. Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Older Women : Prevalence and Risk Factors. :489–97
dc.sourceSung VW, Hampton BS. Epidemiolo gy of Pelvic Floor Dysfunc tion. Obstet Gynecol Clin NA [Internet]. 2009;36(3):421–43. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2009.08.002
dc.sourceKörnig M, Brühlmann E, Günthert A, Christmann C. Intra-, peri- and postoperative complications in pelvic organ prolapse surgery in geriatric women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol [Internet]. 2018;224:142–5. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.03.040
dc.sourceAlshankiti H, Houlihan S, Robert M. Incidence and contributing factors of perioperative complications in surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2019
dc.sourceHorst W, do Valle JB, Silva JC, Gascho CLL. Pelvic organ prolapse: prevalence and risk factors in a Brazilian population. Int Urogynecol J [Internet]. 2017;28(8):1165–70. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3238-7
dc.sourceIsmail S, Duckett J, Rizk D, Sorinola O. Recurrent pelvic organ prolapse : International Urogynecological Association Research and Development Committee opinion. Int Urogynecol J [Internet]. 2016;1619–32. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3076-7
dc.sourceSwift S, Woodman P, O’Boyle A, Kahn M, Valley M, Bland D, et al. Pelvic Organ Support Study (POSST): The distribution, clinical definition, and epidemiologic condition of pelvic organ support defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(3):795–806
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.sourcereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
dc.subjectProlapso de órganos pélvicos
dc.subjectCirugía obliterativa vaginal
dc.subjectCirugía con malla para prolapso
dc.titleCaracterización clínica de las pacientes sometidas a corrección quirúrgica de prolapso genital, en HUM-Méderi, 2011- 2016
dc.typemasterThesis


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución