dc.contributorHernández Herrera, Gilma Norela
dc.creatorMadrid Díaz, Guillermo Adolfo
dc.creatorDíaz Cortés, Juan Carlos
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-18T12:48:25Z
dc.date.available2019-06-18T12:48:25Z
dc.date.created2019-06-18T12:48:25Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifierhttp://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/19863
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_19863
dc.description.abstractIntroduction. Minimally invasive techniques have been a revolution in the history of surgery, improving outcomes with less tissue injury and better pain control. Multimodal pain control techniques have also shown a better recovery of the surgical patient. Intravenous lidocaine is an alternative as multimodal analgesia, with evidence in abdominal surgery, mainly colectomy and open prostatectomy, generating lower opioid consumption and fewer adverse effects. Little is known about the impact of the use of intravenous lidocaine in the control of postoperative pain of prostatectomy by robot. Objective. To evaluate the impact of intravenous lidocaine in the management of post-operative pain in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy by a minimally invasive (robotic) technique during 2017 and 2018 at the Santa Fe de Bogotá University Hospital. Design, materials and methods. Study of quantitative approach, analytical observational, prospective cohort type. Patients older than 18 years old, taken to prostatectomy by robot. As a primary outcome, the intensity of postoperative pain was compared using a visual analogue scale between the groups of patients exposed or not to intravenous lidocaine. Results 92 patients were collected. 47 had received lidocaine (51.1%). A significant association was found between the use of lidocaine and the lower manifestation of moderate to severe pain: RR (95% CI): 0.19 (0.10 to 0.37). It was also associated with lower opioid consumption, early ambulation and peristalsis, and shorter hospital stay (p <0.05). The multivariate analysis to explain the appearance of pain, showed as protective factor the use of lidocaine, and as a risk factor the BMI (Nagelkerke's R2 0.597, AUC 88.4%). Conclusions.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosario
dc.publisherMaestría en Epidemiología
dc.publisherMaestría en Actividad Física y Salud
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAbierto (Texto Completo)
dc.rightsEL AUTOR, manifiesta que la obra objeto de la presente autorización es original y la realizó sin violar o usurpar derechos de autor de terceros, por lo tanto la obra es de exclusiva autoría y tiene la titularidad sobre la misma. PARGRAFO: En caso de presentarse cualquier reclamación o acción por parte de un tercero en cuanto a los derechos de autor sobre la obra en cuestión, EL AUTOR, asumirá toda la responsabilidad, y saldrá en defensa de los derechos aquí autorizados; para todos los efectos la universidad actúa como un tercero de buena fe. EL AUTOR, autoriza a LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO, para que en los términos establecidos en la Ley 23 de 1982, Ley 44 de 1993, Decisión andina 351 de 1993, Decreto 460 de 1995 y demás normas generales sobre la materia, utilice y use la obra objeto de la presente autorización. -------------------------------------- POLITICA DE TRATAMIENTO DE DATOS PERSONALES. Declaro que autorizo previa y de forma informada el tratamiento de mis datos personales por parte de LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO para fines académicos y en aplicación de convenios con terceros o servicios conexos con actividades propias de la academia, con estricto cumplimiento de los principios de ley. Para el correcto ejercicio de mi derecho de habeas data cuento con la cuenta de correo habeasdata@urosario.edu.co, donde previa identificación podré solicitar la consulta, corrección y supresión de mis datos.
dc.sourceLovich-Sapola J, Smith CE, Brandt CP. Postoperative Pain Control. Surg Clin North Am. 2015;95(2):301–18.
dc.sourcePugin F, Bucher P, Morel P. History of robotic surgery : From AESOP® and ZEUS® to da Vinci®. J Visc Surg. 2011 Jan;148(Supplement):e3–8.
dc.sourceAwad H, Walker CM, Shaikh M, Dimitrova GT, Abaza R, O’Hara J. Anesthetic considerations for robotic prostatectomy: a review of the literature. J Clin Anesth. 2012 Sep;24(6):494–504.
dc.sourceDiana M, Marescaux J. Robotic surgery. Br J Surg. 2015;102:15–28.
dc.sourceDrake JM, Joy M, Goldenberg A, Kreindler D. Computer- and robot-assisted resection of thalamic astrocytomas in children. Neurosurgery. 1991 Jan;29(1):27–31.
dc.sourceBroeders IAMJ. Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology Robotics : The next step ? Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2014;28(1):225–32.
dc.sourceCowley G. Introducing “Robodoc”. A robot finds his calling--in the operating room. Newsweek. 1992 Nov;120(21):86.
dc.sourceNg ATL, Tam PC. Current status of robot-assisted surgery. Hong Kong Med J. 2014;20(3):241–50.
dc.sourceSmith JA, Herrell SD. Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: Do Minimally Invasive Approaches Offer Significant Advantages? J Clin Oncol. 2005 Nov;23(32):8170–5.
dc.sourceKraychete DC, Sakata RK, Lannes L de OC, Bandeira ID, Sadatsune EJ. Postoperative persistent chronic pain: what do we know about prevention, risk factors, and treatment. Brazilian J Anesthesiol. 2016;66(5):505–12.
dc.sourceWu CL, Raja SN. Treatment of acute postoperative pain. Lancet. 2011;377(9784):2215–25.
dc.sourceGritsenko K, Khelemsky Y, Kaye AD, Vadivelu N UR. Multimodal therapy in perioperative analgesia. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2014;28(1):59–79.
dc.sourceWick EC, Grant MC WC. Postoperative Multimodal Analgesia Pain Management With Nonopioid Analgesics and Techniques. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(7):691–7.
dc.sourceKranke P, Jokinen J, Nl P, Schnabel A, Mw H, Hahnenkamp K, et al. Continuous intravenous perioperative lidocaine infusion for postoperative pain and recovery ( Review ). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(7):CD009642.
dc.sourceSun Y, Li T, Wang N, Yun Y GT. Perioperative Systemic Lidocaine for Postoperative Analgesia and Recovery after Abdominal Surgery: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55:1183–94.
dc.sourceWeinberg L, Rachbuch C, Ting S, Howard W, Yeomans M, Gordon I, et al. A randomised controlled trial of peri-operative lidocaine infusions for open radical prostatectomy. Anaesthesia. 2016;71(4):405–10.
dc.sourceMottrie A, Ficarra V. Can Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Still be Considered a New Technology Pushed by Marketers ? The IDEAL Evaluation. Eur Urol. 2010;58:525–7.
dc.sourceKowalczyk KJ, Levy JM, Caplan CF, Lipsitz SR, Yu H, Gu X, et al. Temporal National Trends of Minimally Invasive and Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy Outcomes from 2003 to 2007 : Results from the 100 % Medicare Sample. 2012;61:803–9.
dc.sourceFicarra V, Cavalleri S, Novara G. Evidence from Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy : A Systematic Review. Eur Urol. 2007;51:45–56.
dc.sourceAlexander JI. Pain after laparoscopy. Br J Anaesth. 1997 Sep;79(3):369–78.
dc.sourceHabib AS, Polascik TJ, Weizer AZ, White WD, Moul JW, ElGasim MA GT. Lidocaine Patch for Postoperative Analgesia After Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy. Anesth Analg. 2009;108(6):1950–3.
dc.sourceLauwick S, Kim DJ, Mistraletti G, Carli F, Istituto CHG. Functional walking capacity as an outcome measure of laparoscopic prostatectomy : the effect of lidocaine infusion. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103(2):213–9.
dc.sourceGebhart GF, Bielefeldt K. Physiology of Visceral Pain. Compr Physiol. 2016 Sep;6(4):1609–33.
dc.sourceMartin L, Kelly MJ, Roosa K. Multidisciplinary approach to improving pain management. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2012;35(3):268–71.
dc.sourceWeibel S, Jelting Y, Pace NL, Helf A, Eberhart LH, Hahnenkamp K, et al. Continuous intravenous perioperative lidocaine infusion for postoperative pain and recovery in adults. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun;6:CD009642.
dc.sourceEipe N, Gupta S, Penning J. Intravenous lidocaine for acute pain: an evidence-based clinical update. BJA Educ [Internet]. 2016;16(9):292–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaed/mkw008
dc.sourceMasic D, Liang E, Long C, Sterk EJ, Barbas B, Rech MA. Intravenous Lidocaine for Acute Pain: A Systematic Review. Pharmacotherapy. 2018 Dec;38(12):1250–9.
dc.sourceKumar K, Kirksey MA, Duong S, Wu CL. A Review of Opioid-Sparing Modalities in Perioperative Pain Management: Methods to Decrease Opioid Use Postoperatively. Anesth Analg. 2017 Nov;125(5):1749–60.
dc.sourceWeinberg L, Jang J, Rachbuch C, Tan C, Hu R, McNicol L. The effects of intravenous lignocaine on depth of anaesthesia and intraoperative haemodynamics during open radical prostatectomy. BMC Res Notes. 2017 Jul;10(1):248.
dc.sourceSakata S, Grove PM, Stevenson ARL. Effect of 3-Dimensional Vision on Surgeons Using the da Vinci Robot for Laparoscopy: More Than Meets the Eye. JAMA Surg. 2016 Sep;151(9):793–4.
dc.sourceSecin FP, Bianco FJ. Surgical anatomy of radical prostatectomy: Periprostatic fascial anatomy and overview of the urinary sphincters. Arch Españoles Urol [Internet]. 2010;63:255–66. Available from: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-06142010000400002&nrm=iso
dc.sourceIlic D, Evans SM, Allan CA, Jung JH, Murphy D, Frydenberg M. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep;9:CD009625.
dc.sourceChou R, Gordon DB, de Leon-Casasola OA, Rosenberg JM, Bickler S, Brennan T, et al. Management of Postoperative Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American Pain Society, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists’ Committee on Regional Anesthesia, Executive Commi. J Pain. 2016 Feb;17(2):131–57.
dc.sourceSebesta EM, Anderson CB. The Surgical Management of Prostate Cancer. Semin Oncol. 2017 Oct;44(5):347–57.
dc.sourcePlata Bello A, Concepcion Masip T. Prostate cancer epidemiology. Arch Esp Urol. 2014 Jun;67(5):373–82.
dc.sourceRawla P. Epidemiology of Prostate Cancer. World J Oncol. 2019 Apr;10(2):63–89.
dc.sourceChoi E-S, Jeon Y-T, Sohn H-M, Kim D-W, Choi S-J, In C-B. Comparison of the effects of desflurane and total intravenous anesthesia on the optic nerve sheath diameter in robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Oct;97(41):e12772.
dc.sourceTan M, Law LS-C, Gan TJ. Optimizing pain management to facilitate Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathways. Can J Anaesth. 2015 Feb;62(2):203–18.
dc.sourceBrandal D, Keller MS, Lee C, Grogan T, Fujimoto Y, Gricourt Y, et al. Impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery and Opioid-Free Anesthesia on Opioid Prescriptions at Discharge From the Hospital: A Historical-Prospective Study. Anesth Analg. 2017 Nov;125(5):1784–92.
dc.sourceBeaussier M, Delbos A, Maurice-Szamburski A, Ecoffey C, Mercadal L. Perioperative Use of Intravenous Lidocaine. Drugs. 2018 Aug;78(12):1229–46.
dc.sourceSoto G, Naranjo Gonzalez M, Calero F. Intravenous lidocaine infusion. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2018 May;65(5):269–74.
dc.sourceIbrahim A, Aly M, Farrag W. Effect of intravenous lidocaine infusion on long-term postoperative pain after spinal fusion surgery. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Mar;97(13):e0229.
dc.sourceZhao J-B, Li Y-L, Wang Y-M, Teng J-L, Xia D-Y, Zhao J-S, et al. Intravenous lidocaine infusion for pain control after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Feb;97(5):e9771.
dc.sourceLeitao MMJ, Malhotra V, Briscoe G, Suidan R, Dholakiya P, Santos K, et al. Postoperative Pain Medication Requirements in Patients Undergoing Computer-Assisted (‘“ Robotic ”’) and Standard Laparoscopic Procedures for Newly Diagnosed Endometrial Cancer. 2013;(December 2012):3561–7.
dc.sourceWoldu SL, Weinberg AC, Bergman A, Shapiro EY, Korets R, Motamedinia P, et al. Pain and analgesic use after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2014 May;28(5):544–8.
dc.sourceChiou H, Chiu L, Chen C, Yen Y, Chang C, Liu W. Comparing robotic surgery with laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer management : A cohort study. Int J Surg [Internet]. 2015;13:17–22. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.11.015
dc.sourcePietrabissa A, Pugliese L, Vinci A, Peri A, Paolo F, Emma T, et al. Short-term outcomes of single-site robotic cholecystectomy versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy : a prospective , randomized , double-blind trial. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(7):3089–97.
dc.sourceZechmeister JR, Pua TL, Boyd LR, Blank S V, Curtin JP, Pothuri B. pain and quality of life in robotic gynecologic surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2015;212(2):194.e1-194.e7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.08.003
dc.sourceCouceiro TC De, Menezes, Valença MM, Lima LC, Menezes TC De, Cristina M, et al. Prevalência e Influência do Sexo , Idade e Tipo de Operação na Dor Pós-Operatória * Prevalence and Influence of Gender , Age , and Type of Surgery on Postoperative Pain. 2009;59.
dc.sourceKenshalo DRS. Somesthetic sensitivity in young and elderly humans. J Gerontol. 1986 Nov;41(6):732–42.
dc.sourceEdwards RR, Fillingim RB. Effects of Age on Temporal Summation and Habituation of Thermal Pain : Clinical Relevance in Healthy Older and Younger Adults. 2001;2(6):307–17.
dc.sourceLautenbacher S, Kunz M, Strate P, Nielsen J, Arendt-nielsen L. Age effects on pain thresholds , temporal summation and spatial summation of heat and pressure pain. 2005;115:410–8.
dc.sourceHeft MW, Robinson ME. Age differences in suprathreshold sensory function. 2014;(April 2013):1–8.
dc.sourceTighe PJ, Le-wendling LT, Patel A, Zou B, Roger B. HHS Public Access. 2016;156(4):609–17.
dc.sourceZheng H, Schnabel A, Yahiaoui-doktor M, Meissner W, Aken H Van, Zahn P, et al. Age and preoperative pain are major confounders for sex differences in postoperative pain outcome : A prospective database analysis. 2017;1–14.
dc.sourceSerrano-Atero M, Caballero J, Cañas A, García-Saura P, Serrano-Álvarez C, Prieto J. Pain Assessment (I). Rev Soc Esp Dolor. 2002;9:94–108.
dc.sourceMcCarthy GC, Megalla SA, Habib AS. Impact of intravenous lidocaine infusion on postoperative analgesia and recovery from surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Drugs. 2010 Jun;70(9):1149–63.
dc.sourceVentham NT, Kennedy ED, Brady RR, Paterson HM, Speake D, Foo I, et al. Efficacy of Intravenous Lidocaine for Postoperative Analgesia Following Laparoscopic Surgery: A Meta-Analysis. World J Surg. 2015 Sep;39(9):2220–34.
dc.sourceWeibel S, Jokinen J, Pace NL, Schnabel A, Hollmann MW, Hahnenkamp K, et al. Efficacy and safety of intravenous lidocaine for postoperative analgesia and recovery after surgery: a systematic review with trial sequential analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Jun;116(6):770–83.
dc.sourceAsciutto K, Kalapotharakos G, Löfgren M, Högberg T, Borgfeldt C. Robot-assisted surgery in cervical cancer patients reduces the time to normal activities of daily living. 2015;94:260–5.
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.sourcereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
dc.subjectLidocaína
dc.subjectAnalgesia multimodal
dc.subjectProstatectomía
dc.subjectCirugía robótica
dc.titleImpacto de la lidocaína endovenosa en el manejo del dolor postoperatorio de prostatectomía radical por cirugía robótica en el Hospital Universitario Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá de 2017 a 2018
dc.typemasterThesis


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución