Housing Quality and Tenure Choice in Bogota

dc.contributorRodríguez Acosta, Mauricio
dc.contributorGarcia, Andrés
dc.creatorBaquero Vargas, Juan Pablo
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-17T23:26:44Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-21T18:17:10Z
dc.date.available2019-07-17T23:26:44Z
dc.date.available2019-11-21T18:17:10Z
dc.date.created2019-07-17T23:26:44Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifierhttp://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/19960
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3061470
dc.description.abstractFurthermore, we estimate price and income elasticities coefficients that quantify the households' dwelling quality response to price and income variation. Thus, a 1% increase in prices reduces the average dwelling quality in 0.16% for the homeowners and 0.25% for the renters, whereas a 1% increase in permanent income increases the average dwelling quality in 0.08% both for homeowners and renters.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Rosario
dc.publisherMaestría en Economía
dc.publisherFacultad de Economía
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAbierto (Texto Completo)
dc.rightsEL AUTOR, manifiesta que la obra objeto de la presente autorización es original y la realizó sin violar o usurpar derechos de autor de terceros, por lo tanto la obra es de exclusiva autoría y tiene la titularidad sobre la misma. PARGRAFO: En caso de presentarse cualquier reclamación o acción por parte de un tercero en cuanto a los derechos de autor sobre la obra en cuestión, EL AUTOR, asumirá toda la responsabilidad, y saldrá en defensa de los derechos aquí autorizados; para todos los efectos la universidad actúa como un tercero de buena fe. EL AUTOR, autoriza a LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO, para que en los términos establecidos en la Ley 23 de 1982, Ley 44 de 1993, Decisión andina 351 de 1993, Decreto 460 de 1995 y demás normas generales sobre la materia, utilice y use la obra objeto de la presente autorización. -------------------------------------- POLITICA DE TRATAMIENTO DE DATOS PERSONALES. Declaro que autorizo previa y de forma informada el tratamiento de mis datos personales por parte de LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO para fines académicos y en aplicación de convenios con terceros o servicios conexos con actividades propias de la academia, con estricto cumplimiento de los principios de ley. Para el correcto ejercicio de mi derecho de habeas data cuento con la cuenta de correo habeasdata@urosario.edu.co, donde previa identificación podré solicitar la consulta, corrección y supresión de mis datos.
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.sourcereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
dc.sourceArbelaez, M. A., Steiner, R., Becerra, A., & Wills, D. (2011). Housing tenure and housing demand in colombia.
dc.sourceAttanasio, O. P., Bottazzi, R., Low, H. W., Nesheim, L., & Wakefield, M. (2012). Modelling the demand for housing over the life cycle. Review of Economic Dynamics, 15(1), 1.
dc.sourceBelsky, E. S., Di Zhu, X., \& McCue, D. (2006). Multiple-home ownership and the income elasticity of housing demand. Joint Center for Housing Studies, Graduate School of Design {[}and{]} John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
dc.sourceBlackley, D. M., Follain, J. R., \& Lee, H. (1986). An Evaluation of Hedonic Price Indexes for Thirty-four Large SMSAs. Real Estate Economics, 14(2), 179-205.
dc.sourceCameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconometrics: methods and applications. Cambridge university press.
dc.sourceDietz, R. D., & Haurin, D. R. (2003). The social and private micro-level consequences of homeownership. Journal of urban Economics, 54(3), 401-450.
dc.sourceDi Tella, R., Edwards, S., & Schargrodsky, E. (Eds.). (2010). The economics of crime: Lessons for and from Latin America. University of Chicago Press.
dc.sourceFontenla, M., & Gonzalez, F. (2009). Housing demand in Mexico. Journal of Housing Economics, 18(1), 1-12.
dc.sourceGoodman, A. C., \& Kawai, M. (1982). Permanent income, hedonic prices, and demand for housing: New evidence. Journal of Urban Economics, 12(2), 214-237.
dc.sourceGoodman, A. C. (1988). An econometric model of housing price, permanent income, tenure choice, and housing demand. Journal of Urban Economics, 23(3), 327-353.
dc.sourceGoodman, A. C. (2003). Following a panel of stayers: length of stay, tenure choice, and housing demand. Journal of Housing Economics, 12(2), 106-133.
dc.sourceGoodman, A. C. (1978). Hedonic prices, price indices and housing markets. Journal of urban economics, 5(4), 471-484.
dc.sourceHenderson, J. V., & Ioannides, Y. M. (1983). A model of housing tenure choice. The American Economic Review, 73(1), 98-113.
dc.sourceHaurin, D. R., Hendershott, P. H., \& Wachter, S. M. (1996). Borrowing constraints and the tenure choice of young households (No. w5630). National bureau of economic research.
dc.sourceHaurin, D. R., & Gill, H. L. (2002). The impact of transaction costs and the expected length of stay on homeownership. Journal of Urban Economics, 51(3), 563-584.
dc.sourceIoannides, Y. M., & Zabel, J. E. (2003). Neighbourhood effects and housing demand. Journal of applied Econometrics, 18(5), 563-584.
dc.sourceIacoviello, M., & Pavan, M. (2013). Housing and debt over the life cycle and over the business cycle. Journal of Monetary Economics, 60(2), 221-238.
dc.sourceLandvoigt, T., Piazzesi, M., & Schneider, M. (2015). The housing market (s) of San Diego. American Economic Review, 105(4), 1371-1407.
dc.sourceLeSage, J. P. (1999). The theory and practice of spatial econometrics. University of Toledo. Toledo, Ohio, 28, 33.
dc.sourceLinneman, P., & Wachter, S. (1989). The impacts of borrowing constraints on homeownership. Real Estate Economics, 17(4), 389-402.
dc.sourceLustig, N. (Ed.). (2018). Commitment to equity handbook: Estimating the impact of fiscal policy on inequality and poverty. Brookings Institution Press.
dc.sourceMalpezzi, S., Mayo, S. K., \& Gross, D. J. (1985). Housing demand in developing countries. Washington: World Bank.
dc.sourceMayo, S. K. (1981). Theory and estimation in the economics of housing demand. Journal of Urban Economics, 10(1), 95-116.
dc.sourceMcFadden, D. L. (1976). Quantal choice analaysis: A survey. In Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, Volume 5, number 4 (pp. 363-390). NBER.
dc.sourceOrtalo-Magne, F., & Rady, S. (2006). Housing market dynamics: On the contribution of income shocks and credit constraints. The Review of Economic Studies, 73(2), 459-485.
dc.sourceO'sullivan, A. (2007). Urban economics. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
dc.sourcePiazzesi, M., & Schneider, M. (2016). Housing and macroeconomics. In Handbook of macroeconomics (Vol. 2, pp. 1547-1640). Elsevier.
dc.sourceRosen, H. S. (1979). Housing decisions and the US income tax: An econometric analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 11(1), 1-23.
dc.sourceRobst, J., Deitz, R., & McGoldrick, K. (1999). Income variability, uncertainty and housing tenure choice. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 29(2), 219-229.
dc.sourceSieg, H., Smith, V. K., Banzhaf, H. S., & Walsh, R. (2002). Interjurisdictional housing prices in locational equilibrium. Journal of urban Economics, 52(1), 131-153.
dc.sourceUrrutia, M., & Namen, O. M. (2012). Historia del crédito hipotecario en Colombia. Ensayos sobre política económica, 30(67), 282-306.
dc.sourceYang, F. (2009). Consumption over the life cycle: How different is housing?. Review of Economic Dynamics, 12(3), 423-443.
dc.sourcevon Graevenitz, K., & Panduro, T. E. (2015). An alternative to the standard spatial econometric approaches in hedonic house price models. Land Economics, 91(2), 386-409.
dc.sourceWooldridge, J. M. (2015). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. Nelson Education.
dc.subjectColombia
dc.subjectHousing demand
dc.subjectReal estate economics
dc.titleHousing Quality and Tenure Choice in Bogota
dc.typemasterThesis


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución