dc.creatorLobo, J. Francisco
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-30T15:28:59Z
dc.date.available2019-10-30T15:28:59Z
dc.date.created2019-10-30T15:28:59Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifierTransnational Legal Theory, Volumen 10, Issue 2, 2019, Pages 202-228
dc.identifier20414013
dc.identifier20414005
dc.identifier10.1080/20414005.2019.1630172
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/172432
dc.description.abstractAssuming the existence of nuclear weapons as a reality of international relations that cannot simply be wished away, this essay explores what HLA Hart calls the ‘minimum content of natural law’ as applied to international law, as well as its consequences for primary rules in that system. Even if we were to concede, ad arguendum, Hart’s point about the lack of secondary rules in international law, it is still worth exploring whether primary rules are the same for individuals in domestic legal systems as for states in the international legal order, on account of the differences in power and the special deterrents that characterise international relations, as opposed to the ‘approximate equality’ of individuals.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherRoutledge
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
dc.sourceTransnational Legal Theory
dc.subjectInternational law
dc.subjectNatural law
dc.subjectNuclear deterrence
dc.subjectPrimary rules
dc.titleAbolishing atomic warfare? Nuclear power and natural-international law in the twenty-first century
dc.typeArtículo de revista


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución