dc.creatorGuzmán Valenzuela, Carolina
dc.creatorBarnett, Ronald
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-22T03:13:56Z
dc.date.available2019-10-22T03:13:56Z
dc.date.created2019-10-22T03:13:56Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifierInternational Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, Volumen 32, Issue 5, 2019, Pages 477-492
dc.identifier13665898
dc.identifier09518398
dc.identifier10.1080/09518398.2019.1597213
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/172023
dc.description.abstractThe relationship between theory and qualitative research has been extensively examined in the literature and has emerged as a problematic matter. This debate has been driven forward mainly in Anglo-Saxon countries and has done scant justice to an understanding of these issues in regions of the South. This paper addresses this matter by drawing on a geopolitical perspective. The study here provides an analysis of 24 papers by Latin-American researchers in higher education, as included in the Web of Science between 2006 and 2015. Theories in Latin America are mainly produced in the North and exhibit two patterns: (i) critical perspectives are used to address local problems–‘epistemic problematization’; and (ii) a nuancing of Northern theories so as to contextualize them–‘epistemic nuancing’. Suggestions are also made for a new configuration of knowledge production in higher education studies–a model of knowledge from and for the South.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherRoutledge
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
dc.sourceInternational Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education
dc.subjectgeopolitical perspective
dc.subjecthigher education studies
dc.subjectLatin America
dc.subjectqualitative research
dc.subjectTheory
dc.titlePatterns of theory use in qualitative research in higher education studies in Latin America: a geopolitical interpretation
dc.typeArtículo de revista


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución