dc.creatorSchwartz, Daniel
dc.creatorKeenan, Elizabeth A.
dc.creatorImas, Alex
dc.creatorGneezy, Ayelet
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-15T12:25:32Z
dc.date.available2019-10-15T12:25:32Z
dc.date.created2019-10-15T12:25:32Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier07495978
dc.identifier10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.01.003
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/171716
dc.description.abstractThe design of effective incentive schemes that are both successful in motivating employees and keeping down costs is of critical importance. Research has demonstrated that prosocial incentives, where individuals’ effort benefits a charitable organization, can sometimes be more effective than standard monetary incentives. However, most research has focused on the intensive margin, examining effort conditional on participation in the activity. We examine the effectiveness of standard and prosocial incentives on the extensive margin, corresponding to people's decisions to opt-in to an incentivized activity. In addition, we test the effectiveness of optional prosocial incentives, where individuals can choose between keeping or donating all or part of their payment. Across four experiments that vary the type and size of incentives, we find that individuals are more likely to avoid activities that involve any prosocial incentive. Our results highlight the importance of co
dc.languageen
dc.publisherAcademic Press Inc.
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
dc.sourceOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
dc.subjectBehavioral economics
dc.subjectDecision making
dc.subjectField experiments
dc.subjectIncentives
dc.subjectProsocial behavior
dc.subjectRecycling behavior
dc.titleOpting-in to prosocial incentives
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución