Dissertação
Características físico-mecânicas de painéis de lâminas paralelas reforçados com fibra de vidro
Fecha
2011-07-18Registro en:
BULIGON, Ediane Andreia. PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF LAMINATED VENEER LUMBER REINFORCED WITH FIBERGLASS. 2011. 99 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Recursos Florestais e Engenharia Florestal) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 2011.
Autor
Buligon, Ediane Andreia
Institución
Resumen
The aim of the present research was to evaluate the physical and mechanical properties of
LVL reinforced with fiberglass with two types of resins. Pinus elliottii veneers with 1,5 mm
thickness were used to manufacture of the LVL panels. The panels were manufactured in two
steps. The first one was the assembling of the LVL panels with nine layers of wood veneer
glued with phenol-formaldehyde resin. The second step consisted into reinforcing the LVL
with fiberglass impregnated with epoxy resin (E) or isophthalic resin (I). The treatments
were: panels without reinforcement (T), panels reinforced with one fiberglass layer (E T1 e
I T1), panels reinforced with two fiberglass layers (E T2 e I T2) and panels reinforced
with four fiberglass layers (E T3 e I T3). The size of panel was 45 cm x 34 cm x 1,08 cm.
The physical properties tested were density and moisture content. The mechanical properties
tested were: static bending in flatwise and edgewise position, modulus of elasticity (MOE)
and modulus of rupture (MOR); glueline shear strength by compression loading; hardness
test; and non-destructive test by ultrasound method. The epoxy and the isophthalic resin
showed similar mechanical performance among the different treatments.The resistence and
stiffness of the panels were influenced by the reinforcement. The MOE in flatwise position
was influenced by one reinforcement layer and the MOR was influenced by two
reinforcement layers. In the edgewise position the MOE and the MOR values remained
constant among the treatments with two fiberglass reinforcement layers. The MOE in nondestructive
test had higher values when compared with the destructive method, however these
values remained stable with two layers of reinforcement. Two layers of reinforcement on the
tensile and compression side had higher values in hardness test. The epoxy resin presented
higher glueline resistence and higher percentage of wood failure. Isophthalic and phenolic
resin presented similar values of glueline strenght, however the isophthalic resin had lower
percentage of wood failure. Thus, the reinforcement with one layer of fiberglass imprenated
with epoxy resin on the tensile side would be enough to promote the mechanical qualities of
LVL.