| dc.description.abstract | In Uruguay in recent years was evidenced a significant increase in the agricultural
sector. International commodity prices boosted the price of the land wich increased by more
than 600% and leases more than 400% in the period between 2000 and 2011. This was
accompanied by the sale of almost 7 million hectares and the leasing of more than 8 million,
addend between both, almost all of the productive area of the country. In the same period, of a
total of 57 thousand establishments in 2000, lost more than 12 thousand establishments of
which 11 thousand correspond to units of less than 100 hectares. The present work as main
objectives has to understand how it is structured, and works the land market in Uruguay and
then explain how has been the influence of that market and prices landholding on production
systems family. Was performed an analysis of secondary data on prices for land and the
dynamics of the land market, comparing himself with the census data structure of land
ownership, concentration and foreignization of land, throughout the country and by
departments. Subsequently, from the concepts of the theory of the Capitalist Theory of Land
Rent, was evaluated the structure and functioning of the land market by checking for the
existence of a speculative behavior in this market. In turn, on the basis of the systemic
approach based on the Theory of Agrarian Systems (Analysis-Diagnosis of Agrarian Systems)
was used the study of the influence of such market as a differentiation factor for production
systems family of homogeneous area of Barriga Negra and Sierras Blancas in the department
of Lavalleja. Was performed the typology of the production systems on the basis of typical
cases and representative of these typologies, was performed the study economic. The
principal results showed that the large increase in the price of the land, in Uruguay, it is a
product of the international situation with high agricultural prices, but also of a speculative
behavior by the big landowners and agribusiness companies. The price of land officiates as a
barrier for small producers that do not have a scale according to the productive model and
cannot access, via the market to purchase the land. Some systems that they get a
accumulation, however, they do so from lease land and therefore the price of land also
prevents them from the purchase of the mode of independence from the leases. This way, the
forest big companies in the homogeneous area capture lands, they press for the increase of the
prices and they appropriate of the rent land ownership starting from the lease of these small
units. In this context, without a public intervention it seems unlikely that these units found
mechanisms of accesses to the land, to make viable their systems, so they tend to the
abandonment of the production. | |
