dc.contributorBrun, Maurício Veloso
dc.contributorhttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4796386P9
dc.contributorAlievi, Marcelo Meller
dc.contributorhttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4767491D6
dc.contributorRaiser, Alceu Gaspar
dc.contributorhttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4727899U2
dc.creatorSchmitt, Bernardo
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-28
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-24T19:59:04Z
dc.date.available2015-10-28
dc.date.available2019-05-24T19:59:04Z
dc.date.created2015-10-28
dc.date.issued2014-02-26
dc.identifierSCHMITT, Bernardo. Biomechanical test to determination the diameter of the polymethylmethacrylate bar in external skeletal fixator type Ia: in swine humerus. 2014. 46 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Medicina Veterinária) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 2014.
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/10211
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/2837990
dc.description.abstractWhile seemingly inert appearance, bones are highly dynamic structures, which promote formation, resorption, repair and maintenance of homeostasis. Fractures in bones occur when the load applied to a specific bone region exceeds its resilience. The use of external skeletal fixator (ESF) is a method of fairly common internal stabilization, in which connector bars polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) are used without criterion in diameter. In these cases, it can break if it gets too thin or too heavy and uncomfortable when bulky. The aim of this study was to test biomechanical through axial compression and bending, considering different connector bar diameter PMMA correlated to bone diameter for use to type Ia ESF. For this, it was collected 24 swine humerus to make measurements of length, diameter, circumference and testing biomechanical. After the bars confected with 1.5 times the average diameter of the bone (group I), the same diameter bone (group II) and 0.5 times the diameter of the bone (group III). The results obtained, it was observed that the connector bars in group II were more resistant than the bones in the compression test. In the bending test, the bones resisted flexion strength when compared to group III. The group II was 4.3 times more resistant than Group III in the same mechanical test. The results allow a direction for making bars PMMA considering bone diameter as a reference.
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.publisherBR
dc.publisherMedicina Veterinária
dc.publisherUFSM
dc.publisherPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Medicina Veterinária
dc.rightsAcesso Aberto
dc.subjectResina acrílica
dc.subjectResistência
dc.subjectEnsaio biomecânico
dc.subjectCompressão axial
dc.subjectFlexão
dc.subjectSuínos
dc.subjectAcrylic resin
dc.subjectResistance
dc.subjectBiomechanical assay
dc.subjectAxial compression
dc.subjectBending
dc.subjectSwine
dc.titleEnsaio biomecânico para determinação do diâmetro de barra conectora de polimetilmetacrilato em fixador esquelético externo tipo Ia: no úmero de suínos
dc.typeTesis


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución