dc.contributorFonseca, Renato Duarte
dc.contributorhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9762748021331579
dc.contributorSevero, Rogério Passos
dc.contributorhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0584528242177559
dc.contributorSautter, Frank Thomas
dc.contributorhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2804652028967760
dc.contributorCaponi, Gustavo Andrés
dc.contributorhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/5580414399056283
dc.creatorPereira, Karine Rossi
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-23T17:22:37Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-24T19:42:11Z
dc.date.available2019-05-23T17:22:37Z
dc.date.available2019-05-24T19:42:11Z
dc.date.created2019-05-23T17:22:37Z
dc.date.issued2017-08-22
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/16626
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/2836054
dc.description.abstractThis work discusses and analyses realist conceptions of the concept of biological species. There are two broad realist approaches to this concept, viz. the monist approach and the pluralistic approach. Monist conceptions sustain that the species category must be conceptualized through only one species concept, providing just one criterion of delimitation of taxa. On the other side, pluralistic conceptions claim that different concepts correspond to the species category, so that there would be distinct criteria for the delimitation of taxa. Some of the most influential monist conceptions are presented under the titles “biological species concept”, “evolutionary species concept”, “ecological species concept’ and “Henning’s species concept”. Because they employ only one criterion of taxa delimitation, monist conceptions do not satisfy the theoretical requirements for the conceptualization of the diversity of natural organisms. Under this light, pluralistic concepts of species are possible alternatives to monist concepts and their respective problems. This work highlights two pluralistic approaches among those prominent in the current literature: Philip Kitcher’s ontological pluralism approach, also called pluralistic realism, and Richard A. Richards’ approach, called conceptual division of labor. These approaches will be analyzed and discussed along with the monistic concepts presented here, in order to adjudicate their adequacy to the solution of the species concept problem.
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.publisherBrasil
dc.publisherFilosofia
dc.publisherUFSM
dc.publisherPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia
dc.publisherCentro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.subjectConceito de espécie
dc.subjectCategoria de espécie
dc.subjectAbordagens realistas
dc.subjectAbordagens monistas
dc.subjectAbordagens pluralistas
dc.subjectSpecies concept
dc.subjectSpecies category
dc.subjectRealist approaches
dc.subjectMonist approaches
dc.subjectPluralistic approaches
dc.titleMonismo e pluralismo nas concepções realistas do conceito de espécie biológica: análise e crítica
dc.typeTesis


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución