dc.contributorRolim, Clarice Madalena Bueno
dc.contributorhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2270654658839508
dc.contributorAdams, Andréa Inês Horn
dc.contributorhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6872246935204149
dc.contributorMalesuik, Marcelo Donadel
dc.contributorhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8153279253583982
dc.contributorSchaffazick, Scheila Rezende
dc.contributorhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3671495623581433
dc.creatorDelgado, Leila Schreiner
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-03
dc.date.available2013-05-03
dc.date.created2013-05-03
dc.date.issued2011-08-26
dc.identifierDELGADO, Leila Schreiner. DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF ANALITICAL METHODOLOGY TO EVALUATION OF EBASTINE AND PSEUDOEPHEDRINE IN CAPSULES. 2011. 89 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Farmacologia) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 2011.
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/5920
dc.description.abstractEbastine is a second generation antihistaminic clinically used for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and chronic urticaria. Pseudoephedrine hydrochloride is a direct- and indirectacting sympathomimetic, commonly combined with other drugs for their decongestant effect. In Brazil, this drugs association is available in capsules. In the literature, as well as in the official compendium, there are no methods for simultaneous analysis of ebastine and pseudoephedrine hydrochloride in pharmaceutical formulations. In the present work, liquid chromatography (HPLC) and derivative spectrophotometry (UVD) methods were developed and validated for quantification of this drugs association, in capsules. The HPLC analysis were performed on a C18 column, using a mobile phase composed of methanol: acetonitrile: ammonium acetate buffer pH 6.8 (85:5:15, v/v), run at a flow rate of 1,0 mL.min-1, with UV detection at 254 nm. In the UVD method, ebastine was quantified in the first derivative (dA/dλ), at 263.5 and 252.8 nm, respectively. All of them were validated in the following parameters: linearity, precision and accuracy. The specificity was evaluated in the HPLC assay by stress testing. The methods showed good linarity (r>0.99), precision (RSD<2%) and accuracy; the results, statistically compared, did not show significant difference (p>0,05).
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.publisherBR
dc.publisherFarmácia
dc.publisherUFSM
dc.publisherPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas
dc.rightsAcesso Aberto
dc.subjectEbastina
dc.subjectPseudoefedrina
dc.subjectValidação de métodos
dc.subjectCromatografia líquida
dc.subjectEspectrofotometria derivada
dc.subjectEbastine
dc.subjectPseudoephedrine
dc.subjectMethod validation
dc.subjectLiquid chromatography
dc.subjectDerivative spectrophotometry
dc.titleDesenvolvimento e validação de metodologia analítica para avaliação de ebastina e cloridrato de pseudoefedrina em cápsulas
dc.typeDissertação


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución